SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Otter

Créé par: Random2152
Équipe: 2022-23 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 30 juin 2022
Publié: 30 juin 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Simple idea. I didn't bother making other trades as they aren't the point. I just filled out the roster with guys who are going to make a push for roster spots this year. We will have additional space and assets even in this scenario with which to improve (3M of space + the aav of the guys they'd be replacing on the roster).

Dallas can match IF they do nothing else this off season, but if they try to keep or replace Klingberg that presents an opportunity to strike on the cheap. Reportedly contract talks are not going well between them and Otter so far.

OS don't happen so this is unrealistic but quite frankely I really do think it is one of the better possible solutions in net if we can actually pull it off
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
56 300 000 $
21 750 000 $
21 750 000 $
21 400 000 $
Offres hostiles
Le salaire annuel moyen (AAV) de l'offre hostile est calculé en divisant la valeur totale du contrat par: 1. La durée totale du contrat, ou 2. Cinq ans
JOUEURAAVCOMPENSATION
Oettinger, Jake6 300 000 $
Choix de 1e ronde en 2023
Choix de 3e ronde en 2023
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de WPG
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2182 500 000 $79 551 450 $212 500 $0 $2 948 550 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
950 000 $950 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
796 667 $796 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
827 500 $827 500 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
834 167 $834 167 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
6 300 000 $6 300 000 $
G
RFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
762 500 $762 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
30 juin 2022 à 6 h 27
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,914
Mentions "j'aime": 19,292
Matched instantly
EsoYeezus69 a aimé ceci.
30 juin 2022 à 6 h 28
#2
Démarrer sujet
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 9,193
Mentions "j'aime": 5,554
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Matched instantly


You should read some times before commentating. If they keep Klingberg or replace him, they will really struggle to at that level of comp
30 juin 2022 à 6 h 35
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,914
Mentions "j'aime": 19,292
Quoting: Random2152
You should read some times before commentating. If they keep Klingberg or replace him, they will really struggle to at that level of comp


I did read and no they won't no they won't. Dallas has 19.5M cap space to work with and 17 players signed. Lets assume Robertson gets the Svechnikov contract, that leaves them just under 12M. Matching this deal leaves them with around 5.5M and 3-4 players to sign. Sutter can be bought out, cheap palyers can be brought up like Dellandrea, Khudobin can be moved.

I think you greatly overrate their cap issues
EsoYeezus69 a aimé ceci.
30 juin 2022 à 6 h 38
#4
Démarrer sujet
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 9,193
Mentions "j'aime": 5,554
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
I did read and no they won't no they won't. Dallas has 19.5M cap space to work with and 17 players signed. Lets assume Robertson gets the Svechnikov contract, that leaves them just under 12M. Matching this deal leaves them with around 5.5M and 3-4 players to sign. Sutter can be bought out, cheap palyers can be brought up like Dellandrea, Khudobin can be moved.

I think you greatly overrate their cap issues


20 mil:
-8 ish for Robbie
12 mil:
-3-5 ish for depth guys (and that is pretty lean - 2.25 is the min)
7-9 mil:
-6 ish for Klingberg
1-3 mil:
-6.5 for Otter
(5.5)-(3.5)mil:

They have issues man.
30 juin 2022 à 6 h 49
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,914
Mentions "j'aime": 19,292
Quoting: Random2152
20 mil:
-8 ish for Robbie
12 mil:
-3-5 ish for depth guys (and that is pretty lean - 2.25 is the min)
7-9 mil:
-6 ish for Klingberg
1-3 mil:
-6.5 for Otter
(5.5)-(3.5)mil:

They have issues man.


You literally just commented on me not reading then you failed to read yourself. What part of they can buy out Suter or move Khudobin did you miss? I mean you magically made 9.3M cap disappear from your above roster, why does that rule only apply to Toronto and not Dallas?
EsoYeezus69 a aimé ceci.
30 juin 2022 à 6 h 51
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2018
Messages: 6,310
Mentions "j'aime": 2,226
A 2nd line of Kase and Joey Anderson?

Thats diabolical
30 juin 2022 à 6 h 54
#7
Démarrer sujet
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 9,193
Mentions "j'aime": 5,554
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
You literally just commented on me not reading then you failed to read yourself. What part of they can buy out Suter or move Khudobin did you miss? I mean you magically made 9.3M cap disappear from your above roster, why does that rule only apply to Toronto and not Dallas?


Oh I read it. But you just suck at math.
Suter saves you 2.6 - replacement cost (so maybe a million in real money best case)
Khudobin again the same.

They have serious issues with an OS at this level. Its okay to admit it

Besides, Leafs would have a much easier time clearing the space then Dallas would, especially with the time constraints limiting them and the fact that the 3 I have here are being moved regardless of Otter for the Leafs (2 of which have positive value, something Dallas can't say).
30 juin 2022 à 6 h 54
#8
Démarrer sujet
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 9,193
Mentions "j'aime": 5,554
Quoting: Hammerwise
A 2nd line of Kase and Joey Anderson?

Thats diabolical


Gotta have some energy guys to open space for JT right? Pummel em and see what cap't can do
Hammerwise a aimé ceci.
30 juin 2022 à 6 h 57
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2018
Messages: 6,310
Mentions "j'aime": 2,226
Quoting: Random2152
Gotta have some energy guys to open space for JT right? Pummel em and see what cap't can do


Full marks on not going insane like most Leaf posters, but Kase was lucky to make it to 50 games and maybe Robertson should get his chance there.

Joey Anderson, in 4 seasons he hasnt been able to really get full time NHL duty and barely got a callup the last 2 yrs, hes just not a nhler and certainly not in the top 6.

Dont re-sign Kase and you have almost 4mil for a solid 7th dman AND a rater unspectacular top 6 winger.
30 juin 2022 à 7 h 4
#10
Démarrer sujet
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 9,193
Mentions "j'aime": 5,554
Quoting: Hammerwise
Full marks on not going insane like most Leaf posters, but Kase was lucky to make it to 50 games and maybe Robertson should get his chance there.

Joey Anderson, in 4 seasons he hasnt been able to really get full time NHL duty and barely got a callup the last 2 yrs, hes just not a nhler and certainly not in the top 6.

Dont re-sign Kase and you have almost 4mil for a solid 7th dman AND a rater unspectacular top 6 winger.


Anderson not playing is less on him than it is on our depth. We simply didn't have space. He was good in his limited stints this year. He was excellent on the Marlies and he will certainly get a shot.
I get why you're worried about Kase and injuries, but all that makes me think is that we can get him cheaper than I have here. He is good and worth it at that cost.

Anyway I just didn't bother doing other moves as Otter is the focus here. JA and Kase isn't an ideal 2nd line (as much as I would like to see it tried) and is just a stand in to show we have space to add in this scenario. My real target for JT's wing is Puljujarvi (for Kerfoot) and yes Kenny is absolutely stupid enough to take that deal.

Robbie will get his chance up the lineup too, but better to start conservative
30 juin 2022 à 7 h 7
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,914
Mentions "j'aime": 19,292
Quoting: Random2152
Oh I read it. But you just suck at math.
Suter saves you 2.6 - replacement cost (so maybe a million in real money best case)
Khudobin again the same.

They have serious issues with an OS at this level. Its okay to admit it

Besides, Leafs would have a much easier time clearing the space then Dallas would, especially with the time constraints limiting them and the fact that the 3 I have here are being moved regardless of Otter for the Leafs.


Well first it's quite unlikely Kerfoot is moved unless it's to bring in an upgrade like Miller or something.

Secondly, you keep working with this idea that Klingberg is 100% coming back when he probably isn't. Dallas isn't willing to offer him the term that he wants and so he's most likely going to the market. He's already lost his job as the #1 to the far superior Heiskanen so they don't need to find an exact replacement for him either. Plus there will be a bunch of teams trying to move cap out or decent #4 options on the market.

Your math is also bad. Suter does give them 2.6M but they already have a replacement in the lineup with Harley. Dobby is literally in the AHL, he currently doesn't need a replacement at all as he doesn't take up a roster spot.
EsoYeezus69 a aimé ceci.
30 juin 2022 à 7 h 7
#12
MajorMoose
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 3,425
Mentions "j'aime": 2,602
Unless you overpay and offer Oettinger 7-8 million I can't see how Dallas doesn't match. They'd much rather let go of Klingberg than let go of Oettinger
EsoYeezus69 a aimé ceci.
30 juin 2022 à 7 h 11
#13
Démarrer sujet
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 9,193
Mentions "j'aime": 5,554
Quoting: majormoose007
Unless you overpay and offer Oettinger 7-8 million I can't see how Dallas doesn't match. They'd much rather let go of Klingberg than let go of Oettinger


Maybe, but essentially if they keep Klinger or replace him at all (with any top-4 Dman type) they open themselves up to a major OS threat. Thats all this AGM is.
Problem for Dallas is that they need to make the decision on the D before the OS threat if they don't get Otter done before fake July 1st (July 13th?)

According to Serivelli (sic) negotiations are going poorly, so this might be what an overpay looks like as weird as it may seem. It would take a perfect storm (and some balls) but the possibility is out there.

But this is the NHL so no need to worry lol
30 juin 2022 à 7 h 23
#14
Démarrer sujet
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 9,193
Mentions "j'aime": 5,554
Modifié 30 juin 2022 à 7 h 43
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Well first it's quite unlikely Kerfoot is moved unless it's to bring in an upgrade like Miller or something.


I'd be shocked if he were still here on day 1. All flags point towards trade right now, also for miller or an upgrade like that doesn't inherently make sense - at least not necessarily apart of his trade

Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Secondly, you keep working with this idea that Klingberg is 100% coming back when he probably isn't.


FFS go back and read like I told you to: "Dallas can match IF they do nothing else this off season, but if they try to keep or replace Klingberg that presents an opportunity to strike on the cheap"

Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Your math is also bad. Suter does give them 2.6M but they already have a replacement in the lineup with Harley. Dobby is literally in the AHL, he currently doesn't need a replacement at all as he doesn't take up a roster spot.


You need a player in the lineup for Klingberg. That costs money. His 2.6 saved gets eaten into by whoever takes up one of the 23 roster spots he vacates.
Khudobin buyout saves 2.5 mil, him in the minors cost 2.2, so you get 1 mil from moving him. I simplified it for time but their numbers work out the same through buyout. If you trade him (costs assets and/or contracts coming back) and buyout suter you get an additional 3.3 mil combined (best case scenario), which as we already established still is extremely difficult under the best of circumstances cap wise.

You're **** at math lmao
30 juin 2022 à 7 h 36
#15
Biased Opinion
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 2,683
Mentions "j'aime": 1,969
I'm all for this chaos
30 juin 2022 à 7 h 40
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,914
Mentions "j'aime": 19,292
Quoting: Random2152
I'd be shocked if he were still here on day 1. All flags point towards trade right now, also for miller or an upgrade like that doesn't inherently make sense - at least not necessarily apart of his trade



FFS go back and read like I told you to: "Dallas can match IF they do nothing else this off season, but if they try to keep or replace Klingberg that presents an opportunity to strike on the cheap"



You need a player in the lineup for Klingberg. That costs money. His 2.6 saved gets eaten into by whoever takes up one of the 23 roster spots he vacates.
Khudobin buyout saves 2.5 mil, him in the minors cost 2.2, so you get 1 mil from moving him. I simplified it for time but their numbers work out the same through buyout. If you trade him (costs assets and/or contracts coming back) and buyout suter you get an additional 3.3 mil (best case scenario), which as we already established still is extremely difficult under the best of circumstances cap wise.

You're **** at math lmao

Please tell me where my math is wrong, even brought back Klingberg just for you
vOJPRlf.png
EsoYeezus69 a aimé ceci.
30 juin 2022 à 7 h 47
#17
Démarrer sujet
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 9,193
Mentions "j'aime": 5,554
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Please tell me where my math is wrong, even brought back Klingberg just for you
vOJPRlf.png


Not a full roster, not a buyout of Khudobin, and no cap space with absolute best case scenarios for all your contracts.
And again, if you look at the numbers you were using, your math was wrong lmao.

This is my point exactly. They are in a lot of trouble with a well placed OS for Otter. Thank you for proving my point so well

Did you even buyout Suter or are you lying about that to try and win an argument?
30 juin 2022 à 8 h 4
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,914
Mentions "j'aime": 19,292
Quoting: Random2152
Not a full roster, not a buyout of Khudobin, and no cap space with absolute best case scenarios for all your contracts.
And again, if you look at the numbers you were using, your math was wrong lmao.

This is my point exactly. They are in a lot of trouble with a well placed OS for Otter. Thank you for proving my point so well

Did you even buyout Suter or are you lying about that to try and win an argument?


I bought out Suter like I said I above (his cap hit is clearly gone), and I placed Khudobin on LTIR to represent trading him like I said above. I never said anything about buying out Dobby but that can also work, just -833k.

How is it not a full roster? Because I only have 22 players signed but still have 1.4M cap space? Not like 22 players is an illegal roster or something, you posted a roster with 21 players

And best case on contracts? I signed 4 players:
1. Otter to the exact offersheet I am matching
2. Robertson to the exact same deal as Svechnikov, as well as within 200k of what Evolving Wild projects him to get
3. Studenic to exactly what EW projects for him
4. A back up goalie (again at what he is projected at by EW)
EsoYeezus69 a aimé ceci.
30 juin 2022 à 8 h 17
#19
Démarrer sujet
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 9,193
Mentions "j'aime": 5,554
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
I bought out Suter like I said I above (his cap hit is clearly gone), and I placed Khudobin on LTIR to represent trading him like I said above. I never said anything about buying out Dobby but that can also work, just -833k.

How is it not a full roster? Because I only have 22 players signed but still have 1.4M cap space? Not like 22 players is an illegal roster or something, you posted a roster with 21 players

And best case on contracts? I signed 4 players:
1. Otter to the exact offersheet I am matching
2. Robertson to the exact same deal as Svechnikov, as well as within 200k of what Evolving Wild projects him to get
3. Studenic to exactly what EW projects for him
4. A back up goalie (again at what he is projected at by EW)


My SC of EWs projections Have Wedgewood at 2@2.045, JR at 6@7.856.
You also have a litany of depth at league minimum and a 22 man roster which is not normal (the Leafs tend to be the exception in that case, we also have significant space to fill it which was the point)
Regardless, all of this is literally a best case scenario for the Stars - that is exceptionally unlikely to happen. Proper budgeting for depth tends to run at its leanest around 3-5 million (hence why I budgeted that earlier). You have it literally at 2.25.

Look at how much fudging you have to do to make it work, and you're really trying to sit here and tell me that they're fine and 'easily match'? Come on man this is absurd. They would be in trouble and this clearly proves just how much trouble it is. I never said impossible, I said "really struggle" and this is the definition of that.

Hell I don't even think the Leafs depth ever got this cheap. We ran lean numbers wise, but aav wise we still kept it in normal ranges - not like this.
30 juin 2022 à 8 h 27
#20
Jinx god
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 10,201
Mentions "j'aime": 13,729
Stars match instantly. They should sign JRob and Otter first then do other moves. IMO they should let Klingberg go and get a cheaper replacement.

If Toronto tries to OS Otter, don’t forget they have their cap worries too, except something like a Sandin OS to be given not too long after.
30 juin 2022 à 8 h 30
#21
Démarrer sujet
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 9,193
Mentions "j'aime": 5,554
Quoting: EsoYeezus69
Stars match instantly. They should sign JRob and Otter first then do other moves. IMO they should let Klingberg go and get a cheaper replacement.

If Toronto tries to OS Otter, don’t forget they have their cap worries too, except something like a Sandin OS to be given not too long after.


So you just not pay attention to the whole part about how Toronto is in a much better cap spot than you are if you keep or replace Klingberg? Besides we'd have him locked up by then and even if we were stupid and didn't could survive an OS anyway
30 juin 2022 à 8 h 38
#22
Jinx god
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 10,201
Mentions "j'aime": 13,729
Quoting: Random2152
So you just not pay attention to the whole part about how Toronto is in a much better cap spot than you are if you keep or replace Klingberg? Besides we'd have him locked up by then and even if we were stupid and didn't could survive an OS anyway


First of all Dallas has reportedly said that they aren’t willing to give Klingberg what he wants, so he’ll probably go to Seattle. There’s tons of cheap replacements out there, it’s not like Klingberg is vital to this team. They aren’t as much in cap hell as you think they’re.

Also you said that the Leafs will lock up Sandin because they aren’t stupid, then why aren’t the Stars locking up Otter who’s a way more important player? Stars could match an Otter OS, but chances are it doesn’t get there and the Stars resign him.
30 juin 2022 à 8 h 38
#23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,914
Mentions "j'aime": 19,292
Quoting: Random2152
My SC of EWs projections Have Wedgewood at 22.045, JR at 67.856.
You also have a litany of depth at league minimum and a 22 man roster which is not normal (the Leafs tend to be the exception in that case, we also have significant space to fill it which was the point)
Regardless, all of this is literally a best case scenario for the Stars - that is exceptionally unlikely to happen. Proper budgeting for depth tends to run at its leanest around 3-5 million (hence why I budgeted that earlier). You have it literally at 2.25.

Look at how much fudging you have to do to make it work, and you're really trying to sit here and tell me that they're fine and 'easily match'? Come on man this is absurd. They would be in trouble and this clearly proves just how much trouble it is


Whether it's Wedgewood or someone else cheap really doesn't matter, but they have him at a 41% chance to sign for 1 year at 1.425M and a 43% chance to sign for 2 years at 2.045M. I chose the 1 year deal

The forward depth I have here is nearly the exact same as what they had last year, 10/12 returning regular forwards. The only differences are Dellandrea and Studenic in for Raffl and Radulov. I can also resign Sekera for 800k as the #7 and 23rd player. All these "depth players" are literally already signed to contracts and regulars on the team. To me this is just you trying to double down on your already poor take by using league averages instead of literal fact on what the teams composition already is.

The only thing that makes this a "best case scenario" is if the worst case scenario of Otter signing an OS happens first. And Klingberg (or similar) is already signed. An actual best case scenario would probably be re-signing Namestnikov with the spare money saved on not having to match an OS, and/or not re-signing Klingberg to a deal that could very possibly not age well
EsoYeezus69 a aimé ceci.
30 juin 2022 à 8 h 46
#24
Démarrer sujet
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 9,193
Mentions "j'aime": 5,554
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Whether it's Wedgewood or someone else cheap really doesn't matter, but they have him at a 41% chance to sign for 1 year at 1.425M and a 43% chance to sign for 2 years at 2.045M. I chose the 1 year deal


Exactly. Literally the best case scenario for Dallas. That is my whole, entire point of this. If they go for klinger or equivalent, they open themselves up for a very real and dangerous OS threat that requires them to thread many needles to navigate safely.

Anyway OS aren't real so whatever.
30 juin 2022 à 8 h 49
#25
Démarrer sujet
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 9,193
Mentions "j'aime": 5,554
Quoting: EsoYeezus69
First of all Dallas has reportedly said that they aren’t willing to give Klingberg what he wants, so he’ll probably go to Seattle. There’s tons of cheap replacements out there, it’s not like Klingberg is vital to this team. They aren’t as much in cap hell as you think they’re.

Also you said that the Leafs will lock up Sandin because they aren’t stupid, then why aren’t the Stars locking up Otter who’s a way more important player? Stars could match an Otter OS, but chances are it doesn’t get there and the Stars resign him.


The premise of the agm is if:
Dallas signs Klinger or some equivalent (might as well use klinger since he's already there).

I am aware that they are fine if they dont. Next time consider reading the description.

Reports are coming in that contract negotiations are not going well with otter. They may drag out.

Again, read the desc. Ffs.


This entire exchange is rendered pointless by you being literate and reading the helpfully provided description. Please use it in the future.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage