SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Its Been A Good Run

Créé par: ItsTheCracken
Équipe: 2022-23 Stars de Dallas
Date de création initiale: 16 mai 2022
Publié: 16 mai 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
2750 000 $
2750 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
33 125 000 $
21 125 000 $
2925 000 $
2925 000 $
2925 000 $
36 400 000 $
2925 000 $
2925 000 $
2825 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
22 000 000 $
21 750 000 $
2925 000 $
87 875 000 $
34 750 000 $
Transactions
1.
DAL
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (PIT)
ANA
  1. Seguin, Tyler
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (DAL)
2.
DAL
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (BOS)
3.
TOR
  1. Gurianov, Denis [Droits de RFA]
  2. Klingberg, John
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (DAL)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (DAL)
4.
DAL
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (NJD)
5.
DAL
  1. Burns, Brent (2 000 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (SJS)
SJS
  1. Hanley, Joel
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2023 (DAL)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de DAL
Logo de PIT
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
2023
Logo de DAL
Logo de SJS
Logo de BOS
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
2024
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de NJD
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $73 986 532 $675 000 $1 545 000 $7 513 468 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Stars de Dallas
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 4
Logo de Stars de Dallas
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 3
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
925 000 $925 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C, AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance537 500 $$538K)
AD
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Stars de Dallas
8 450 000 $8 450 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 280 000 $3 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Stars de Dallas
3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
G
RFA - 3
Logo de Stars de Dallas
5 800 000 $5 800 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Stars de Dallas
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
4 916 667 $4 916 667 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
925 000 $925 000 $
AG
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
16 mai 2022 à 15 h 46
#1
me wan da poonani
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,857
Mentions "j'aime": 4,243
I think you need to pay assets for someone to take on Khudobin’s contract. Can’t see Devils giving up anything for him.
TheMooterus et NJDevils1317 a aimé ceci.
16 mai 2022 à 15 h 47
#2
True Reverse Retro
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 4,616
Mentions "j'aime": 3,032
- Anaheim isn't taking that contract
- You're going to have to pay a team to take Faksa's contract
- Not enough value for Toronto
- Going to have to pay a team to take on Khudobin's contract
- Dallas has too many old contracts on their books. Decline the Burns deal
EsoYeezus69, Goofie et SlevinKalevra a aimé ceci.
16 mai 2022 à 15 h 47
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 14,978
Mentions "j'aime": 11,366
No thank you to Seguin’s contract
16 mai 2022 à 16 h 0
#4
Démarrer sujet
ItsTheCracken
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 286
Mentions "j'aime": 40
Quoting: TheMooterus
- Anaheim isn't taking that contract
- You're going to have to pay a team to take Faksa's contract
- Not enough value for Toronto
- Going to have to pay a team to take on Khudobin's contract
- Dallas has too many old contracts on their books. Decline the Burns deal


All fair responses.

- Tough to find a spot for Sequin, though there are teams that need a 2nd C or 2-3 RW. Biggest question mark is wtf is up with him.
- I think yall sleep on Faksa. The only fanbase that doesn't like him is ours. Dude is solid on PK, wins faceoffs and does a good job shutting down top lines. He's perfect for a 3rd-4th line on Boston.
- How much are you willing to give up for Nylander? He on his own is not winning us the cup, just like he didn't for Toronto. So, what's the price?
- Khudobin is probably a buy out candidate tbh. I think the deadline was his best value. But, NJ got murdered in net once Blackwood went down. They need a legit reliable goalie behind him.
- I 100% hear you on contracts. Most of my maneuvering was to get us out from under some contracts that don't fit our team, but Burns doesn't fit that type. Dude is closer to Pavelski than he is Suter. He's got 1-2 years left at a top level.
16 mai 2022 à 16 h 2
#5
Démarrer sujet
ItsTheCracken
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 286
Mentions "j'aime": 40
Quoting: GeneralLandro
No thank you to Seguin’s contract


Fair. Tough to find a landing spot for him. Y'all need a Vet 2nd Line Center, though - unless y'all are going for a longer rebuild (which is fine). I thought y'alls young talent on the wings gave him the best shot to wake back up. Much of Seguins drop off is due to our scheme. It's expecting the world of him to put up Seguin like numbers when the team spends 65% of the game in its own end.
16 mai 2022 à 16 h 2
#6
Démarrer sujet
ItsTheCracken
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 286
Mentions "j'aime": 40
Quoting: Tintin
I think you need to pay assets for someone to take on Khudobin’s contract. Can’t see Devils giving up anything for him.


Probably true.
16 mai 2022 à 16 h 28
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 2,686
Mentions "j'aime": 1,219
thats not happening. Horrible for SJ
16 mai 2022 à 16 h 45
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,204
Mentions "j'aime": 2,861
If the Sharks are giving you a positive value player and retaining $6 million on said player, they aren’t gonna be adding more value the other way.
16 mai 2022 à 17 h 2
#9
Démarrer sujet
ItsTheCracken
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 286
Mentions "j'aime": 40
Quoting: FunMustBeAlways
If the Sharks are giving you a positive value player and retaining $6 million on said player, they aren’t gonna be adding more value the other way.


They're not retaining 6, they're retaining 2.
16 mai 2022 à 17 h 5
#10
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Talk about wishful thinking
16 mai 2022 à 17 h 27
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 14,978
Mentions "j'aime": 11,366
Quoting: ItsTheCracken
Fair. Tough to find a landing spot for him. Y'all need a Vet 2nd Line Center, though - unless y'all are going for a longer rebuild (which is fine). I thought y'alls young talent on the wings gave him the best shot to wake back up. Much of Seguins drop off is due to our scheme. It's expecting the world of him to put up Seguin like numbers when the team spends 65% of the game in its own end.


Not that that price with him being over 30+ and under contract for what like 6 more years?? No thanks to that
16 mai 2022 à 17 h 49
#12
Representing the 505
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,444
Mentions "j'aime": 3,629
Quoting: ItsTheCracken
I think yall sleep on Faksa. The only fanbase that doesn't like him is ours. Dude is solid on PK, wins faceoffs and does a good job shutting down top lines. He's perfect for a 3rd-4th line on Boston.


The problem is his cap hit versus his production. You can't have a guy that puts up all of 19 points in 77 games being paid like a guy that should put up 35-40 points. If he were producing like he did earlier in his career, it wouldn't be much of an issue but he's been on the decline for 3 seasons. If he were making about $1.5M less, almost anyone would take him for the reasons you cite and I doubt Dallas would retain on him for the next 3 years. It's just a harsh fact of life that players get paid for point production and Faksa doesn't have that anymore.
16 mai 2022 à 18 h 16
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,204
Mentions "j'aime": 2,861
Quoting: ItsTheCracken
They're not retaining 6, they're retaining 2.


I was saying total.

$2M x 3 years = $6M
16 mai 2022 à 19 h 11
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 481
Mentions "j'aime": 40
THE LEAFS CANT AFFORD ANOTHER 6 MILLION DOLLAR DMAN
16 mai 2022 à 19 h 44
#15
Démarrer sujet
ItsTheCracken
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 286
Mentions "j'aime": 40
Quoting: FunMustBeAlways
I was saying total.

$2M x 3 years = $6M


That's better than the $24M you currently are on the hook for. I get it, everyone values their players and doesn't want to give em away. But, y'all don't want a 37 YO $8M defenseman.
16 mai 2022 à 19 h 45
#16
Démarrer sujet
ItsTheCracken
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 286
Mentions "j'aime": 40
Quoting: crankshaft
thats not happening. Horrible for SJ


Lol. It's not horrible for SJ, it's horrible for you because you love Burns. Which is fair. You can emotionally value a player more than he's worth to your franchise. I feel the same about Benn. But, a 37 YO $8M defenseman on a team that needs to restructure its roster, is not what you think it is.
16 mai 2022 à 19 h 47
#17
Démarrer sujet
ItsTheCracken
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 286
Mentions "j'aime": 40
Quoting: NMAvsFan
The problem is his cap hit versus his production. You can't have a guy that puts up all of 19 points in 77 games being paid like a guy that should put up 35-40 points. If he were producing like he did earlier in his career, it wouldn't be much of an issue but he's been on the decline for 3 seasons. If he were making about $1.5M less, almost anyone would take him for the reasons you cite and I doubt Dallas would retain on him for the next 3 years. It's just a harsh fact of life that players get paid for point production and Faksa doesn't have that anymore.


Sad, but very true. I thought $3.7M was steep when we signed him but he had just came off a monster year. Jim Nill has a little Jerry Jones in him - he likes to overpay his own guys. lol
16 mai 2022 à 20 h 12
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 4,029
Mentions "j'aime": 973
Quoting: ItsTheCracken
That's better than the $24M you currently are on the hook for. I get it, everyone values their players and doesn't want to give em away. But, y'all don't want a 37 YO $8M defenseman.


But Dallas does not want a 9.5M 18 goal forward either. Burns has 8 more points then Benn and 5 more than Seguin. I think that is where a Dallas/SJ deal could be made. We have an extra expensive D men. You have 2 expensive inderperforming Forwards.
crankshaft a aimé ceci.
16 mai 2022 à 20 h 33
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 2,686
Mentions "j'aime": 1,219
Quoting: ItsTheCracken
Lol. It's not horrible for SJ, it's horrible for you because you love Burns. Which is fair. You can emotionally value a player more than he's worth to your franchise. I feel the same about Benn. But, a 37 YO $8M defenseman on a team that needs to restructure its roster, is not what you think it is.


37 years old, played more minutes than any other player in the league this year by almost 100 and was 12th in scoring among defensemen. You can use the age argument when age is catching up to a player. It isn't with Burns so try a little harder next time you want to sound smart on the internet. Outscored both Benn and Seguin this year.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage