SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Pastrnak

Créé par: Kjell_Forsman
Équipe: 2022-23 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 22 juin 2022
Publié: 22 juin 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
22 250 000 $
22 250 000 $
2985 000 $
Transactions
1.
BOS
  1. Eklund, William
  2. Labanc, Kevin
  3. Wiesblatt, Ozzy
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (SJS)
Détails additionnels:
Essentially 3 1st round picks and Labanc for cap purposes
2.
ARI
  1. Émond, Zacharie
  2. Simek, Radim
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (SJS)
3.
SJS
  1. Seguin, Tyler
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (DAL)
4.
SJS
  1. Holl, Justin
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (WPG)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de WPG
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de BUF
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de ARI
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de DAL
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $74 453 334 $0 $382 500 $8 046 666 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Stars de Dallas
9 850 000 $9 850 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
916 667 $916 667 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 025 000 $1 025 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
985 000 $985 000 $
C
RFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 175 000 $2 175 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
762 500 $762 500 $
DG
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
22 juin 2022 à 20 h 32
#1
down bad
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 3,143
Mentions "j'aime": 1,426
For 1 year of Pasta? That’s a bad trade…
palhal et vikhodush a aimé ceci.
22 juin 2022 à 20 h 43
#2
go Sharks go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 862
Mentions "j'aime": 396
We did a trade with a similar structure in the past and it didn’t work out well
palhal a aimé ceci.
22 juin 2022 à 20 h 47
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,067
Mentions "j'aime": 427
If Pasta said he wanted to be moved i would have a hard time not liking this deal. Send him to the west coast out of conference and get Eklund back who would pair really well with Lysell. The only thing is I would assume the Pastrnak extension conversation would happen after the draft so that pick may end up being 2023.
Kjell_Forsman a aimé ceci.
22 juin 2022 à 20 h 49
#4
Démarrer sujet
BORDEGOD
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 1,310
Mentions "j'aime": 490
Quoting: Heyhowareya37
If Pasta said he wanted to be moved i would have a hard time not liking this deal. Send him to the west coast out of conference and get Eklund back who would pair really well with Lysell. The only thing is I would assume the Pastrnak extension conversation would happen after the draft so that pick may end up being 2023.


I know the Pasta rumors have no real foundation but I think it's a fair offer. Pasta with Hertl is too tempting...
Heyhowareya37 et Warrzone a aimé ceci.
22 juin 2022 à 20 h 54
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 1,673
Mentions "j'aime": 411
Quoting: SJSGM
We did a trade with a similar structure in the past and it didn’t work out well


(Karlsson?)
SJSGM a aimé ceci.
22 juin 2022 à 20 h 55
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,067
Mentions "j'aime": 427
Quoting: Kjell_Forsman
I know the Pasta rumors have no real foundation but I think it's a fair offer. Pasta with Hertl is too tempting...


I agree - I think if it went that way this would be a deal the bruins would have to look hard at. Eklund could be really really good.
22 juin 2022 à 20 h 56
#7
Démarrer sujet
BORDEGOD
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 1,310
Mentions "j'aime": 490
Quoting: Chabotrrorr
(Karlsson?)


tears of joy
22 juin 2022 à 21 h 20
#8
Amirov Forever
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 6,500
Mentions "j'aime": 5,991
Honestly Id rather have Eklund
22 juin 2022 à 21 h 36
#9
Démarrer sujet
BORDEGOD
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 1,310
Mentions "j'aime": 490
Quoting: Nathaniel
Honestly Id rather have Eklund


So would I. But with all the sharks fans/writers talking about getting Pasta, this is what it would take probably.
NorthernLeafsFan05 a aimé ceci.
22 juin 2022 à 23 h 23
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 8,099
Mentions "j'aime": 3,597
Why are the sharks moving the best prospect they have had in a decade for a rental?
23 juin 2022 à 0 h 18
#11
Démarrer sujet
BORDEGOD
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 1,310
Mentions "j'aime": 490
Quoting: glarson17
Why are the sharks moving the best prospect they have had in a decade for a rental?


Obviously he would be re-signed. Eklund is not a better prospect than Timo. Weird comment.
23 juin 2022 à 0 h 41
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 8,099
Mentions "j'aime": 3,597
Quoting: Kjell_Forsman
Obviously he would be re-signed. Eklund is not a better prospect than Timo. Weird comment.


Yes he is, Eklund was top 5 in most rankings. Timo was top 15 in his, don’t think anyone had him top 10
23 juin 2022 à 1 h 4
#13
Démarrer sujet
BORDEGOD
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 1,310
Mentions "j'aime": 490
Quoting: glarson17
Yes he is, Eklund was top 5 in most rankings. Timo was top 15 in his, don’t think anyone had him top 10


Timo was in the deepest draft since 2003 and maybe ever. 2021 was not a deep draft. I don't project Eklund to be as valuable a player as Timo, unfortunately.
Rob32sjsharks a aimé ceci.
23 juin 2022 à 1 h 12
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,120
Mentions "j'aime": 4,619
Quoting: Kjell_Forsman
Timo was in the deepest draft since 2003 and maybe ever. 2021 was not a deep draft. I don't project Eklund to be as valuable a player as Timo, unfortunately.

100% agree with this statement. but this deal is BAD this forces either Meier out or we give up a gigantic piece of our future for 1 year of Pasta and this isn’t a cup worthy team that justifies the deal. even with the Seguin for Burns deal thrown in.
23 juin 2022 à 5 h 45
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,212
Mentions "j'aime": 2,863
This sucks ass for the Sharks
24 juin 2022 à 22 h 32
#16
Démarrer sujet
BORDEGOD
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 1,310
Mentions "j'aime": 490
Quoting: FunMustBeAlways
This sucks ass for the Sharks


have you ever had your ass sucked? It's pretty good.
24 juin 2022 à 22 h 35
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,694
Mentions "j'aime": 3,362
This doesn’t seem like a good move for the Sharks. Does it push them into contender territory? I don’t think so and it stretches out the rebuild for another couple of years beyond what it could be
24 juin 2022 à 22 h 41
#18
Démarrer sujet
BORDEGOD
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 1,310
Mentions "j'aime": 490
Quoting: vikhodush
This doesn’t seem like a good move for the Sharks. Does it push them into contender territory? I don’t think so and it stretches out the rebuild for another couple of years beyond what it could be


I am aware of this this is purely an example of what it would take to get Pastrnak. A lot of sharks media and fans have been talking about wanting to get him this summer and this is the reality of the price.I wouldn't do this if I were GM. I vastly prefer Eklund, Wiesblatt and our 11th OA
vikhodush a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage