SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Spitballing

Créé par: babouie
Équipe: 2022-23 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 24 juin 2022
Publié: 24 juin 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
, Kerfoot and others to be traded at deadline
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
31 750 000 $
2950 000 $
2950 000 $
14 200 000 $
21 200 000 $
23 300 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Dahlin, Rasmus
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (BUF)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (BUF)
2.
CHI
  1. Dumoulin, Brian
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (PIT)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (PIT)
PIT
  1. Kane, Patrick (5 000 000 $ retained)
3.
CHI
  1. Monahan, Sean
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (CGY)
CGY
  1. Toews, Jonathan (5 000 000 $ retained)
4.
CHI
  1. Kerfoot, Alexander
  2. Mrázek, Petr
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
5.
CHI
  1. Pacioretty, Max
Détails additionnels:
helps solve vegas cap situation
VGK
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (VGK)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
6.
CHI
  1. Eller, Lars
Détails additionnels:
For cap space
WSH
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2023 (CHI)
7.
CHI
  1. Killorn, Alex
Détails additionnels:
For cap space
TBL
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (CHI)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (CHI)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Frais appliqués
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de BUF
Logo de PIT
Logo de CHI
Logo de MIN
Logo de EDM
Logo de CHI
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CHI
2023
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de CGY
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de BUF
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2024
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de CHI
Logo de PIT
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CGY
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2282 500 000 $86 655 128 $237 500 $1 307 500 $-4 155 128 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 300 000 $3 300 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 4
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 200 000 $4 200 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 415 000 $2 415 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
758 333 $758 333 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
AD, C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
758 333 $758 333 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
750 000 $750 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
867 500 $867 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
UFA - 1
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
975 000 $975 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
24 juin 2022 à 20 h 24
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,279
Mentions "j'aime": 4,924
I don't think there's any realistic circumstance BUF would trade Dahlin
Gmonwy et gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
24 juin 2022 à 20 h 24
#2
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 18,263
Mentions "j'aime": 10,607
I doubt Buffalo does that
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
24 juin 2022 à 20 h 24
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 286
Mentions "j'aime": 104
Pens agree in record time.
24 juin 2022 à 20 h 33
#4
Owly
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 4,559
Mentions "j'aime": 932
I would say Kerfoot is beyond enough of a sweetener to move Mrazek. You're asking the Leafs to send a 2nd, a goalie who has been above average for 300 NHL games and a very good middle 6 forward for a 3rd pair defenceman making 4 million a year. This is very 1 sided. I'd wager Kerfoot and Mrazek in a package nets an okay return. Not this.
24 juin 2022 à 20 h 44
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 5,715
Mentions "j'aime": 4,783
So Dahlin and the 9th pick, yeah that ain't happening
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
24 juin 2022 à 21 h 50
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 417
Mentions "j'aime": 162
That Buffalo trade gets shot to the moon.
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
24 juin 2022 à 22 h 17
#7
Démarrer sujet
hawkman
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 686
Mentions "j'aime": 112
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
I would say Kerfoot is beyond enough of a sweetener to move Mrazek. You're asking the Leafs to send a 2nd, a goalie who has been above average for 300 NHL games and a very good middle 6 forward for a 3rd pair defenceman making 4 million a year. This is very 1 sided. I'd wager Kerfoot and Mrazek in a package nets an okay return. Not this.


If Mrazek had one year left i would agree but he has 2 yrs left . Show me a middle of the pack backup goalie that makes 3.8 million .Dubas f up getting him from Carolina he has had one year of at least at least a .915 save percentage ( STARTER SAVE PERCENTAGE ) IN HIS LAST 6 YRS . He has not played more then 40 games in a season in the last 6 years more proof that he is a backup . The only decent season he has had in the last 6 yrs he played 12 games in 2021 and had a .923 save percentage playing behind one of the best defences in the nhl . And the .923 is only spaced out over 12 games so it does ot mean much . Mcabe is a decent 4-5 dman, Consider it a 1 for 1 kerfoot for mcabe and the 2nd to is to eat 2 yrs of a crappy contract for a backup goalie . You do realize he had a .888 sa percentage this year .
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
24 juin 2022 à 23 h 56
#8
Owly
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 4,559
Mentions "j'aime": 932
Quoting: babouie
If Mrazek had one year left i would agree but he has 2 yrs left . Show me a middle of the pack backup goalie that makes 3.8 million .Dubas f up getting him from Carolina he has had one year of at least at least a .915 save percentage ( STARTER SAVE PERCENTAGE ) IN HIS LAST 6 YRS . He has not played more then 40 games in a season in the last 6 years more proof that he is a backup . The only decent season he has had in the last 6 yrs he played 12 games in 2021 and had a .923 save percentage playing behind one of the best defences in the nhl . And the .923 is only spaced out over 12 games so it does ot mean much . Mcabe is a decent 4-5 dman, Consider it a 1 for 1 kerfoot for mcabe and the 2nd to is to eat 2 yrs of a crappy contract for a backup goalie . You do realize he had a .888 sa percentage this year .


GM's aren't silly fans who justify their stance off cherry picked stats. They see a body of work and have scouts who get way more info than anyone here will see. And then they make a decision. Mrazek isn't trash, he had a rough injury plagued season. And this summer's goalie market is paper thin.
25 juin 2022 à 1 h 11
#9
Démarrer sujet
hawkman
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 686
Mentions "j'aime": 112
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
GM's aren't silly fans who justify their stance off cherry picked stats. They see a body of work and have scouts who get way more info than anyone here will see. And then they make a decision. Mrazek isn't trash, he had a rough injury plagued season. And this summer's goalie market is paper thin.


He has had 6 bad years in a row . Look at the difference in sa percentage between him and Campbell playing behind the same defence this year in Toronto . And their is nothing cherry picked about his stats in the last 6 years .
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
25 juin 2022 à 6 h 39
#10
Owly
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 4,559
Mentions "j'aime": 932
Quoting: babouie
He has had 6 bad years in a row . Look at the difference in sa percentage between him and Campbell playing behind the same defence this year in Toronto . And their is nothing cherry picked about his stats in the last 6 years .


That is blatantly false. You're just making up a narrative to prove points that aren't real.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage