SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Scheifele

Créé par: Bruins1054_gmb
Équipe: 2022-23 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 6 juin 2022
Publié: 6 juin 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I already understand that Bruins fans will tell me it's too much and that Scheifele doesn't fit the Bruins mold, and Jets fans will say the deal doesn't happen without Carlo or Lysell.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2800 000 $
1750 000 $
2762 500 $
1750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
14 000 000 $
1900 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
31 750 000 $
Transactions
1.
WPG
  1. DeBrusk, Jake
  2. Studnicka, Jack [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (BOS)
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (BOS)
2.
BOS
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (NYI)
  2. Choix de 7e ronde en 2023 (NYI)
Détails additionnels:
Discount price due to Reilly's injury
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de CGY
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de OTT
2023
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de NYI
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de NYI
2024
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $66 771 251 $0 $150 000 $15 728 749 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 375 000 $2 375 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
883 750 $883 750 $
C
RFA - 1
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG
NTC, NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance150 000 $$150K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 137 500 $1 137 500 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
900 000 $900 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Bruins de Boston
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 8
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 687 500 $3 687 500 $
DG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
6 juin 2022 à 13 h 48
#26
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 15,719
Mentions "j'aime": 6,983
Quoting: Bruins1054_gmb
Look at the Eichel trade. This proposal is very similar and Eichel had more value than Scheifele.


There wasn't a single worthless piece (like Studnica) in the Eichel trade and none of the pieces going to Buffalo had reduced their value by requesting a trade.

Plus all the players going to Buffalo filled needs for them while both players offered here don't fill a need fir the Jets.
Jetsdood27 a aimé ceci.
6 juin 2022 à 13 h 50
#27
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 5,265
Mentions "j'aime": 2,154
Quoting: Bruins1054_gmb
Already acknowledged that Jets fans would say something like that in the description. I think Jets fans overestimate what the return would be.


i agree jets fans overrate schiefele, but bruins fans also overrate debrusk and studnicka
Bruins1054_gmb a aimé ceci.
6 juin 2022 à 13 h 53
#28
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 1,210
Mentions "j'aime": 465
Quoting: Windjammer
There wasn't a single worthless piece (like Studnica) in the Eichel trade and none of the pieces going to Buffalo had reduced their value by requesting a trade.

Plus all the players going to Buffalo filled needs for them while both players offered here don't fill a need fir the Jets.


What you hope the Jets get for Scheifele and what they will get are two totally different things.
6 juin 2022 à 13 h 56
#29
jimmyjets
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2016
Messages: 932
Mentions "j'aime": 317
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
It actually fits really well. All are expected to miss at least 25% of the season. Plenty of room.


Quoting: CMcAvoy73
They’re all expected to miss a quarter of the season+. Multiply that 19M number by .75 an try again.


Quoting: Bruins1054_gmb
You're also not taking into consideration the cap hits of players that will be removed from the roster after those 3 players return.


It's always awkward when you double and triple down on things but people who know how things actually work see that you're wrong and when they try to point it out to you, you just tell them that they are wrong.

I think the key confusion here is that when you are an LTIR team you don't accrue capspace like you normally would, that is the penalty for being in LTIR. I didn't know much about it until the Jets actually became an LTIR team, so I'm pretty sure this is where the confusion is. Even when you waive 3 guys and save $2,300,000 worth of players, you're still over the cap. Trying to get the extra $1.3M off by going with a 22 or 21 person roster does cause problems whenever there is an injury/illness as you don't have room to call guys up unless you LTIR the person that got hurt.

So you could maybe tinker with the roster some more to become compliant, but additional cap dumps would need to happen as it doesn't look like you'd be compliant with this.

As for the trade, I would expect the Jets to just keep Scheif and see what happens with the new coach before doing a deal like this. Next offseason we could probably still expect to get a 1st, roster player and prospect for him. It's already a '23 1st being offered here so really we lose the value of a 2nd round pick by waiting and maybe get a roster player that we could actually use instead of another winger.
6 juin 2022 à 13 h 58
#30
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 15,719
Mentions "j'aime": 6,983
Quoting: Bruins1054_gmb
What you hope the Jets get for Scheifele and what they will get are two totally different things.


And what you hope you can get Scheifele for and what he will actually cost are two totally different things.
6 juin 2022 à 13 h 59
#31
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: TampaBayLightning22
On what planet? They're all 6 month recovery times. I don't know about you. but that comes to late November early December hardly 1/4 of the season.

And FYI that only eats real money not the cap hit which still remains the same.


No, the cap hit is prorated. Thats true of any player, whether or not they’re on LTIR. The NHL season is roughly 180 days. I think the number they use is 183. If a player is on the roster for 100 days, his cap hit is pro-rated at roughly 55% of his AAV.

This team would be cap compliant if the players all make their expected recovery.
6 juin 2022 à 14 h 1
#32
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: jimmyjets
It's always awkward when you double and triple down on things but people who know how things actually work see that you're wrong and when they try to point it out to you, you just tell them that they are wrong.

I think the key confusion here is that when you are an LTIR team you don't accrue capspace like you normally would, that is the penalty for being in LTIR. I didn't know much about it until the Jets actually became an LTIR team, so I'm pretty sure this is where the confusion is. Even when you waive 3 guys and save $2,300,000 worth of players, you're still over the cap. Trying to get the extra $1.3M off by going with a 22 or 21 person roster does cause problems whenever there is an injury/illness as you don't have room to call guys up unless you LTIR the person that got hurt.

So you could maybe tinker with the roster some more to become compliant, but additional cap dumps would need to happen as it doesn't look like you'd be compliant with this.

As for the trade, I would expect the Jets to just keep Scheif and see what happens with the new coach before doing a deal like this. Next offseason we could probably still expect to get a 1st, roster player and prospect for him. It's already a '23 1st being offered here so really we lose the value of a 2nd round pick by waiting and maybe get a roster player that we could actually use instead of another winger.


Sheesh, it takes guts to be this confidently wrong.

You’re correct that you can’t, “bank,” LTIR space as you can with real cap room. However players cap hits are prorated based on the time they miss. Its the whole point of LTIR. If a player has an AAV of $10M, and is on LTIR for the first 20% of NHL season days, 80% of his cap hit is applied. Cap space is a daily function, not a yearly function.
6 juin 2022 à 14 h 2
#33
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: Windjammer
There wasn't a single worthless piece (like Studnica) in the Eichel trade and none of the pieces going to Buffalo had reduced their value by requesting a trade.

Plus all the players going to Buffalo filled needs for them while both players offered here don't fill a need fir the Jets.


How has Debrusks trade request reduced his value?
6 juin 2022 à 14 h 4
#34
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 103
Mentions "j'aime": 65
Quoting: Bruins1054_gmb
Look at the Eichel trade. This proposal is very similar and Eichel had more value than Scheifele.


To be fair eichel wanted out of Buffalo and needed a a serious neck surgery and the return was much much more than what’s proposed here.
Windjammer a aimé ceci.
6 juin 2022 à 14 h 25
#35
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 8,127
Mentions "j'aime": 3,622
Quoting: Bruins1054_gmb
Look at the Eichel trade. This proposal is very similar and Eichel had more value than Scheifele.


What???? Tuch>>>>DeBrusk and Krebs>>>>>>>>>>>>>Studnicka it’s not even close to that deal man. Take off the homer glasses
Windjammer, Jetsdood27 et mv21227 a aimé ceci.
6 juin 2022 à 15 h 50
#36
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 10,046
Mentions "j'aime": 9,320
Quoting: Bruins1054_gmb
Look at the Eichel trade. This proposal is very similar and Eichel had more value than Scheifele.


The Eichel return was definitely better than this (as it should as Eichel is better, but this is still a lackluster return for Scheifele)

Tuch > Debrusk
Krebs >>>> Studnicka
Windjammer a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage