SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Sharks

Créé par: rangershockey24
Équipe: 2022-23 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 26 juin 2022
Publié: 26 juin 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1925 000 $
1925 000 $
11 000 000 $
1975 000 $
1975 000 $
22 300 000 $
22 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Harley, Thomas
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (DAL)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (DAL)
DAL
  1. Burns, Brent (4 000 000 $ retained)
2.
SJS
  1. Powell, Eamon [Liste de réserve]
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (TBL)
3.
SJS
  1. Gerasimyuk, Kirill [Liste de réserve]
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (FLA)
Détails additionnels:
This trade is if the Panthers trade Bob
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de BUF
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de ARI
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de DAL
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de TBL
Logo de FLA
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de DAL
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $68 189 167 $0 $890 000 $14 310 833 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
894 167 $894 167 $
AG
RFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
916 667 $916 667 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
975 000 $975 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 175 000 $2 175 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Stars de Dallas
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $
C
RFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
26 juin 2022 à 17 h 4
#1
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 7,792
Mentions "j'aime": 4,483
Brent Burns to Dallas, just makes far too much sense. Pretty sure the Stars take that and run.
26 juin 2022 à 17 h 22
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 686
Mentions "j'aime": 304
Will Reimer want to come back to Florida after the Panthers traded him for nothing years ago.
26 juin 2022 à 17 h 22
#3
Miss YA Killer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 3,761
Mentions "j'aime": 1,422
Quoting: TampaBayLightning22
Brent Burns to Dallas, just makes far too much sense. Pretty sure the Stars take that and run.


how age 38,39 40 seasons makes sense to you??? huh I'm Dallas i get as far from that as possiblr one of their top d prospects and a 2&3 wow


Bognino trade prevents TB from resigning Paul so thats a pass
26 juin 2022 à 17 h 26
#4
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 7,792
Mentions "j'aime": 4,483
Quoting: Boltsradynasty
how age 38,39 40 seasons makes sense to you??? huh I'm Dallas i get as far from that as possiblr one of their top d prospects and a 2&3 wow


Bognino trade prevents TB from resigning Paul so thats a pass


A 38, 39 and 40 Brent Burns is still better than a 34, 35 and 36 Jeff Petry any day of the year. Plus San Jose would probably gladly eat 50% of Burns just to get rid of him.
26 juin 2022 à 17 h 27
#5
Miss YA Killer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 3,761
Mentions "j'aime": 1,422
Quoting: TampaBayLightning22
A 38, 39 and 40 Brent Burns is still better than a 34, 35 and 36 Jeff Petry any day of the year. Plus San Jose would probably gladly eat 50% of Burns just to get rid of him.


both of them would be moronic for Dallas to go after
26 juin 2022 à 17 h 29
#6
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 7,792
Mentions "j'aime": 4,483
Quoting: Boltsradynasty
both of them would be moronic for Dallas to go after


Brent Burns fits the mold of Pete DeBoer not Jeff Petry. Tyson Barrie might be even better for Dallas than those other two.
26 juin 2022 à 17 h 33
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 114
Mentions "j'aime": 62
Quoting: TampaBayLightning22
Brent Burns fits the mold of Pete DeBoer not Jeff Petry. Tyson Barrie might be even better for Dallas than those other two.


The value of the Dallas trade is about right with the retention. It just makes no sense for Dallas to trade their only real dman prospect for a declining dman. Whether its Burns or Petry. Dallas isn’t a contender so why step backward by getting older.
Boltsradynasty et EsoYeezus69 a aimé ceci.
26 juin 2022 à 17 h 34
#8
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 7,792
Mentions "j'aime": 4,483
Quoting: SaucePass
The value of the Dallas trade is about right with the retention. It just makes no sense for Dallas to trade their only real dman prospect for a declining dman. Whether its Burns or Petry. Dallas isn’t a contender so why step backward by getting older.


I totally agree with what you're saying.
SaucePass et WallStreet83 a aimé ceci.
26 juin 2022 à 18 h 24
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 484
Mentions "j'aime": 372
Quoting: Boltsradynasty
both of them would be moronic for Dallas to go after


Couldn't agree more.
Boltsradynasty a aimé ceci.
26 juin 2022 à 18 h 27
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 4,181
Mentions "j'aime": 998
Quoting: Boltsradynasty
both of them would be moronic for Dallas to go after


Dallas just Hired pete Deboer so they have a positive hostory together.
26 juin 2022 à 18 h 30
#11
Miss YA Killer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 3,761
Mentions "j'aime": 1,422
Quoting: vols94
Dallas just Hired pete Deboer so they have a positive hostory together.


Doesn't change the fact Burns wil be on his age 38-40 seasons and with this deal cost Dallas it's top defenseman prospect really bad trade for them .
26 juin 2022 à 18 h 35
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 4,181
Mentions "j'aime": 998
Quoting: Boltsradynasty
Doesn't change the fact Burns wil be on his age 38-40 seasons and with this deal cost Dallas it's top defenseman prospect really bad trade for them .


Dallas was stupid enough to hire Deboer. Usually that is the beginning of a list of other bad choices.
FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
26 juin 2022 à 18 h 40
#13
Miss YA Killer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 3,761
Mentions "j'aime": 1,422
Quoting: vols94
Dallas was stupid enough to hire Deboer. Usually that is the beginning of a list of other bad choices.


i never said they absolutely won't I'm saying it'd be utter stupidity to do so
FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
26 juin 2022 à 18 h 47
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 4,181
Mentions "j'aime": 998
Quoting: Boltsradynasty
i never said they absolutely won't I'm saying it'd be utter stupidity to do so


For sure but Hiring Deboer is a win the cup in the next 2 yrs move. Deboer is terrible with young players and did not sign on for a rebuild. they feel they have a goalies for the playoffs and already lots of older guys Suter, Pavelski and Benn and Seguin who are aging badly. Dallas is a win now team. in 3 seasons its going to be bad for Dallas
26 juin 2022 à 19 h 16
#15
Jinx god
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 10,201
Mentions "j'aime": 13,730
Burns wouldn’t be the worst idea, but certainly not at the cost of Harley, not even half retained.
FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
26 juin 2022 à 20 h 14
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 114
Mentions "j'aime": 62
Quoting: vols94
For sure but Hiring Deboer is a win the cup in the next 2 yrs move. Deboer is terrible with young players and did not sign on for a rebuild. they feel they have a goalies for the playoffs and already lots of older guys Suter, Pavelski and Benn and Seguin who are aging badly. Dallas is a win now team. in 3 seasons its going to be bad for Dallas


Dallas isn’t in win now. Dallas is in just make the playoffs to keep butts in the seats. They are in a holding pattern until Johnston, Stankhoven, and Borque mature. This should coincide with Bennguin dropping off the books.
26 juin 2022 à 20 h 20
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,286
Mentions "j'aime": 2,731
Quoting: TampaBayLightning22
Brent Burns to Dallas, just makes far too much sense. Pretty sure the Stars take that and run.


Harley will be better than Burns before Burns’ deal is up. Take it and run? I leave it all day long. I’ll be calling for Nill’s job if he trades any of Johnston, Bourque, Stankoven, Harley, or Grush for an old defenseman
27 juin 2022 à 17 h 0
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 4,181
Mentions "j'aime": 998
Quoting: SaucePass
Dallas isn’t in win now. Dallas is in just make the playoffs to keep butts in the seats. They are in a holding pattern until Johnston, Stankhoven, and Borque mature. This should coincide with Bennguin dropping off the books.


holding onto Benn and Seguin, Resigning Pavelski, hired Deboer. none of those are rebuild moves
27 juin 2022 à 20 h 26
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 114
Mentions "j'aime": 62
Like I said. It’s to keep butts in the seats. If Dallas went full tank the building would be empty. They need to try to at least make an 8 seed. As far as Benn & Seguin there isn’t any getting rid of them. They both have full no movement clauses and are not worth their money. It would be cost prohibitive to try to move their contracts.

There’s a difference between remaining competitive and being a contender.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage