My no, from Minnesota easily. Connor Garland isn't that good and there's a reason Canucks are trying to trade him after a year. but Guerin says no. Also, Garland doesn't have more value than dumba whose an RHD

Minnesota needs capspace and saves here over 1 mil. Garland takes fialas place in the line up after they trade fiala for picks and an A prospect

Guerin doesn't want to trade dumba. There's a reason fiala is being traded. There's a reason they also let Adam Beckman get a head start on his summer, training so he can make team in his final elc year and stay. This thing people use about Minnesota having bad capspace to justify bad trade proposal isn't reality for Minnesota, it's not.

Gotta say, its a great remake to get this team competitive again

Here are my comments:
Contracts all look fine
MIN trade - My feeling is the pick goes the other way, and VAN may need to add a prospect
OTT trade - I like it, but I think Miller needs to be 7x6
BOS - pick should prbably be a 5th, but Pearson is a guy that can help hold down the fort until injured guys return
FLA - Cap dump help for them, but I think they'd pull the trigger
PHI - same, cap dump, but since they are in semi-rebuild they might decline. 50/50 on this one
NSH - Since Forsberg appears to be leaving, I think Boeser is a perfect replacement. Might be a bit of an overpay by NSH

value on Miller is good, but I just don't think there's a world where he's the target for the Sens. between the 1C and 2C spots being locked up and Miller's age, I don't think it makes sense for the Sens timeline, even with the extension. in a vacuum, just in terms of value, I'd have no issue with this

Got the trade from this guy
https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/3362093

With all due respect, if you read the whole thing, you would read people say doubt our gm does it because he doesn't want to trade dumba. There's also Some who undervalue dumba

Okey. Search for different RHD. Thanks for good input ☺️

Helge Grans and Alex Turcotte for Connor Garland + 4th good or bad?

Garland > Dumba, only Wild homers will say otherwise

The Bruins trade is fair

Um no. Dman like dumba always have more value. Garland was used to give away a cap dump and then his only year in Vancouver sucked then complained in media about not liking Vancouver. Your such a homer. No , Minnesota will keep dumba then. Canucks can keep trying to trade him since deadline

Garland didn't suck and he never complained about not liking it in Vancouver, you're twisting the truth big time

No I am actually not. I read other Canucks blogs and writings. It's so abundantly clear he wasn't good with Vancouver to the point, your new front office was seeking to trade him dating back to deadline. Dude if your player's are so good, keep them. It's Canucks fans making this proposals, not wild.

You're lying, no way you went out of your way to read Canuck blogs as Wild fan, you shouldn't care about that stuff. Even if you did, you're assessment is still inaccurate

I actually read blogs of every team, so I am not lying. In fact, it's a fact Garland has been rumored to be available dating back to deadline and your new front office didn't deny it. But anyway you on everything by Canucks fans saying this player is so great, or worth so much more. Keep hating on dumba and being blind to the fact of your bias against dumba. Minnesota doesn't want to trade dumba. Have a beef against your own fanbase

Whatever, I was never trying to claim that Garland is untouchable, but the Canucks are not actively shopping him

Nobody is salivating over Dumba right now. He's still got good trade value, don't get me wrong, but he ain't returning a haul if he got traded

Miller can play LW, he's extremely versatile. Give me that top-9 :

Miller - Stutzle - Batherson
Tkachuk - Norris - Joseph
Formenton - Pinto - Brown