SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

REALISTIC Flames fixes

Créé par: k3vinkac
Équipe: 2022-23 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 27 mai 2022
Publié: 27 mai 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Shaking things up in Calgary as a Flames fan

Seems to be that Tkachuk doesn't want to stay long term, therefore I believe they should trade him

Defence was a huge issue in the playoffs, I address this by trade and UFA

More speed on the 4th line, I think the new 4th line consists of fantastic checking players that are upgrades to what we currently role.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
23 500 000 $
25 000 000 $
1900 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1900 000 $
89 500 000 $
11 300 000 $
11 400 000 $
21 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
ARI
  1. Lucic, Milan
  2. Välimäki, Juuso
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (CGY)
Détails additionnels:
Cap dump, maybe excessive but not sure what ARZ wants
2.
CGY
  1. Konecny, Travis
  2. Sanheim, Travis
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (FLA)
Détails additionnels:
Flyers get a big upgrade at forward, seems like they still want to be competitive. Dube could break out with a change of scenery
PHI
  1. Dubé, Dillon
  2. Tkachuk, Matthew [Droits de RFA]
Détails additionnels:
Flames solidify their defence, Sanheim has been in rumours
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2023
Logo de CGY
Logo de FLA
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2024
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2282 500 000 $70 963 333 $0 $0 $11 536 667 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 125 000 $2 125 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
863 333 $863 333 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
C, AG
UFA
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
4 675 000 $4 675 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
912 500 $912 500 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
27 mai 2022 à 3 h 28
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,241
Mentions "j'aime": 19,510
Anyone saying Tkachuk traded for depth players is "realistic" is trolling
27 mai 2022 à 3 h 38
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 3
Mentions "j'aime": 1
With all due respect, Konecny and Sanheim are not depth players. They are solid players. It's an unsigned RFA, not sure why there would be much more in that deal but okay!
27 mai 2022 à 3 h 49
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,241
Mentions "j'aime": 19,510
Quoting: k3vinkac
With all due respect, Konecny and Sanheim are not depth players. They are solid players. It's an unsigned RFA, not sure why there would be much more in that deal but okay!


Lol you say that like he wont sign long term with anyone. Konecny is a 2nd line winger at best, 3rd line on your above team and Sanheim is 1 year from UFA and you have him on the 3rd pair. Philly adds this years 1st at least and its still probably a crappy return
27 mai 2022 à 4 h 37
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2018
Messages: 6,311
Mentions "j'aime": 2,227
CGY fans will want the moon for Tkachuk and I don't blame them.

However, I think its important to remember that you cant agree an extension first and its a trade of RFA rights.

You'll never trade a tkachuk for tkachuk or a marner for a marner, but you can address other (multiple) problems/areas.

I think something like a Koneckny, Sanheim AND a 2nd or 3rd for Tkachuk's rights alone is probably not far off. (TK put up 50pts without a 1C all season, and a 2C, 2LW, 3LW and Giroux all out for 20 or more games, on a malfunctioning/poorly coached team, which I think is pretty good production, so I think its wrong to not see him as a top 6 winger.) Sanheim, while a pending UFA, is coming off a career year and CGY is still close now, and his salary/resign wouldnt upset balance of team moving forward. So I dont think the offer above is out of whack. (But I'd keep Dube and not make the Boyd acquisition, still leaving 2-3mil for an upgrade somewhere)

I'd have:
Gaudreau-Lindholm-Mangiapane
Toffoli-Backlund-Koneckny
Pelletier-Larsson-Coleman
?-Rucizcka-Dube

Yesterday I put a Couturier/Sanheim/prospect Desnoyes and pick offer for Tkachuk.
ReelBigFan et k3vinkac a aimé ceci.
27 mai 2022 à 5 h 10
#5
Bandwagon fairweathe
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,585
Mentions "j'aime": 3,250
Tkachuk ever said what he wants in a extension or if he wants to go south, after a playoff outing like this I’m sure left him with some fire and unfinished business. 90s jets fan here and witnessing a 22 year old Walt tkachuk, damn did I want jets 2.0 to find a way up to grab at least one of them or both ala sedin brothers.
27 mai 2022 à 8 h 16
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 1,829
Mentions "j'aime": 792
Probably reaching, but would you take Provorov instead of Sanhiem?
27 mai 2022 à 8 h 22
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 1,829
Mentions "j'aime": 792
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Lol you say that like he wont sign long term with anyone. Konecny is a 2nd line winger at best, 3rd line on your above team and Sanheim is 1 year from UFA and you have him on the 3rd pair. Philly adds this years 1st at least and its still probably a crappy return


Sanhiem probably moves to top pair in Philly this year, definitely not a 3rd pair D, TK most likely moves up to the first line on the Flames… not a 3rd liner on any team in the league…
27 mai 2022 à 8 h 29
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,241
Mentions "j'aime": 19,510
Quoting: ReelBigFan
Sanhiem probably moves to top pair in Philly this year, definitely not a 3rd pair D, TK most likely moves up to the first line on the Flames… not a 3rd liner on any team in the league…


Sanheim is a top 4 defenseman on most teams, I'm not arguing that. He's not a top pair defenseman though. He would maybe be 2nd pair in Calgary over Kylington but that still puts too much cap into the 3rd pair regardless of who plays there.

TK is a middle 6 winger, Mangiapane or Toffoli would be 1st line over him pretty easily if Tkachuk is moved. Regardless this still doesn't change the fact that even if you remove Dube the trade is extremely lopsided towards Philly
27 mai 2022 à 8 h 53
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 1,829
Mentions "j'aime": 792
Quoting: Hammerwise
CGY fans will want the moon for Tkachuk and I don't blame them.

However, I think its important to remember that you cant agree an extension first and its a trade of RFA rights.

You'll never trade a tkachuk for tkachuk or a marner for a marner, but you can address other (multiple) problems/areas.

I think something like a Koneckny, Sanheim AND a 2nd or 3rd for Tkachuk's rights alone is probably not far off. (TK put up 50pts without a 1C all season, and a 2C, 2LW, 3LW and Giroux all out for 20 or more games, on a malfunctioning/poorly coached team, which I think is pretty good production, so I think its wrong to not see him as a top 6 winger.) Sanheim, while a pending UFA, is coming off a career year and CGY is still close now, and his salary/resign wouldnt upset balance of team moving forward. So I dont think the offer above is out of whack. (But I'd keep Dube and not make the Boyd acquisition, still leaving 2-3mil for an upgrade somewhere)

I'd have:
Gaudreau-Lindholm-Mangiapane
Toffoli-Backlund-Koneckny
Pelletier-Larsson-Coleman
?-Rucizcka-Dube

Yesterday I put a Couturier/Sanheim/prospect Desnoyes and pick offer for Tkachuk.


Those are some good lines, I think TK probably could also make sense on line 1, brings a bit of that same style they would lose from Tkachuk and overall is the best winger not named Johnny… or at least he is when he isn’t being coached by AV lol
Hammerwise a aimé ceci.
27 mai 2022 à 11 h 13
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 3
Mentions "j'aime": 1
Quoting: Hammerwise
CGY fans will want the moon for Tkachuk and I don't blame them.

However, I think its important to remember that you cant agree an extension first and its a trade of RFA rights.

You'll never trade a tkachuk for tkachuk or a marner for a marner, but you can address other (multiple) problems/areas.

I think something like a Koneckny, Sanheim AND a 2nd or 3rd for Tkachuk's rights alone is probably not far off. (TK put up 50pts without a 1C all season, and a 2C, 2LW, 3LW and Giroux all out for 20 or more games, on a malfunctioning/poorly coached team, which I think is pretty good production, so I think its wrong to not see him as a top 6 winger.) Sanheim, while a pending UFA, is coming off a career year and CGY is still close now, and his salary/resign wouldnt upset balance of team moving forward. So I dont think the offer above is out of whack. (But I'd keep Dube and not make the Boyd acquisition, still leaving 2-3mil for an upgrade somewhere)

I'd have:
Gaudreau-Lindholm-Mangiapane
Toffoli-Backlund-Koneckny
Pelletier-Larsson-Coleman
?-Rucizcka-Dube

Yesterday I put a Couturier/Sanheim/prospect Desnoyes and pick offer for Tkachuk.


Finally constructive criticism. Thank you for your input
Hammerwise a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage