SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Seaoffseason1

Créé par: KPM12
Équipe: 2022-23 Kraken de Seattle
Date de création initiale: 18 mai 2022
Publié: 18 mai 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Definitely setting the team up to have the ability to sell some assets at the deadline and keeping two of the three retained salary spots available. Taking some not so great contracts from contenders as a lot of teams will be looking for more financial flexibility. This allows Seattle to add more picks and build up a prospect pool.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
11 750 000 $
11 450 000 $
2875 000 $
2875 000 $
11 600 000 $
2900 000 $
34 110 731 $
2777 000 $
2777 000 $
2777 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 950 000 $
Offres hostiles
Le salaire annuel moyen (AAV) de l'offre hostile est calculé en divisant la valeur totale du contrat par: 1. La durée totale du contrat, ou 2. Cinq ans
JOUEURAAVCOMPENSATION
Sandin, Rasmus4 110 731 $
Choix de 2e ronde en 2023
Transactions
1.
SEA
  1. Holl, Justin
  2. Kerfoot, Alexander
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
TOR
  1. Soucy, Carson
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (SEA)
2.
SEA
  1. Hagelin, Carl
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (WPG)
3.
SEA
  1. Lindblom, Oskar
Détails additionnels:
Saw this on another AGM (from the PHI side) and thought it could work
PHI
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2023 (SEA)
4.
SEA
  1. Stanley, Logan
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2022 (WPG)
5.
SEA
  1. Smilanic, Ty [Liste de réserve]
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (MTL)
Détails additionnels:
If MTL wants to be good again, LD is a major hole on the roster.

Pick 33rd Overall
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de SEA
Logo de TOR
Logo de FLA
Logo de NSH
Logo de TOR
Logo de WPG
Logo de MTL
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de CGY
Logo de WSH
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de WPG
Logo de SEA
2023
Logo de SEA
Logo de TOR
Logo de WPG
Logo de SEA
Logo de CGY
Logo de SEA
Logo de COL
Logo de WPG
Logo de SEA
Logo de WSH
Logo de SEA
2024
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de TOR
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $72 249 897 $0 $925 000 $10 250 103 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
5 166 666 $5 166 666 $
C, AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
897 500 $897 500 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
1 950 000 $1 950 000 $
C
UFA
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
875 000 $875 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
5 900 000 $5 900 000 $
G
NTC
UFA - 5
4 110 731 $4 110 731 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
900 000 $900 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
900 000 $900 000 $
DG
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
18 mai 2022 à 7 h 40
#1
Jet69
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 2,595
Mentions "j'aime": 1,142
Stanley for Geekie?
KPM12 a aimé ceci.
18 mai 2022 à 8 h 43
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 2,682
Mentions "j'aime": 2,995
Major overpay on the Avs trade. Dunn would be a 3rd pairing guy in Colorado and would not get any PP time. Avs are better off giving a similar contract to a guy like Manson and keeping their 2023 1st, best defensive prospect, decent forward prospect, and EJ.
18 mai 2022 à 10 h 10
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,256
Mentions "j'aime": 8,898
WTH is that COL trade? Vince Dunn would be like the 5th best dman on COL get zero power play time and they are expected to trade a dman that fills his roll significantly better, the Avs top d prospect a forward prospect and a 1st. I’ve seen some bad value trades on here but this is up there. Seriously I want to understand how a) you decided the Avs would want Dunn knowing already under contract for next year they have Makar, Toews, Byram, and Girard b) how you think Dunn is worth that package?
18 mai 2022 à 10 h 20
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 21
Mentions "j'aime": 6
The Flyers will throw in JVR as well but lets bump that pick up to a 3rd. Lindblom and JVR for one of your 3rds.
18 mai 2022 à 10 h 51
#5
Skip skibbity
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2016
Messages: 2,089
Mentions "j'aime": 811
That's a yes from the Caps.
KPM12 a aimé ceci.
18 mai 2022 à 11 h 25
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 708
Mentions "j'aime": 236
Quoting: jgimp69
Stanley for Geekie?


I am personally not a huge stanley fan. I think that could make sense if Seattle got a 6th(ish) back as well. I personally think Geekie is a little better
18 mai 2022 à 11 h 38
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 708
Mentions "j'aime": 236
Quoting: turtlemountain
Major overpay on the Avs trade. Dunn would be a 3rd pairing guy in Colorado and would not get any PP time. Avs are better off giving a similar contract to a guy like Manson and keeping their 2023 1st, best defensive prospect, decent forward prospect, and EJ.


The reason for Colorado doing this trade is to 1.) clear EJ's contract to have the opportunity to sign some of Burakovsky, Nichuskin, Kadri, kuemper or possibly even manson. 2.) Dunn has played both sides throughout his career so he is very lineup flexible in that sense 3.) manson will likely cost a lot more than 2.6 next season and get a 3-6 yr deal in all likelihood, that is not something appealing for a team needing to sign Mac next offseason 4.) Dunn gets the RS and is under team control (rfa) after he expires so while he's technically a rental but could be moved out if needed 5.) the retained salary, cap clearing and acquiring dunn will cost assets but if Colorado actually wants to win again beyond this season, you sometimes have to dip into your futures to do so.
18 mai 2022 à 12 h 1
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 2,682
Mentions "j'aime": 2,995
Quoting: KPM12
The reason for Colorado doing this trade is to 1.) clear EJ's contract to have the opportunity to sign some of Burakovsky, Nichuskin, Kadri, kuemper or possibly even manson. 2.) Dunn has played both sides throughout his career so he is very lineup flexible in that sense 3.) manson will likely cost a lot more than 2.6 next season and get a 3-6 yr deal in all likelihood, that is not something appealing for a team needing to sign Mac next offseason 4.) Dunn gets the RS and is under team control (rfa) after he expires so while he's technically a rental but could be moved out if needed 5.) the retained salary, cap clearing and acquiring dunn will cost assets but if Colorado actually wants to win again beyond this season, you sometimes have to dip into your futures to do so.


Yeah that’s not happening. Makar, Toews, Girard, Byram are all better than Dunn. All of those guys are more likely to play on the PP than Dunn. So really what the Avs would need is someone for their PK. Which to my knowledge is not Dunn’s strong suit.

EJ is still a competent NHL defenseman and is overpaid by a few million for one more year. The Avs aren’t in a huge cap crunch this summer, that will be summer 2023. You don’t clear your prospect pool out to save $4M for one year.

Again using Manson as an example: someone like him probably gets around a 4x$4.5? He’s a better role fit for Colorado given that he’s a PK guy. AND you get to keep your top defensive prospect, a 1st, and a decent forward prospect. I think that’s worth the trade off.

I get what you’re trying to do, but this is both a huge overvalue of Dunn and not a good fit for where Colorado is.
18 mai 2022 à 12 h 34
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,605
Mentions "j'aime": 915
Leafs aren’t paying a 1st+ for Soucy
18 mai 2022 à 12 h 43
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 708
Mentions "j'aime": 236
Quoting: T0R
Leafs aren’t paying a 1st+ for Soucy


Leafs are moving down about 10 picks, it’s not really giving up a first plus trade.
18 mai 2022 à 13 h 6
#11
Craig Laughlin Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2019
Messages: 5,216
Mentions "j'aime": 5,708
I'm going to disagree with my fellow Caps fan above and say that Washington declines this. Donato is expiring this offseason so I don't see why a team would be sending a large sum for that, considering that sign and trades are incredibly rare. For the player himself, he'll be due a raise this offseason and Washington already has someone who does what Donato can, only better in Sheary, who's locked up and is cheaper.

I would assume part of this is predicated on Hagelin being a dump, however there currently isn't a need to deal with Hagelin in his current state. He's struggling with depth perception issues in his injured eye and it's not known if he will even play again, leaving the large possibility that he will stay on LTIR and his contract will not be an issue. The combination of dump and perceived upgrade are certainly not worth sending away a mid 2nd round pick for when you have a plethora of prospects that can easily do what the Caps would bring in Donato for.
18 mai 2022 à 17 h 37
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 708
Mentions "j'aime": 236
Quoting: turtlemountain
Yeah that’s not happening. Makar, Toews, Girard, Byram are all better than Dunn. All of those guys are more likely to play on the PP than Dunn. So really what the Avs would need is someone for their PK. Which to my knowledge is not Dunn’s strong suit.

EJ is still a competent NHL defenseman and is overpaid by a few million for one more year. The Avs aren’t in a huge cap crunch this summer, that will be summer 2023. You don’t clear your prospect pool out to save $4M for one year.

Again using Manson as an example: someone like him probably gets around a 4x$4.5? He’s a better role fit for Colorado given that he’s a PK guy. AND you get to keep your top defensive prospect, a 1st, and a decent forward prospect. I think that’s worth the trade off.

I get what you’re trying to do, but this is both a huge overvalue of Dunn and not a good fit for where Colorado is.


I did change dunn off to a different city bc I didn’t consider the fact that Byram (should) + hopefully will take a step up next yr in ice time and impact. The part I disagree with his extending manson like that given the players up front plus the goalie they should resign when some great PK/ second or Third pair guys come much cheaper around the league. EJ is probably about a 2M dollar defenseman at this point not a 6M dollar defenseman so he probably does need to get dumped or bought out whatever it needs to be. Burakovsky, kuemper, lehkonen and Nichuskin are very valuable to the roster. Kadri is also important but I think it is almost certain he can be much better compensated elsewhere next season
18 mai 2022 à 18 h 50
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 2,682
Mentions "j'aime": 2,995
Quoting: KPM12
I did change dunn off to a different city bc I didn’t consider the fact that Byram (should) + hopefully will take a step up next yr in ice time and impact. The part I disagree with his extending manson like that given the players up front plus the goalie they should resign when some great PK/ second or Third pair guys come much cheaper around the league. EJ is probably about a 2M dollar defenseman at this point not a 6M dollar defenseman so he probably does need to get dumped or bought out whatever it needs to be. Burakovsky, kuemper, lehkonen and Nichuskin are very valuable to the roster. Kadri is also important but I think it is almost certain he can be much better compensated elsewhere next season


Yeah I agree with you, I would prefer adding at forward rather than adding more at defense. Ideally the Avs can find a nice PK guy for the bottom pairing at like $2M and then extend Nuke. Might need to find a 2C also
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage