SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Harders Habs

Créé par: RJBH
Équipe: 2022-23 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 15 juin 2022
Publié: 15 juin 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
37 500 000 $
Transactions
MTL
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (DET)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de MTL
Logo de CGY
Logo de MTL
Logo de EDM
Logo de MTL
Logo de ANA
Logo de CAR
Logo de MTL
Logo de NYR
Logo de TBL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de STL
2023
Logo de MTL
Logo de FLA
Logo de MTL
Logo de DET
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de CGY
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
2024
Logo de MTL
Logo de COL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de EDM
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
1982 500 000 $76 201 666 $1 132 500 $1 570 000 $6 298 334 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
C
UFA - 8
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
880 833 $880 833 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
875 000 $875 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance507 500 $$508K)
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 875 000 $2 875 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
762 500 $762 500 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG
RFA - 3
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 857 143 $7 857 143 $
DD
UFA - 4

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
15 juin 2022 à 15 h 0
#1
Buffbry
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 8,913
Mentions "j'aime": 5,352
Wings pass, habs pay us to take him or look elsewhere
15 juin 2022 à 15 h 20
#2
Subbanator
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 7,316
Mentions "j'aime": 3,328
Habs get more then a second for Petry. Detroit won't be willing to pay what it would cost to acquire him
Drakin1978 a aimé ceci.
15 juin 2022 à 15 h 21
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 5,490
Mentions "j'aime": 1,659
Quoting: buffbry
Wings pass, habs pay us to take him or look elsewhere


Only on cap friendly you see these kinds of comments
Like Lehkonen, you didn’t want him for a 5th when so delusional Habs fans were trading him
15 juin 2022 à 15 h 29
#4
Buffbry
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 8,913
Mentions "j'aime": 5,352
Quoting: Poehling
Only on cap friendly you see these kinds of comments
Like Lehkonen, you didn’t want him for a 5th when so delusional Habs fans were trading him


Right so we are paying a 2nd for 3+ more years at 6m+ for a 6D on our team. He goes in behind seider and Hronek on the depth chart, so explain to me again why the wings are paying a 2nd for him and not being paid to take this contract?
15 juin 2022 à 15 h 38
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 5,490
Mentions "j'aime": 1,659
Quoting: buffbry
Right so we are paying a 2nd for 3+ more years at 6m+ for a 6D on our team. He goes in behind seider and Hronek on the depth chart, so explain to me again why the wings are paying a 2nd for him and not being paid to take this contract?


First he would be your 2nd best dman being Seider, but let’s ignore that
I know y’all are good with Seider Hronek and Lindstrom on the right side. But you can take Petry for a 2nd, then trade him for a 1st or top prospect + or even retained for a better package
15 juin 2022 à 15 h 43
#6
Buffbry
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 8,913
Mentions "j'aime": 5,352
Quoting: Poehling
First he would be your 2nd best dman being Seider, but let’s ignore that
I know y’all are good with Seider Hronek and Lindstrom on the right side. But you can take Petry for a 2nd, then trade him for a 1st or top prospect + or even retained for a better package


No thanks you can retain and trade him for that. He does not go above hronek on the depth chart at 34 years old and 6M he is not worth a 2nd. We aren't taking a contract for a 2nd in hopes of retaining and moving him for more, that logic is out the window. He is not a fit on Detroit unless we move hronek and that's it. You are so confident then you retain and get your first + if you think it's possible. Wings are out and nobody ever thinks about it from the other teams perspective. We also wouldnt be trading our 2nd that's another good joke here.

Wings pass and good luck getting anything for 34 year old with 3 years and 6+ left
15 juin 2022 à 15 h 57
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 5,490
Mentions "j'aime": 1,659
Quoting: buffbry
No thanks you can retain and trade him for that. He does not go above hronek on the depth chart at 34 years old and 6M he is not worth a 2nd. We aren't taking a contract for a 2nd in hopes of retaining and moving him for more, that logic is out the window. He is not a fit on Detroit unless we move hronek and that's it. You are so confident then you retain and get your first + if you think it's possible. Wings are out and nobody ever thinks about it from the other teams perspective. We also wouldnt be trading our 2nd that's another good joke here.

Wings pass and good luck getting anything for 34 year old with 3 years and 6+ left


95% of Habs fans don’t know Hronek and Lindstrom so since they know Petry is from Michigan, you will always have Petry to DET trade
buffbry et aedoran a aimé ceci.
15 juin 2022 à 16 h 0
#8
Buffbry
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 8,913
Mentions "j'aime": 5,352
Quoting: Poehling
95% of Habs fans don’t know Hronek and Lindstrom so since they know Petry is from Michigan, you will always have Petry to DET trade


I can agree with you there and think that is a fair assessment
aedoran a aimé ceci.
15 juin 2022 à 16 h 11
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 685
Mentions "j'aime": 559
Wings absolutely pass. Petry does not make sense for Detroit. We are looking for young players to fit our timeline, not some 35 year old plug.
15 juin 2022 à 17 h 1
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2021
Messages: 230
Mentions "j'aime": 60
Petry only gets considered if we have already moved Hronek. Otherwise, what would be the point? Even then, the contract term and amount are a stumbling block to overcome. We did pay a 2nd for Leddy, but he only had one year left, had a lower cap hit, and was younger. Petry, as has been pointed out, does not fit our timeline. To take on Staal, we had to be paid. Petry is better than Staal or Leddy, but also plays on the right and we don't have a need there. We had a desperate need on the left side when acquiring Staal and Leddy. IF we moved Hronek, I would be willing to talk, but I probably don't accept a trade for our 2nd in 2023. Maybe for Washington's 2nd in 2022.

If he was that easy to flip for a better return, then why even involve the Red Wings?
RedWing9119 et Billy12Bob a aimé ceci.
15 juin 2022 à 17 h 16
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 179
Mentions "j'aime": 95
No thx

Exactly the same as Montreal, Detroit is rebuilding.
Whatever rationale a Habs fan would use to rationalize why they would trade away Petry, use those exact words why Detroit wouldn't trade a 2nd for him.

Ex.
Rebuilding clubs dont need over 30 6plus million dollar dmen signed for 3 plus years

Rebuilding clubs value draft picks more

Rebuilding clubs valued high draft picks even more

Rebuilding clubs value cheap 1 year deal vets to flip for draft picks at the deadline

Rebuilding clubs if adding, prefer guys under 30 who can be part of there core for the next 5-7 years
Billy12Bob a aimé ceci.
15 juin 2022 à 18 h 8
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 465
Mentions "j'aime": 226
Can we at least acknowledge Petry's 6 (six!) points in 40 games before St. Louis took over and Caufield when on a scoring spree? If Petry really is still a top pairing D, shouldn't he have been more impactful than that?
Detroit already has a middle pairing, offensively-minded, defensively deficient right-shooting D, but he's 10 years younger and $2 million cheaper. No need for Petry. His name is Filip Hronek.
Billy12Bob a aimé ceci.
15 juin 2022 à 18 h 35
#13
PlusMinus is stupid
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 7,319
Mentions "j'aime": 7,154
Montreal fans doing ACGMs sending Petry to Detroit
square-peg-round-hole-gif.gif.gif
andrewj72 a aimé ceci.
15 juin 2022 à 19 h 10
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 102
Mentions "j'aime": 62
Ya we’ll take Petry if you throw in your 2023 1ST
Billy12Bob a aimé ceci.
15 juin 2022 à 20 h 10
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 1,299
Mentions "j'aime": 426
Habs fans really think Petry is Lidstrom when in reality he’s not even Lindstrom
Billy12Bob a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage