SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Burns Fast forward to May pls

Créé par: HappyKampfers
Équipe: 2022-23 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 20 mai 2022
Publié: 20 mai 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Yes I do want to watch the world burn

Can playoffs end so we acutally hear rumors with base to it... Acutally can we fast forward to may, who cares about this playoffs and the regular season

Also I factored in the Liljegren overage penalty and if you look at the mrazek trade and Holl trade and say we decline.. it could be literally any team. Mrazek will be a minimal cap dump since some teams will need a goalie and Holl is a right shot PKer which gms go crazy for
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
11 500 000 $
21 800 000 $
23 000 000 $
1850 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
14 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
TOR
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2022 (CHI)
CHI
  1. Mrázek, Petr
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
3.
TOR
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (DAL)
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2022 (DAL)
4.
TOR
  1. Strome, Dylan [Droits de RFA]
Détails additionnels:
Not QO
CHI
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de WPG
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 300 000 $77 909 917 $212 500 $0 $4 390 083 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
950 000 $950 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 3
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
796 667 $796 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
762 500 $762 500 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
827 500 $827 500 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 280 000 $1 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
20 mai 2022 à 8 h 50
#1
TOR V5 GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 4,366
Mentions "j'aime": 1,904
not enough for nylander
HappyKampfers a aimé ceci.
20 mai 2022 à 8 h 51
#2
Démarrer sujet
Drover006
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 1,448
Mentions "j'aime": 494
Quoting: LGuy54
not enough for nylander


I mean probably but looking at the sharks roster not much there. Plus I REALLY like both balcers and gregor
20 mai 2022 à 8 h 53
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 550
Mentions "j'aime": 395
Probably not enough to take on Mrazek. Strome is definitely getting qualified.
20 mai 2022 à 8 h 57
#4
Seiders on the Storm
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2020
Messages: 9,890
Mentions "j'aime": 7,764
Much easier to trade Holl than Mrazek.
20 mai 2022 à 8 h 58
#5
Démarrer sujet
Drover006
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 1,448
Mentions "j'aime": 494
Quoting: thesaadfather
Probably not enough to take on Mrazek. Strome is definitely getting qualified.


There was rumors in season that he and kubalik wouldn't be.
20 mai 2022 à 9 h 1
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 550
Mentions "j'aime": 395
Quoting: SomethingLeafs
There was rumors in season that he and kubalik wouldn't be.


That was before Strome started getting playing time again and his production blew up.
Garak a aimé ceci.
20 mai 2022 à 9 h 15
#7
Démarrer sujet
Drover006
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 1,448
Mentions "j'aime": 494
Quoting: thesaadfather
That was before Strome started getting playing time again and his production blew up.


It was acutally a bit after he did
20 mai 2022 à 9 h 27
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 2,686
Mentions "j'aime": 1,219
50% retention on Burns is never happening. And this deal is INSANELY lopsided toward the leafs. Super easy decline.
Horrible for the Sharks.
Bias_it_self a aimé ceci.
20 mai 2022 à 9 h 43
#9
OTTAWA Sean
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 244
Mentions "j'aime": 43
This doesn't work for either
20 mai 2022 à 9 h 56
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 2,686
Mentions "j'aime": 1,219
Sharks will either retain (some) salary or send a young player with Burns but it won't be 2 excellent young players + our best goalie.

Realistic is:

To TML: Burns (1 mil retention) + Noah Gregor
To SJS: 2nd Round pick and Alex Kerfoot (cap purposes)

Your deal is video game level fantasy.
20 mai 2022 à 10 h 0
#11
Démarrer sujet
Drover006
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 1,448
Mentions "j'aime": 494
Quoting: crankshaft
50% retention on Burns is never happening. And this deal is INSANELY lopsided toward the leafs. Super easy decline.
Horrible for the Sharks.


Buddy idk where it's lopsided since we are giving the better player
20 mai 2022 à 10 h 5
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 2,686
Mentions "j'aime": 1,219
Quoting: SomethingLeafs
Buddy idk where it's lopsided since we are giving the better player


Nylander is not worth a 4 mil Brent Burns, our top goalie on an excellent contract, a young player who will have a very good contract next year who is primed to break out, a very solid versatile Balcers on an excellent contract. No GM is retaining that much cap in a hard cap world. classic, delusional Leafs fantasy.
Waffelz a aimé ceci.
20 mai 2022 à 10 h 10
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 550
Mentions "j'aime": 395
Quoting: SomethingLeafs
It was acutally a bit after he did


Regardless of when you saw it, I don’t see any way that it actually happens.
20 mai 2022 à 11 h 12
#14
Temple of Ferraro
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 637
Mentions "j'aime": 335
Sharks decline
Waffelz a aimé ceci.
20 mai 2022 à 11 h 34
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 780
Mentions "j'aime": 290
Easy Sharks decline. $12m in retained cap over 3 years, a good defenseman, a solid 1a/1b goaltender, and a pair of promising young forwards in exchange for basically just Nylander?


Also what the hell is that Mrazek trade? Most of the AGMs I see have the leafs giving up a 1st just to get his contract off the books, and you think a team will take him for nothing?
crankshaft a aimé ceci.
20 mai 2022 à 11 h 38
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 2,686
Mentions "j'aime": 1,219
Quoting: Waffelz
Easy Sharks decline. $12m in retained cap over 3 years, a good defenseman, a solid 1a/1b goaltender, and a pair of promising young forwards in exchange for basically just Nylander?


Also what the hell is that Mrazek trade? Most of the AGMs I see have the leafs giving up a 1st just to get his contract off the books, and you think a team will take him for nothing?


Leafs fans...I feel for 'em though while we've seen 4 conference finals, cup finals and so many semi finals in the last 20 years, they have seen nothing but first round exits. But for some reason they still think teams are lining up to be fleeced by them in trades...
Waffelz a aimé ceci.
20 mai 2022 à 11 h 54
#17
Démarrer sujet
Drover006
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 1,448
Mentions "j'aime": 494
Quoting: Waffelz
Easy Sharks decline. $12m in retained cap over 3 years, a good defenseman, a solid 1a/1b goaltender, and a pair of promising young forwards in exchange for basically just Nylander?


Also what the hell is that Mrazek trade? Most of the AGMs I see have the leafs giving up a 1st just to get his contract off the books, and you think a team will take him for nothing?


Most agms on here forget that gms will miss out on a goalies in FA and probably take the bet on Mrazek
20 mai 2022 à 12 h 7
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 2,686
Mentions "j'aime": 1,219
Quoting: SomethingLeafs
Most agms on here forget that gms will miss out on a goalies in FA and probably take the bet on Mrazek


There are 10 goalies in UFA I would take over Mrazek. He has missed time due to injuries 7 times in the last 3 years. He has a 10 team NT list and makes almost 4 mil for a guy who has been super inconsistent when he has played. Leafs will have to keep him or retain a heap of salary to move him.
Waffelz a aimé ceci.
20 mai 2022 à 12 h 24
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,282
Mentions "j'aime": 2,731
None of this is realistic. SJ isn’t retaining that kind of money on Burns. Mrazek’s contract will cost more to dump. I’m not convinced Holl is worth good picks. Chicago isn’t letting a 50 point forward go for nothing
20 mai 2022 à 13 h 50
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,204
Mentions "j'aime": 2,861
You could probably try routing Burns through Arizona and pay them to retain on him but the sharks aren’t retaining that much.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage