Forums/Armchair-GM

Bold and Busy off-season for Hextall

Créé par: Hullsy09
Date de création initiale: 27 mai 2022
Publié: 27 mai 2022
Équipe: 2022-23 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Explications
Note: Miller comes with an extension
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
Joseph, Pierre-Olivier2950 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
Fleury, Marc-André22 000 000 $
Letang, Kris57 750 000 $
Malkin, Evgeni36 750 000 $
Nichushkin, Valeri55 750 000 $
Marchment, Mason43 250 000 $
Domingue, Louis2800 000 $
Rodrigues, Evan13 000 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Geekie, Conor3925 000 $
Transactions
1.
PIT
  1. Miller, J.T.
VAN
  1. Kapanen, Kasperi [Droits de RFA]
  2. Marino, John
  3. 2023 1e round pick (PIT)
2.
PIT
  1. Burns, Brent (4 000 000 $ retained)
  2. 2022 1e round pick (SJS)
SJS
  1. Heinen, Danton [Droits de RFA]
  2. Hållander, Filip
  3. Légaré, Nathan
  4. 2022 1e round pick (PIT)
  5. 2023 2e round pick (PIT)
  6. 2024 3e round pick (PIT)
Détails additionnels:
Who adds?

(2024 3rd becomes a 2nd if Pittsburgh makes to ECF and burns plays in at least half the games)
3.
PIT
  1. 2022 3e round pick (DET)
DET
  1. Pettersson, Marcus
4.
PIT
  1. 2023 6e round pick (ARI)
  2. 2023 7e round pick (VAN)
Team doesn’t matter, whoever will give the best picks for them
ARI
  1. Zucker, Jason
  2. McGinn, Brock
Rachats de contrats
  • Jack Johnson: 1 916 667 $
ANNÉE DE REPÊCHAGERONDE 1RONDE 2RONDE 3RONDE 4RONDE 5RONDE 6RONDE 7
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de DET
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2023
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de ARI
Logo de PIT
Logo de TOR
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2282 500 000 $82 180 000 $0 $0 $320 000 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de PIT
Guentzel, Jake
6 000 000 $
AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de PIT
Crosby, Sidney
8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de PIT
Rust, Bryan
5 125 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de VAN
Miller, J.T.
5 250 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de PIT
Malkin, Evgeni
6 750 000 $
C
UFA
Nichushkin, Valeri
5 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
Marchment, Mason
3 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
Logo de PIT
Carter, Jeff
3 125 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de PIT
Rodrigues, Evan
3 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA
Logo de PIT
O'Connor, Drew
750 000 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de PIT
Blueger, Teddy
2 200 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de PIT
Zohorna, Radim
750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de PIT
Dumoulin, Brian
4 100 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de PIT
Letang, Kris
7 750 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de PIT
Jarry, Tristan
3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de PIT
Matheson, Michael
4 875 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de SJS
Burns, Brent
4 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Fleury, Marc-André
2 000 000 $
G
UFA
Logo de PIT
Joseph, Pierre-Olivier
950 000 $
DG
RFA
Logo de PIT
Ruhwedel, Chad
800 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de PIT
Poulin, Samuel
863 333 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de PIT
Friedman, Mark
775 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
27 mai à 14 h 21
#1
train, train
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 2,554
Mentions "j'aime": 604
I'm not understanding how the Sharks are retaining half of Burns' contract -- 4mil -- for three years, just so that they could trade him to move down from their #11 position to instead pick somewhere in the #20s?
sharks_1999 a aimé ceci.
27 mai à 14 h 26
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 963
Mentions "j'aime": 225
Yeah, we're not retaining 4mil for a guy that still put up 50+ points AND also trading away our #11 pick lol
CheechYou a aimé ceci.
27 mai à 14 h 43
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 1,315
Mentions "j'aime": 490
Quoting: CheechYou
I'm not understanding how the Sharks are retaining half of Burns' contract -- 4mil -- for three years, just so that they could trade him to move down from their #11 position to instead pick somewhere in the #20s?


Quoting: sharks_1999
Yeah, we're not retaining 4mil for a guy that still put up 50+ points AND also trading away our #11 pick lol


Quoting: sharks_1999
Yeah, we're not retaining 4mil for a guy that still put up 50+ points AND also trading away our #11 pick lol


You guys tried to trade one of vlasic karlson or burns with no interest per Elliott Friedman and he said you guys may need to retain to move them. Nobody is paying to take on the 37 year old wonder making 8 mil.

I asked “who adds” in the trade description, so now that you’ve made it clear you think the pens need to add, what do they need to add?
27 mai à 15 h 18
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 3,289
Mentions "j'aime": 1,913
Quoting: Hullsy09
You guys tried to trade one of vlasic karlson or burns with no interest per Elliott Friedman and he said you guys may need to retain to move them. Nobody is paying to take on the 37 year old wonder making 8 mil.

I asked “who adds” in the trade description, so now that you’ve made it clear you think the pens need to add, what do they need to add?


Lol pretty bold to say “nobody” is taking burns after the year he had. You shouldn’t clump Burns and Karlsson with Vlasic because they are completely different cases and players. Burns is easily movable without retaining half of his salary while moving down in the draft. What GM would think that’s a good trade for their franchise?
FunMustBeAlways et Shorkz a aimé ceci.
27 mai à 16 h 8
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 1,315
Mentions "j'aime": 490
Quoting: glarson17
Lol pretty bold to say “nobody” is taking burns after the year he had. You shouldn’t clump Burns and Karlsson with Vlasic because they are completely different cases and players. Burns is easily movable without retaining half of his salary while moving down in the draft. What GM would think that’s a good trade for their franchise?


That's not me saying that it's elliote friedman. He said they tried to move one of the 3 and they couldn't do it. Sorry I am going to take his word over the opinion of Glarson17.

As I have said several times now, I said "who adds" in the trade description. Meaning that I am not 100% sure which side this trade favors and asking for the opinion of a better trade. Not asking for a bunch of sharks fans to come and complain that 37 year old, overpaid, defensive liability, Brent Burns is the re-incarnation of Bobby Orr.
27 mai à 16 h 19
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 3,289
Mentions "j'aime": 1,913
Quoting: Hullsy09
That's not me saying that it's elliote friedman. He said they tried to move one of the 3 and they couldn't do it. Sorry I am going to take his word over the opinion of Glarson17.

As I have said several times now, I said "who adds" in the trade description. Meaning that I am not 100% sure which side this trade favors and asking for the opinion of a better trade. Not asking for a bunch of sharks fans to come and complain that 37 year old, overpaid, defensive liability, Brent Burns is the re-incarnation of Bobby Orr.


Pittsburg adds, I think that’s clear.

Friedman said there were preliminary discussions and nothing serious, I’ve never seen info stating there is “no interest” as you claim. In fact anything I’ve seen it mentioned there were teams interested and the talks were preliminary.
27 mai à 17 h 2
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 2,686
Mentions "j'aime": 1,218
Quoting: Hullsy09
That's not me saying that it's elliote friedman. He said they tried to move one of the 3 and they couldn't do it. Sorry I am going to take his word over the opinion of Glarson17.

As I have said several times now, I said "who adds" in the trade description. Meaning that I am not 100% sure which side this trade favors and asking for the opinion of a better trade. Not asking for a bunch of sharks fans to come and complain that 37 year old, overpaid, defensive liability, Brent Burns is the re-incarnation of Bobby Orr.


You are a total moron. Give it up.
27 mai à 17 h 46
#8
Big Shoots
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 1,496
Mentions "j'aime": 442
Canucks would have to take that I think
Hullsy09 a aimé ceci.
27 mai à 17 h 47
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 1,315
Mentions "j'aime": 490
Quoting: BigShoots
Canucks would have to take that I think


I have seen many variations of this trade but this seems like the simplest one that makes sense.
28 mai à 1 h 54
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 527
Mentions "j'aime": 189
Maybe Sharks do that deal if there's no Retention, if the retention remains at 4M per then remove the Sharks 1st for put like a Sharks 5th
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Supprimer une option
Soumettre le sondage