Forums/NHL Trades

(TOR/CHI) - Mrázek + 2022 1st round pick for 2022 2nd round pick

Who won the trade?
Le graphique a été masqué

Options de sondage


7 juill. à 22 h 22
#26
Retired V2 V3 GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 2,894
Mentions "j'aime": 780
Mrazek should bounce back. Assuming that Chicago won’t buy him out. Share starts with someone?
7 juill. à 22 h 22
#27
Sweet Lou
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,220
Mentions "j'aime": 459
Dubas got fleeced badly BAHAHAHAHA
7 juill. à 22 h 23
#28
BORDEGOD
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 936
Mentions "j'aime": 336
Pretty good move for Dubas. Desperately needed cap space and didn't move too far back.
7 juill. à 22 h 23
#29
You know nothing JS
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 4,796
Mentions "j'aime": 2,779
Toronto fans will paise Dumbas,.... forgetting he's the one who signed this horrible contract LOL
exo2769, Koskinen_The_Great, draft_em_sign_em_trade_em and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
7 juill. à 22 h 24
#30
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 1,445
Mentions "j'aime": 594
Quoting: MadLin27
I said fair deal, but this is move benefits the Leafs greatly.
Chicago turns an early 2nd into a late first and gets a goalie who will help them secure 1st overall next year... lol

Leafs move a bad contract for barely anything.
Shoutout to all the goofs on here that said that moving Mrazek would cost a 1st without anything coming back.


Had him going to Seattle with the same 1st for Hayden Fleury. Didnt see too many not giving anything back, saw more ppl tell me he wasnt being traded with a 1st when he was traded with that 1st.
7 juill. à 22 h 26
#31
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 7,988
Mentions "j'aime": 2,965
Sigh... While mrazek wasn't my first choice for 1b last summer (it was raanta, then Ullmark (who costed more than a 1b in the end) Mrazek was in the next tier), it was a reasonable gamble that just flopped hard.

The cost is significant but not terrible. Sigh. Time to move on
7 juill. à 22 h 26
#32
FireKyle
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 5,631
Mentions "j'aime": 2,380
Quoting: BlackwoodForVezina
Brad lambert? I know who won


As we draft someone I have never heard of
exo2769, BlackwoodForVezina et CFMan a aimé ceci.
7 juill. à 22 h 27
#33
but you’re close.
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 222
Mentions "j'aime": 56
Quoting: Nathaniel
Yay, no more Abruzzese, Mrazek, and a first for a fifth!


I’ll give you Bracco and a 2nd to take that back.
Nathaniel a aimé ceci.
7 juill. à 22 h 27
#34
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 12,650
Mentions "j'aime": 5,713
I was on the record saying a 2nd and a prospect. It's not exactly what I thought we'd get, but it's higher end than I thought. Leafs win slightly, but the Hawks could afford it. I'm happy with a higher end pick than what I was expecting.
Koskinen_The_Great a aimé ceci.
7 juill. à 22 h 28
#35
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 7,988
Mentions "j'aime": 2,965
Quoting: KSIxSKULLS
I feel like Dubas has to trade assets every year for his terrible signings and trades. Somehow Leafs Nation still think he's a good GM tears of joy


This and Ritchie. Got another example?

Marleau was a Lou signing
7 juill. à 22 h 29
#36
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 7,988
Mentions "j'aime": 2,965
Quoting: Random2152
Lmao everyone on this site has been screaming for months that it will cost an arm and a leg to move Petr and stupid leafs fans were delusional for saying it would cost anything less and all it ended up costing was 13 spots that amount to virtually no actual draft pick value.

****ing LOL

The fact that after all that, this isn't all the way leafs win says everything you need to know about CF users.
Leafs win easily and it isn't close


The cost to move from 38-> 25 is likely a late second or early 3rd. Around 55-65. So we traded essentially a late second or early 3rd. That's not "virtually no actual draft pick value"
Koskinen_The_Great a aimé ceci.
7 juill. à 22 h 29
#37
Chad of Chads
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 19,000
Mentions "j'aime": 15,523
Quoting: DrDinkiee
Easy win for Leafs


Like there will be silly people going wtf

But if we look at ACGM's it was

Nick Abruzzese + Mrazek + 2023 3rd or 2024 2nd for FC

Dubas trades Mrazek + the 25th OA and gets the 38th OA

I dont know about you but that seems fine to me as while FC is an amazing guy the 38th OA pick is more enticing

Plus with the space we can now go get Kuemper, Campbell, or heck trade for Gibson and sign Husso
DrDinkiee et Saskleaf a aimé ceci.
7 juill. à 22 h 31
#38
Western Champs
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2015
Messages: 247
Mentions "j'aime": 228
Quoting: Random2152
Lmao everyone on this site has been screaming for months that it will cost an arm and a leg to move Petr and stupid leafs fans were delusional for saying it would cost anything less and all it ended up costing was 13 spots that amount to virtually no actual draft pick value.

****ing LOL

The fact that after all that, this isn't all the way leafs win says everything you need to know about CF users.
Leafs win easily and it isn't close


Still the Leafs are paying again to get out of a bad contract
Koskinen_The_Great a aimé ceci.
7 juill. à 22 h 32
#39
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 456
Mentions "j'aime": 96
I love how all along everyone was commenting how much it would cost to get rid of Mrazek. It starts with Sandin or a 1st plus. Meanwhile, all it took was trading down 13 picks and people still vote that the leafs lost. People love to hate
DrDinkiee, LaffsFan et HeroStuff a aimé ceci.
7 juill. à 22 h 34
#40
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 6,664
Mentions "j'aime": 3,914
Quoting: BCAPP
The cost to move from 38-> 25 is likely a late second or early 3rd. Around 55-65. So we traded essentially a late second or early 3rd. That's not "virtually no actual draft pick value"


It's 1.6 gsva to dump 3.8x2
Oilers literally just gave up 2.4 to dump 3.2x2
1.6 gsva is equal to a 3rd or so, which compared to what users here were saying, is pretty much nothing (feel free to go back and look at all the trades and see what I mean).

3.8 aav compared to a 3rd is meaningless. That's a ****ing steal in favour of Toronto, not to mention that Chicago donked the pick lmao
aadoyle a aimé ceci.
7 juill. à 22 h 35
#41
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 6,664
Mentions "j'aime": 3,914
Quoting: Joe_La_Garnotte
Still the Leafs are paying again to get out of a bad contract


You win some and you lose some. Win big (bunting) and lose small (Petr and ritchie)

That's what good management is about
7 juill. à 22 h 43
#42
Robertson For Calder
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 676
Mentions "j'aime": 184
Quoting: KSIxSKULLS
I feel like Dubas has to trade assets every year for his terrible signings and trades. Somehow Leafs Nation still think he's a good GM tears of joy


literally twice
HeroStuff et Saskleaf a aimé ceci.
7 juill. à 22 h 44
#43
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 6,627
Mentions "j'aime": 1,598
Lou wins over Dubas once again.

Lou trades 1st Rd pick for a Top 4 Dman, Dubas trades 1st Rd for nothing.

Yea I know Dubas got a 2nd Rd pick back in a seriously weak Draft, maybe 2-5 players Drafted from this 2nd Rd become a regular in the Nhl.
7 juill. à 22 h 46
#44
Chad of Chads
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 19,000
Mentions "j'aime": 15,523
Quoting: Random2152
It's 1.6 gsva to dump 3.8x2
Oilers literally just gave up 2.4 to dump 3.2x2
1.6 gsva is equal to a 3rd or so, which compared to what users here were saying, is pretty much nothing (feel free to go back and look at all the trades and see what I mean).

3.8 aav compared to a 3rd is meaningless. That's a ****ing steal in favour of Toronto, not to mention that Chicago donked the pick lmao


Honestly this trade reminds me of when the raptors dumped their 1st to get out of Dragic and got a high 2nd

And they ended up with a solid pick

Koloko I believe

If all goes well Dubas at 38 gets one of

Belluz, Beck, Lambert, Howard, Chesley or Goyette
7 juill. à 22 h 46
#45
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 903
Mentions "j'aime": 335
Quoting: Random2152
Lmao everyone on this site has been screaming for months that it will cost an arm and a leg to move Petr and stupid leafs fans were delusional for saying it would cost anything less and all it ended up costing was 13 spots that amount to virtually no actual draft pick value.

****ing LOL

The fact that after all that, this isn't all the way leafs win says everything you need to know about CF users.
Leafs win easily and it isn't close


It's still a loss. A poor free agent signing resulted in the Leafs paying another team to take the bad contract.
GenXHockey a aimé ceci.
7 juill. à 22 h 49
#46
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 6,664
Mentions "j'aime": 3,914
Quoting: Bruins1054_gmb
It's still a loss. A poor free agent signing resulted in the Leafs paying another team to take the bad contract.


Quoting: Random2152
You win some and you lose some. Win big (bunting) and lose small (Petr and ritchie)

That's what good management is about
7 juill. à 22 h 52
#47
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 20,752
Mentions "j'aime": 10,542
Quoting: Random2152
Lmao everyone on this site has been screaming for months that it will cost an arm and a leg to move Petr and stupid leafs fans were delusional for saying it would cost anything less and all it ended up costing was 13 spots that amount to virtually no actual draft pick value.

****ing LOL

The fact that after all that, this isn't all the way leafs win says everything you need to know about CF users.
Leafs win easily and it isn't close


It cost us a 2nd. That is the price for moving down.
7 juill. à 22 h 54
#48
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 6,664
Mentions "j'aime": 3,914
Quoting: GenXHockey
It cost us a 2nd. That is the price for moving down.


Cost less (closer to a 3rd), and is below market value (see edm), especially considering what 4 mil aav can buy us over 2 years.

People were saying it would cost us the 1st on its own or sandin to dump Petr. Let's not pretend otherwise and let this website off the hook for its ****ty takes.

This is a great trade for the leafs
7 juill. à 22 h 58
#49
too dumb to log off
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 7,664
Mentions "j'aime": 8,478
Quoting: Random2152


I mean it could've been worse. Could've gotten three first round picks in a row and whiffed on all of them.
OldNYIfan et Saskleaf a aimé ceci.
7 juill. à 22 h 59
#50
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 20,752
Mentions "j'aime": 10,542
Quoting: Random2152
Cost less (closer to a 3rd), and is below market value (see edm), especially considering what 4 mil aav can buy us over 2 years.

People were saying it would cost us the 1st on its own or sandin to dump Petr. Let's not pretend otherwise and let this website off the hook for its ****ty takes.

This is a great trade for the leafs


No it costs a 2nd. Canes traded 26 for 39 and 50 just last draft. It's a PERFECT match comparable. I thought it would cost a 3rd but 2nd was the price.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Chargement de l'animation
Soumettre les modifications du sondage