Forums/Armchair-GM

Yotes 2022

Créé par: MMXD
Date de création initiale: 24 juin 2022
Publié: 24 juin 2022
Équipe: 2022-23 Coyotes de l'Arizona
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
Hayton, Barrett22 500 000 $
Dineen, Cam2900 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
Strålman, Anton12 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
ARI
  1. Björnfot, Tobias
  2. Turcotte, Alex
  3. 2022 1e round pick (LAK)
  4. 2023 1e round pick (LAK)
LAK
  1. Chychrun, Jakob
2.
ARI
  1. 2023 2e round pick (PIT)
  2. 2024 2e round pick (PIT)
PIT
  1. Crouse, Lawson [Droits de RFA]
3.
ARI
  1. Myers, Tyler
  2. 2023 2e round pick (VAN)
  3. 2023 3e round pick (VAN)
VAN
  1. Capobianco, Kyle [Droits de RFA]
4.
ARI
  1. 2023 1e round pick (CAR)
CAR
  1. Gostisbehere, Shayne (2 250 000 $ retained)
5.
ARI
  1. Khudobin, Anton
DAL
  1. 2023 4e round pick (ARI)
6.
ARI
  1. Klefbom, Oscar
EDM
  1. Fischer, Christian [Droits de RFA]
7.
ARI
  1. Hörnqvist, Patric
  2. Noel, Serron
  3. 2023 4e round pick (FLA)
FLA
  1. 2023 6e round pick (ARI)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
  • Shayne Gostisbehere: 2 250 000 $ (50%)
  • Oliver Ekman-Larsson: 990 000 $ (12%)
ANNÉE DE REPÊCHAGERONDE 1RONDE 2RONDE 3RONDE 4RONDE 5RONDE 6RONDE 7
2022
Logo de ARI
Logo de CAR
Logo de COL
Logo de LAK
Logo de ARI
Logo de NYI
Logo de PHI
Logo de SJS
Logo de ARI
Logo de ARI
Logo de ARI
2023
Logo de ARI
Logo de LAK
Logo de CAR
Logo de ARI
Logo de PIT
Logo de VAN
Logo de ARI
Logo de DAL
Logo de WSH
Logo de VAN
Logo de FLA
Logo de ARI
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de ARI
Logo de ARI
Logo de FLA
Logo de MTL
Logo de PIT
Logo de ARI
Logo de ARI
Logo de SJS
Logo de ARI
Logo de ARI
Logo de ARI
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $68 147 834 $0 $4 895 000 $14 352 166 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de ARI
Keller, Clayton
7 150 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 6
Logo de ARI
Schmaltz, Nick
5 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de ARI
Guenther, Dylan
894 167 $
AD
RFA - 3
Logo de ARI
Ritchie, Nick
2 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de ARI
Hayton, Barrett
2 500 000 $
C, AG
RFA
Logo de ARI
Boyd, Travis
1 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de ARI
Maccelli, Matias
853 333 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de ARI
McBain, Jack
883 750 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de ARI
Smith, Nathan
883 750 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de ARI
Ladd, Andrew
5 500 000 $
AG
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de LAK
Turcotte, Alex
894 167 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de FLA
Hörnqvist, Patric
5 300 000 $
AD
NTC
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de ARI
Moser, Janis
886 667 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de VAN
Myers, Tyler
6 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de ARI
Vejmelka, Karel
2 725 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de ARI
Strålman, Anton
2 500 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de ARI
Söderström, Victor
863 333 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de DAL
Khudobin, Anton
3 333 333 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de ARI
Kolyachonok, Vladislav
789 167 $
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de ARI
Timmins, Conor
850 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de ARI
O'Brien, Liam
775 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de ARI
Little, Bryan
5 291 667 $
C, AD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de ARI
Kelemen, Milos
817 500 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de EDM
Klefbom, Oscar
4 167 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de ARI
Mayo, Dysin
950 000 $
DD
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
24 juin à 13 h 23
#1
alwaysnextyear
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 4,541
Mentions "j'aime": 1,028
Canucks likely decline. They're not desperate to dump Myers and they want to add picks.
Knuckl3s a aimé ceci.
24 juin à 13 h 24
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 12,709
Mentions "j'aime": 3,154
No team is paying a 1st for a guy the Coyotes got as a cap dump
24 juin à 13 h 24
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 2,659
Mentions "j'aime": 693
Quoting: alwaysnextyear
Canucks likely decline. They're not desperate to dump Myers and they want to add picks.


On the contrary. Seen numerous reports of them actively trying to get rid of big contracts like Myers, OEL and even Garland. Must be done to retain Miller and Boeser, and Myers is the easiest to move out so.
24 juin à 13 h 25
#4
Sign Tanger
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 1,385
Mentions "j'aime": 708
I’d accept, though I highly doubt Hextall blows all 3 seconds for the next 3 years so it probably doesn’t happen.
24 juin à 13 h 26
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 2,659
Mentions "j'aime": 693
Quoting: Caniac2000
No team is paying a 1st for a guy the Coyotes got as a cap dump


Funny, because he had a great year this year. He's well worth a high pick based on his season, plus retention. Ghost was a cap dump because Fletcher is incompetent. Traded the dude with two firsts then turned around and acquired a worse player with a first.

Not to mention, this year Ghost put up 51 points... on the coyotes... Imagine what he could do with Carolina.
24 juin à 13 h 27
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 2,659
Mentions "j'aime": 693
Quoting: Pensman69
I’d accept, though I highly doubt Hextall blows all 3 seconds for the next 3 years so it probably doesn’t happen.


I'm on and off. It's similar to a trade I've done before. If Pittsburgh sees a chance to win, and get a young guy on the verge of a breakout, I'd imagine they'd do it.
24 juin à 13 h 28
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 4,621
Mentions "j'aime": 1,475
canes wont move a first for a rental
24 juin à 13 h 30
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 2,659
Mentions "j'aime": 693
Quoting: ecupirate07
canes wont move a first for a rental


I wouldn't put it past them. They're in their window now. Bit different too as its a full year deal, so it's a bit easier to swallow. And with retention, Ghost is worth it.
24 juin à 13 h 33
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 4,621
Mentions "j'aime": 1,475
Quoting: MMXD
I wouldn't put it past them. They're in their window now. Bit different too as its a full year deal, so it's a bit easier to swallow. And with retention, Ghost is worth it.


I would. If Ghost was a 1 year left RFA then sure, he would have control. Canes wouldnt sacrifice their big deadline trade chip for the 1 year of Ghost.
24 juin à 13 h 36
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 2,659
Mentions "j'aime": 693
Quoting: ecupirate07
I would. If Ghost was a 1 year left RFA then sure, he would have control. Canes wouldnt sacrifice their big deadline trade chip for the 1 year of Ghost.


Personally, I still think they may. I think what happens with DeAngelo may also be a contributor too
24 juin à 13 h 39
#11
Canucks Fan... Help
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 193
Mentions "j'aime": 128
Quoting: MMXD
On the contrary. Seen numerous reports of them actively trying to get rid of big contracts like Myers, OEL and even Garland. Must be done to retain Miller and Boeser, and Myers is the easiest to move out so.


They're looking to move them yes, but not to pay to move them, and the reason isn't to retain on those guys.

They are not in a position to do a trade like that, nor do they have to because they currently have 10.5 mil in space to sign Boeser, Lammikko, Highmore, and Rathbone. Then they have a full roster.

Canucks decline for sure.
Knuckl3s a aimé ceci.
24 juin à 13 h 47
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 12,709
Mentions "j'aime": 3,154
Quoting: MMXD
Funny, because he had a great year this year. He's well worth a high pick based on his season, plus retention. Ghost was a cap dump because Fletcher is incompetent. Traded the dude with two firsts then turned around and acquired a worse player with a first.

