Forums/Armchair-GM

one for one

Créé par: NoWah49
Date de création initiale: 24 juin 2022
Publié: 24 juin 2022
Équipe: 2022-23 Flames de Calgary
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
Necas, Martin13 500 000 $
Tkachuk, Matthew610 000 000 $
Kubalik, Dominik33 000 000 $
Ruzicka, Adam2900 000 $
Kylington, Oliver54 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
Marchment, Mason23 500 000 $
Gudbranson, Erik1900 000 $
Nichushkin, Valeri66 250 000 $
Lewis, Trevor1900 000 $
Transactions
1.
CGY
  1. Necas, Martin [Droits de RFA]
CAR
  1. Mangiapane, Andrew [Droits de RFA]
2.
CGY
  1. 2023 3e round pick (CGY)
high risk high reward
SEA
  1. Monahan, Sean
3.
CGY
  1. Kubalik, Dominik [Droits de RFA]
CHI
  1. Dubé, Dillon
ANNÉE DE REPÊCHAGERONDE 1RONDE 2RONDE 3RONDE 4RONDE 5RONDE 6RONDE 7
2022
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2023
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2024
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2282 500 000 $81 536 666 $0 $215 000 $963 334 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de CGY
Tkachuk, Matthew
10 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 8
Logo de CGY
Lindholm, Elias
4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Kubalik, Dominik
3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Nichushkin, Valeri
6 250 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 8
Necas, Martin
3 500 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de CGY
Toffoli, Tyler
4 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Marchment, Mason
3 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de CGY
Backlund, Mikael
5 350 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de CGY
Coleman, Blake
4 900 000 $
AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de CGY
Lucic, Milan
5 250 000 $
AG
NMC NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de CGY
Ruzicka, Adam
900 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de CGY
Lewis, Trevor
900 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de CGY
Hanifin, Noah
4 950 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de CGY
Andersson, Rasmus
4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de CGY
Markström, Jacob
6 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de CGY
Kylington, Oliver
4 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de CGY
Tanev, Christopher
4 500 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de CGY
Vladar, Daniel
750 000 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de CGY
Välimäki, Juuso
1 550 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de CGY
Gudbranson, Erik
900 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 4
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de CGY
Pelletier, Jakob
863 333 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de CGY
Poirier, Jérémie
823 333 $
DG
RFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
24 juin à 16 h 30
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 9,214
Mentions "j'aime": 8,567
canes need to add a fair bit
NoWah49 a aimé ceci.
24 juin à 17 h 11
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 13,101
Mentions "j'aime": 3,290
I don't like this from a Canes standpoint and I cannot tell you why at all because all logic points to this working.
palhal et NoWah49 a aimé ceci.
24 juin à 17 h 16
#3
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 47,317
Mentions "j'aime": 15,974
Quoting: Caniac2000
I don't like this from a Canes standpoint and I cannot tell you why at all because all logic points to this working.


Actually it's the time of trade that might work. Canes get the more expensive player...but probably goal certainly. Flames get a needed cheaper player, with more controllable years though he may/may not be as good as in the short term.

IMO Monahan is going to cost a sweetener to move. He really does nothing for a non playoff team with cap.
24 juin à 17 h 22
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 13,101
Mentions "j'aime": 3,290
Quoting: palhal
Actually it's the time of trade that might work. Canes get the more expensive player...but probably goal certainly. Flames get a needed cheaper player, with more controllable years though he may/may not be as good as in the short term.

IMO Monahan is going to cost a sweetener to move. He really does nothing for a non playoff team with cap.


Exactly. Logic points to it making sense, but when I think of losing Necas and the return is Mangiapane... I cannot tell you why, but it's kind of underwhelming. I know it shouldn't be but that kind of disappointed feeling sets in
palhal a aimé ceci.
24 juin à 17 h 31
#5
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 47,317
Mentions "j'aime": 15,974
Quoting: Caniac2000
Exactly. Logic points to it making sense, but when I think of losing Necas and the return is Mangiapane... I cannot tell you why, but it's kind of underwhelming. I know it shouldn't be but that kind of disappointed feeling sets in


Well here's the thing. Mangiapaine had just 15 more points than Necas last season. Mangi is eligible for arbitration and a signed contract might cost 5m X. 4 year for this 26 year old You probably get 23 year old Necas on 3.0m X 3 deal and then have one more year of control. For three years the Canes save 2m in cap, hopefully three years of growth (compared to Mangi).
24 juin à 19 h 52
#6
Check it yo!
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 206
Mentions "j'aime": 8
One of the better proposals I have seem, despite losing a great player in Mangi
NoWah49 a aimé ceci.
24 juin à 20 h 59
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 5,052
Mentions "j'aime": 2,534
Quoting: Caniac2000
Exactly. Logic points to it making sense, but when I think of losing Necas and the return is Mangiapane... I cannot tell you why, but it's kind of underwhelming. I know it shouldn't be but that kind of disappointed feeling sets in


I think there’s a couple things that play into it bc I feel very similar to what you feel. This trade should be and probably is pretty good (maybe add minor stuff but the bones are there).

Main thing for me is I get a Lindholm type feeling this whole time the Necas rumors have been ongoing. I just see him thriving wherever he goes and I hate to lose him even tho maybe he’s run his course here for various reasons. The lindholm trade worked out for us but would’ve been sweet to have him pan out the way he has for Calgary. Wonder what we’d look like now.

The other piece is it doesn’t really solve our top 6 scoring. Mang would fit great and think he’d be a consistent option but he’s not a pure goal scorer which is what we’re missing. So if this is a move it can’t be the only move - I see it as more of a Nino replacement and upgrade. We’re also losing a couple mill in cap space on a deal like this which isn’t ideal.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage