Don't see Dallas moving Benn. Seguin more likely. Also Burns is more valuable than Benn and I'd much rather have Burns for the duration of his deal than Benn for his.

Bordeleau is wasted on the 4th line.

I've seen this proposal a couple of times now.

I don't really have an issue with it. I guess it all depends if Dubas wants to split Hill's time with another goalie that costs around the same as Hill. Not sure how I feel about a Mrazek/Hill tandem if Mrazek doesn't get moved out.

I wasn't too sure who they would move so I picked what looked like the worse contract

bordy will definitely be at least a middle 6 center but he only has like 9 NHL games and if the sharks go into the season with him as 3c we will definitely be challenging...... teams like Arizona

I've just seen a lot of holl to the sharks for picks but I was seeing what another option would be

I think the issue for Toronto is Hill is a backup. At best, a B in an A/B tandem. Toronto needs an A. So he helps, but doesn't necessarily fill their need.

You're exactly right, TOR needs an A. Hill as a backup at almost $2.2M isn't exactly ideal. Holl at $2M has better value. Seems silly because this is such a minor deal, but TOR would probably decline.

I’d rather the sharks not do either trade, particularly the Dallas trade. Benn is the more expensive player and Burns is better by a bit recently.