I'd rather have Matt Roy than Conor Garland. No thanks from me, if I was in charge of LA.

Too much money for Horvat and Dumba

I think Pearson has more value than Dickenson.

No doubt he does

No chance we trade Roy, who is essential (and not internally replaceable), for Garland, who is a luxury.

that bottom 6 is disgusting lol

Totally agree, that was suppose to be flipped.

Not really

I don't know... Horvat at 28 years old wont get over $7,500,000? a 30 goal scorer captain of the team and plays a two way game! I thought I might have under valued him. And Dumba was a total shot in the dark. I dont know how much he will fetch on the open market. But he will be the odd man out for Mini.

Horvat is only mediocre defensively, he's not getting more than 7.5M on the open market, scoring 30 goals is more of a pre-requisite to make up that valuation difference

Dumba will get 4.5-5M on the open market

Great! That adds another $2.5million to the canucks salary cap space plus the $6.2million already available... 8.7 million available for the following year to pay pettersson and Roy ($18million including their current salaries already accounted for)

There you go

Not a chance Minnesota does this. Minnesota isn't trading dumba to take on worse player and contract

Dumba will get more..there's some people on here who don't know how to value dumba. Minnesota says no

They get a 2nd round pick in case you didn't notice, for the downgrade



No, it's Wild fans typically overvaluing certain players of theirs

2nd round pick mean nothing. Minnesota isn't taking on another team bad contract and player. Trade him elsewhere. Minnesota will keep dumba with 1 year left. It's funny Canucks fans wanting other teams players than saying other teams fans are overvaluing him

You already have made your point clear. Trade Tyler Myers elsewhere dude. Dumba who loves Minnesota and just bought s house here along with Guerin making it clear dumba isn't getting traded will stay in Minnesota and sign a cheaper contract

Myers isn't a bad player, just an inefficient contract. See what I mean? You're absolutely clueless, or you're just trolling

Or maybe you are. Holy crap Tyler Myers isn't a bad player. Is any Canucks player a bad player to you? & not overvaluing by you? Seems you are the troll. Everyone knows who Tyler Myers is. Keep him then instead of forcing him on Minnesota

No, nobody was forcing Myers on Minnesota, I know I wasn't. You haven't watched Myers enough, you can't accept that maybe you could be wrong about something, I don't know why

Apparently everyone including your own Canucks fans are wrong about him being a cap dump.. he played for jets, so I saw him plenty. I saw how wild played him with him being on jets than Canucks but hey, Tyler Myers apparently isn't a bad player. Minnesota isn't trading dumba, nor taking on your bad contract. Like it's been said before, Minnesota and Canucks fans are never agreeing on here

Myers isn't the same player he is now that he was on the Jet's. That's where you are wrong. You seem to actually WANT to butt heads with other fanbases

Only with you who comments on every Canucks post that has to do with sending players to wild by Canucks fan. Ps: Tyler Myers was better on jets and had a coach who used him better. Him getting that contract with Canucks and him , especially his play hadn't been good with Canucks. But I am done arguing with you. Like other have said in past wild and Canucks fans like yourself will not agree and it becomes pointless with trade proposals like this

Again, you're completely out to lunch with that take. Who knows what is causing you to try and preach inaccurate valuations of players

Pearson is worth more. Try a 3rd and 4th