Quoting: Pensman69
Fleury would come in as backup and why would we overpay and throw assets away at Gibson when we have our young franchise goalie in Jarry? Would make no sense, we wouldn’t bring in both.
It's been speculated that Fleury wants to return to Pitt to retire, so he might. Most teams are doing tandems. As for Gibson, if Verbeek isn't asking too much it might happen, or if Hextall feels like the price an a potential overpay is justifiable (whether it is or not, can't pretend that GMs don't make bad trades).
As for moving Jarry, perhaps contract negotiations or they decide that he's just not the guy.
Personally, I don't think he's proven to be more of a franchise goalie than Fleury or Murray and I know they were moved because they struggled and they ultimately decided to go with the younger goalie (Murray over Fleury, Jarry over Murray). Jarry has had his fair share of playoff woes, although he hasn't played much due to injury, which could factor into why they move him based on his next contract expectation, not to mention that his potential return could be very high (maybe even compared to the ask on Gibson).
I'm not saying Jarry should be moved, just saying why they might consider moving him.