SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Realistic Debrincat Trade Part II

Créé par: CoachQ
Équipe: 2022-23 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 3 juill. 2022
Publié: 3 juill. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Sorry, haven't had enough coffee this morning and inadvertently deleted my prior post.

In reading the trade offers for Debrincat on this board, there have been a lot of offers of a low first, a B or C prospect and a cap dump. According to Elliott Friedman and others these are nowhere close to what Kyle Davidson is looking for to come back. Keep in mind that Debrincat is controlled by his team for the next two years, so that's where he differs from someone like Fiala. Minnesota had to trade him, the Hawks do not. I see Kyle Davidson looking for a better offer than he got for Brandon Hagel, and is willing to keep the Cat if he doesn't get what he wants. So this is my rationale for this trade.

I chose New Jersey because they have the most attractive talent pool and the 2nd pick overall is enticing. Jersey fans, don't hate on this. I'm not saying that this is the trade that I'm proposing, only that this return is the type of return it will take for the Hawks to trade Debrincat.
Transactions
CHI
  1. Foote, Nolan
  2. Holtz, Alexander
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (NJD)
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (NJD)
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (NJD)
NJD
  1. DeBrincat, Alex
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (TBL)
Frais appliqués
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de NJD
Logo de CHI
Logo de MIN
Logo de EDM
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
Logo de CHI
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CHI
2023
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de NJD
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2024
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de NJD
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CGY
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
1682 500 000 $53 116 795 $237 500 $2 125 000 $29 383 205 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
AD, C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
758 333 $758 333 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
750 000 $750 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
863 333 $863 333 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
758 333 $758 333 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
975 000 $975 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
3 juill. 2022 à 9 h 4
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 1,266
Mentions "j'aime": 689
Laughable
3 juill. 2022 à 9 h 7
#2
do not Devil my ass
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,880
Mentions "j'aime": 4,254
Are you sure you're getting enough back for DeBrincat?
Don't you feel like maybe adding the Hughes brothers would be in order?
Tbrew a aimé ceci.
3 juill. 2022 à 9 h 8
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 1,550
Mentions "j'aime": 1,276
You forgot to add the Hughes bros, Bratt and Hischier.
Tbrew a aimé ceci.
3 juill. 2022 à 9 h 16
#4
n.1 Topias Vilen fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 5,913
Mentions "j'aime": 2,573
Lose the 2023 and 2024 picks and the Devils still decline because they can just go after free agents and make the pick at 2oa
Tbrew a aimé ceci.
3 juill. 2022 à 9 h 16
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,280
Mentions "j'aime": 4,924
This post does not represent the Chicago fanbase as a whole. We are not all this dilusional
Tbrew, MellowK, KDev and 2 others a aimé ceci.
3 juill. 2022 à 9 h 22
#6
Démarrer sujet
CoachQ
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 149
Mentions "j'aime": 90
Quoting: KDev
Laughable


Quoting: Tintin
Are you sure you're getting enough back for DeBrincat?
Don't you feel like maybe adding the Hughes brothers would be in order?



Quoting: MellowK
You forgot to add the Hughes bros, Bratt and Hischier.


Again guys, this is not what I expect to happen, this is the rumor going around from sources like Friedman about what it will take to get Debrincat. Do I see it happening, probably not. I know it's a huge overpayment but that's what Davidson wants right now, especially, after what he got back for Hagel. Again, he doesn't need to trade Debrincat, it's just that a deal like this would probably be the only one he would consider.
3 juill. 2022 à 9 h 23
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 2,615
Mentions "j'aime": 1,079
Wow, that’s all it costs for Cat? Nothing else?
3 juill. 2022 à 9 h 25
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,704
Mentions "j'aime": 14,471
Well, that is quite an overpay and not at all reasonable or realistic
3 juill. 2022 à 9 h 25
#9
Démarrer sujet
CoachQ
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 149
Mentions "j'aime": 90
Quoting: pretzelcoatl
Lose the 2023 and 2024 picks and the Devils still decline because they can just go after free agents and make the pick at 2oa


If you read what I posted, I only chose the Devils because they have a good talent pool. This could be any team, that has high first rounders and a good talent pool.
3 juill. 2022 à 9 h 26
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 1,266
Mentions "j'aime": 689
Quoting: CoachQ
Again guys, this is not what I expect to happen, this is the rumor going around from sources like Friedman about what it will take to get Debrincat. Do I see it happening, probably not. I know it's a huge overpayment but that's what Davidson wants right now, especially, after what he got back for Hagel. Again, he doesn't need to trade Debrincat, it's just that a deal like this would probably be the only one he would consider.


It doesn’t matter what he wants, you think Minnesota was desperately looking for a better price than a mid rounder and Brock Faber? Asking for 5 1st round picks including 2OA is ludicrous and completely ruins the relationship between Davidson and Fitzgerald moving forward. That trade is for someone like matthews or McDavid, not Debrincat. This whole “realistic” take is closer to just wishful thinking.
3 juill. 2022 à 9 h 26
#11
do not Devil my ass
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,880
Mentions "j'aime": 4,254
Quoting: CoachQ
that's what Davidson wants right now


Hey now.
I never said anything to the contrary.
What Davidson wants, Davidson gets.
Everyone know that's how today's NHL work.

I would never dare to suggest otherwise.
3 juill. 2022 à 9 h 27
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,704
Mentions "j'aime": 14,471
Quoting: CoachQ
Again guys, this is not what I expect to happen, this is the rumor going around from sources like Friedman about what it will take to get Debrincat. Do I see it happening, probably not. I know it's a huge overpayment but that's what Davidson wants right now, especially, after what he got back for Hagel. Again, he doesn't need to trade Debrincat, it's just that a deal like this would probably be the only one he would consider.


You realize the difference between the picks Hagel will get, the 31st overall and another very likely extremely late 1st are combined worth tremendously less than the 2022 2nd overall pick alone right? Right????

Then you add in 2 MORE 1sts, AND a high-end prospect AND another young player.

This is laugh out loud ridiculous
3 juill. 2022 à 9 h 28
#13
Démarrer sujet
CoachQ
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 149
Mentions "j'aime": 90
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
Well, that is quite an overpay and not at all reasonable or realistic


I agree it's an overpayment and probably not realistic, but the trades of a low #1, a B or C prospect and a cap dump aren't realistic either. My guess is that Debrincat signs a long-term deal with the Hawks to be part of the future core and all this trade talk is moot.
3 juill. 2022 à 9 h 41
#14
Démarrer sujet
CoachQ
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 149
Mentions "j'aime": 90
Folks, again, this is what's going around the internet right now (and if it's from the internet, it must be true). The angst about this fake trade is laughable. This is an internet board, none of us is an NHL GM and 99% of us (including myself) don't know anything about these picks or prospects.
3 juill. 2022 à 10 h 3
#15
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,466
Mentions "j'aime": 22,651
Quoting: CoachQ
If you read what I posted, I only chose the Devils because they have a good talent pool. This could be any team, that has high first rounders and a good talent pool.


Well as said above, it seems delusional that a rebuilding team (New Jersey) would trade multiple futures and little cap back to a rebuilding team (by this post.
Rebuilding teams with cap keeping their picks and ELCs and maybe spend for a UFAs. Playoff team LA gave up a 1st and second for five years of Fiala. A non playoff team isn't giving up so much more for two years of DeBrincat. If that's all you'll accept for DeBrincat, well he stays a Hawk.
3 juill. 2022 à 10 h 47
#16
Subbanator
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 7,318
Mentions "j'aime": 3,331
Quoting: Wadejos123
This post does not represent the Chicago fanbase as a whole. We are not all this dilusional


Pfff try being a Habs fan on here, I don't even go to the comments anymore because the trades above are....well you've seen them I'm sure lol
Wadejos123 a aimé ceci.
3 juill. 2022 à 11 h 19
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,256
Mentions "j'aime": 1,865
Quoting: CoachQ
Again guys, this is not what I expect to happen, this is the rumor going around from sources like Friedman about what it will take to get Debrincat. Do I see it happening, probably not. I know it's a huge overpayment but that's what Davidson wants right now, especially, after what he got back for Hagel. Again, he doesn't need to trade Debrincat, it's just that a deal like this would probably be the only one he would consider.


The rumors going around were that the sabres were asking for 1oa + zibanejad + for eichel, that Arizona wanted 3 firsts + for Chychrun, and that MN would only trade Fiala if they got a young NHL player back. For anyone wondering what return DeBrincat, Pastrnak, PLD, Miller will get, look through the trade tool on this website filtered to those including 1sts. Until Hagel this year, the last player to get traded for multiple firsts without a pick swap was Brayden Schenn in 2017. NHL players just do not get moved for these types of massive packages that fans think they should be. Yea it will be better than a 1st + B prospect, but it will be a lot closer to that than the package you have here.
3 juill. 2022 à 12 h 15
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 3,658
Mentions "j'aime": 1,622
No team will ever give 3 straight firsts.

This is way too much.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage