Depends entirely on what dollar figure you sign Boeser. They'd have to move multiple contracs with Boeser in the fold unless Price goes LTIR.
Fiala came with an extension. 26th OA to 19th OA difference is negligible. Faber seems legit but no one knows. Farrell is a boom or bust prospect.

I assume Min was SUPER high on Faber to make that trade. I assume the equivalent would be Guhle from Montreal.

Guhle is a more reasonable comparable to Faber than Farrel

Guhle would be a non starter. They can keep Boeser and deal with his struggles to perform to a contract.

Barron + pick would be better comp

Bro, guhle is worth a top 10 pick nowadays (should've been probably)

Farrel has a crazy high upside

Bold to talk about struggling to perform to a contract when your name is Koskinen the Great and when the Habs currently have Josh Anderson, Drouin, Armia, Byron, Gallagher, and Hoffman all struggling to perform to their contracts

Considering Lehkonen got Barron and a 2nd, it would at least be Barron and a 1st for Boeser

Oh. You. Spicy.

Now it's just mean. Badgering poor Stanley Cup Champion Lehkonen.

I like Lehkonen, but Boeser should absolutely get a better return than him

I mean none of that is really wrong though

Not from the Habs. Their cap sucks. You just said it. You cant go one way and expect an entirely different result.

I don’t think the Habs are a great fit for Boeser. But if they were interested it would start with Barron and a 1st

Barron is their only decent RHD prospect. Not a fit, they'd have to shed another player just to fit him in. Thus is the problem with trading Boeser. You are not getting close to a prospect like Barron or Guhle when teams cant fit in his money

Which is why if they do trade him it would be to a team that can fit his money involving either a prospect on the level of Barron/Guhle or an NHL caliber top 4 dman like Marino

Good luck with that. Didnt work so well for Minnesota

And a pretty low floor

Still not worth close to Guhle.

Fiala's QO situation wasn't nearly as cumbersome as Boeser's, and on platform year performance, Fiala outperformed Boeser significantly.I would handicap Boeser as having less trade value accordingly.

— Thomas Drance (@ThomasDrance) June 29, 2022

You'd have to add a much better prospect or an earlier 1st round pick if you want Boeser.

Not according to the fiala trade

The Wild got the 19OA pick and a really good RHD prospect. You're offering the 26OA pick and a mediocre prospect. Boeser would get closer to what Fiala got than what you're proposing.