SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Sharks major overhaul

Créé par: papishark
Équipe: 2022-23 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 17 mai 2022
Publié: 17 mai 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
33 000 000 $
32 175 000 $
22 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
85 750 000 $
33 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Blueger, Teddy
  2. Pettersson, Marcus
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (PIT)
2.
SJS
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
EDM
  1. Hill, Adin
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2023 (SJS)
3.
SJS
ARI
  1. Simek, Radim
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (SJS)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de BUF
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de ARI
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de PIT
Logo de EDM
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $73 727 675 $0 $442 500 $8 772 325 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
894 167 $894 167 $
AG
RFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
916 667 $916 667 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 8
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 025 000 $1 025 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 025 175 $4 025 175 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 175 000 $2 175 000 $
G
UFA - 2
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
848 333 $848 333 $ (Bonis de performance60 000 $$60K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 833 $850 833 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
17 mai 2022 à 22 h 45
#1
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 7,792
Mentions "j'aime": 4,483
Pittsburgh can't just take on Burns $8,000,000 contract without sending back similar cap.
17 mai 2022 à 23 h 23
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: TampaBayLightning22
Pittsburgh can't just take on Burns $8,000,000 contract without sending back similar cap.


They sent back 6.2 mil here.... They are also losing Letang in this scenario and maybe Malkin. They can afford it
17 mai 2022 à 23 h 33
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,204
Mentions "j'aime": 2,861
Wonder if we could flip Pettersson to Vancouver I heard somewhere they were interested in him.
17 mai 2022 à 23 h 34
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: FunMustBeAlways
Wonder if we could flip Pettersson to Vancouver I heard somewhere they were interested in him.


I dont think he would be the worst to have on the team, but is a little pricey. Could play him one year and dump him at the offseason to make room for Meier contract.
17 mai 2022 à 23 h 45
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,204
Mentions "j'aime": 2,861
Quoting: papishark
I dont think he would be the worst to have on the team, but is a little pricey. Could play him one year and dump him at the offseason to make room for Meier contract.


Yeah he's fine but it's more money and term than I'd want to take on even though he's probably more or less worth it. At least it's a moveable contract.
17 mai 2022 à 23 h 59
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 4,029
Mentions "j'aime": 973
Sharks should not be offering anyone a 8yr deal.
Dahlen not getting 2M
I dont hate the pittsburgh Idea and pittsburgh if they let their FA go has almsot 30M in space
crankshaft a aimé ceci.
18 mai 2022 à 0 h 9
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: vols94
Sharks should not be offering anyone a 8yr deal.
Dahlen not getting 2M
I dont hate the pittsburgh Idea and pittsburgh if they let their FA go has almsot 30M in space


Yeah I think its a pretty reasonable deal and a team that Burns might be interested in playing for which is important.
18 mai 2022 à 0 h 14
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 4,029
Mentions "j'aime": 973
Quoting: papishark
Yeah I think its a pretty reasonable deal and a team that Burns might be interested in playing for which is important.


Yes i could see Burns waiving for Pittsburgh, Dallas, Florida
18 mai 2022 à 0 h 54
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 2,686
Mentions "j'aime": 1,219
Good trades. And actual fair value for 88, finally
papishark a aimé ceci.
18 mai 2022 à 0 h 55
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 2,686
Mentions "j'aime": 1,219
Quoting: vols94
Sharks should not be offering anyone a 8yr deal.
Dahlen not getting 2M
I dont hate the pittsburgh Idea and pittsburgh if they let their FA go has almsot 30M in space


Agree. 8 years on Nichushkin is a big mistake.
gegemoroo et areax91 a aimé ceci.
18 mai 2022 à 3 h 47
#11
Defence Baby
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 78
Mentions "j'aime": 26
Nichushkin is kind of player that has success because he plays for amazing team, don't let that fool you.
He is not 5.75mil worthy and certainly not 8 years worthy. My price would be 4 mil x 2 years if we are realistic.
18 mai 2022 à 8 h 29
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 23,767
Mentions "j'aime": 7,637
Edmonton already has 2 goalies under contract next year.
18 mai 2022 à 12 h 6
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: CD282
Edmonton already has 2 goalies under contract next year.


And the sharks had two when they traded for Kahkonen? You can’t just always be okay with terrible play
18 mai 2022 à 12 h 7
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: gegemoroo
Nichushkin is kind of player that has success because he plays for amazing team, don't let that fool you.
He is not 5.75mil worthy and certainly not 8 years worthy. My price would be 4 mil x 2 years if we are realistic.

I disagree about him being not that good, but I wouldn’t want to give him 8 years. I think he’s very underrated by people but his analytics have been amazing for years
18 mai 2022 à 12 h 33
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 23,767
Mentions "j'aime": 7,637
Quoting: papishark
And the sharks had two when they traded for Kahkonen? You can’t just always be okay with terrible play

Terrible play? Smith posted a .915 this year and Skinner was .913 - that's above average.

Hill had a .906, not sure why you're so convinced they'd be interested at all, let alone willing to part with a 2nd to get a 3rd string goalie they'd likely lose to waivers anyhow.
18 mai 2022 à 12 h 43
#16
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: CD282
Terrible play? Smith posted a .915 this year and Skinner was .913 - that's above average.

Hill had a .906, not sure why you're so convinced they'd be interested at all, let alone willing to part with a 2nd to get a 3rd string goalie they'd likely lose to waivers anyhow.


Do you really trust mike smith to maintain that? I still like Adin Hill and believe he’s got potential to be a good starter when he’s not injured, the sharks just have no room for him.
18 mai 2022 à 13 h 17
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 23,767
Mentions "j'aime": 7,637
Quoting: papishark
Do you really trust mike smith to maintain that?

Why not? He was .923 last year and he's currently .938 through 7 playoff games. I don't think .915 is an unreasonable expectation next year.

Quoting: papishark
I still like Adin Hill and believe he’s got potential to be a good starter when he’s not injured, the sharks just have no room for him.

I like him too, the Oilers just have no room for him.
18 mai 2022 à 16 h 4
#18
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: CD282
Why not? He was .923 last year and he's currently .938 through 7 playoff games. I don't think .915 is an unreasonable expectation next year.


I like him too, the Oilers just have no room for him.


Alright to each their own, it’s not like I’m being very proposterous. Koskinen is horrible
18 mai 2022 à 16 h 11
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 595
Mentions "j'aime": 230
The three trades are reasonable , but yikes re: Nichushkin! His stats are sandbagged being in a highly talented Avs team, and 8 years is way too long in term. Given what we saw with Donskoi this season, I'd be wary of targeting Avs UFAs for Top 6 wingers.
18 mai 2022 à 16 h 47
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 23,767
Mentions "j'aime": 7,637
Quoting: papishark
Alright to each their own, it’s not like I’m being very proposterous. Koskinen is horrible

??

Koskinen is not on Edmonton's roster next year. He has nothing to do with this.
18 mai 2022 à 22 h 49
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 4,029
Mentions "j'aime": 973
Quoting: CD282
Edmonton already has 2 goalies under contract next year.


And one is 41yr old mike smith who was injured at least 3 times. If anyone needs a 3rd insurance goalie its edmonton. you wont have Koskinen to put in for long stretches next year.
papishark a aimé ceci.
19 mai 2022 à 10 h 9
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 23,767
Mentions "j'aime": 7,637
Quoting: vols94
And one is 41yr old mike smith who was injured at least 3 times. If anyone needs a 3rd insurance goalie its edmonton. you wont have Koskinen to put in for long stretches next year.

No, they'll have Skinner to put in for long stretches next year. And Koskinen is a UFA, so if they feel they need a 3rd goalie they could easily bring him back.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage