SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Gibson

Créé par: Napparific
Équipe: 2022-23 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 13 juin 2022
Publié: 13 juin 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
11 750 000 $
11 750 000 $
12 750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
12 400 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
    Future considerations
    2.
    TOR
    1. Comtois, Maxime (1 000 000 $ retained)
    2. Gibson, John
    ANA
    1. Kerfoot, Alexander
    2. Knies, Matthew [Liste de réserve]
    3. Mrázek, Petr
    4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
    Détails additionnels:
    I think Kerfoot pushes this deal over the top, might be a slight overpay from Toronto given how promising Knies is and how average Gibson has been for 3 years but if you're the leafs you're betting in a return to form. Anaheim can really stock the cupboards with this haul and get a cost-controlled roster player in Kerfoot in exchange for taking Mrazek
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2022
    Logo de WPG
    Logo de TOR
    2023
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    2024
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2182 500 000 $82 477 283 $212 500 $0 $22 717 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    950 000 $950 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
    AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    796 667 $796 667 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
    C, AG
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    750 000 $750 000 $
    AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    1 037 500 $1 037 500 $
    AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    850 000 $850 000 $
    AG, C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    900 000 $900 000 $
    AD, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
    DG
    NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
    DD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 2
    2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
    G
    UFA
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    800 000 $800 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 2

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    13 juin 2022 à 15 h 40
    #1
    Lenny7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 13,291
    Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
    How exactly does Kerfoot push the deal over the top? He's signed for 1 year, which is a season where the Ducks clearly won't be contending.
    OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
    13 juin 2022 à 15 h 40
    #2
    Once a Kings Fan Too
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 39,662
    Mentions "j'aime": 24,576
    Kerfoot and Mrazek push the deal under water.
    13 juin 2022 à 15 h 48
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2015
    Messages: 55
    Mentions "j'aime": 8
    Why is it always Kerfoot?....every deal on this site. tears of joy
    OldNYIfan et CD282 a aimé ceci.
    13 juin 2022 à 15 h 53
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2016
    Messages: 1,137
    Mentions "j'aime": 358
    Quoting: OldNYIfan
    Kerfoot and Mrazek push the deal under water.


    Kerfoot just put up 50 points on a great contract. In what way does he push it under water? Mrazek 100% agree but come on... good team or not, Kerfoot still put up points moving throughout the lineup.
    13 juin 2022 à 16 h 29
    #5
    Once a Kings Fan Too
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 39,662
    Mentions "j'aime": 24,576
    Quoting: KPasty
    Kerfoot just put up 50 points on a great contract. In what way does he push it under water? Mrazek 100% agree but come on... good team or not, Kerfoot still put up points moving throughout the lineup.


    Kerfoot is a rental. By definition, any rental involved in a trade for players with 4 and 5 years' term is a throw-in. He pushes the deal under the surface because he's nowhere near the value of Comtois. Take Comtois out and I wouldn't say Kerfoot pushes the deal under water, just Mrazek.
    13 juin 2022 à 16 h 29
    #6
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 230
    Mentions "j'aime": 44
    Quoting: Lenny7
    How exactly does Kerfoot push the deal over the top? He's signed for 1 year, which is a season where the Ducks clearly won't be contending.


    50 point guy, cost controlled, owed
    13 juin 2022 à 16 h 30
    #7
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 230
    Mentions "j'aime": 44
    Quoting: OldNYIfan
    Kerfoot is a rental. By definition, any rental involved in a trade for players with 4 and 5 years' term is a throw-in. He pushes the deal under the surface because he's nowhere near the value of Comtois. Take Comtois out and I wouldn't say Kerfoot pushes the deal under water, just Mrazek.


    Lol what a stupid arguement. Really? Any rental is a throw in no matter what if there is a long term deal involved? So if Matthews had a year left on his deal and was being traded for Dahlin with 3 years left would Matthews be a throw in?
    Lenny7 a aimé ceci.
    13 juin 2022 à 16 h 31
    #8
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 230
    Mentions "j'aime": 44
    Quoting: Lenny7
    How exactly does Kerfoot push the deal over the top? He's signed for 1 year, which is a season where the Ducks clearly won't be contending.


    So the ducks just want to ice a team of scrubs forever?
    13 juin 2022 à 16 h 35
    #9
    Once a Kings Fan Too
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 39,662
    Mentions "j'aime": 24,576
    Quoting: Napparific
    Lol what a stupid arguement. Really? Any rental is a throw in no matter what if there is a long term deal involved? So if Matthews had a year left on his deal and was being traded for Dahlin with 3 years left would Matthews be a throw in?


    Only you would construe my comment as equating Kerfoot with Matthews.

    Once again, Yes, bottom-6 rental forwards are throw-ins in deals involving players with 4 or 5 years' term. That's how hockey works.
    Lenny7 a aimé ceci.
    13 juin 2022 à 17 h 35
    #10
    Lenny7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 13,291
    Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
    Quoting: Napparific
    So the ducks just want to ice a team of scrubs forever?


    Does 1 year of Kerfoot change the outcome in Anaheim?
    OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
    13 juin 2022 à 17 h 36
    #11
    Lenny7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 13,291
    Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
    Quoting: Napparific
    50 point guy, cost controlled, owed


    For one year. Heck, if I was a contending team I’d be all over him, which begs the question of why Leafers have such a hard on to move him.
    OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
    13 juin 2022 à 17 h 36
    #12
    Lenny7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 13,291
    Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
    Quoting: Napparific
    Lol what a stupid arguement. Really? Any rental is a throw in no matter what if there is a long term deal involved? So if Matthews had a year left on his deal and was being traded for Dahlin with 3 years left would Matthews be a throw in?


    Rental to contender-good.
    Rental to rebuilding team-Very, very dumb.
    OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
    13 juin 2022 à 17 h 49
    #13
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2017
    Messages: 23,753
    Mentions "j'aime": 7,634
    Quoting: BlackieO
    Why is it always Kerfoot?....every deal on this site. tears of joy


    Because nobody is touching the Tavares contract?
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage