SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Was Elliotte Friedman referring to Ottawa when talking about Alex DeBrincat

Créé par: sensonfire
Équipe: 2022-23 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de création initiale: 2 juill. 2022
Publié: 2 juill. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3925 000 $
3870 000 $
3835 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
77 250 000 $
42 500 000 $
42 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
OTT
    "Friedman on 32TP says momentum is building for an Alex DeBrincat trade, he heard that one team offered a reasonably high 1st RD pick and another 1st RD pick and prospect, not a great prospect but a young player who could play and that wasn't enough to get it done"


    ---- Per NHL Watcher on Twitter
    CHI
      Might Elliotte Friedman be referring to Ottawa?


      According to the Fourth Period, Ottawa is reportedly one of the teams linked to DeBrincat.


      https://www.thefourthperiod.com/summer-trade-watch-2022
      2.
      OTT
      1. DeBrincat, Alex
      Détails additionnels:
      Might Ottawa have offered something like this for DeBrincat?


      Would Chicago have turned down this package?



      I'd love to hear what you have to say in the comments.
      CHI
      1. Brännström, Erik [Droits de RFA]
      2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (OTT)
      3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (OTT)
      Détails additionnels:
      I'm guessing the 2023 1st round pick would be lottery protected.
      Rachats de contrats
      Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
      2022
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de TBL
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de BOS
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de BOS
      Logo de WPG
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de NYI
      2023
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de NSH
      2024
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de TBL
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de OTT
      TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
      2382 500 000 $73 114 881 $0 $4 025 000 $9 385 119 $

      Formation

      Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      8 205 714 $8 205 714 $
      AG
      UFA - 6
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
      C
      UFA - 8
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      4 975 000 $4 975 000 $
      AD, AG
      UFA - 5
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 4
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
      C
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
      AG
      RFA
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
      C
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      3 600 000 $3 600 000 $
      AD, AG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
      AD, AG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      950 000 $950 000 $
      C
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
      C, AD
      UFA - 1
      Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 6
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
      DD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
      G
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
      DG
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      4 687 500 $4 687 500 $
      G
      M-NTC
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
      DG
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 1
      Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      750 000 $750 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      821 667 $821 667 $
      C, AD
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      762 500 $762 500 $
      AG
      RFA - 2

      Code d'intégration

      • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
      • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

      Texte intégré

      Cliquer pour surligner
      2 juill. 2022 à 18 h 45
      #1
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2021
      Messages: 573
      Mentions "j'aime": 242
      I mean, it potentially was ottawa, and that trade seems similar to what Friedman said, and if so, then it would be understandable why the Hawks rejected it, it might need another prospect like Greig or JBD
      sensonfire, Earth et Garak a aimé ceci.
      2 juill. 2022 à 18 h 46
      #2
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2018
      Messages: 9,443
      Mentions "j'aime": 4,149
      It would be fun if something like this happened! Would love to see Ottawa be good again! Would make for some fun games against the Leafs.

      I think Chicago needs to sell Kane and Toews. But I would keep Debrincat. Just extend him 8 years.

      But a trade like this if something else is added would be intriguing.
      sensonfire et zizougaffar a aimé ceci.
      2 juill. 2022 à 18 h 47
      #3
      exo2769
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juill. 2015
      Messages: 15,595
      Mentions "j'aime": 9,675
      CHI fan here. Yes I would turn down that package. The #7OA is nice, but this really isn't THAT much better than what Hagel got. But, I'll admit my bias toward TRad immediately too. Having watched (ironically) Debrincat play in Erie at the same time...there's were serious questions as to who was driving the play. TRad hasn't been able to find NHL ice time, but he's a VERY good prospect. Obviously you've seen what Mathieu was able to do once he was allowed more ice time.
      sensonfire, Garak et ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
      2 juill. 2022 à 18 h 48
      #4
      alwaysnextyear
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2015
      Messages: 5,522
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,566
      7th overall pick this year, plus there's no guarantee OTT would be a playoff team next year in a tough Division and Conference. I think CHI would look long and hard at this if it was offered.
      exo2769 et sensonfire a aimé ceci.
      2 juill. 2022 à 18 h 49
      #5
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2018
      Messages: 2,429
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,068
      If that was actually the deal that was offered then good for Dorion getting the ball rolling with a lowball. Obviously not a deal that would get accepted but need to start somewhere.
      exo2769, csick et sensonfire a aimé ceci.
      2 juill. 2022 à 18 h 51
      #6
      alwaysnextyear
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2015
      Messages: 5,522
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,566
      Quoting: exo2769
      CHI fan here. Yes I would turn down that package. The #7OA is nice, but this really isn't THAT much better than what Hagel got. But, I'll admit my bias toward TRad immediately too. Having watched (ironically) Debrincat play in Erie at the same time...there's were serious questions as to who was driving the play. TRad hasn't been able to find NHL ice time, but he's a VERY good prospect. Obviously you've seen what Mathieu was able to do once he was allowed more ice time.


      Two 1st's from TBL are definitely a lot lower value than 7th OA and another OTT 1st next year.
      sensonfire et MellowK a aimé ceci.
      2 juill. 2022 à 18 h 52
      #7
      KFTW
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juill. 2018
      Messages: 42,633
      Mentions "j'aime": 23,792
      Quoting: TheBoyDuddus
      If that was actually the deal that was offered then good for Dorion getting the ball rolling with a lowball. Obviously not a deal that would get accepted but need to start somewhere.


      If Ottawa doesn’t make the playoffs with Debrincat, Norris, Batherson, Stutzle, Tkachuk, Chabot, Zub and Sanderson, someone should be fired .
      sensonfire, Garak, zizougaffar and 2 others a aimé ceci.
      2 juill. 2022 à 18 h 57
      #8
      Shibbal18
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: janv. 2016
      Messages: 25,192
      Mentions "j'aime": 9,012
      I assumed both picks were this year but maybe
      sensonfire a aimé ceci.
      2 juill. 2022 à 19 h 3
      #9
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: janv. 2017
      Messages: 6,563
      Mentions "j'aime": 3,279
      Quoting: csick
      If Ottawa doesn’t make the playoffs with Debrincat, Norris, Batherson, Stutzle, Tkachuk, Chabot, Zub and Sanderson, someone should be fired .


      For sure. That’s way too much talent. Only concern to me is goaltending. I’d personally try to sign Capmbell or Kuemper at least for a few years to stabilize the back end.
      sensonfire et zizougaffar a aimé ceci.
      2 juill. 2022 à 19 h 5
      #10
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2019
      Messages: 10,709
      Mentions "j'aime": 10,392
      I don't necessarily like Brannstroms play in the NHL thus far, but I get the feeling that I believe in his upside more than most other Hawks fans and hockey fans in general. That being said, it is possible that this was the trade that got turned down, because I wouldn't do that. It's missing AT LEAST one more significant piece coming back to CHI and yeah probably some protections on the 2023 pick. Top 10 protection maximum but I'd say top 2 to 5 would be the most realistic.
      sensonfire, ChiHawk et zizougaffar a aimé ceci.
      2 juill. 2022 à 19 h 9
      #11
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2017
      Messages: 18,989
      Mentions "j'aime": 9,300
      Quoting: alwaysnextyear
      7th overall pick this year, plus there's no guarantee OTT would be a playoff team next year in a tough Division and Conference. I think CHI would look long and hard at this if it was offered.


      I think it's pretty clear based on the rumors of what Chicago is asking this won't get it done.
      Garak, sensonfire et zizougaffar a aimé ceci.
      2 juill. 2022 à 19 h 10
      #12
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juill. 2022
      Messages: 94
      Mentions "j'aime": 10
      If Im the blackhawks Im turning this down as there are no desirable prospects that fit their system worth the 7th overall pick and theres not value in a lottery protected pick
      ChiHawk, Garak et sensonfire a aimé ceci.
      2 juill. 2022 à 19 h 10
      #13
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2017
      Messages: 18,989
      Mentions "j'aime": 9,300
      Quoting: Garak
      I don't necessarily like Brannstroms play in the NHL thus far, but I get the feeling that I believe in his upside more than most other Hawks fans and hockey fans in general. That being said, it is possible that this was the trade that got turned down, because I wouldn't do that. It's missing AT LEAST one more significant piece coming back to CHI and yeah probably some protections on the 2023 pick. Top 10 protection maximum but I'd say top 2 to 5 would be the most realistic.


      Agree, based on reports of what Chicago is looking for, if this is what was offered, it's understandable why this was turned down.
      Garak, sensonfire et Wadejos123 a aimé ceci.
      2 juill. 2022 à 19 h 12
      #14
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2017
      Messages: 18,989
      Mentions "j'aime": 9,300
      The last thing the Hawks need is another LHD young player or prospect who doesn't have a really really good shot at being a 1st liner. Hawks need forward prospects. Pinto and or Greig (plus the 2022 pick and the 2023 pick if both Pinto and Greig aren't included) need to be included to make it work is my guess. With the 3 pieces, maybe top 5 protected on the 2023 pick....maybe
      sensonfire, Wadejos123 et exo2769 a aimé ceci.
      2 juill. 2022 à 19 h 14
      #15
      Judd Bracket ripoff
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juill. 2019
      Messages: 6,927
      Mentions "j'aime": 3,575
      I wonder if Buffalo or Philly were the team. Both have high firsts this year plus a Florida first and both are looking to take another step
      sensonfire a aimé ceci.
      2 juill. 2022 à 19 h 32
      #16
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2017
      Messages: 5,634
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,457
      no it was not OTT they have ZERO interest in cat and his 9M QO.
      sensonfire a aimé ceci.
      2 juill. 2022 à 19 h 46
      #17
      exo2769
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juill. 2015
      Messages: 15,595
      Mentions "j'aime": 9,675
      Modifié 2 juill. 2022 à 19 h 56
      Quoting: alwaysnextyear
      Two 1st's from TBL are definitely a lot lower value than 7th OA and another OTT 1st next year.


      No doubt, but Taylor Raddysh is a superior prospect than Brannstrom, Plus there's Boris...too which idk
      Wadejos123, sensonfire et ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
      2 juill. 2022 à 19 h 47
      #18
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2017
      Messages: 8,269
      Mentions "j'aime": 4,915
      Glad the hawks wouldn't accept this. I don't even think it's particularly close to what it would take too. Brannstrom would need to be Grieg or Pinto and another piece added in as well
      sensonfire et ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
       
      Répondre
      To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
      Question:
      Options:
      Ajouter une option
      Soumettre le sondage