Not to mention, this year Ghost put up 51 points... on the coyotes... Imagine what he could do with Carolina.


DeAngelo put up 51 points. In 65 games.

Ghost is a good player, but you're not going to see a team giving up a 1st for him even with retention. He is still a defensive nightmare and he is still a powerplay specialist. If he's having success in Arizona, good for him. Giving up a 1st for him as a rental... that's just bad management. A 2nd? Maybe, with retention. 3rd? I could see it. 1st is too high
24 juin à 13 h 48
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 2,659
Mentions "j'aime": 693
Quoting: YesThisIsFlo
They're looking to move them yes, but not to pay to move them, and the reason isn't to retain on those guys.

They are not in a position to do a trade like that, nor do they have to because they currently have 10.5 mil in space to sign Boeser, Lammikko, Highmore, and Rathbone. Then they have a full roster.

Canucks decline for sure.


I didn’t retain. And you’re missing the elephant in the room… Miller, who is up next year. Myers would still be under contract. Better to clear now, extend and make the other moves. No one is gonna pay to take Myers for their hands
24 juin à 13 h 50
#14
alwaysnextyear
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 4,541
Mentions "j'aime": 1,028
Quoting: MMXD
On the contrary. Seen numerous reports of them actively trying to get rid of big contracts like Myers, OEL and even Garland. Must be done to retain Miller and Boeser, and Myers is the easiest to move out so.


I don't think they see Myers as a cap "dump" though. I could see a pick swap with later picks in a Myers deal, but they won't give up a 2nd + to do it.
Knuckl3s a aimé ceci.
24 juin à 13 h 59
#15
Canucks Fan... Help
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 193
Mentions "j'aime": 128
Modifié 24 juin à 14 h 5
Quoting: MMXD
I didn’t retain. And you’re missing the elephant in the room… Miller, who is up next year. Myers would still be under contract. Better to clear now, extend and make the other moves. No one is gonna pay to take Myers for their hands


Oh I see, I misread your previous response. I thought you said retain ON miller and boeser, but you just said retain like keep them. I understand your reasoning, but I just don't see Myers being the guy. RHD is the weakest position on the Canucks, I don't think they're paying to lose their best one. I disagree with the "better to clear now" part, because it would leave a massive hole in the Canucks D-core and honestly essentially tanks their season this year. There's no RHD in UFA, and they would have to trade even more to fill Myers space. If they are committed to make cap room, I would guess it's much more likely the Canucks move a top 6 forward like Boeser, Garland, or Miller out for cap space, and bank on guys like Kuzmenko, Podkolzin, and Hoglander developing and filling the void.

I am also wondering if they actually do need more cap space to retain everyone. If they spend 10 mil on the 4 RFAs I mentioned in the previous post (which seems doable), and those contracts are at least 2 years in length, then the Canucks would have 25 mil (plus any cap rise) to sign Miller, Horvat, Kuzmenko, Hoglander, Dermott, and Schenn. It might be a bit too tight and they might have to trim a couple mil somewhere, but that doesn't sound completely undoable.


Edit: honestly if they're trying to dump anyone, it's Dickinson and/or Poolman. I think they'd pay some picks to get rid of them, but not a 2nd.
Knuckl3s a aimé ceci.
24 juin à 14 h 36
#16
First NY Then LA
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 28,703
Mentions "j'aime": 16,168
I just can't see us trading one of our two NHL-qualified LDs for another, even though Chychrun is clearly much, much more valuable than Bjornfot. Substitute Spence or Grans for Bjornfot and we'd say Yes.
24 juin à 15 h 39
#17
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 2,659
Mentions "j'aime": 693
Quoting: OldNYIfan
I just can't see us trading one of our two NHL-qualified LDs for another, even though Chychrun is clearly much, much more valuable than Bjornfot. Substitute Spence or Grans for Bjornfot and we'd say Yes.


I was so close to doing grans tbh
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
24 juin à 16 h 35
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,068
Mentions "j'aime": 244
I don't see LA trading two 1st's. I can see Iafallo being included instead since AZ needs to get the cap floor.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
25 juin à 1 h 3
#19
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 2,659
Mentions "j'aime": 693
Quoting: kingsfaninSD
I don't see LA trading two 1st's. I can see Iafallo being included instead since AZ needs to get the cap floor.


Really would not want Iafallo, too many forwards in the system, and I filled the cap issue with far worse players (the plan). Iafallo doesn’t really fit the plan moving forward with his contract. I would be willing to drop the first to a lower pick or a second prospect but not Iafallo.
25 juin à 11 h 9
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,068
Mentions "j'aime": 244
Quoting: MMXD
Really would not want Iafallo, too many forwards in the system, and I filled the cap issue with far worse players (the plan). Iafallo doesn’t really fit the plan moving forward with his contract. I would be willing to drop the first to a lower pick or a second prospect but not Iafallo.


I don't see Myers waiving to go to AZ.
25 juin à 12 h 28
#21
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 2,659
Mentions "j'aime": 693
Quoting: kingsfaninSD
I don't see Myers waiving to go to AZ.


Very well could. Players value playing time, no one can offer more than Arizona would
26 juin à 12 h 7
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,068
Mentions "j'aime": 244
Quoting: MMXD
Very well could. Players value playing time, no one can offer more than Arizona would


Players also will take less money to try and win a cup. I don't see AZ being a place players want to play the next few years.
26 juin à 18 h 11
#23
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 2,659
Mentions "j'aime": 693
Quoting: kingsfaninSD
Players also will take less money to try and win a cup. I don't see AZ being a place players want to play the next few years.


Well, Myers doesn't really have that take less to win. Arizona has been able to bring in quite a few guys to sign deals with term. No competing team is going to take Myers, and Arizona can pull the Hall and Buffalo with the retention game to move him elsewhere. Always other factors
26 juin à 18 h 19
#24
Canucks...
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 9,185
Mentions "j'aime": 2,035
Quoting: alwaysnextyear
Canucks likely decline. They're not desperate to dump Myers and they want to add picks.


I 2nd this
26 juin à 18 h 26
#25
Canucks...
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 9,185
Mentions "j'aime": 2,035
Quoting: YesThisIsFlo
Oh I see, I misread your previous response. I thought you said retain ON miller and boeser, but you just said retain like keep them. I understand your reasoning, but I just don't see Myers being the guy. RHD is the weakest position on the Canucks, I don't think they're paying to lose their best one. I disagree with the "better to clear now" part, because it would leave a massive hole in the Canucks D-core and honestly essentially tanks their season this year. There's no RHD in UFA, and they would have to trade even more to fill Myers space. If they are committed to make cap room, I would guess it's much more likely the Canucks move a top 6 forward like Boeser, Garland, or Miller out for cap space, and bank on guys like Kuzmenko, Podkolzin, and Hoglander developing and filling the void.

I am also wondering if they actually do need more cap space to retain everyone. If they spend 10 mil on the 4 RFAs I mentioned in the previous post (which seems doable), and those contracts are at least 2 years in length, then the Canucks would have 25 mil (plus any cap rise) to sign Miller, Horvat, Kuzmenko, Hoglander, Dermott, and Schenn. It might be a bit too tight and they might have to trim a couple mil somewhere, but that doesn't sound completely undoable.


Edit: honestly if they're trying to dump anyone, it's Dickinson and/or Poolman. I think they'd pay some picks to get rid of them, but not a 2nd.


Canucks aren't paying anything to dump Poolman, the new regime doesn't see him as a negative asset EVEN when he's healthy. The most I can see the Canucks paying to unload Dickinson is a 4th
YesThisIsFlo a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Supprimer une option
Soumettre le sondage