SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

No idea how to feel

Créé par: AllJonedOut
Équipe: 2022-23 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 13 juill. 2022
Publié: 13 juill. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
On paper we just cleared up a crap ton of cap space. Maybe the market wasn’t as big as we thought.
Transactions
SJS
  1. Lorentz, Steven [Droits de RFA]
  2. Mäkiniemi, Eetu
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (CAR)
CAR
  1. Burns, Brent (2 640 000 $ retained)
  2. Pederson, Lane
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de CAR
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de CBJ
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2025
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
1982 500 000 $65 855 834 $0 $580 000 $16 644 166 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 025 000 $1 025 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
916 667 $916 667 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 175 000 $2 175 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 833 $850 833 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
867 500 $867 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
762 500 $762 500 $
DG
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
13 juill. 2022 à 12 h 59
#1
go Sharks go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 862
Mentions "j'aime": 396
thought we would get a better deal but overall I think a solid deal for SJ
CheechYou, poeticentropy, AllJonedOut and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
13 juill. 2022 à 13 h 0
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 4,029
Mentions "j'aime": 973
Moving the big contracts is a must. Vlasic buy out next summer
CheechYou et AllJonedOut a aimé ceci.
13 juill. 2022 à 13 h 2
#3
Démarrer sujet
AllJonedOut
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,463
Mentions "j'aime": 266
Quoting: SJSGM
thought we would get a better deal but overall I think a solid deal for SJ


Wonder what Dallas had on the table. My personal opinion in MG took whatever offer had the most cap space for SJ.
CheechYou et poeticentropy a aimé ceci.
13 juill. 2022 à 13 h 3
#4
train, train
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 2,996
Mentions "j'aime": 730
A little too much cap retention and not enough of a return (C-level-prospects and a 3rd), but overall glad with the decision to trade out Burns. I imagine Grier didn't have much leverage with only DAL CAR and a unrealistic destination (something like TB) as the only options.
AllJonedOut, poeticentropy, FunMustBeAlways and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
13 juill. 2022 à 13 h 5
#5
Démarrer sujet
AllJonedOut
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,463
Mentions "j'aime": 266
Quoting: vols94
Moving the big contracts is a must. Vlasic buy out next summer


It is. EK65 was not as moveable. And was actually way better this season. Albeit in a role that played to his strengths than burns. Vlasics buyout sucks. Depending on where we are. I could see is giving up captia for vlasic salary rather than a buyout.
13 juill. 2022 à 13 h 7
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 1,629
Mentions "j'aime": 531
I don't like it but since there's not really much cap coming back and the retention is moderate it shows Grier valued opening up cap more than anything else
AllJonedOut et FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
13 juill. 2022 à 13 h 8
#7
Démarrer sujet
AllJonedOut
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,463
Mentions "j'aime": 266
Quoting: CheechYou
A little too much cap retention and not enough of a return (C-level-prospects and a 3rd), but overall glad with the decision to trade out Burns. I imagine Grier didn't have much leverage with only DAL CAR and a unrealistic destination (something like TB) as the only options.


It’s obviously a cap dumb. Whatever else you get is free captia. Will wonder what the dal offer looked like.
CheechYou a aimé ceci.
13 juill. 2022 à 13 h 8
#8
Démarrer sujet
AllJonedOut
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,463
Mentions "j'aime": 266
Quoting: poeticentropy
I don't like it but since there's not really much cap coming back and the retention is moderate it shows Grier valued opening up cap more than anything else


I think when it came down to picking who’s deal to take. I think they took whatever offer had more cap space.
13 juill. 2022 à 13 h 19
#9
Grierless Sharks Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 2,935
Mentions "j'aime": 914
It's awful. That much retention and no names.
poeticentropy a aimé ceci.
13 juill. 2022 à 13 h 22
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 595
Mentions "j'aime": 230
It's awful to see Burnzie go, but it had to be done with our current cap situation. I do wish we had a 2nd pick instead of a 3rd, but he's 37 so it's understandable if this was as much as the Canes wanted to spend.

Make no mistake: despite what Grier says regarding the term "rebuild", this is exactly what he's doing now. This is likely not the last trade Sharks will conduct this week, and I am wondering if the team is asking Vlasic to retire after this season and Couture and Karlsson to waive their clauses to be moved. I wouldn't be surprised if this is happening behind the scenes and it'll be interesting to how else we'll clear out space and room for youngsters and cheaper players.
poeticentropy a aimé ceci.
13 juill. 2022 à 13 h 28
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 4,029
Mentions "j'aime": 973
EK 65 is not moveable. 2-3 more years have to toll off that contract
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage