leafs will get a third team for the 75% retention if they trade for murray

It could be any team. Is the value right?

id take it. i think murray can bounce back, he just needs the chance

Bruins say yes
Leafs say yes(Honestly murray probably goes for a 3rd)
Arizona blocks your number(Ladd has 1 yr left, Zaitsev does not)
I dont see why Ottawa makes that chicago trade?
And again i dont see why edmonton makes that trade either

I don't think Ottawa trades for Pastranak. They probably wait to get him in FA if he does want out and that deal would involve an extension.

Murray trade is really for anything as long as the Leafs eat a bit of the salary.

That Arizona trade is not bad because while they get a lower cap for two years he is an defenseman that could have a little bit of value and would be able to shelter their young players. His M-NTC blocks that trade though.

That Chicago trade is pretty pointless but Mete and Abromov probably don't play but Abramov is much more valuable than that if you can get him back to NA.

Edmonton trade is to get rid of Kassian but Ottawa would decline.

make it pinto greig and 7OA for Pastrnak sign and trade and they say yes.
I don't think their is anyway boston moves him to Ottawa unless that 7OA pick is coming back + more

the whole pastrnak wanting to leave boston is blown way out of proportion
1. the athletic article by fluto was a false made up statement
2. Elliotte Friedman and JP Barry(Pastrnak's agent) both confirmed sweeney and pastrnak are meeting in july to work on an extension
3. Why would Pastrnak have been trying to recruit krecji back to boston when they were playing team Czech together if he was just gonna leave or request a trade. also Krecji hated cassidy so cassidy being fired probably increases the chance krech comes back to boston which would make pasta happy
4. all this is blown out of proportion because BNH posted and article saying if bergy retires then it's time for boston to rebuild and pastrnak would be a good trade chip to speed up our rebuild and acquire top tier assets. Not once though did that article state pastrnak wanted to leave or hated the bruins organization. All that happened is that websites like the ATHLETIC rely heavily on clickbait and made up their own sh*t about the situation like media always does and 90% of the time don't actually have reliable information, Fluto especially is the worst for sh*tty takes and clickbait posts

I don't see BOS accepting that for Pasta. Would ask for different players involved particularly if your offering your 23' 1st.

I agree that I don't think Pastranak leaves via trade. If an extension isn't worked out and that is probably purely a numbers figure then I think that there might be a chance but Boston will view themselves in contention so he probably goes to FA. But otherwise I don't think Pasta is traded.

i could see boston trying to compete 1 more year, most likely pasta extends this summer and hopefully bergy and krech come back, then win the cup or not both C's retire and i could see boston talking to pasta if he wants to stick for the long haul or if he wants to compete im gonna say if a trade does happen it's most likely in the 23-24 offseason.

Wouldn't 23-24 offseason be for his rights? Or does he still have one year left?

yes so he would be a free agent after the 23-24 season, but what i am saying is that he signs an extension and then boston give him the option if he wants to be moved or not after next season then he gets to choose where he wants to go with his new contract that probably has a stricter NMC and boston will still get full value.

if pasta doesn't sign an extension he is most likely moved right away before the TD. But im pretty confident from all the rumblings i have heard from B's insiders and HFboards that Pasta will most likely be resigned to a max term contract as of AAV i have no clue what he will get