SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Is It Enough 4 Fiala

Créé par: BootBoi
Équipe: 2022-23 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de création initiale: 28 juin 2022
Publié: 28 juin 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
25 000 000 $
21 500 000 $
78 250 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
35 000 000 $
Transactions
OTT
  1. Fiala, Kevin [Droits de RFA]
MIN
  1. Brännström, Erik [Droits de RFA]
  2. Formenton, Alex [Droits de RFA]
  3. Pinto, Shane
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (OTT)
  5. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (TBL)
  6. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (BOS)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de BOS
Logo de WPG
Logo de OTT
Logo de NYI
2023
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de NSH
2024
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de TBL
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2282 500 000 $74 200 714 $0 $3 425 000 $8 299 286 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 205 714 $8 205 714 $
AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C
UFA - 8
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 975 000 $4 975 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 5
8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
894 167 $894 167 $
AD
RFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
3 600 000 $3 600 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
762 500 $762 500 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
838 333 $838 333 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
950 000 $950 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 687 500 $4 687 500 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
28 juin 2022 à 22 h 51
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 6,592
Mentions "j'aime": 4,735
It's way more than enough for Fiala.

Norris will cost you more..............around 6.5
destroyers19 a aimé ceci.
28 juin 2022 à 22 h 54
#2
destroyers19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 122
Mentions "j'aime": 16
haha?
28 juin 2022 à 22 h 54
#3
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,439
Mentions "j'aime": 22,639
It's a big overpay.
28 juin 2022 à 23 h 30
#4
Mr.T 17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 2,790
Mentions "j'aime": 338
You can take Pinto And Formenton out and Billy G would still take that and run, if I was high on Fiala, which I am so not high on him, I'd go JBD and the 2022 1st for Fiala, possibly even just the 2022 1st is good enough too
29 juin 2022 à 0 h 40
#5
Osiecki death stare
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 1,304
Mentions "j'aime": 550
Quoting: cody_tugak
You can take Pinto And Formenton out and Billy G would still take that and run, if I was high on Fiala, which I am so not high on him, I'd go JBD and the 2022 1st for Fiala, possibly even just the 2022 1st is good enough too


Which prospect do Sens fans consider to be better, JBD or Thomson?
29 juin 2022 à 0 h 56
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 4,414
Mentions "j'aime": 3,130
Quoting: Digitalbooya06
Which prospect do Sens fans consider to be better, JBD or Thomson?


I would think it's more preference based more than anything. JBD is kind of like a Brodin-lite but plays the right side instead. Thompson plays more like Middleton but doesn't have his size or is as heavy as him.

We could both types on the right side for our prospect pool to be honest. But we are only getting one of them. I also like either Järventie or Sokolov as a potential return too.
29 juin 2022 à 11 h 3
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 1,811
Mentions "j'aime": 844
Quoting: Digitalbooya06
Which prospect do Sens fans consider to be better, JBD or Thomson?


depends on who you ask, Thomson is a bit more dynamic and has some better puck-moving, but JBD is the kind of defenceman that you never notice, for all the right reasons. Thomson is definitely a bit more exciting, but for the Sens' needs, personally I prefer JBD. There probably won't be room for both of them long term, and if one of them were to be Chabot's long-term partner, I'd want it to be JBD
29 juin 2022 à 12 h 14
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 211
Mentions "j'aime": 114
Quoting: emoprettyboy
depends on who you ask, Thomson is a bit more dynamic and has some better puck-moving, but JBD is the kind of defenceman that you never notice, for all the right reasons. Thomson is definitely a bit more exciting, but for the Sens' needs, personally I prefer JBD. There probably won't be room for both of them long term, and if one of them were to be Chabot's long-term partner, I'd want it to be JBD


Thomson also has one more year on his ELC so that might swing the Wild more in his favor over JBD too...
29 juin 2022 à 12 h 16
#9
Osiecki death stare
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 1,304
Mentions "j'aime": 550
Quoting: RazWild
I would think it's more preference based more than anything. JBD is kind of like a Brodin-lite but plays the right side instead. Thompson plays more like Middleton but doesn't have his size or is as heavy as him.

We could both types on the right side for our prospect pool to be honest. But we are only getting one of them. I also like either Järventie or Sokolov as a potential return too.

I feel like Middleton isn't a good comparison. Middleton sucks offensively. I've been told Thomson has a nice shot.
29 juin 2022 à 13 h 0
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 4,414
Mentions "j'aime": 3,130
Quoting: Digitalbooya06
I feel like Middleton isn't a good comparison. Middleton sucks offensively. I've been told Thomson has a nice shot.


Middleton in no way sucks offensively.

He was either paired with Burns or Karlsson in San Jose so was forced to strictly stay back as a defensive defenseman but has shown flashes of promise in his offensive game since coming to Minnesota and he's been partnered with Spurgeon. Both Evason and Guerin have mentioned in pressers that they were surprised to find out how good he was offensively and how good of a shot he has since they too thought he was strictly a defensive defenseman when he was acquired. The term pleasantly surprised may have been an understatement for them.

This gives them greater flexibility in how they chose to deploy those two in game situations and it was often Middleton who was the chosen active D-man that pressed into the offensive zone while Spurgeon held back. That wouldn't of been the case if Middleton sucked offensively.

Middleton's offensive game may be unpolished and raw right now, but the Wild brass have basically said it's something they'll look to develop now that they know it's there.

In short, he's absolutely a comparable.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage