SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Mock-Draft

The True Final Rankings (3 rounds!!!!)

The True Final Rankings (3 rounds!!!!)

Cuvée de repêchage: 2022
Créé par: Z0ra
Publié: 23 juin 2022 à 11 h 35
Description
This will be my final ranking post before draft day. Later sometime in July, I will have another mock draft released. There have been a lot of rumors and speculation since the Combine and World Championship and it changed my opinion on who some teams would take.

But for now, here are my rankings, any feedback is appreciated.
RONDE 1ÉQUIPEORIGINALJOUEURDéTAILS
1Logo de Canadiens de Montréal-Projection: Top Line Center Player Type: Two-Way Forward Pros: Defensive Consistency, Shot, Playmaking, Hockey IQ, Skating Cons: Offensive Consistency Readiness: NHL Ready Comparable: Jonathan Toews
2Logo de Devils du New Jersey-Projection: Top Line Center Player Type: Two-Way Forward Pros: Skating, Playmaking, 200-ft Game, Two-Way Cons: Size Readiness: NHL Ready Comparable: Brayden Point
3Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona-Projection: Top Defenseman Player Type: Two-Way Defenseman Pros: Skating, Hockey IQ, Shot Blocking, Two-Way Cons: Shot Variety, O-Zone Pinch Readiness: 1 Year Comparable: Miro Heiskanen
4Logo de Kraken de Seattle-Projection: Top Defenseman Player Type: Two-Way Defenseman Pros: Size, Shot, O-Zone Intelligence, Defensive Option, Skating Cons: Health Concerns, Emotional Readiness: 1 Year Comparable: Darnell Nurse
5Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie-Projection: Top Line C/RW Player Type: Playmaker Pros: Playmaking, Goal-Scoring, Skating, Creativity, Hockey IQ Cons: Size, Physicality Readiness: 1 Year Comparable: Nikolaj Ehlers
6Logo de Blue Jackets de ColumbusLogo de Blackhawks de ChicagoProjection: Top Line LW Player Type: Power Forward Pros: Size, Shot, Playmaking, Compete Level Cons: Skating, Consistency Readiness: 1 Year Comparable: Blake Wheeler
7Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa-Projection: Top 6 RW Player Type: Sniper Pros: Goal-Scoring, Playmaking, Skating, Hockey Sense Cons: Defensive Effort, Health Concerns Readiness: 1 Year Comparable: David Pastrnak
8Logo de Red Wings de Detroit-Projection: Top 6 C/RW Player Type: Playmaker Pros: Effort, Playmaking, Goal-Scoring, Skating, Hockey Sense Cons: Small Frame Readiness: 1 Year Comparable: Mitch Marner
9Logo de Sabres de Buffalo-Projection: Top 6 RW Player Type: Sniper Pros: NHL-Ready Shot, Playmaking, Vision, Skating, Puck Handling Cons: Defensive Consistency Readiness: 1 Year Comparable: Kyle Connor
10Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim-Projection: Top 6 LW/C Player Type: Power Forward Pros: NHL-Ready Shot, NHL-Ready Skating, Defensive Option, Size Cons: Offensive Consistency, Needs to Bulk Up Readiness: 2 Years Comparable: Matt Duchene
11Logo de Sharks de San Jose-Projection: Top 6 Center Player Type: Power Forward Pros: Two-Way, Bulky, Net Front Menace, 200-ft Game Cons: Needs to Grow More, Agility, Discipline Readiness: 2 Years Comparable: Blake Coleman
12Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus-Projection: Top 6 RW Player Type: Power Forward Pros: Two-Way, Aggressiveness, Shot, Hockey IQ Cons: Agility, Small Ice Time Readiness: 1 Year Comparable: Pavel Buchnevich
13Logo de Islanders de New York-Projection: Top 6 RW Player Type: Playmaker Pros: Skating, Playmaking, Hockey Sense, Puck Handling Cons: Offensive Consistency, Boom or Bust Readiness: 1 Year Comparable: Mikko Rantanen
14Logo de Jets de Winnipeg-Projection: 2nd, 3rd Defenseman Player Type: Two-Way Defenseman Pros: Hockey IQ, Skating, Positioning, Two-Way Cons: Decision Making, Small Readiness: 2 Years Comparable: Mattias Ekholm
15Logo de Canucks de Vancouver-Projection: 2nd, 3rd Defenseman Player Type: Two-Way Defenseman Pros: O-Zone Pinch, Calmness, Size Utilization, Defensive Option Cons: Shot Accuracy Readiness: 2 Years Comparable: Ivan Provorov
16Logo de Sabres de BuffaloLogo de Golden Knights de VegasProjection: 2nd, 3rd Defenseman Player Type: Offensive Defenseman Pros: Power Play Option, Offensive Smarts, Skating, Size Utilization Cons: Offensive Consistency, Shot Power Readiness: 2 Years Comparable: Cale Makar
17Logo de Predators de Nashville-Projection: Top 6 LW Player Type: Playmaker Pros: Goal-Scoring, Playmaking, Skating, Compete Level Cons: Defensive Decision Making Readiness: 2 Years Comparable: Filip Zadina
18Logo de Stars de Dallas-Projection: Top 6 Center Player Type: Power Forward Pros: Size, Shot, Offensive Awareness, Rangy Cons: Skating, Balance, Boom or Bust Readiness: 3 Years Comparable: Ryan Getzlaf
19Logo de Kings de Los Angeles-Projection: Top 6 Center Player Type: Playmaker Pros: Playmaking, Shot, Skating, 200-ft Game Cons: Size, Physicality Readiness: 2 Years Comparable: Patrick Kane
20Logo de Capitals de Washington-Projection: 2nd, 3rd Defenseman Player Type: Two-Way Defenseman Pros: Hockey IQ, NHL-Ready Poise, Skating, Offensive Option Cons: Size Readiness: 2 Years Comparable: Jared Spurgeon
21Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh-Projection: Top 6 LW Player Type: Sniper Pros: NHL-Ready Shot, Physicality, Skating, O-Zone Pinch Cons: Consistency, Major Health Concerns, Defensive Effort Readiness: 5+ Years Comparable: Alex Ovechkin
22Logo de Ducks d'AnaheimLogo de Bruins de BostonProjection: No. 2 Right Wing Player Type: Playmaker Pros: NHL-Ready Passing, Skating, Dominant Point Production, Highlight-Reel Ability Cons: Size, Shot Variety Readiness: 2 Years Comparable: Marco Rossi
23Logo de Blues de St-Louis-Projection: No. 2 Center Player Type: Sniper Pros: Shot, Two-Way, Puck Protecting, Compete Level, Size Utilization Cons: Weak Competition, Defensive Consistency Readiness: 3 Years Comparable: Auston Matthews
24Logo de Wild du Minnesota-Projection: No. 2 Center Player Type: Two-Way Forward Pros: Two-Way, Consistency, Hockey IQ, Vision, Skating Cons: Physicality, 1 on 1 Battles Readiness: 1 Year Comparable: Ryan O’Rielly
25Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto-Projection: No. 2 Center Player Type: Playmaking Pros: Skating, Playmaking, Offensive Skill, Puck Handling Cons: Defensive Effort Readiness: 1 Year Comparable: Mark Schiefele
26Logo de Canadiens de MontréalLogo de Flames de CalgaryProjection: No. 2 Right Winger Player Type: Playmaker Pros: Playmaking, Compete Level, Skating, Puck Handling Cons: Weak Competition, Physicality Readiness: 3 Years Comparable: Niklas Backstrom
27Logo de Coyotes de l'ArizonaLogo de Hurricanes de la CarolineProjection: No. 2 Right Winger Player Type: Sniper Pros: Dominant Point Production, Coolest Name, Goal-Scoring, Skating Cons: Size, Physicality Readiness: 2 Years Comparable: Cam Atkinson
28Logo de Sabres de BuffaloLogo de Panthers de la FlorideProjection: 3rd, 4th Defenseman Player Type: Defensive Defenseman Pros: Defensive Smarts, Gap Control, Skating, Bulky Cons: Offensive Effort, Discipline Readiness: 3 Years Comparable: Ryan Suter
29Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton-Player Projection: 3rd, 4th Defenseman Player Type: Offensive Defenseman Pros: NHL-Ready Puck Protecting, Skating, Shot, 200-ft Game Cons: Small, Needs to Bulk Up Readiness: 5 Years Comparable: Quinn Hughes
30Logo de Jets de WinnipegLogo de Rangers de New YorkProjection: 3rd, 4th Defenseman Player Type: Offensive Defenseman Pros: NHL-Ready Skating, Shot, Intelligence, Maturity, Puck Handling Cons: Defensive Consistency, Size, Boom or Bust Readiness: 4 Years Comparable: Quinn Hughes
31Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay-Projection: No. 2 Right Winger/Center Player Type: Playmaker Pros: Playmaking, Defensive Smarts, Compete Level, Neutral Zone Play Cons: Project Pick, Faceoffs Readiness: 5+ Years Comparable: Anze Kopitar
32Logo de Coyotes de l'ArizonaLogo de Avalanche du ColoradoProjection: No. 2 Right Winger Player Type: Two-Way Forward Pros: NHL-Ready Leadership, Two-Way, Hockey IQ, Intelligence Cons: Puck Handling, Explosiveness Readiness: 2 Years Comparable: Henrik Zetterberg
RONDE 2ÉQUIPEORIGINALJOUEURDéTAILS
33Logo de Canadiens de Montréal-Projection: 3rd, 4th Defenseman Player Type: Defensive Defenseman Pros: Size, Skating, Defensive Smarts, Puck Protecting Cons: Defensive Decision Making, Offensive Upside Readiness: 3 Years Comparable: Ryan Suter
34Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona-Projection: Middle Pair Defenseman Player Type: Two-Way Defenseman Pros: Big Frame, Skating, Offensive Smarts, Gap Control, Shot Cons: Project Pick, Needs to Bulk Up Readiness: 4 Years Comparable: Brent Burns
35Logo de Kraken de Seattle-Projection: No. 2 Right Winger Pros: Two-Way, Consistency, 200-Ft Game, Skating Cons: Second Draft Year Readiness: NHL Ready Comparable: Evgeny Kuznetsov
36Logo de Coyotes de l'ArizonaLogo de Flyers de PhiladelphieProjection: Middle-Pair Defenseman Player Type: Two-Way Forward Pros: Big Frame, Playmaking, Hockey IQ, Poise Cons: Explosiveness, Needs to Bulk Up Readiness: 2 Years Comparable: Ivan Provorov
37Logo de Devils du New Jersey-Projection: Middle Pair Defenseman Player Type: Two-Way Defenseman Pros: Skating, Size, Shot, Defensive Smarts Cons: Discipline, Puck Handling Readiness: 2 Years Comparable: Nick Leddy
38Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago-Projection: Middle Pair Defenseman Player Type: Two-Way Defenseman Pros: Playmaking, Skating, Discipline, Gap Control, Defensive Smarts Cons: Shot Accuracy, Project Pick Readiness: 5+ Years Comparable: Jake Sanderson
39Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa-
Lucas Edmonds
Projection: 2nd, 3rd Right Winger Player Type: Playmaker Pros: Playmaking, Highlight-Reel Ability, Offensive Consistency, Effort Cons: Fourth-Year Draft Eligible Readiness: NHL Ready Comparable: Claude Giroux
40Logo de Red Wings de Detroit-Projection: 2nd, 3rd Center Player Type: Power Forward Pros: Size Utilization, Shot, Puck Handling, Faceoffs Cons: Skating, Discipline, Offensive Consistency Readiness: 3 Years Comparable: Anze Kopitar
41Logo de Sabres de Buffalo-Projection: Middle Pair Defenseman Player Type: Two-Way Defenseman Pros: Vision, Poise, Size, Skating, Defensive Awareness Cons: Weak Competition, Boom or Bust, Decision Making Readiness: 5 Years Comparable: Erik Johnson
42Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim-Projection: Middle Pair Defenseman Player Type: Offensive Defenseman Pros: Playmaking, Hockey Sense, Skating, Compete Level Cons: Defensive Positioning, Lack of Physicality Readiness: 3 Years Comparable: Jake Bean
43Logo de Coyotes de l'ArizonaLogo de Sharks de San JoseProjection: Middle 6 Forward Player Type: Playmaker Pros: Highlight-Reel Ability, Shot, Skating, Hockey Sense Cons: Defensive Consistency, Lack of Production Readiness: 2 Years Comparable: Trevor Zegras
44Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus-Projection: No. 2 Center Player Type: Playmaker Pros: Fluid Skater, Offensive Smarts, Puck Protecting, Transition Between Plays Cons: Small, Stamina, Lack of Physicality Readiness: 3 Years Comparable: Jack Hughes
45Logo de Coyotes de l'ArizonaLogo de Islanders de New YorkProjection: No. 2 Winger Player Type: Playmaker Pros: Playmaker, Compete Level, Hockey Sense, Skating Cons: Physicality, Stamina, Size Readiness: 3 Years Comparable: Cam Atkinson
46Logo de Capitals de WashingtonLogo de Jets de WinnipegProjection: Middle Pair Defenseman Player Type: Offensive Defenseman Pros: O-Zone Pinch, Long-Range Shot, Hockey IQ, Offensive Upside Cons: Defensive Consistency, Lack of Production Readiness: 4 Years Comparable: Erik Karlsson
47Logo de Wild du MinnesotaLogo de Canucks de VancouverProjection: No. 3 Center Player Type: Two-Way Forward Pros: Playmaking, Skating, 200-ft Game, Vision, Two-Way, NHL Bloodlines Cons: Upside Concerns, Shot Utilization, Needs to Bulk Up Readiness: 5 Years Comparable: David Krejci
48Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas-Projection: No. 3 Center Player Type: Power Forward Pros: Size, Shot, Skating, Vision, Puck Protecting Cons: Playmaking, Defensive Consistency Readiness: 3 Years Comparable: Eric Staal
49Logo de Kraken de SeattleLogo de Predators de Nashville
Christian Kyrou
Projection: Middle Pair Defenseman Player Type: Offensive Defenseman Pros: NHL-Ready Skating, Poise, Puck Control, Bulky Despite Size, NHL Bloodlines Cons: Small, Defense, Lack of Physicality Readiness: 2 Years Comparable: Brandt Clarke
50Logo de Stars de Dallas-Projection: No. 3 Right Winger Player Type: Sniper Pros: NHL-Ready Size, Hockey IQ, Shot, Puck Handling Cons: Upside, Discipline, Sandpaper Readiness: 5+ Years Comparable: Patrik Laine
51Logo de Kings de Los Angeles-Projection: No. 3 Center Player Type: Playmaker Pros: Playmaking, Shot, Skating, Maturity, Hockey IQ Cons: Balance, Defensive Positioning, Lack of Production Readiness: 4 Years Comparable: Vincent Lecavalier
52Logo de Red Wings de DetroitLogo de Capitals de WashingtonProjection: Low Elite Goaltender Player Type: Hybrid Pros: NHL-Ready Size, Athleticism, Poise, Positioning, Puck Handling Cons: Lack of Aggressiveness, Rebound Control Consistency Readiness: 4 Years Comparable: Ben Bishop
53Logo de Ducks d'AnaheimLogo de Penguins de PittsburghProjection: Low Elite Goalie Player Type: Hybrid Pros: NHL-Ready Athleticism, Angles, Glove Saves, Speed Cons: Project Pick, Small, Puck Handling Readiness: 5+ Years Comparable: Juuse Saros
54Logo de Bruins de Boston-Projection: Low Elite Goalie Player Type: Butterfly Pros: NHL-Ready Size, Plays Down Low, Angles, Positioning Cons: Consistency, Speed, Rebound Control Readiness: 5 Years Comparable: Elvis Merzlikins
55Logo de Jets de WinnipegLogo de Blues de St-LouisProjection: No. 3 Right Winger Player Type: Power Forward Pros: NHL-Ready Size, Close Quarters Menace, Shot, Puck Protector Cons: Sandpaper, Late Riser Readiness: 2 Years Comparable: Jonathan Huberdeau
56Logo de Wild du Minnesota-Projection: Middle Pair Defenseman Player Type: Two-Way Defenseman Pros: Poise, Skating, Playmaking, Defensive Smarts Cons: Project Pick, Offensive Consistency, Physicality Readiness: 4 Years Comparable: Simon Edvinsson
57Logo de Blackhawks de ChicagoLogo de Wild du MinnesotaProjection: No. 3 LW/RW Player Type: Playmaker Pros: NHL-Ready Frame, Skating, Playmaking, Offensive Consistency Cons: Defensive Consistency, Shies Away from Finishing Plays Readiness: 3 Years Comparable: Mikko Rantanen
58Logo de Kraken de SeattleLogo de Maple Leafs de TorontoProjection: No. 3 Right Wing Player Type: Playmaker Pros: Playmaking, Compete Level, Shot, Hockey Sense, Skating, Bloodlines Cons: Consistency, Defensive Effort, Health Concerns Readiness: 4 Years Comparable: Brock Boeser
59Logo de Flames de Calgary-Projection: No. 3 Right Wing Player Type: Playmaker Pros: Playmaking, Hockey IQ, Skating, Offensive Awareness Cons: Weak Shot, Stamina Readiness: 3 Years Comparable: Alex DeBrincat
60Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline-Projection: Middle Pair Defenseman Player Type: Defensive Defenseman Pros: NHL-Ready Size, Defensive Smarts, Skating, Puck Handling Cons: Project Pick, Shot Power, Offensive Consistency Readiness: 5 Years Comparable: Drew Doughty
61Logo de Kraken de SeattleLogo de Panthers de la FlorideProjection: No. 3 C/LW Player Type: Sniper Pros: Goal-Scoring, Compete Level, Skating, Hockey Sense Cons: Defensive Smarts, Explosiveness Readiness: 3 Years Comparable: Patrik Laine
62Logo de Canadiens de MontréalLogo de Oilers d'EdmontonProjection: No. 3 Center Player Type: Two-Way Forward Pros: Future Leader, 200-ft Game, Offensive Smarts, Vision Cons: Weak Frame, Stamina, Lack of Physicality Readiness: 3 Years Comparable: Bryan Little
63Logo de Rangers de New York-Player Projection: No. 3 Left Winger Player Type: Two-Way Forward Pros: Future Leader, Superstar Production Rate, 200-ft Game, Two-Way, Offensive Smarts Cons: Emotional, Weak Frame, Physicality, Weak Competition Readiness: 5 Years Comparable: Brad Marchand
64Logo de Sénateurs d'OttawaLogo de Lightning de Tampa BayPlayer Projection: Middle Pair Defenseman Player Type: Offensive Defenseman Pros: Compete Level, Offensive Smarts, Skating, Power Play Cons: Size, Physicality, Late Riser Readiness: 5+ Years Comparable: Torey Krug
65Logo de Islanders de New YorkLogo de Avalanche du ColoradoProjection: High Potential Starter Player Type: Hybrid Pros: Lateral Movement, Compete Level, Makes Saves Thru Screens, Glove Saves Cons: Size, Improper Angles Readiness: 4 Years Comparable: Juuse Saros
23 juin 2022 à 11 h 37
#1
power forward
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,930
Mentions "j'aime": 603
23 juin 2022 à 11 h 37
#2
Démarrer sujet
power forward
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,930
Mentions "j'aime": 603
BruinsFan35 et Zinger a aimé ceci.
23 juin 2022 à 11 h 37
#3
Démarrer sujet
power forward
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,930
Mentions "j'aime": 603
23 juin 2022 à 11 h 37
#4
Démarrer sujet
power forward
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,930
Mentions "j'aime": 603
Playersoverpayed a aimé ceci.
23 juin 2022 à 11 h 37
#5
Démarrer sujet
power forward
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,930
Mentions "j'aime": 603
TheMooterus et BuFfaLOFaN a aimé ceci.
23 juin 2022 à 11 h 38
#6
Démarrer sujet
power forward
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,930
Mentions "j'aime": 603
bunzy1034 a aimé ceci.
23 juin 2022 à 11 h 38
#7
Démarrer sujet
power forward
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,930
Mentions "j'aime": 603
Lenny7 et Saskleaf a aimé ceci.
23 juin 2022 à 11 h 38
#8
Démarrer sujet
power forward
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,930
Mentions "j'aime": 603
23 juin 2022 à 11 h 38
#9
Démarrer sujet
power forward
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,930
Mentions "j'aime": 603
23 juin 2022 à 11 h 38
#10
Démarrer sujet
power forward
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,930
Mentions "j'aime": 603
23 juin 2022 à 11 h 55
#11
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
I feel like you're spot on with Slafkovsky. Someone is going to take him earlier, but that's a high-risk pick.
A_Habs_fan a aimé ceci.
23 juin 2022 à 12 h 1
#12
Démarrer sujet
power forward
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,930
Mentions "j'aime": 603
Quoting: Lenny7
I feel like you're spot on with Slafkovsky. Someone is going to take him earlier, but that's a high-risk pick.


Agreed. The skating is his biggest downfall. I think he's much higher on people's boards because of recency bias, but the skating isn't nowhere near top 5 worthy.
Lenny7, drivet et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
23 juin 2022 à 12 h 15
#13
Evans truther
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 2,506
Mentions "j'aime": 1,434
If the draft goes like this Montreal will be hard pressed to move up either from 26 to get one of Kasper/Kulich (Or secure Ohgren earlier) or from 33 to get one of Chesley/Hutson/Casey.
23 juin 2022 à 12 h 22
#14
Démarrer sujet
power forward
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,930
Mentions "j'aime": 603
Quoting: ColonelX
If the draft goes like this Montreal will be hard pressed to move up either from 26 to get one of Kasper/Kulich (Or secure Ohgren earlier) or from 33 to get one of Chesley/Hutson/Casey.


To clarify, these are just rankings. But I do agree with your take as in my mock draft (spoiler) I have Casey going to Montreal.
ColonelX a aimé ceci.
23 juin 2022 à 12 h 34
#15
Amirov Forever
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 6,521
Mentions "j'aime": 6,016
Cant really see Lamoureux going that late
Z0ra a aimé ceci.
23 juin 2022 à 13 h 26
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,181
Mentions "j'aime": 238
i need someone to interact with this so i can find this again
OldNYIfan et Keaton1117 a aimé ceci.
23 juin 2022 à 14 h 6
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 3,793
Mentions "j'aime": 2,496
Quoting: chaserice
i need someone to interact with this so i can find this again


sup
chaserice et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
23 juin 2022 à 15 h 6
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 9,507
Mentions "j'aime": 6,514
I like the fact that you have 2 NHL ready players in the second round.
Z0ra a aimé ceci.
23 juin 2022 à 15 h 14
#19
Démarrer sujet
power forward
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,930
Mentions "j'aime": 603
Quoting: BuFfaLOFaN
I like the fact that you have 2 NHL ready players in the second round.


They are overagers. Robertson is a second year draft eligible and Edmonds is a fourth-year draft eligible player. Outside the age, both players are flawless.
23 juin 2022 à 15 h 22
#20
Famous Twitter Guy.
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 16
Mentions "j'aime": 6
Bro the Devils aren't drafting Cooley, they already have Hischier and Hughes and their bottom 2 centers could be filled by anyone. A second overall pick on a guy who's going to spend most of his time in the bottom 6 is a waste.
Z0ra a aimé ceci.
23 juin 2022 à 16 h 19
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,067
Mentions "j'aime": 427
Thanks for doing these! Personally i dont see the B's drafting a Goalie - thats one position id say they are comfortable with what they have.
Z0ra a aimé ceci.
23 juin 2022 à 17 h 39
#22
Démarrer sujet
power forward
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,930
Mentions "j'aime": 603
Quoting: JackKanoff
Bro the Devils aren't drafting Cooley, they already have Hischier and Hughes and their bottom 2 centers could be filled by anyone. A second overall pick on a guy who's going to spend most of his time in the bottom 6 is a waste.


This isn't a mock draft. Only player rankings.
JackKanoff et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
23 juin 2022 à 17 h 40
#23
Démarrer sujet
power forward
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,930
Mentions "j'aime": 603
Quoting: Heyhowareya37
Thanks for doing these! Personally i dont see the B's drafting a Goalie - thats one position id say they are comfortable with what they have.


Thank you. To clarify, its not a mock draft. Just rankings of each individual player.
Heyhowareya37 et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
23 juin 2022 à 19 h 37
#24
Famous Twitter Guy.
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 16
Mentions "j'aime": 6
Quoting: christianyog
This isn't a mock draft. Only player rankings.


Gotcha, my mistake
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
23 juin 2022 à 20 h 43
#25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,067
Mentions "j'aime": 427
Quoting: christianyog
Thank you. To clarify, its not a mock draft. Just rankings of each individual player.


Oh sorry - misread that. Thanks again!
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage