SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

New 1 D

Créé par: Kitch
Équipe: 2022-23 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 14 mai 2022
Publié: 14 mai 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
31 500 000 $
22 175 000 $
21 500 000 $
2800 000 $
21 200 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
77 500 000 $
11 750 000 $
1900 000 $
1750 000 $
2825 000 $
1950 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Bellows, Kieffer [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (NYI)
NYI
  1. Rielly, Morgan
  2. Scott, Ian [Droits de RFA]
2.
TOR
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (SEA)
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2022 (SEA)
SEA
3.
4.
ANA
  1. Mrázek, Petr
  2. Robertson, Nicholas
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de NYI
Logo de WPG
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2082 500 000 $82 393 116 $212 500 $0 $106 884 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
950 000 $950 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 175 000 $2 175 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
950 000 $950 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
825 000 $825 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 2
900 000 $900 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C, AD
UFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
14 mai 2022 à 23 h 8
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 3,623
Mentions "j'aime": 2,253
klingberg isn’t an upgrade over rielly
mikearky a aimé ceci.
14 mai 2022 à 23 h 10
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,579
Mentions "j'aime": 7,353
So the leafs replace rielly with worse but right handes rielly
14 mai 2022 à 23 h 10
#3
Shaf_daddy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 624
Mentions "j'aime": 147
Morgan is the only player on this team who gives a damn enough to say how it is. He is the LAST player traded.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
14 mai 2022 à 23 h 12
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,656
Mentions "j'aime": 1,904
Wild decline easily. Not even close.
14 mai 2022 à 23 h 12
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,254
Mentions "j'aime": 11,640
That will not get you Gibson .. not even close
mikearky et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
14 mai 2022 à 23 h 14
#6
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 7,792
Mentions "j'aime": 4,483
Ducks laugh at the Gibson offer, Plus he has a 16 team no trade list, Which probably means that most Canadian teams are on it.
mikearky et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
14 mai 2022 à 23 h 20
#7
Patient gm
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,864
Mentions "j'aime": 992
Toronto just isn’t going to win with 3 players over 10m a year. You can’t build enough depth or well rounded ness at defense and goal this way. The core will be broken up this offseason.
14 mai 2022 à 23 h 27
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 4,897
Mentions "j'aime": 1,406
I gotta think isles accept. I know his contract takes him through his age 35 season but this is a good price for a top offensive dman.
14 mai 2022 à 23 h 51
#9
Islesadist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 1,100
Mentions "j'aime": 282
Islanders say yes
14 mai 2022 à 23 h 59
#10
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2020
Messages: 2,766
Mentions "j'aime": 520
Foligno can't be had. This wouldn't get him. Minnesota declines
mikearky a aimé ceci.
15 mai 2022 à 0 h 2
#11
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 28,975
Mentions "j'aime": 11,239
Quoting: drmantalban
Wild decline easily. Not even close.


Ehhh do they though? Not even close? Bro...
15 mai 2022 à 0 h 30
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,656
Mentions "j'aime": 1,904
Quoting: mokumboi
Ehhh do they though? Not even close? Bro...


Yeah they do, and it’s not. This is a classic example of comparing two players on a spreadsheet and thinking it’s a good exchange.
15 mai 2022 à 0 h 38
#13
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 28,975
Mentions "j'aime": 11,239
Quoting: drmantalban
Yeah they do, and it’s not. This is a classic example of comparing two players on a spreadsheet and thinking it’s a good exchange.


I have no clue what you're on about with this spreadsheet stuff. Kerfoot is the better player. He's the player with more value. He's younger. And Foligno is coming off a total outlier career year. And a weak playoff showing, to boot. And on top of all that, the Wild's weakness up the middle was just exposed.

They take that deal and run with it.
15 mai 2022 à 1 h 12
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,656
Mentions "j'aime": 1,904
Quoting: mokumboi
I have no clue what you're on about with this spreadsheet stuff. Kerfoot is the better player. He's the player with more value. He's younger. And Foligno is coming off a total outlier career year. And a weak playoff showing, to boot. And on top of all that, the Wild's weakness up the middle was just exposed.

They take that deal and run with it.


Kerfoot is the better player how? Cuz he chips in a few more points? Yeah no. Foligno is in the 99th percentile for EVD, 52% EVO and 83% on WAR. Kerfoot is 60% on EVD, 8% on EVO and 44% WAR.

On top of that, Foligno fights, hits, wears an A and has term left. Kerfoot has a year remaining.

I can assure you the Wild do not “take this deal and run.”
RazWild et Wildnochance a aimé ceci.
15 mai 2022 à 1 h 23
#15
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 28,975
Mentions "j'aime": 11,239
Quoting: drmantalban
Kerfoot is the better player how? Cuz he chips in a few more points? Yeah no. Foligno is in the 99th percentile for EVD, 52% EVO and 83% on WAR. Kerfoot is 60% on EVD, 8% on EVO and 44% WAR.

On top of that, Foligno fights, hits, wears an A and has term left. Kerfoot has a year remaining.

I can assure you the Wild do not “take this deal and run.”



Heh. It's a more than just more points, and it's definitely more than just even strength line analytics (btw are we actually pretending that Foligno isn't the passenger on his line?). Hey, by all means, I hope the Wild don;t do this trade. It only helps my team.
15 mai 2022 à 1 h 33
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,656
Mentions "j'aime": 1,904
Quoting: mokumboi
Heh. It's a more than just more points, and it's definitely more than just even strength line analytics (btw are we actually pretending that Foligno isn't the passenger on his line?). Hey, by all means, I hope the Wild don;t do this trade. It only helps my team.


Lol if anyone is a passenger on that line, it’s Greenway. But you’re clearly just editorializing your own opinion, so I’m really not surprised that you missed the mark there either.
15 mai 2022 à 1 h 47
#17
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 28,975
Mentions "j'aime": 11,239
Quoting: drmantalban
Lol if anyone is a passenger on that line, it’s Greenway. But you’re clearly just editorializing your own opinion, so I’m really not surprised that you missed the mark there either.


Oh are we pretending you're not editorializing your opinion (which is a redundant phrase, by the way)? We'll agree to disagree.
15 mai 2022 à 3 h 9
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 4,414
Mentions "j'aime": 3,130
Quoting: mokumboi
I have no clue what you're on about with this spreadsheet stuff. Kerfoot is the better player. He's the player with more value. He's younger. And Foligno is coming off a total outlier career year. And a weak playoff showing, to boot. And on top of all that, the Wild's weakness up the middle was just exposed.

They take that deal and run with it.


Strange how Foligno was on a career year two seasons ago, then on another career year last year, and finally on one again this year. Furthermore, he's been amongst the best defensive forwards by analytics during that same timespan. This isn't a fluke. Foligno is better than Kerfoot, period.

At what point do people maybe start to understand that he's better then they give him credit for. And what's this about a weak playoffs? The man took a cheap ass knee on knee from Macdermid in the final regular season game against the Avs and still played through it for six more playoff games while playing at something like 60% health, and also took Kyrou to the cleaners on a big open ice hit which led to a scoring chance the other way in game three.

Aside from Kaprizov, The GREEF line was our best line of the series. It took Berube taking the ROR line off Kaprizov, which was ineffective anyway, and sticking them on the GREEF line to get the series back under control and in your favor. They stayed on them the entire rest of the series.
15 mai 2022 à 11 h 53
#19
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2020
Messages: 2,766
Mentions "j'aime": 520
Quoting: mokumboi
I have no clue what you're on about with this spreadsheet stuff. Kerfoot is the better player. He's the player with more value. He's younger. And Foligno is coming off a total outlier career year. And a weak playoff showing, to boot. And on top of all that, the Wild's weakness up the middle was just exposed.

They take that deal and run with it.


No they don't ..Guerin, will never trade foligno. Not a chance will he trade foligno, or in his right mind trade him for Kerfoot
15 mai 2022 à 12 h 7
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,656
Mentions "j'aime": 1,904
Quoting: mokumboi
Oh are we pretending you're not editorializing your opinion (which is a redundant phrase, by the way)? We'll agree to disagree.


Lolllll ah yes…the old switcheroo to call out grammar in an online argument. Never a sign of desperation, not at all.
15 mai 2022 à 13 h 57
#21
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 28,975
Mentions "j'aime": 11,239
Quoting: drmantalban
Lolllll ah yes…the old switcheroo to call out grammar in an online argument. Never a sign of desperation, not at all.


Not nearly as big a sign as evading the point entirely to bring up another topic. tears of joy
15 mai 2022 à 15 h 37
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,656
Mentions "j'aime": 1,904
Quoting: mokumboi
Not nearly as big a sign as evading the point entirely to bring up another topic. tears of joy


Lol you haven’t actually made an argument besides “Kerfoot is better, bro.”

Foligno is a better player, except for PK. He has term and brings intangibles - ie is a captain. Theres multiple wild fans in agreement that this is trash.

Just take your L and move on, big fella
15 mai 2022 à 15 h 40
#23
GeniusGM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 71
Mentions "j'aime": 10
Why would you ever think the leafs should move Rielly on his fresh deal and keep injury prone muzzin LOL?
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage