Mikeyev won't sign that, he is looking for 4-5M

Poolman's contact is way too bad to take on at any cost.

I'd probably go as high as 3.5-4M. Beyond that I'd look for other options.

We have really good future considerations in Vancouver.

Bruins reject. If they move Carlo, it should be for futures (picks/prospects instead of 25yo+ player) and for fair value.

Poolman isn't even viewed as a negative asset by Vancouver's front office FOR EVERYONE'S INFORMATION

Hoglander > Roy

Brossoit is also a negative asset

I think Hoglander and Roy are fairly close in value. Brossoit and Ferland are both negative assets.

Ferland is NOT negative asset, did you see how little it cost Dallas to unload Ben Bishop?

What do you consider fair value for Carlo? I think Boston needs a top 6 RW and Garland is young and signed to a good contract.

For a team that wants to accrue cap space over the season he is.

Then Ferland will be traded to a team that plans on being capped out, simple as that. Such a team won't value him negatively

If the Bruins still try to win next year, they could use a top6 RW but not with Carlo going back as it would leave a hole in the top4 defense. I don't expect the Bruins to move Carlo anyways. If they did, I would use the Lindholm and Muzzin deals' returns as comparables (A 1st, a 2nd and a 3rd).