SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

One Last Run

Créé par: markhpre
Équipe: 2022-23 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 25 juin 2022
Publié: 25 juin 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Please Provide Feedback
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2925 000 $
23 500 000 $
2850 000 $
2850 000 $
36 750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
17 750 000 $
18 500 000 $
1900 000 $
Transactions
1.
PIT
  1. Emilio Pettersen, Mathias
  2. Huckins, Cole [Liste de réserve]
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (CGY)
2.
3.
PIT
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (CAR)
  2. Choix de 7e ronde en 2022 (CBJ)
4.
PIT
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2024 (ANA)
5.
VAN
  1. Hållander, Filip
  2. Poulin, Samuel
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (CGY)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de CAR
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de CBJ
2023
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2182 500 000 $80 708 334 $0 $0 $1 791 666 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
7 750 000 $7 750 000 $
C
UFA - 4
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
AD, C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
900 000 $900 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
UFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
25 juin 2022 à 18 h 25
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 2,105
Mentions "j'aime": 479
Vancouver never picks up the phone again and phones you just to laugh at you
Knuckl3s et Userunknown a aimé ceci.
25 juin 2022 à 18 h 49
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 7,870
Mentions "j'aime": 6,382
No way in hell the Canucks are gonna do that
Knuckl3s a aimé ceci.
25 juin 2022 à 18 h 49
#3
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Insulting offer for Boeser
majormoose007 a aimé ceci.
25 juin 2022 à 18 h 53
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 708
Mentions "j'aime": 236
RH was willing to part ways with pettersson for a late rd pick around the deadline but teams were treating him as a camp dump so cgy says no
easy no for boston, two pretty strong players pitt would be asking for from boston
canes would easily take that if they have the financial flexibility to do so but the bos trade wouldnt happen anyways so that is void
anh says yes
Definitely a no from vancouver
Knuckl3s a aimé ceci.
25 juin 2022 à 19 h 4
#5
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 18,211
Mentions "j'aime": 10,557
Flames don't have the cap for that
25 juin 2022 à 19 h 10
#6
i hate don sweeney
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 216
Mentions "j'aime": 61
boston declines
markhpre et Userunknown a aimé ceci.
25 juin 2022 à 19 h 31
#7
Démarrer sujet
Preston Markham
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 54
Mentions "j'aime": 8
Quoting: BestGMBenning
Vancouver never picks up the phone again and phones you just to laugh at you


46 points 71 games
25 juin 2022 à 19 h 31
#8
Démarrer sujet
Preston Markham
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 54
Mentions "j'aime": 8
Quoting: TheAlien
No way in hell the Canucks are gonna do that


46 points in 71 games
25 juin 2022 à 19 h 32
#9
Démarrer sujet
Preston Markham
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 54
Mentions "j'aime": 8
Quoting: Knuckl3s
Insulting offer for Boeser


46 points in 71 games
25 juin 2022 à 19 h 32
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 7,870
Mentions "j'aime": 6,382
Quoting: markhpre
46 points in 71 games


Then why you trading for him?
Knuckl3s a aimé ceci.
25 juin 2022 à 19 h 34
#11
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: markhpre
46 points in 71 games


You wouldn't be trading for Boeser unless you are confident he will bounce back, in which case, the Canucks will just keep him
25 juin 2022 à 20 h 36
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 2,105
Mentions "j'aime": 479
Quoting: markhpre
46 points in 71 games


If you’re basing off his production of just one season than hell no. It’s a trade that Vancouver will not consider.
Knuckl3s a aimé ceci.
25 juin 2022 à 21 h 17
#13
Benzino204
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,642
Mentions "j'aime": 695
Boeser has enough value on his own for Vancouver to trade him by himself, and not add a cap dump.
markhpre a aimé ceci.
26 juin 2022 à 19 h 1
#14
Démarrer sujet
Preston Markham
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 54
Mentions "j'aime": 8
Quoting: TheAlien
Then why you trading for him?


hes a good TOP 6 FOWARD he's not elite
26 juin 2022 à 19 h 1
#15
Démarrer sujet
Preston Markham
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 54
Mentions "j'aime": 8
Quoting: Knuckl3s
You wouldn't be trading for Boeser unless you are confident he will bounce back, in which case, the Canucks will just keep him


No, I'm trading for a TOP 6 FOWARD not an elite one
26 juin 2022 à 19 h 2
#16
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: markhpre
No, I'm trading for a TOP 6 FOWARD not an elite one


Whoever said Boeser was elite?
TheAlien a aimé ceci.
26 juin 2022 à 19 h 5
#17
Démarrer sujet
Preston Markham
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 54
Mentions "j'aime": 8
Quoting: Knuckl3s
Whoever said Boeser was elite?


Your over value of him, #1, #4 prospects both NHL ready and a 2nd for a top 6 forward is the exact market value if anything an overpay but Boesers a bigger name
26 juin 2022 à 19 h 6
#18
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: markhpre
Your over value of him, #1, #4 prospects both NHL ready and a 2nd for a top 6 forward is the exact market value if anything an overpay but Boesers a bigger name


????? Hallander and Poulin have made no indication that either of them are NHL ready dude
TheAlien a aimé ceci.
26 juin 2022 à 19 h 10
#19
Démarrer sujet
Preston Markham
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 54
Mentions "j'aime": 8
Quoting: Knuckl3s
????? Hallander and Poulin have made no indication that either of them are NHL ready dude


the only reason they are;t in the lineup is because they're on a deep playoff-capable team ofc they're not going to insert two kids with upside, they're not young bottom 6ers like o connor and zhorna. You could put both in the top 9 for Vancouver next year with established players and they give you elcs rather then overpaid contracts you should be moving anyway
26 juin 2022 à 19 h 13
#20
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: markhpre
the only reason they are;t in the lineup is because they're on a deep playoff-capable team ofc they're not going to insert two kids with upside, they're not young bottom 6ers like o connor and zhorna. You could put both in the top 9 for Vancouver next year with established players and they give you elcs rather then overpaid contracts you should be moving anyway


Bad take, Pittsburgh isn't that deep, they're secondary scoring was suspect. Considering where there roster was lacking, that's not a valid excuse to be keeping the kids out of the lineup, even in the playoffs. Also, I'm not quite sure what bad contracts you're referring to, Pittsburgh in any case should be looking to move out Dumoulin, Pettersson, McGinn, or Matheson in that case. Stop trying to pry away Boeser for pennies on the dollar, it's not happening
26 juin 2022 à 19 h 51
#21
Démarrer sujet
Preston Markham
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 54
Mentions "j'aime": 8
Quoting: Knuckl3s
Bad take, Pittsburgh isn't that deep, they're secondary scoring was suspect. Considering where there roster was lacking, that's not a valid excuse to be keeping the kids out of the lineup, even in the playoffs. Also, I'm not quite sure what bad contracts you're referring to, Pittsburgh in any case should be looking to move out Dumoulin, Pettersson, McGinn, or Matheson in that case. Stop trying to pry away Boeser for pennies on the dollar, it's not happening


Im gonna laugh when your return is no more then a mid 1st and a B prospect
No way you're telling me Pitt would put two kids in the bottom 6 in their situation this season
that's a bad take
26 juin 2022 à 19 h 54
#22
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: markhpre
Im gonna laugh when your return is no more then a mid 1st and a B prospect
No way you're telling me Pitt would put two kids in the bottom 6 in their situation this season
that's a bad take


Boeser will fetch a mid 1st and a B prospect minimum, so we can be somewhat in agreement. Poulin is a B prospect at best (that still might be a bit of a reach), but Hallander doesn't really qualify as a prospect anymore
26 juin 2022 à 20 h 30
#23
Démarrer sujet
Preston Markham
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 54
Mentions "j'aime": 8
Quoting: Knuckl3s
Boeser will fetch a mid 1st and a B prospect minimum, so we can be somewhat in agreement. Poulin is a B prospect at best (that still might be a bit of a reach), but Hallander doesn't really qualify as a prospect anymore


hallander is 21 years old former 2nd
27 juin 2022 à 3 h 51
#24
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: markhpre
hallander is 21 years old former 2nd


Hallander is more of a reclamation project than an actual prospect now that he's coming off of his ELC. He holds little to no value now that he's about to become waivers eligible
27 juin 2022 à 11 h 16
#25
Démarrer sujet
Preston Markham
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 54
Mentions "j'aime": 8
Quoting: Knuckl3s
Hallander is more of a reclamation project than an actual prospect now that he's coming off of his ELC. He holds little to no value now that he's about to become waivers eligible


so because he got an early ELC he is no longer a prospect at age 21. news to me
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage