SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Canucks use cap space

Créé par: Kattensmagi
Équipe: 2022-23 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 1 juin 2022
Publié: 5 juin 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
2850 000 $
2850 000 $
3850 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
2950 000 $
2950 000 $
2950 000 $
2950 000 $
46 250 000 $
42 250 000 $
32 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
21 000 000 $
21 750 000 $
44 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
VAN
  1. Hörnqvist, Patric
  2. Johansson, Jonas [Droits de RFA]
  3. Kos, Jakub [Liste de réserve]
2.
VAN
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (DAL)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (DAL)
DAL
  1. Myers, Tyler (2 000 000 $ retained)
3.
VAN
  1. Boqvist, Adam [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (CHI)
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
CBJ
  1. Miller, J.T.
Détails additionnels:
Signs for 8,75*6
4.
VAN
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (OTT)
OTT
  1. Garland, Conor
  2. Woo, Jett
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (VAN)
5.
VAN
VGK
  1. Ferland, Micheal
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (VAN)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de VAN
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de DAL
Logo de TOR
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de NYR
Logo de DAL
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2182 500 000 $74 414 167 $1 250 000 $1 150 000 $8 085 833 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
950 000 $950 000 $
C, AG
UFA
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 260 000 $7 260 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
5 juin 2022 à 6 h 56
#1
PDG over PDO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 5,027
Mentions "j'aime": 4,092
I don't see the point in trading both Garland and Miller in this draft especially with it being a weaker year
5 juin 2022 à 7 h 11
#2
Hii
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 1,397
Mentions "j'aime": 570
Quoting: theleano1
I don't see the point in trading both Garland and Miller in this draft especially with it being a weaker year


It's not weaker, it's just being compared to a phenomenal draft next year. That year you probably don't get many picks traded.
dopplsan et AndrewPawlack a aimé ceci.
5 juin 2022 à 7 h 13
#3
Hii
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 1,397
Mentions "j'aime": 570
Also Ottawa declines.

Reasoning is because while Garland is pretty good Ottawa has a potentially better player in Greig that is not that far away so Ottawa doesn't need to go pay what could be a core piece of the future for a player that is not needed.

Woo is not needed cause we already have Thompson, JBD, and Guennette so he will struggle to find playing time as it is.

And the third does not make up for the lack of value in the other two pieces.
TCMonkey, athrin et PLDGEY a aimé ceci.
5 juin 2022 à 8 h 8
#4
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 7,792
Mentions "j'aime": 4,483
laugh On what planet does Garland plus Woo plus a 3rd round pick get you the 7th overall pick? I wouldn't move Detroit's 8th for that let alone Ottawa's 7th overall pick.
Hii et athrin a aimé ceci.
5 juin 2022 à 8 h 11
#5
Nah.
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,428
Mentions "j'aime": 4,296
I’m not sure you get Boqvist and 6th OA. I’d be willing to give 12tHh OA.
5 juin 2022 à 8 h 19
#6
Jimmy Stu
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 1,475
Mentions "j'aime": 541
It would be very upsetting if the sens traded a chance to draft Lekkerimaki or Kemell for Garland. Hard pass for me
athrin a aimé ceci.
5 juin 2022 à 9 h 7
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 10,488
Mentions "j'aime": 3,716
Quoting: TampaBayLightning22
laugh On what planet does Garland plus Woo plus a 3rd round pick get you the 7th overall pick? I wouldn't move Detroit's 8th for that let alone Ottawa's 7th overall pick.


It would be less painful to just forfeit the pick

Quoting: Hii
Also Ottawa declines.

Reasoning is because while Garland is pretty good Ottawa has a potentially better player in Greig that is not that far away so Ottawa doesn't need to go pay what could be a core piece of the future for a player that is not needed.

Woo is not needed cause we already have Thompson, JBD, and Guennette so he will struggle to find playing time as it is.

And the third does not make up for the lack of value in the other two pieces.


Hard to be more "diplomatic" than that!
Hii a aimé ceci.
5 juin 2022 à 17 h 12
#8
18 lotteries, 0 wins
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 1,226
Mentions "j'aime": 748
Quoting: Hii
It's not weaker, it's just being compared to a phenomenal draft next year. That year you probably don't get many picks traded.


this year has a top 5 after Wright, but next year has a big 3. It seems this year's draft is deeper for quality (Like 2017,18), but next year's will have much more prominent players out of those big 3. A lot more euro players this year so the Canadian media doesn't care about them (looking at you 2020 draft)
Hii et Xspyrit a aimé ceci.
5 juin 2022 à 17 h 15
#9
Hii
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 1,397
Mentions "j'aime": 570
Quoting: AndrewPawlack
this year has a top 5 after Wright, but next year has a big 3. It seems this year's draft is deeper for quality (Like 2017,18), but next year's will have much more prominent players out of those big 3. A lot more euro players this year so the Canadian media doesn't care about them (looking at you 2020 draft)


Yep, this draft is still very good and I have seen a lot of people saying that the draft is one of the weaker ones .
AndrewPawlack a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage