SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Buffalos Big Leap Forward

Créé par: Hockey_Hippy
Équipe: 2022-23 Sabres de Buffalo
Date de création initiale: 26 juin 2022
Publié: 26 juin 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Malkin's deal looks rich/long but it will take that to lure him away from Pittsburgh. Even if he only plays 200 games over the length of it,. it is money well spent.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3750 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
34 000 000 $
2850 000 $
21 000 000 $
2900 000 $
2950 000 $
2950 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
65 500 000 $
46 500 000 $
Transactions
BUF
  1. Gibson, John
Détails additionnels:
Verbeek lands a stud prospect goalie on the same timeline as a lot of the players he will be counting on going forward. He also gets Mittelstadt who likely figures somewhere in the middle six at the end of the day and Petrerka who looked pretty damn good in the AHL last year plus a1st
ANA
  1. Levi, Devon
  2. Mittelstadt, Casey
  3. Peterka, John-Jason
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (VGK)
Détails additionnels:
It's time for Buffalo to throw their hat into the ring and in order to do that, they cannot be relying on Craig Anderson to be their goalie, regardless of how well he has aged. They need a stud and Gibson is that, which means thewy are going to have to give up quality and quantity to land him.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de BUF
Logo de FLA
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de NJD
Logo de BUF
Logo de CGY
Logo de BUF
Logo de DAL
2023
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de PHI
Logo de VGK
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
2024
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2082 500 000 $63 679 167 $0 $3 037 500 $18 820 833 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance412 500 $$412K)
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
825 000 $825 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 916 667 $4 916 667 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
26 juin 2022 à 6 h 13
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,520
Mentions "j'aime": 769
That's insane for a washed up Gibson. ANd, yea, good luck getting Malkin on that contract.
dzmets a aimé ceci.
26 juin 2022 à 6 h 13
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,520
Mentions "j'aime": 769
I'd do the Manson deal, tho.
Hockey_Hippy a aimé ceci.
26 juin 2022 à 7 h 9
#3
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,117
Mentions "j'aime": 25,031
You either think that Gibson solves your goaltending problems for 5 years, or you don't. If you do, this is an entirely reasonable package for him, and one that Anaheim should strongly consider.
Hockey_Hippy a aimé ceci.
26 juin 2022 à 7 h 12
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 1,531
Mentions "j'aime": 819
That’s so much for Gibson. We’re not doing that
dzmets, wojme, palhal and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
26 juin 2022 à 7 h 28
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,644
Mentions "j'aime": 14,429
This is a horrendous trade for buffalo.

My god
dzmets, wojme et palhal a aimé ceci.
26 juin 2022 à 7 h 46
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,878
Mentions "j'aime": 974
Quoting: OldNYIfan
You either think that Gibson solves your goaltending problems for 5 years, or you don't. If you do, this is an entirely reasonable package for him, and one that Anaheim should strongly consider.


Bro if this was offered Anaheim couldn't say yes fast enough. This is the most ridiculous package for a goalie I have ever seen
palhal a aimé ceci.
26 juin 2022 à 7 h 58
#7
thewookie1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,412
Mentions "j'aime": 1,014
Buffalo declines this up, down, and in any cardinal direction.
dzmets, wojme et palhal a aimé ceci.
26 juin 2022 à 8 h 3
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 2,037
Mentions "j'aime": 1,372
F NO
26 juin 2022 à 8 h 42
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 411
Mentions "j'aime": 267
If you're gonna overpay for a declining goaltender, overpay bigly I guess.
26 juin 2022 à 9 h 54
#10
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,433
Mentions "j'aime": 22,637
Why give up so much for Gibson....just sign a just a good UFA this year or next. Fact. Sabres 750,000 Anderson had a better GAA than 6.4m Gibson last season. Way too much term for Manson. You really think he's going to 6.5m effective for 6 years?
26 juin 2022 à 9 h 59
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 351
Mentions "j'aime": 32
Modifié 26 juin 2022 à 10 h 7
Quoting: worldwidesensei
That's insane for a washed up Gibson. ANd, yea, good luck getting Malkin on that contract.


I happen not to think Gibson is washed up at 28, that he is a victim of a bad situation more than he is a perpetator in his own demise. Take him out of that siuation and the problem fixes itself. In terms of overall development I look at Anaheim as two to three years behind Buffalo.

As for Malkin, the fourth year is key. Who else do you think pays him that or more until he is 39 years old. I'm not seeing another team out there who A) has the cap space now and in the future; B) Needs a center of his caliber and C) is on the cusp of contention where it would be attractive for him to sign there.
26 juin 2022 à 10 h 3
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 351
Mentions "j'aime": 32
Modifié 26 juin 2022 à 10 h 12
Quoting: palhal
Why give up so much for Gibson....just sign a just a good UFA this year or next. Fact. Sabres 750,000 Anderson had a better GAA than 6.4m Gibson last season. Way too much term for Manson. You really think he's going to 6.5m effective for 6 years?


5.5 for Manson, not 6.5. That's a reasonable raise given what he making now and he is playing in the Finals.

Pray tell, what good UFA is there in the goaltending market this year? Neither Fluery (at this point in his career) or Kuemper are the difference maker Gibson is.

When you evaluate a player, you kinda need to go back more than one or two years to get an accurate picture of what that player is.
26 juin 2022 à 10 h 47
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,644
Mentions "j'aime": 14,429
Modifié 26 juin 2022 à 10 h 56
Quoting: Hockey_Hippy
5.5 for Manson, not 6.5. That's a reasonable raise given what he making now and he is playing in the Finals.

Pray tell, what good UFA is there in the goaltending market this year? Neither Fluery (at this point in his career) or Kuemper are the difference maker Gibson is.

When you evaluate a player, you kinda need to go back more than one or two years to get an accurate picture of what that player is.


I would sign a guy like campbell (toronto) and keep all those very valuable assets. Or I would make a much smaller trade for a goalie.

Sabres finally seem to have direction and a plan. This completely destroys it
palhal a aimé ceci.
26 juin 2022 à 12 h 54
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 1,022
Mentions "j'aime": 723
Quoting: OldNYIfan
You either think that Gibson solves your goaltending problems for 5 years, or you don't. If you do, this is an entirely reasonable package for him, and one that Anaheim should strongly consider.


That's too much for Gibson. His contract and his play that past few seasons are going to scare teams away.

I would be happy with a three piece package that includes a good young roster player, a good prospect and a 1st round pick. Levi is a better prospect that we can expect to be included. And honestly the pick here is probably too high in the draft at #16. The #28 is probably more realistic, although that is kind of balanced out by Mittelstadt being an undesirable player. Ducks don't need another marginal center (at the moment - he does have upside), they need a top 6 winger. If only Olofsson were 24 instead of 26 he'd be what I have in mind.
28 juin 2022 à 12 h 32
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 1,531
Mentions "j'aime": 819
Just so you know, you were featured in a YouTube video because this trade is so bad for buffalo. One of the worst trades I’ve ever seen
2 juill. 2022 à 10 h 51
#16
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 351
Mentions "j'aime": 32
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
I would sign a guy like campbell (toronto) and keep all those very valuable assets. Or I would make a much smaller trade for a goalie.

Sabres finally seem to have direction and a plan. This completely destroys it


And if Campbell went to Free Agency, you could do that. But he'll re-sign. Which is why I didn't include him here.
2 juill. 2022 à 10 h 55
#17
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 351
Mentions "j'aime": 32
Quoting: CHAR
That's too much for Gibson. His contract and his play that past few seasons are going to scare teams away.

I would be happy with a three piece package that includes a good young roster player, a good prospect and a 1st round pick. Levi is a better prospect that we can expect to be included. And honestly the pick here is probably too high in the draft at #16. The #28 is probably more realistic, although that is kind of balanced out by Mittelstadt being an undesirable player. Ducks don't need another marginal center (at the moment - he does have upside), they need a top 6 winger. If only Olofsson were 24 instead of 26 he'd be what I have in mind.



I appreciate the back and forth by you two on this deal. It's far more interesting than the 'Man You Suck' specials that normally pollute the comment section.
CHAR a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage