SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Realistic Pastrnak Trades

Créé par: JDHockey
Équipe: 2022-23 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 2 juin 2022
Publié: 11 juin 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
The belief is the Bruins and Pastrnak’s camp will work on extension in July. However, should they fail to reach an agreement, I think these are realistic trades to start the rebuild. Assume for this proposal that Pastrnak signs an extension.
Transactions
1.
BOS
  1. Boucher, Tyler
  2. Pinto, Shane
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (OTT)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (OTT)
2.
BOS
  1. Foerster, Tyson
  2. Zamula, Yegor
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (PHI)
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (PHI)
PHI
    Pastrnak
    3.
    BOS
    1. Berggren, Jonatan
    2. Sebrango, Donovan
    3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (DET)
    4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (DET)
    DET
      Pastrnak
      4.
      BOS
      1. Bordeleau, Thomas
      2. Kniazev, Artemi
      3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (SJS)
      4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (SJS)
      SJS
        Pastrnak
        5.
        BOS
        1. Holtz, Alexander
        2. Okhotiuk, Nikita
        3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (NJD)
        4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (NJD)
        NJD
          Pastrnak
          6.
          BOS
          1. Bean, Jake
          2. Johnson, Kent
          3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (CBJ)
          4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (CBJ)
          CBJ
            Pastrnak
            7.
            BOS
            1. Comtois, Maxime
            2. McTavish, Mason
            3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (ANA)
            ANA
              Pastrnak
              8.
              BOS
              1. Holmes, Jacob [Liste de réserve]
              2. Johnston, Wyatt
              3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (DAL)
              4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (DAL)
              DAL
                Pastrnak
                Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
                2022
                Logo de OTT
                Logo de PHI
                Logo de DET
                Logo de SJS
                Logo de NJD
                Logo de CBJ
                Logo de DAL
                Logo de BOS
                Logo de ANA
                Logo de CGY
                Logo de BOS
                Logo de BOS
                Logo de BOS
                Logo de OTT
                2023
                Logo de BOS
                Logo de PHI
                Logo de DET
                Logo de SJS
                Logo de DAL
                Logo de OTT
                Logo de NJD
                Logo de CBJ
                Logo de BOS
                Logo de BOS
                Logo de BOS
                Logo de BOS
                Logo de BOS
                2024
                Logo de BOS
                Logo de BOS
                Logo de BOS
                Logo de BOS
                Logo de BOS
                TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
                3482 500 000 $89 115 835 $0 $5 372 500 $-6 615 835 $
                Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
                Logo de Bruins de Boston
                1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
                AG, AD
                UFA - 1
                Logo de Bruins de Boston
                5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
                C, AD
                M-NTC, NMC
                UFA - 4
                Logo de Bruins de Boston
                6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
                AG
                M-NTC, NMC
                UFA - 3
                Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
                925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
                C
                RFA - 1
                Logo de Bruins de Boston
                1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
                AD, C
                UFA - 1
                Logo de Bruins de Boston
                3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
                AG, C, AD
                M-NTC
                UFA - 1
                Logo de Bruins de Boston
                3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
                AD
                UFA - 1
                Logo de Bruins de Boston
                4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
                AD, AG
                UFA - 2
                Logo de Bruins de Boston
                2 375 000 $2 375 000 $
                C, AG
                UFA - 1
                Logo de Bruins de Boston
                6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
                AG
                M-NTC
                UFA - 3
                Logo de Bruins de Boston
                1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
                AG, C
                UFA - 1
                Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
                894 167 $894 167 $
                AD
                RFA - 4
                Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
                2 037 500 $2 037 500 $
                AG
                RFA - 1
                Logo de Bruins de Boston
                800 000 $800 000 $
                C, AD
                RFA - 2
                Logo de Devils du New Jersey
                894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
                AD, AG
                RFA - 3
                Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
                863 333 $863 333 $
                AD
                RFA - 3
                Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
                925 000 $925 000 $
                AD, AG
                RFA - 2
                Logo de Sharks de San Jose
                916 667 $916 667 $
                C, AG
                RFA - 2
                Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
                925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
                AG, C
                RFA - 2
                Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
                894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
                C, AG
                RFA - 3
                Logo de Stars de Dallas
                894 167 $894 167 $
                C
                RFA - 3
                Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
                Logo de Bruins de Boston
                6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
                DG
                NTC, NMC
                UFA - 8
                Logo de Bruins de Boston
                4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
                DD
                UFA - 5
                Logo de Bruins de Boston
                5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
                G
                NMC
                UFA - 3
                Logo de Bruins de Boston
                3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
                DG
                M-NTC
                UFA - 2
                Logo de Bruins de Boston
                925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance150 000 $$150K)
                G
                RFA - 1
                Logo de Bruins de Boston
                1 137 500 $1 137 500 $
                DG/DD
                UFA - 2
                Logo de Bruins de Boston
                1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
                DD
                UFA - 1
                Logo de Bruins de Boston
                3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
                DG
                UFA - 2
                Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
                756 667 $756 667 $
                DG/DD
                RFA - 1
                Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
                828 333 $828 333 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
                DG
                RFA - 3
                Logo de Sharks de San Jose
                789 167 $789 167 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
                DG
                RFA - 2
                Logo de Devils du New Jersey
                789 167 $789 167 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
                DG
                RFA - 2
                Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
                2 333 333 $2 333 333 $
                DG/DD
                RFA - 2
                Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
                Logo de Bruins de Boston
                9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
                DD
                UFA - 8
                Logo de Bruins de Boston
                3 687 500 $3 687 500 $
                DG
                UFA - 2

                Code d'intégration

                • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
                • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

                Texte intégré

                Cliquer pour surligner
                11 juin 2022 à 19 h 41
                #1
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: mai 2019
                Messages: 39,600
                Mentions "j'aime": 18,154
                What does the contract look like? Would have to be very cheap for many of these to be options.
                11 juin 2022 à 19 h 42
                #2
                Dolzhenkov Is Coming
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: mars 2022
                Messages: 3,572
                Mentions "j'aime": 5,125
                The Ducks proposal seems significantly out of balance with a lot of the other ones.
                11 juin 2022 à 19 h 44
                #3
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: déc. 2017
                Messages: 21,485
                Mentions "j'aime": 11,900
                I'd say the Detroit trade is fair value wise but Detroit is in no position to make a trade like that. They just have to many holes to fill before giving up 4 assets for Pasta.
                JDHockey et Billy12Bob a aimé ceci.
                11 juin 2022 à 19 h 46
                #4
                Demidov to MTL
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: août 2021
                Messages: 337
                Mentions "j'aime": 164
                Ducks, Devils and Blue Jackets trades are overpays
                11 juin 2022 à 19 h 47
                #5
                KFTW
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: juill. 2018
                Messages: 42,157
                Mentions "j'aime": 23,514
                I would do this if he came with a decent extension. But for 1 year of Pastrnak, it’s too much
                RedWing9119, JDHockey et zizougaffar a aimé ceci.
                11 juin 2022 à 19 h 51
                #6
                Démarrer sujet
                JDHockey
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: févr. 2022
                Messages: 55
                Mentions "j'aime": 8
                Quoting: dk325
                The Ducks proposal seems significantly out of balance with a lot of the other ones.


                I agree, might be an overpay from Anaheim standpoint. As long as McTavish is the centerpiece.
                11 juin 2022 à 19 h 54
                #7
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: juin 2019
                Messages: 8,025
                Mentions "j'aime": 3,568
                Instant San Jake decline. Top 6 center and top 4 puck moving defenseman prospects and two firsts is an overpayment unless Pasta comes with like an 8 year $4 aav. Just not happening
                Shorkz a aimé ceci.
                11 juin 2022 à 20 h 18
                #8
                Démarrer sujet
                JDHockey
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: févr. 2022
                Messages: 55
                Mentions "j'aime": 8
                Quoting: glarson17
                Instant San Jake decline. Top 6 center and top 4 puck moving defenseman prospects and two firsts is an overpayment unless Pasta comes with like an 8 year $4 aav. Just not happening

                Key word is prospect. Sharks would be paying for proven talent, Bruins inherit all the risk. Any deal involving Pastrnak would need to start with Eklund or Bordeleau, so maybe these won’t be compatible trade partners.
                11 juin 2022 à 20 h 18
                #9
                Dolzhenkov Is Coming
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: mars 2022
                Messages: 3,572
                Mentions "j'aime": 5,125
                Quoting: JDHockey
                I agree, might be an overpay from Anaheim standpoint. As long as McTavish is the centerpiece.


                I was thinking it was an underpay compared to a lot of the others actually. At least it certainly feels like significantly less compared to the Ottawa, New Jersey and Columbus proposals.
                11 juin 2022 à 20 h 35
                #10
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: oct. 2020
                Messages: 1,665
                Mentions "j'aime": 406
                Would you do the Sens trade if we replaced Boucher with Bernard-Docker or Kleven?
                11 juin 2022 à 20 h 50
                #11
                Démarrer sujet
                JDHockey
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: févr. 2022
                Messages: 55
                Mentions "j'aime": 8
                Quoting: Chabotrrorr
                Would you do the Sens trade if we replaced Boucher with Bernard-Docker or Kleven?


                I honestly do not know enough about them to answer that. I would hope the Bruins would target forward prospects as their defensive pool is top heavy. But I totally understand wanting to keep Boucher, could be a quintessential power forward some day.
                11 juin 2022 à 20 h 53
                #12
                BORDEGOD
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: mai 2022
                Messages: 1,310
                Mentions "j'aime": 490
                Sharks would do this if Pasta made us an instant contender. It won't. And the upside of Bordeleau is too enticing to move him.
                11 juin 2022 à 20 h 56
                #13
                Buffbry
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: août 2017
                Messages: 8,844
                Mentions "j'aime": 5,309
                Wings pass can't give up 2 top 10 picks especially in a draft like 2023. Can't see any team give up 2 firsts for pasta with 1 year left
                Billy12Bob a aimé ceci.
                11 juin 2022 à 21 h 25
                #14
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: nov. 2021
                Messages: 1,131
                Mentions "j'aime": 868
                Would Bobby Brink, Egor Zamula, 2022 1st, FLA 2024 1st, PHI 2023 3rd work? I really like the trade that you have, but just curious
                11 juin 2022 à 21 h 43
                #15
                Démarrer sujet
                JDHockey
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: févr. 2022
                Messages: 55
                Mentions "j'aime": 8
                Quoting: Farabee
                Would Bobby Brink, Egor Zamula, 2022 1st, FLA 2024 1st, PHI 2023 3rd work? I really like the trade that you have, but just curious


                I think if the Bruins weren’t in desperate need of a good center prospect then that counteroffer would absolutely work. Either way I think a Flyers team with Pastrnak and a new coach could make some noise !
                Farabee a aimé ceci.
                11 juin 2022 à 21 h 44
                #16
                Hockey 1st Sens 2nd
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: août 2016
                Messages: 3,548
                Mentions "j'aime": 1,582
                Quoting: JDHockey
                I honestly do not know enough about them to answer that. I would hope the Bruins would target forward prospects as their defensive pool is top heavy. But I totally understand wanting to keep Boucher, could be a quintessential power forward some day.


                That is a lot to ask from Ottawa. I'd prefer Shane Pinto, who is going to be what you THOUGHT you were getting in Studnicka, the 7th OA, the '23 2nd and JBD, Jarventie or White (with $1.75M retained).
                11 juin 2022 à 22 h 17
                #17
                LongtimeLeafsufferer
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: juill. 2015
                Messages: 59,072
                Mentions "j'aime": 22,466
                Why would any of these teams make these trades? Pasta is one year rental and he doesn't help these significantly. I'm always amazed that fans think teams will trade for "their" upcoming UFAs. but are delighted when they can other teams UFAs for free.
                That's a crazy assumption that an extension is signed (for another team)
                12 juin 2022 à 1 h 42
                #18
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: juin 2019
                Messages: 8,025
                Mentions "j'aime": 3,568
                Quoting: JDHockey
                Key word is prospect. Sharks would be paying for proven talent, Bruins inherit all the risk. Any deal involving Pastrnak would need to start with Eklund or Bordeleau, so maybe these won’t be compatible trade partners.


                So are draft picks, what’s your point? That’s like 3/4 of the trades in the league. And Eklund or Bordeleau are a nonstarter for San Jose. Kinda like how Lysell is for all Boston fans
                12 juin 2022 à 12 h 51
                #19
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: juill. 2016
                Messages: 10,457
                Mentions "j'aime": 3,700
                As much as it pains me to trade Pinto, this is too hard to not want this Top-9 :

                Tkachuk - Norris - Batherson
                Formenton - Stutzle - Pastrnak
                Joseph - White - Brown

                Even better when Greig comes in and replaces White, then it would look :

                Tkachuk - Norris - Batherson
                Greig - Stutzle - Pastrnak
                Formenton - Joseph - Brown

                Could eventually afford to trade Brown (then replaced by Joseph) and have Ostapchuk at #3 C

                Quoting: csick
                I would do this if he came with a decent extension. But for 1 year of Pastrnak, it’s too much


                No way any team should trade a young player like Pinto and/or a 7th OA pick for any player who isn't going to be with them long term. This is a MUST
                csick a aimé ceci.
                 
                Répondre
                To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
                Question:
                Options:
                Ajouter une option
                Soumettre le sondage