SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Hawks 2022-23

Créé par: MMXD
Équipe: 2022-23 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 30 juin 2022
Publié: 30 juin 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3880 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 300 000 $
21 500 000 $
22 000 000 $
22 300 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Abruzzese, Nick
  2. Mrázek, Petr
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
TOR
  1. Strome, Dylan [Droits de RFA]
Détails additionnels:
Hawks allegedly aren't interested in bringing back Strome from what I have seen. May as well trade out his rights.
2.
CHI
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (DAL)
DAL
  1. Kubalik, Dominik [Droits de RFA]
Détails additionnels:
Another player that the Hawks may not be looking to keep from what I have seen. Wouldn't fit a rebuild either.
3.
CHI
  1. Kakko, Kaapo [Droits de RFA]
  2. Lundkvist, Nils
  3. Reaves, Ryan
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (NYR)
NYR
  1. Kane, Patrick (5 000 000 $ retained)
4.
CHI
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2023 (TBL)
TBL
  1. Reaves, Ryan (800 000 $ retained)
5.
CHI
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (DET)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (DET)
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (DET)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de MIN
Logo de EDM
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
Logo de CHI
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CHI
2023
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de NYR
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DET
Logo de CHI
Logo de DET
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de CHI
2024
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de DET
Logo de CHI
Logo de CGY
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $71 609 295 $237 500 $2 975 000 $10 890 705 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 4
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
758 333 $758 333 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
750 000 $750 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
758 333 $758 333 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
AD, C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
975 000 $975 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
30 juin 2022 à 21 h 45
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 4,986
Mentions "j'aime": 2,356
As much as Id like that return for NYR thats too much for them to give up.

The Strom rights are probs worth a late 2nd and the Mrazek cap dump is worth this package put together.

Murphy being sold short here would be detrimental to this franchise.
NYR1983 et gdli a aimé ceci.
30 juin 2022 à 21 h 47
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 2,679
Mentions "j'aime": 696
Quoting: Aussie_Blackhawk
As much as Id like that return for NYR thats too much for them to give up.

The Strom rights are probs worth a late 2nd and the Mrazek cap dump is worth this package put together.

Murphy being sold short here would be detrimental to this franchise.


Ok thank you, I kind of needed to hear this. Really had a hard tome valuing Murphy correctly, and realized the Kane deal may have been a tad excessive. Making some changes
30 juin 2022 à 21 h 49
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 4,986
Mentions "j'aime": 2,356
Quoting: MMXD
Ok thank you, I kind of needed to hear this. Really had a hard tome valuing Murphy correctly, and realized the Kane deal may have been a tad excessive. Making some changes


Murph is probably valued at a 2nd + prospect/young NHLer
30 juin 2022 à 21 h 50
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 2,679
Mentions "j'aime": 696
Quoting: Aussie_Blackhawk
Murph is probably valued at a 2nd + prospect/young NHLer


Changed it. More so did a Murphy for a 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. Lowered a bit of that Kane trade down too
Aussie_Blackhawk a aimé ceci.
30 juin 2022 à 21 h 55
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 4,986
Mentions "j'aime": 2,356
Quoting: MMXD
Changed it. More so did a Murphy for a 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. Lowered a bit of that Kane trade down too


Im not sure DET is the team for Murph but I do think the NYR move is closer to something they should look at but you will get the Ranger fans on here disagreeing vehemently.
30 juin 2022 à 22 h 6
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 2,679
Mentions "j'aime": 696
Quoting: Aussie_Blackhawk
Im not sure DET is the team for Murph but I do think the NYR move is closer to something they should look at but you will get the Ranger fans on here disagreeing vehemently.


I can't do NY again tbh, too much going on there cap wise. I think Detroit could be a good fit as a lot of their D are walking, and they could use a vet RHD on the squad.
30 juin 2022 à 22 h 25
#7
Buffbry
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 8,842
Mentions "j'aime": 5,306
Wings accepted before the 2nd was added, now it's a pass
30 juin 2022 à 22 h 40
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 6,200
Mentions "j'aime": 2,506
Quoting: Aussie_Blackhawk
As much as Id like that return for NYR thats too much for them to give up.

The Strom rights are probs worth a late 2nd and the Mrazek cap dump is worth this package put together.

Murphy being sold short here would be detrimental to this franchise.


Very refreshing seeing someone with realistic Values on here. But to be fair if there’s a biding war with multiple teams is could be in this range. Doubt it but it’s not out of the question. Can’t wait to see what your rebuild becomes! Dach will be something special I. The future
MMXD et Aussie_Blackhawk a aimé ceci.
30 juin 2022 à 22 h 43
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 2,679
Mentions "j'aime": 696
Quoting: NYR1983
Very refreshing seeing someone with realistic Values on here. But to be fair if there’s a biding war with multiple teams is could be in this range. Doubt it but it’s not out of the question. Can’t wait to see what your rebuild becomes! Dach will be something special I. The future


The too much was I initially had a second 1st in the deal, then I pulled it out as that comment was made
30 juin 2022 à 22 h 43
#10
arky
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2016
Messages: 6,674
Mentions "j'aime": 4,315
Wings are not the right team to trade a RHD, they need LHD
Billy12Bob a aimé ceci.
30 juin 2022 à 23 h 1
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 4,986
Mentions "j'aime": 2,356
Quoting: NYR1983
Very refreshing seeing someone with realistic Values on here. But to be fair if there’s a biding war with multiple teams is could be in this range. Doubt it but it’s not out of the question. Can’t wait to see what your rebuild becomes! Dach will be something special I. The future


Hopefully something similar to how yours is panning out. Find a couple of gems and build from there.
30 juin 2022 à 23 h 3
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,556
Mentions "j'aime": 3,278
Rangers will be strapped and looking at Dubois (allegedly). If they move for him and have to resign him I can’t see them spending the additional assets for Kane. It’d be too much subtracting off the roster and counterproductive imo. They’d be too top heavy with very little quality depth. I mean Mika, Kreider, Breadman, Kane, Laf and Dubois sounds sick, but the bottom six would likely be awful and extremely hard to fill out with the limited cap space.
30 juin 2022 à 23 h 14
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 2,679
Mentions "j'aime": 696
Quoting: HOCKEYBOY448
Rangers will be strapped and looking at Dubois (allegedly). If they move for him and have to resign him I can’t see them spending the additional assets for Kane. It’d be too much subtracting off the roster and counterproductive imo. They’d be too top heavy with very little quality depth. I mean Mika, Kreider, Breadman, Kane, Laf and Dubois sounds sick, but the bottom six would likely be awful and extremely hard to fill out with the limited cap space.


Basically a Dubois or Kane situation. Kane at least would subtract from total cap hell the following year. And think of Kane with Panarin again
30 juin 2022 à 23 h 14
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 2,679
Mentions "j'aime": 696
Quoting: mikearky
Wings are not the right team to trade a RHD, they need LHD


I have seen some rumours revolving around Hronek potentially on his way out. This frees another RD spot
30 juin 2022 à 23 h 21
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,556
Mentions "j'aime": 3,278
Quoting: MMXD
Basically a Dubois or Kane situation. Kane at least would subtract from total cap hell the following year. And think of Kane with Panarin again


As good as that would be, finding a long term 2C is far more important in the long run. Kane won’t be playing 6-7 years from now. A center in their early to mid 20s right now will be. Given the lack of depth at that position in the organization, I personally think it’d be smarter to focus efforts on finding that solution given how pivotal a center core is.
1 juill. 2022 à 0 h 4
#16
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 2,679
Mentions "j'aime": 696
Quoting: HOCKEYBOY448
As good as that would be, finding a long term 2C is far more important in the long run. Kane won’t be playing 6-7 years from now. A center in their early to mid 20s right now will be. Given the lack of depth at that position in the organization, I personally think it’d be smarter to focus efforts on finding that solution given how pivotal a center core is.


Long term dubois contract is roughly 7M. You literally have no cap space moving forward
1 juill. 2022 à 1 h 35
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,556
Mentions "j'aime": 3,278
Quoting: MMXD
Long term dubois contract is roughly 7M. You literally have no cap space moving forward


Then I’d rather not add a 1 year rental in Kane and keep the young players and picks and keep developing till we can get one internally or some other way, no matter how you slice it, I think a 2C is more valuable then a winger even one as good as Kane,
1 juill. 2022 à 9 h 34
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 5,588
Mentions "j'aime": 3,001
Detroit declines, don't need RD.
2 juill. 2022 à 7 h 36
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 461
Mentions "j'aime": 91
Quoting: Aussie_Blackhawk
As much as Id like that return for NYR thats too much for them to give up.

The Strom rights are probs worth a late 2nd and the Mrazek cap dump is worth this package put together.

Murphy being sold short here would be detrimental to this franchise.


Quoting: Aussie_Blackhawk
As much as Id like that return for NYR thats too much for them to give up.

The Strom rights are probs worth a late 2nd and the Mrazek cap dump is worth this package put together.

Murphy being sold short here would be detrimental to this franchise.


NYR - Let's Take them one at a time Reaves: For those of us Blueshirt diehards that would like to part company with Ryan, he is popular in the locker room. If Drury tossed him Gallant would be apoplectic. After watching Ryan play for a full season, he not a goon, loves to hit anyone who isn't wearing the same jersey he his, will drop the gloves with anyone when called upon (he doesn't go looking for trouble except to come to the defense of his teammates, and his minimial +- negative is offset by his intimidation factor. Ryan will likely be on the NYR Roster for 22-23. Lundqvist: I have a personal Bias on this one. I would like to see Nils and Zach Jones compete for the 3rd par LD spot with Schneider on RD. Both have 20 odd NHL games under their belt. Let them compete. I believe Nils is the stronger of the two. Depending on how Drury proceeds to construct the 22-23 NYR roster. Nils might be available for a swap. Kappo says he want to re-up my estimate: $2.25M for 2 years) but he may go by way of a competing offer sheet he can't refuse. If the Ranger get wind of that, Kappo's available. Assuming both Nils and Kappo are available, most Ranger fans would say you can have one but not both. With Ryan off the table as well it probably doesn't work. Patrick!!!: The #1 draft pick is a given. The problem for the Rangers however is they need CAP relief at 50% in order for a swap to be financially feasible. I'm certain that would be a non-starter for the Hawk nation. But in a perfect world, the proposal as written would be as Aussie_Blackhawk notes a bit too high for the Rangers.
Aussie_Blackhawk a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage