SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

The Island of Misfit toys Davidson stinks

Créé par: SlickWilly
Équipe: 2022-23 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 11 juill. 2022
Publié: 11 juill. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
A list of unqualified players that I would like to see Davidson take a run at. Obviously not all will happen, but some of these guys could provide value to a rebuild or could thrive with more ice time and flip em for some 3rds at the deadline.

For the Kane trade, I figured a good price to settle on was a late first and an alright prospect, but that is not necessarily the point of this trade. (For assessment purposes, I used Scott Wheeler at the Athletics ranking, so dont flame me if its not accurate.) I gave them a 4th back because they would probably like to draft some players at some point.

Dont care about the Jones trade. Get literally anything for him and im happy. Saw a dumb rumor on twitter that probably isnt accurate that the Sens were interested so thats what this is based on.

Murphy trade, thought about it for a little bit. Murphy is a leader, not very expensive, not flashy, good underlying metrics, shut down guy. Canes dont have an established RD after Pesce if Bear leaves, and it sounds like the Canes dont want to pay Bear, so now u get Murphy who has term and experience for a late 2nd that could turn into a 1st if they win the cup. (In any case, I would have offersheeted Bear anyway).

Let me reiterate - trades are not the main focus here, mainly that the players will be gone at some point and im trying to gauge roster spots.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
11 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Foudy, Jean-Luc
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (COL)
COL
  1. Kane, Patrick (5 250 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (CHI)
2.
CHI
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (OTT)
Détails additionnels:
Would take back Hamonic/Zaitsev if theyre deemed cap dumps. Maybe you make the second conditional on something like (sens make the conference finals and it turns into a 1st.)

Return is not the main goal here.
OTT
  1. Jones, Seth (3 500 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
Seth Jones is still decent value at 6 million. Would fit well with Chabot.
3.
CHI
  1. van Riemsdyk, James
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (PHI)
Détails additionnels:
Cap dump so they can screw up their rebuild and sign Gaudreau
(conditional top 10 protected, probably)
PHI
4.
CHI
  1. Bear, Ethan [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (CAR)
Détails additionnels:
Win the cup + top 4 minutes and it becomes a 1st
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de COL
Logo de PHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de OTT
Logo de CAR
Logo de CHI
Logo de DAL
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2024
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de CHI
Logo de CGY
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2025
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $63 424 296 $237 500 $2 290 000 $19 075 704 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
758 333 $758 333 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
AD, C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
847 500 $847 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
RFA - 3
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 1
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
758 333 $758 333 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
975 000 $975 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
11 juill. 2022 à 18 h 10
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 3,017
Mentions "j'aime": 1,265
Marvei or Bedard
11 juill. 2022 à 18 h 11
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 3,222
Mentions "j'aime": 2,162
Quoting: jet11567
Marvei or Bedard


Until Russia stops being a ****fest, no chance Im picking Michkov 1st OA
Rob32sjsharks et Garak a aimé ceci.
11 juill. 2022 à 18 h 13
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,153
Mentions "j'aime": 4,639
Bedard is a Towes replacement for the next 10+ years so that's an easy pick lol.
I would keep Jones unless someone offers up a 1st. just to kep the cap floor and gives a young team leadership for the next 4-5 years.
at this point no use in that large of a retention for a still quality player, in 6-7 years he will still be good and you will be a team on the rise.
SlickWilly a aimé ceci.
11 juill. 2022 à 18 h 13
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 3,017
Mentions "j'aime": 1,265
Quoting: SlickWilly
Until Russia stops being a ****fest, no chance Im picking Michkov 1st OA


If ur picking second you take Michkov
11 juill. 2022 à 18 h 13
#5
Glep
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 2,391
Mentions "j'aime": 911
Quoting: SlickWilly
Until Russia stops being a ****fest, no chance Im picking Michkov 1st OA


Michkov is the projected #2 based on his KHL contract. His play he may be better than bedard. Depends on if they put him in the KHL this season, if he balls out in the KHL as a 17 year old he may have a serious case for 1 but won’t be taken there because of his contract and the fact he is a Russian.
Rob32sjsharks a aimé ceci.
11 juill. 2022 à 18 h 15
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 3,222
Mentions "j'aime": 2,162
Quoting: Hurricanes73
Michkov is the projected #2 based on his KHL contract. His play he may be better than bedard. Depends on if they put him in the KHL this season, if he balls out in the KHL as a 17 year old he may have a serious case for 1 but won’t be taken there because of his contract and the fact he is a Russian.


Oh for sure theres a case to be made that hes the better player. But I dont want Putin putting a target on his back so he cant come over to the States, plus theres always the very real possibility that he just wants to stay in russia.

Quoting: jet11567
If ur picking second you take Michkov


As of this moment, definitely
11 juill. 2022 à 18 h 16
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 3,222
Mentions "j'aime": 2,162
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
Bedard is a Towes replacement for the next 10+ years so that's an easy pick lol.
I would keep Jones unless someone offers up a 1st. just to kep the cap floor and gives a young team leadership for the next 4-5 years.
at this point no use in that large of a retention for a still quality player, in 6-7 years he will still be good and you will be a team on the rise.


Thats fair. We've seen defensemen fall off sooner, although that doesnt necessarily hurt us. Id rather just open the roster spot for a younger defenseman. But thats definitely the least likely trade on here
11 juill. 2022 à 18 h 18
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,153
Mentions "j'aime": 4,639
Quoting: SlickWilly
Thats fair. We've seen defensemen fall off sooner, although that doesnt necessarily hurt us. Id rather just open the roster spot for a younger defenseman. But thats definitely the least likely trade on here


there are 5 other spots on the roster! again only if someone offers a 1st zero retention. no need to trade him and a 2nd doesnt help you nearly as much as he does, plus 3.5 mil for 7 years is a lot of money for a 2nd.
11 juill. 2022 à 18 h 18
#9
Briere Masterclass
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2021
Messages: 1,164
Mentions "j'aime": 480
The Flyers aren’t using a first to dump Someone with one year left on their contract
11 juill. 2022 à 18 h 21
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 3,222
Mentions "j'aime": 2,162
Quoting: B_seka17
The Flyers aren’t using a first to dump Someone with one year left on their contract


From what I've seen, theyre looking for somewhere to dump him and nobody has wanted it for what theyre offering. Ultimately, I would agree, but I didnt want to think about it too hard so I just clicked the first. The trade returns werent supposed to be the main focus here
B_seka17 a aimé ceci.
11 juill. 2022 à 18 h 24
#11
Habs 7th round 1983
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 1,622
Mentions "j'aime": 749
Quoting: B_seka17
The Flyers aren’t using a first to dump Someone with one year left on their contract


In 2019 Toronto paid Carolina a 1st and a 7th to get rid of Patrick Marleau's last year contract @ $6.25M

https://www.capfriendly.com/trades/players/patrick-marleau
11 juill. 2022 à 18 h 27
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 2,213
Mentions "j'aime": 967
Quoting: B_seka17
The Flyers aren’t using a first to dump Someone with one year left on their contract


I almost guarantee they'll end up doing exactly that, although not the 2023 1st. Probably going to be the FLA 24 1st
11 juill. 2022 à 18 h 41
#13
Briere Masterclass
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2021
Messages: 1,164
Mentions "j'aime": 480
Quoting: SlickWilly
From what I've seen, theyre looking for somewhere to dump him and nobody has wanted it for what theyre offering. Ultimately, I would agree, but I didnt want to think about it too hard so I just clicked the first. The trade returns werent supposed to be the main focus here


Fair enough
11 juill. 2022 à 18 h 43
#14
Glep
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 2,391
Mentions "j'aime": 911
Quoting: SlickWilly
Oh for sure theres a case to be made that hes the better player. But I dont want Putin putting a target on his back so he cant come over to the States, plus theres always the very real possibility that he just wants to stay in russia.



As of this moment, definitely


Yea bro Russia is crazy. As a canes fan I’m like please let svech come back.
SlickWilly a aimé ceci.
11 juill. 2022 à 18 h 46
#15
Briere Masterclass
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2021
Messages: 1,164
Mentions "j'aime": 480
Quoting: TheRussianFive
In 2019 Toronto paid Carolina a 1st and a 7th to get rid of Patrick Marleau's last year contract $6.25M

https://www.capfriendly.com/trades/players/patrick-marleau


Yeah but JVR is for more productive than Marleau. He still is a 20 goal scorer and I think teams would easily take him with a third to flip for more
11 juill. 2022 à 19 h 25
#16
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 3,222
Mentions "j'aime": 2,162
Quoting: B_seka17
Yeah but JVR is for more productive than Marleau. He still is a 20 goal scorer and I think teams would easily take him with a third to flip for more


Quoting: TheRussianFive
In 2019 Toronto paid Carolina a 1st and a 7th to get rid of Patrick Marleau's last year contract $6.25M

https://www.capfriendly.com/trades/players/patrick-marleau


I also think that Toronto was in a much more stable situation. Flyers, knowing they very well may miss the playoffs, might not want to risk the first because its not guaranteed they can sign Gaudreau. Thats also why i made it protected. Had to include a little thinking in my post!
VladislavTretiak a aimé ceci.
11 juill. 2022 à 19 h 27
#17
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 3,222
Mentions "j'aime": 2,162
Quoting: Hurricanes73
Yea bro Russia is crazy. As a canes fan I’m like please let svech come back.


I would be very sad if he wasnt able to come back. One of my favorite young players. As a Canes fan, what do you think of the concept of acquiring Murphy?
Cardiak a aimé ceci.
11 juill. 2022 à 19 h 32
#18
Glep
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 2,391
Mentions "j'aime": 911
Quoting: SlickWilly
I would be very sad if he wasnt able to come back. One of my favorite young players. As a Canes fan, what do you think of the concept of acquiring Murphy?


Honestly he is one the best options to acquire at RD he would be the cheapest to trade for and he is very serviceable. I like the term as well, reminds me of when they traded for Skjei. It would be a very tulsky/yorke move to make. You can tell which guys in the canes front office are calling the shots depending on the move. The canes best RHD options right now are Kling, Marino, murphy. There’s probably others out there like Barrie but I am talking about guys who have serious term as the most viable options because it is a canes move to get a guy with term. I like Marino and klingberg better personally but the murphy is a solid top 4D and I like him as an option.
SlickWilly a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage