SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Does this team finish last

Créé par: ChiHawk
Équipe: 2022-23 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 10 juill. 2022
Publié: 11 juill. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Weaponize cap space with Zucker, Kane and Toews. Zaits and Johnson get moved the following season by retaining 1/2.

This team should finish last or 2nd to last; this is awful. Bedard or Fantilli here we come!
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
31 750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
22 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Zucker, Jason
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (PIT)
PIT
    Future considerations
    2.
    CHI
    1. Zaitsev, Nikita
    2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (OTT)
    3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (OTT)
    3.
    CHI
    1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (COL)
    COL
    1. Toews, Jonathan (5 250 000 $ retained)
    2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (TBL)
    4.
    CHI
    1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (ANA)
    Détails additionnels:
    TDL move to anywhere
    ANA
    1. Zucker, Jason (2 250 000 $ retained)
    5.
    CHI
    1. Kakko, Kaapo [Droits de RFA]
    2. Nemeth, Patrik
    3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (NYR)
    NYR
    1. Kane, Patrick (5 250 000 $ retained)
    2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (CHI)
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Frais appliqués
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2023
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de COL
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    2024
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    2025
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2382 500 000 $65 830 129 $237 500 $2 157 500 $16 669 871 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
    AD, C, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
    AG, C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
    AG, C, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    AD, C, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    758 333 $758 333 $
    AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    975 000 $975 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    750 000 $750 000 $
    C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    800 000 $800 000 $
    AG, C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    870 000 $870 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    800 000 $800 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    800 000 $800 000 $
    AD, C
    RFA - 2
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
    DD
    NMC
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
    DG
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DG
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    867 500 $867 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    866 667 $866 667 $
    DD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    DG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    11 juill. 2022 à 0 h 41
    #26
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2017
    Messages: 19,026
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,322
    Quoting: Aussie_Blackhawk
    As much as I'm sure KD would like to move the salary, I don't think it happens and I think it was a part of the reason Hawks shipped Cat (as they didn't want 2 large caps whilst they weaponise the cap space). Jones is an elite RD in this league and will still be here in 4-5 years when we potentially start to move off the bottom of the standings.


    Maybe, unless he starts vocally saying he wants out which I could definitely see. Then he becomes a problem. So much of performance is mental and environment, Jones could come unglued in this environment.
    Aussie_Blackhawk et TML_Tika a aimé ceci.
    11 juill. 2022 à 0 h 42
    #27
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2017
    Messages: 19,026
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,322
    Quoting: TML_Tika
    He is a great player and being at his prime at 27 and a right hand defenceman there will be a team in the win now mode that will take him........but Hawks would need to take some contacts back to make the deal work.

    He is going to be the trickest decision for Davidson going forward.......Alternatively the Hawks let the rebuild happen around him and do not move him out for another few years.


    He'd actually be a awesome fit for the Leafs but of course they don't have the cap room.
    TML_Tika a aimé ceci.
    11 juill. 2022 à 0 h 43
    #28
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2017
    Messages: 19,026
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,322
    Quoting: TML_Tika
    Matthews and Marner both idolize Kane and I think they are all friends ......so would love to see Kane play for the Leafs for atleast one year.


    Yeah, he'd be lights out with Matthews, just don't see how the Leafs afford him and don't think the Leafs want to move Knies but likely what it would take.
    TML_Tika a aimé ceci.
    11 juill. 2022 à 0 h 54
    #29
    Number 1 Kahun Fan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2017
    Messages: 1,601
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,022
    Quoting: ChiHawk
    Only if we sign UFA's because we don't want to take anymore cap dumps as we won't have retention spots to move them. Most UFAs of value aren't going to have much interest coming to Chicago unless nobody wants them.


    I was thinking something along the lines that Buffalo did last year, they managed to squeeze out some value from quality depth players like Hinnie/Caggs/Eakin. Heck we did it before with Janmark. If we immediately put that pressure on Reichel like we did with Dach...same old same old is going to happen.
    11 juill. 2022 à 0 h 56
    #30
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2019
    Messages: 4,986
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,356
    Quoting: ChiHawk
    Maybe, unless he starts vocally saying he wants out which I could definitely see. Then he becomes a problem. So much of performance is mental and environment, Jones could come unglued in this environment.


    Good point though the expectation of retaining cap for that length of time seems perilous. He should try and play his best hockey to put him in the shop window if he decides his future lies elsewhere.
    ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
    11 juill. 2022 à 0 h 58
    #31
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2017
    Messages: 19,026
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,322
    Quoting: CFMan
    I was thinking something along the lines that Buffalo did last year, they managed to squeeze out some value from quality depth players like Hinnie/Caggs/Eakin. Heck we did it before with Janmark. If we immediately put that pressure on Reichel like we did with Dach...same old same old is going to happen.


    Without question Reichel is in the NHL last year. He probably should have played a third of the season last year, but the Hawks obviously were bad. I'm not suggesting he's going to the first line or maybe not 2nd line, but he's going to get heavy minutes next year. Letting him sit another year in the AHL is kind of pointless as he's proven himself there, he needs to experience the NHL and spend a couple years developing so he can help the young draftees when they are ready.
    11 juill. 2022 à 1 h 0
    #32
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2020
    Messages: 2,270
    Mentions "j'aime": 443
    Quoting: ChiHawk
    He'd actually be a awesome fit for the Leafs but of course they don't have the cap room.


    Leafs would need to trade out Nylander to fit him some way.
    11 juill. 2022 à 1 h 30
    #33
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 9,527
    Mentions "j'aime": 8,968
    Does this team finish last? That forward group would be lucky to have a single player hit double digits in goals, and the defense + goaltending combo is so porous that they’d probably give up a dozen per night before the other team just started playing keep-away to kill off time for the last two periods. This team would struggle with an average WHL team lmao
    ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
    11 juill. 2022 à 12 h 55
    #34
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 10,774
    Mentions "j'aime": 10,505
    Quoting: ChiHawk
    You don't think they can afford him at $7M?


    Quoting: Fotiu4U
    I know they can't.


    @Fotiu4U is right. I've run a Rangers ACGM a handful of times. They would probably need 3rd party retention just to have him for next season, and then beyond that they won't be able to afford him with all the raises they have due to young players.
    Fotiu4U a aimé ceci.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage