SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Bold and Busy off-season for Hextall

Créé par: Hullsy09
Équipe: 2022-23 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 27 mai 2022
Publié: 27 mai 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Note: Miller comes with an extension
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2950 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
22 000 000 $
57 750 000 $
36 750 000 $
55 750 000 $
43 250 000 $
2800 000 $
13 000 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Geekie, Conor
3925 000 $
Transactions
1.
VAN
  1. Kapanen, Kasperi [Droits de RFA]
  2. Marino, John
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (PIT)
2.
PIT
  1. Burns, Brent (4 000 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (SJS)
SJS
  1. Hållander, Filip
  2. Heinen, Danton [Droits de RFA]
  3. Légaré, Nathan
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (PIT)
  5. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (PIT)
  6. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (PIT)
Détails additionnels:
Who adds?

(2024 3rd becomes a 2nd if Pittsburgh makes to ECF and burns plays in at least half the games)
3.
PIT
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (DET)
4.
PIT
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2023 (ARI)
  2. Choix de 7e ronde en 2023 (VAN)
Détails additionnels:
Team doesn’t matter, whoever will give the best picks for them
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de DET
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2023
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de ARI
Logo de PIT
Logo de TOR
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2282 500 000 $77 960 000 $0 $0 $4 540 000 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
C
UFA - 4
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 8
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
AD, C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
7 750 000 $7 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 280 000 $1 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
950 000 $950 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
775 000 $775 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
27 mai 2022 à 14 h 21
#1
train, train
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 3,013
Mentions "j'aime": 733
I'm not understanding how the Sharks are retaining half of Burns' contract -- 4mil -- for three years, just so that they could trade him to move down from their #11 position to instead pick somewhere in the #20s?
sharks_1999 a aimé ceci.
27 mai 2022 à 14 h 26
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 978
Mentions "j'aime": 228
Yeah, we're not retaining 4mil for a guy that still put up 50+ points AND also trading away our #11 pick lol
CheechYou a aimé ceci.
27 mai 2022 à 14 h 43
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 2,770
Mentions "j'aime": 1,090
Quoting: CheechYou
I'm not understanding how the Sharks are retaining half of Burns' contract -- 4mil -- for three years, just so that they could trade him to move down from their #11 position to instead pick somewhere in the #20s?


Quoting: sharks_1999
Yeah, we're not retaining 4mil for a guy that still put up 50+ points AND also trading away our #11 pick lol


Quoting: sharks_1999
Yeah, we're not retaining 4mil for a guy that still put up 50+ points AND also trading away our #11 pick lol


You guys tried to trade one of vlasic karlson or burns with no interest per Elliott Friedman and he said you guys may need to retain to move them. Nobody is paying to take on the 37 year old wonder making 8 mil.

I asked “who adds” in the trade description, so now that you’ve made it clear you think the pens need to add, what do they need to add?
27 mai 2022 à 15 h 18
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 8,103
Mentions "j'aime": 3,602
Quoting: Hullsy09
You guys tried to trade one of vlasic karlson or burns with no interest per Elliott Friedman and he said you guys may need to retain to move them. Nobody is paying to take on the 37 year old wonder making 8 mil.

I asked “who adds” in the trade description, so now that you’ve made it clear you think the pens need to add, what do they need to add?


Lol pretty bold to say “nobody” is taking burns after the year he had. You shouldn’t clump Burns and Karlsson with Vlasic because they are completely different cases and players. Burns is easily movable without retaining half of his salary while moving down in the draft. What GM would think that’s a good trade for their franchise?
FunMustBeAlways et Shorkz a aimé ceci.
27 mai 2022 à 16 h 8
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 2,770
Mentions "j'aime": 1,090
Quoting: glarson17
Lol pretty bold to say “nobody” is taking burns after the year he had. You shouldn’t clump Burns and Karlsson with Vlasic because they are completely different cases and players. Burns is easily movable without retaining half of his salary while moving down in the draft. What GM would think that’s a good trade for their franchise?


That's not me saying that it's elliote friedman. He said they tried to move one of the 3 and they couldn't do it. Sorry I am going to take his word over the opinion of Glarson17.

As I have said several times now, I said "who adds" in the trade description. Meaning that I am not 100% sure which side this trade favors and asking for the opinion of a better trade. Not asking for a bunch of sharks fans to come and complain that 37 year old, overpaid, defensive liability, Brent Burns is the re-incarnation of Bobby Orr.
27 mai 2022 à 16 h 19
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 8,103
Mentions "j'aime": 3,602
Quoting: Hullsy09
That's not me saying that it's elliote friedman. He said they tried to move one of the 3 and they couldn't do it. Sorry I am going to take his word over the opinion of Glarson17.

As I have said several times now, I said "who adds" in the trade description. Meaning that I am not 100% sure which side this trade favors and asking for the opinion of a better trade. Not asking for a bunch of sharks fans to come and complain that 37 year old, overpaid, defensive liability, Brent Burns is the re-incarnation of Bobby Orr.


Pittsburg adds, I think that’s clear.

Friedman said there were preliminary discussions and nothing serious, I’ve never seen info stating there is “no interest” as you claim. In fact anything I’ve seen it mentioned there were teams interested and the talks were preliminary.
27 mai 2022 à 17 h 2
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 2,686
Mentions "j'aime": 1,219
Quoting: Hullsy09
That's not me saying that it's elliote friedman. He said they tried to move one of the 3 and they couldn't do it. Sorry I am going to take his word over the opinion of Glarson17.

As I have said several times now, I said "who adds" in the trade description. Meaning that I am not 100% sure which side this trade favors and asking for the opinion of a better trade. Not asking for a bunch of sharks fans to come and complain that 37 year old, overpaid, defensive liability, Brent Burns is the re-incarnation of Bobby Orr.


You are a total moron. Give it up.
27 mai 2022 à 17 h 46
#8
Big Shoots
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,570
Mentions "j'aime": 1,087
Canucks would have to take that I think
Hullsy09 a aimé ceci.
27 mai 2022 à 17 h 47
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 2,770
Mentions "j'aime": 1,090
Quoting: BigShoots
Canucks would have to take that I think


I have seen many variations of this trade but this seems like the simplest one that makes sense.
28 mai 2022 à 1 h 54
#10
SJS Tanking fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 579
Mentions "j'aime": 201
Maybe Sharks do that deal if there's no Retention, if the retention remains at 4M per then remove the Sharks 1st for put like a Sharks 5th
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage