SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Lakoffseason1

Créé par: KPM12
Équipe: 2022-23 Kings de Los Angeles
Date de création initiale: 19 mai 2022
Publié: 19 mai 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3775 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
2775 000 $
2825 000 $
2900 000 $
21 150 000 $
2800 000 $
3800 000 $
1955 000 $
3805 000 $
22 800 000 $
66 000 000 $
22 200 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
12 000 000 $
21 550 000 $
Transactions
1.
LAK
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (WPG)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (WSH)
Détails additionnels:
Saw this on another AGM
2.
TOR
  1. Grundström, Carl
  2. Kempe, Adrian
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (LAK)
3.
4.
LAK
  1. Portillo, Erik [Liste de réserve]
Détails additionnels:
assuming Portillo does not want to sign in buffalo, lak would also consider a draft pick trade for Portillo
5.
LAK
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (PHI)
Rachats de contrats
Frais de résiliation
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de LAK
Logo de WPG
Logo de PIT
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
2023
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de PIT
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
2024
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de WSH
Logo de PHI
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $72 348 200 $637 500 $4 365 000 $10 151 800 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
795 000 $795 000 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 875 000 $1 875 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance1 550 000 $$2M)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
955 000 $955 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
900 000 $900 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 675 000 $1 675 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance150 000 $$150K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
825 000 $825 000 $
C, AG, AD
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
820 000 $820 000 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DD
RFA - 2
1 550 000 $1 550 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
19 mai 2022 à 12 h 7
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 6,430
Mentions "j'aime": 4,487
Petersen must steal the role from Quick, he can't be given it. Quick can't be traded, it's bad for morale and Petersen hasn't proven he is the better goalie yet.

If we are losing a 30+ goal scorer to get a more expensive goal scorer (Kempe is expected at $5.5M) and get weaker at LD, how is this a step in the right direction?

Get picks/prospects for Walker, we have too many players who need to be re-upped to give Lindblom a shot.

I'm not ready to give up on Byfield, but I guess I understand the Byfield for Byram argument.
19 mai 2022 à 12 h 11
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 782
Mentions "j'aime": 339
I'd concider it from the buffalo perspective, especially after the Tage revelation of last year.
I havent given up on portillo signing yet tho and we need the goalie.
If i was LA i would be concerned that portillo doesnt seem to want to be in buffalo right now. Theres a chance to earn a starting job here in the ahl and nhl. UPL has had injury issues and levi is a younger prospect. The amerks did well and are making a nice run with their back up goalie right now and he chose to not take a shot at beating out Dell and taking a run at an nhl job next year. Makes me question his compete.
Also you're crazy yo trade byfield.
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
19 mai 2022 à 12 h 20
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 708
Mentions "j'aime": 236
Quoting: tryger
Petersen must steal the role from Quick, he can't be given it. Quick can't be traded, it's bad for morale and Petersen hasn't proven he is the better goalie yet.

If we are losing a 30+ goal scorer to get a more expensive goal scorer (Kempe is expected at $5.5M) and get weaker at LD, how is this a step in the right direction?

Get picks/prospects for Walker, we have too many players who need to be re-upped to give Lindblom a shot.

I'm not ready to give up on Byfield, but I guess I understand the Byfield for Byram argument.


Edler and Maata were both good on LD last yr and Bjornfot heavily struggled (ik he's young but LAK has a lot of D prospects). I just couldn’t sign them both back on LD, I would hope they bring one of them back. I actually agree with you on the Walker thing. Kempe will probably get 5.5-6 but he doesn’t come even close to the playmaking ability and zone entry game as Nylander does, along with that he still shoots pretty well. One of LA's biggest weaknesses last season was pure zone entry from fwds which is why I think Nylander would be crucial to the success of this time. Byram for byfield and bjornfot would be a chance LAK needs to take given Bjornfot's early struggles and byram has been significantly better than byfield so far. Col does have Girard and Toews on LD and would add bjornfot as a chance who they can actually take the time to properly develop him along with getting two yrs at a rookie deal on byfield vs the one.
tryger a aimé ceci.
19 mai 2022 à 12 h 21
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 708
Mentions "j'aime": 236
Quoting: DDossett
I'd concider it from the buffalo perspective, especially after the Tage revelation of last year.
I havent given up on portillo signing yet tho and we need the goalie.
If i was LA i would be concerned that portillo doesnt seem to want to be in buffalo right now. Theres a chance to earn a starting job here in the ahl and nhl. UPL has had injury issues and levi is a younger prospect. The amerks did well and are making a nice run with their back up goalie right now and he chose to not take a shot at beating out Dell and taking a run at an nhl job next year. Makes me question his compete.
Also you're crazy yo trade byfield.


I don’t think erik is completely out but I feel like I still respected his value as a goalie if he wants out. LA could definitely use a good goalie prospect like him
19 mai 2022 à 12 h 51
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 373
Mentions "j'aime": 78
I like Kempe, I just don't see the Leafs doing that deal
19 mai 2022 à 14 h 4
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 6,430
Mentions "j'aime": 4,487
Quoting: KPM12
Edler and Maata were both good on LD last yr and Bjornfot heavily struggled (ik he's young but LAK has a lot of D prospects). I just couldn’t sign them both back on LD, I would hope they bring one of them back. I actually agree with you on the Walker thing. Kempe will probably get 5.5-6 but he doesn’t come even close to the playmaking ability and zone entry game as Nylander does, along with that he still shoots pretty well. One of LA's biggest weaknesses last season was pure zone entry from fwds which is why I think Nylander would be crucial to the success of this time. Byram for byfield and bjornfot would be a chance LAK needs to take given Bjornfot's early struggles and byram has been significantly better than byfield so far. Col does have Girard and Toews on LD and would add bjornfot as a chance who they can actually take the time to properly develop him along with getting two yrs at a rookie deal on byfield vs the one.


I agree with most of these points, but I'm not willing to move Bjornfot just yet. He still is in the top-10 of games played from his draft class. He's two years younger than Durzi and we haven't come close to seeing his ceiling.

I want Byram, but I don't believe Vilardi, Turcotte, or Kupari have what it takes to be a #1 in the NHL, Byfield does, he needs more time.
19 mai 2022 à 14 h 37
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 708
Mentions "j'aime": 236
Quoting: tryger
I agree with most of these points, but I'm not willing to move Bjornfot just yet. He still is in the top-10 of games played from his draft class. He's two years younger than Durzi and we haven't come close to seeing his ceiling.

I want Byram, but I don't believe Vilardi, Turcotte, or Kupari have what it takes to be a #1 in the NHL, Byfield does, he needs more time.


I know Colorado would need Byfield to have a chance at taking a deal like that, I think bjornfot is negotiable for another prospect or draft choice but you have to give good to get good back. I give a lot of credit for what the Kings accomplished this season but they definitely need to shift towards finding the pieces the fit them best and being practical vs emotional on decisions.
ArakinSkywalker a aimé ceci.
19 mai 2022 à 14 h 39
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 7,136
Mentions "j'aime": 3,156
I could see the Sabres moving Portillo
Seems like he feels he’ll be stuck behind 2 other young goalies we have & not get a shot
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage