SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Dubois Before the Draft

Créé par: Campabee
Équipe: 2022-23 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 23 juin 2022
Publié: 23 juin 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Nashville trade is based off of previous year trades where it only cost a 2nd to move up 10 ish spots from the 20's to the mid teens.

Winnipeg gets some very good assets for a player who has already notified the team that he is planning on going to FA in 2024. No team is going to give up more knowing PLD will go to FA in 2 years.

Pens are rumored to be interested in Petry and Montreal is not going to move him without getting what they want. I don't think the ask here is too much considering we are adding a 3rd.

Having 3 top 6 centers is an issue once Wright's ELC ends but that isn't for 4 years still since he would be sent back to the Fronts for the 22-23 season. We can deal with any cap issues then.

BTW this is not likely to happen just an idea of what could unfold with the news of Dubois not willing to sign a long term deal. Our RD still sucks but it gives time for Mailloux and Barron to develop. Our Goal tending is still also questionable with the Price situation but we have to assume Price will play until it is determined he won't. Our cap situation has been fixed and will only improve over the next 2-4 years as the bad deals expire.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2850 000 $
2850 000 $
1925 000 $
32 750 000 $
26 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1750 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Wright, Shane
3925 000 $
Transactions
1.
ARI
  1. Drouin, Jonathan
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (NYR)
2.
MTL
  1. Poulin, Samuel
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (PIT)
PIT
  1. Petry, Jeff
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (ANA)
3.
MTL
  1. Dubois, Pierre-Luc [Droits de RFA]
WPG
  1. Dvorak, Christian
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (CGY)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de EDM
Logo de MTL
Logo de CAR
Logo de MTL
Logo de TBL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de STL
2023
Logo de FLA
Logo de PIT
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de CGY
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
2024
Logo de MTL
Logo de COL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de EDM
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2482 500 000 $72 935 833 $1 132 500 $1 440 000 $9 564 167 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
880 833 $880 833 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
C
UFA - 8
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
825 000 $825 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 875 000 $2 875 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance507 500 $$508K)
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
762 500 $762 500 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
859 167 $859 167 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
23 juin 2022 à 10 h 2
#1
Habs4Ever
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 4,278
Mentions "j'aime": 1,734
PLD said so many times he wants to be a Habs. Now, it's known he isn't signing long terms with any team because he wants to play for MTL. Why would we trade assets for him when we are rebuilding ? Just tank another 2 years, and sign him via Free Agency Summer 2024 and we got our LW to play with Suzuki and Caufield with seize. PLD-Suzuki-Caufield / Roy?-Wright/Cooley-Anderson, now that's starting to be a decent top 6
Andy_Dick a aimé ceci.
23 juin 2022 à 10 h 3
#2
Nik_SH
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 623
Mentions "j'aime": 75
17th OA for 26th and 62nd isn't fair deal. Preds pass easly.

Look at the Detroit-Dallas trade from the previous year.
15tg OA for 23, 48 and 138. And this draft class wasn't really strong (except current one).

So here it should be 17th OA for 26th and 33th.
villenash a aimé ceci.
23 juin 2022 à 10 h 9
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 14,467
Mentions "j'aime": 6,142
Considering that as a pure rental in 2 years Dubois gets a 1st and a prospect minimum I would imagine this generates no interest from Winnipeg.

2 years of PLD>>3years of Dvorak

Unneeded LD prospect = 0 value to Winnipeg

2 late firsts = close to rental price in 2 years for PLD.

All in all equals no incentive for Winnipeg to move PLD now.
23 juin 2022 à 10 h 18
#4
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,278
Mentions "j'aime": 11,032
Quoting: Nik_SH
17th OA for 26th and 62nd isn't fair deal. Preds pass easly.

Look at the Detroit-Dallas trade from the previous year.
15tg OA for 23, 48 and 138. And this draft class wasn't really strong (except current one).

So here it should be 17th OA for 26th and 33th.


Just for my own interest, the draft pick value chart has that as:

Nashville Out: 395 (17)
Montreal Out: 534 (26/33)
Difference: 139 (Value of pick 88ish)

Detroit/Dallas was:
Det out: 433 (15)
Dal out: 584 (23/48/138)
Difference: 151 (Value of pick 82)
23 juin 2022 à 10 h 29
#5
Bo Horvat enjoyer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 10,711
Mentions "j'aime": 11,932
Quoting: TheRealisticGuy
PLD said so many times he wants to be a Habs. Now, it's known he isn't signing long terms with any team because he wants to play for MTL. Why would we trade assets for him when we are rebuilding ? Just tank another 2 years, and sign him via Free Agency Summer 2024 and we got our LW to play with Suzuki and Caufield with seize. PLD-Suzuki-Caufield / Roy?-Wright/Cooley-Anderson, now that's starting to be a decent top 6


Where has he said that
Friendly_Cannon a aimé ceci.
23 juin 2022 à 10 h 33
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 13,946
Mentions "j'aime": 5,525
Quoting: Nik_SH
17th OA for 26th and 62nd isn't fair deal. Preds pass easly.

Look at the Detroit-Dallas trade from the previous year.
15tg OA for 23, 48 and 138. And this draft class wasn't really strong (except current one).

So here it should be 17th OA for 26th and 33th.


LOL, I couldn't remember where the Oilers pick was. I agree it needs to be the Habs pick then.

Quoting: Windjammer
Considering that as a pure rental in 2 years Dubois gets a 1st and a prospect minimum I would imagine this generates no interest from Winnipeg.

2 years of PLD>>3years of Dvorak

Unneeded LD prospect = 0 value to Winnipeg

2 late firsts = close to rental price in 2 years for PLD.

All in all equals no incentive for Winnipeg to move PLD now.


You are right Dubois is better than Dvorak, hence the reason for the other additions to the trade. However lets not forget that this also saves the Jets cap space (about 2 mil or so depending on the PLD extension)

Fair enough swap Norlinder for Ylonen or Farrell if you want.

2 late 1sts? The Preds is 17th OVA, so mid round and Montreal still won't be a playoff team next year hence the top 10 protection so it will also be an early to mid 1st rounder with the potential to be an unprotected 1st in 2024 if the Habs do end up drafting in the top 10.

The incentive for the Jets is to recoup assets for him before he walks in FA, there will not be many other offers for him when other teams know he will walk in 2 years. I think that PLD announcing that he plans on walking in FA was one of the worst things that could have happened for the Jets to get full value.
23 juin 2022 à 10 h 41
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 14,467
Mentions "j'aime": 6,142
Quoting: Campabee
LOL, I couldn't remember where the Oilers pick was. I agree it needs to be the Habs pick then.



You are right Dubois is better than Dvorak, hence the reason for the other additions to the trade. However lets not forget that this also saves the Jets cap space (about 2 mil or so depending on the PLD extension)

Fair enough swap Norlinder for Ylonen or Farrell if you want.

2 late 1sts? The Preds is 17th OVA, so mid round and Montreal still won't be a playoff team next year hence the top 10 protection so it will also be an early to mid 1st rounder with the potential to be an unprotected 1st in 2024 if the Habs do end up drafting in the top 10.

The incentive for the Jets is to recoup assets for him before he walks in FA, there will not be many other offers for him when other teams know he will walk in 2 years. I think that PLD announcing that he plans on walking in FA was one of the worst things that could have happened for the Jets to get full value.


Right. PLD may not get full value if the Jets trade him and you aren't offering full value. You're basically trying to acquire PLD for 2 years for his TDL price in 2 years. The Jets don't need cap space, so that is a non-issue. The firsts if they aren't top 10 are late and the Jets can get that at the TDL.

The main point is you want the Jets to move PLD for what they will easily get for him in 2 seasons at the TDL and there is zero incentive for Winnipeg to do that.

You're only looking at what is good for Montreal with no regard as to what would work best for the Jets.
23 juin 2022 à 10 h 48
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 13,946
Mentions "j'aime": 5,525
Quoting: Windjammer
Right. PLD may not get full value if the Jets trade him and you aren't offering full value. You're basically trying to acquire PLD for 2 years for his TDL price in 2 years. The Jets don't need cap space, so that is a non-issue. The firsts if they aren't top 10 are late and the Jets can get that at the TDL.

The main point is you want the Jets to move PLD for what they will easily get for him in 2 seasons at the TDL and there is zero incentive for Winnipeg to do that.

You're only looking at what is good for Montreal with no regard as to what would work best for the Jets.


In 2 years he won't have the value that you think he will because teams know they are not going to be able to resign him. He will only get a late 1st + prospect as a rental. Here you are getting double that.
23 juin 2022 à 11 h 14
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 14,467
Mentions "j'aime": 6,142
Quoting: Campabee
In 2 years he won't have the value that you think he will because teams know they are not going to be able to resign him. He will only get a late 1st + prospect as a rental. Here you are getting double that.


Exactly. Worst case the Jets get a 1st and a prospect.

You're not really offering double that to Winnipeg. As I pointed our earlier:

2 years of PLD is worth much more than 3 years of Dvorak. So one of the firsts would be compensating the Jets for downgrading.

All of the prospects you mentioned aren't needed by the Jets so would add zero value for Winnipeg.

So, the only valuable piece you are offering Winnipeg is a mid to late first. For that price Winnipeg is better off keeping the much better player in PLD for 2 seasons and the TDL return.

PLD for 2 seasons + 1st + prospect is greater in value to Winnipeg than this package = no invective for Winnipeg.
23 juin 2022 à 11 h 17
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 4,332
Mentions "j'aime": 1,901
Quoting: Campabee
In 2 years he won't have the value that you think he will because teams know they are not going to be able to resign him. He will only get a late 1st + prospect as a rental. Here you are getting double that.


Windjammer rejects everything. PLD will walk in 2 years anyways. I dont see the point in trading for him at a cost when he could be grabbed for free and the rumours suggest he wants to go to MTL. He'd interfere with the tank regardless this season. Winterpeg has enough problems with an identity. Enjoy the fake retool.
Campabee a aimé ceci.
23 juin 2022 à 11 h 35
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 4,332
Mentions "j'aime": 1,901
The most hilarious offers are Pens fans thinking they can offer up Dumoulin for Anderson with a 1 year term til UFA status with a cap crunch and the Pens flood of LD. That's not how scarcity works.
23 juin 2022 à 12 h 11
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 13,946
Mentions "j'aime": 5,525
Quoting: Windjammer
Exactly. Worst case the Jets get a 1st and a prospect.

You're not really offering double that to Winnipeg. As I pointed our earlier:

2 years of PLD is worth much more than 3 years of Dvorak. So one of the firsts would be compensating the Jets for downgrading.

All of the prospects you mentioned aren't needed by the Jets so would add zero value for Winnipeg.

So, the only valuable piece you are offering Winnipeg is a mid to late first. For that price Winnipeg is better off keeping the much better player in PLD for 2 seasons and the TDL return.

PLD for 2 seasons + 1st + prospect is greater in value to Winnipeg than this package = no invective for Winnipeg.


LMAO, the difference between PLD and Dvorak is a good prospect like Norlinder, Farrell or Ylonen not a 1st. However, by your own admission the Habs are significantly overpaying here by like a 1st and good prospect. You literally said that the difference between Dubois and Dvorak is a 1st so you are just being greedy and trying to fleece everyone all the time. I will fix this deal immediately to make it more fair. Deal is now Dubois for Dvorak + Calgary’s 1st (2 years of PLD is worth much more than 3 years of Dvorak. So one of the firsts would be compensating the Jets for downgrading.). Sucks that you just ruined a great deal for your team by admitting to be trying to fleece everyone LMAO.
23 juin 2022 à 12 h 25
#13
Leafs Sufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 4,053
Mentions "j'aime": 3,450
Quoting: Campabee
LMAO, the difference between PLD and Dvorak is a good prospect like Norlinder, Farrell or Ylonen not a 1st. However, by your own admission the Habs are significantly overpaying here by like a 1st and good prospect. You literally said that the difference between Dubois and Dvorak is a 1st so you are just being greedy and trying to fleece everyone all the time. I will fix this deal immediately to make it more fair. Deal is now Dubois for Dvorak + Calgary’s 1st (2 years of PLD is worth much more than 3 years of Dvorak. So one of the firsts would be compensating the Jets for downgrading.). Sucks that you just ruined a great deal for your team by admitting to be trying to fleece everyone LMAO.


One of the more childish comments I have read in a while.
23 juin 2022 à 12 h 31
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 13,946
Mentions "j'aime": 5,525
Quoting: Ritzy
One of the more childish comments I have read in a while.


How is it "childish"? He is the one that ruined a great deal for his team by trying to get greedy
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage