SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

What price would you rather pay to move up in the draft

Créé par: sensonfire
Équipe: 2021-22 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de création initiale: 13 mai 2022
Publié: 13 mai 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
1. The one for 6th overall


2. The one for 5th overall


3. The one for 4th overall


4. The one for 3rd overall


5. The one for 2nd overall


6. The one for Shane Wright
Transactions
1.
OTT
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (MTL)
MTL
    7th overall + Jake Sanderson
    2.
    OTT
    1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (NJD)
    NJD
      7th overall and New Jersey's choice of any one of our prospects except for Jake Sanderson.
      3.
      OTT
      1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (ARI)
      ARI
        7th overall and Ottawa's choice of one of our former first round picks.
        4.
        OTT
        1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (SEA)
        SEA
          7th overall + Both of our seconds
          5.
          OTT
          1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (PHI)
          PHI
            7th overall + Ottawa's 2nd
            6.
            OTT
            1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (CHI)
            CBJ
              7th overall + Tampa's 2nd
              Rachats de contrats
              Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
              Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
              2022
              Logo de OTT
              Logo de MTL
              Logo de NJD
              Logo de ARI
              Logo de SEA
              Logo de PHI
              Logo de CHI
              Logo de OTT
              Logo de TBL
              Logo de OTT
              Logo de BOS
              Logo de OTT
              Logo de OTT
              Logo de BOS
              Logo de WPG
              Logo de OTT
              Logo de NYI
              2023
              Logo de OTT
              Logo de OTT
              Logo de OTT
              Logo de OTT
              Logo de OTT
              Logo de OTT
              Logo de OTT
              Logo de NSH
              2024
              Logo de OTT
              Logo de OTT
              Logo de OTT
              Logo de OTT
              Logo de TBL
              Logo de OTT
              Logo de OTT
              Logo de OTT
              TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
              2481 500 000 $67 802 257 $0 $4 507 500 $13 697 743 $
              Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              8 330 674 $8 330 674 $
              AG
              UFA - 7
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
              C
              UFA - 1
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              4 975 000 $4 975 000 $
              AD, AG
              UFA - 6
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              737 500 $737 500 $
              AG, AD
              UFA - 1
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
              C
              UFA - 2
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              3 600 000 $3 600 000 $
              AD, AG
              UFA - 2
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              747 500 $747 500 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
              AG
              RFA - 1
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
              C
              RFA - 2
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
              C, AD
              UFA - 4
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
              AD, AG
              UFA - 2
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              997 500 $997 500 $
              C, AD
              UFA - 1
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
              C
              UFA - 1
              Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
              DG
              UFA - 7
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
              DD
              M-NTC
              UFA - 3
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              900 000 $900 000 $
              G
              UFA - 1
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance450 000 $$450K)
              DG/DD, AG
              RFA - 1
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
              DD
              UFA - 2
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              4 687 500 $4 687 500 $
              G
              M-NTC
              UFA - 3
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
              DG
              UFA - 1
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
              DD
              M-NTC
              UFA - 2
              Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
              C
              UFA - 1
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
              DG
              UFA - 2
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
              DG/DD
              UFA - 1
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              900 000 $900 000 $
              AG, AD
              UFA - 1

              Code d'intégration

              • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
              • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

              Texte intégré

              Cliquer pour surligner
              What price would you rather pay to move up in the draft
              Le graphique a été masqué

              Options de sondage


              13 mai 2022 à 19 h 30
              #1
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: août 2021
              Messages: 4,126
              Mentions "j'aime": 2,132
              I would honestly do that deal as the Devils. Sanderson is a stud D. Someone good will still be there at the 7th spot and I already have a sure thing.
              HeadHighSauce et sensonfire a aimé ceci.
              13 mai 2022 à 19 h 30
              #2
              Dougie HIMilton
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: sept. 2020
              Messages: 3,071
              Mentions "j'aime": 1,628
              Quoting: NJDevils1317
              I would honestly do that deal as the Devils. Sanderson is a stud D. Someone good will still be there at the 7th spot and I already have a sure thing.


              I would as well, and I'm in love with Logan Cooley at this point.
              sensonfire et csick a aimé ceci.
              13 mai 2022 à 19 h 37
              #3
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: avr. 2018
              Messages: 2,242
              Mentions "j'aime": 983
              All of these prices are extremely high. I wouldn’t even want Cooley for Sanderson 1 for 1 let alone with Ottawa throwing 7th overall in… or even Greig?? Way too high on all of these.
              sensonfire, csick et Cowling a aimé ceci.
              13 mai 2022 à 19 h 39
              #4
              BigMeech
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: mars 2022
              Messages: 1,546
              Mentions "j'aime": 348
              MTL decline
              13 mai 2022 à 19 h 42
              #5
              Démarrer sujet
              sensonfire
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: févr. 2021
              Messages: 11,614
              Mentions "j'aime": 4,383
              Quoting: Canucks123
              MTL decline


              Good for them
              HeadHighSauce, Canucks123, csick and 2 others a aimé ceci.
              13 mai 2022 à 19 h 43
              #6
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: mars 2022
              Messages: 494
              Mentions "j'aime": 180
              I mean I get it’s only moving back two spots…but Tyler Boucher? Meh
              Canucks123 a aimé ceci.
              13 mai 2022 à 19 h 43
              #7
              Démarrer sujet
              sensonfire
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: févr. 2021
              Messages: 11,614
              Mentions "j'aime": 4,383
              Quoting: TheBoyDuddus
              All of these prices are extremely high. I wouldn’t even want Cooley for Sanderson 1 for 1 let alone with Ottawa throwing 7th overall in… or even Greig?? Way too high on all of these.


              What is a Top 5 pick worth exactly in your opinion?
              13 mai 2022 à 19 h 44
              #8
              Démarrer sujet
              sensonfire
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: févr. 2021
              Messages: 11,614
              Mentions "j'aime": 4,383
              Quoting: Clarky11
              I mean I get it’s only moving back two spots…but Tyler Boucher? Meh


              kk
              13 mai 2022 à 20 h 2
              #9
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: avr. 2022
              Messages: 2,615
              Mentions "j'aime": 1,079
              If that’s the trade for 2OA I think Fitz needs to do it.
              sensonfire et csick a aimé ceci.
              13 mai 2022 à 20 h 18
              #10
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: mai 2019
              Messages: 39,600
              Mentions "j'aime": 18,154
              Yes from Devils.
              sensonfire et csick a aimé ceci.
              13 mai 2022 à 20 h 46
              #11
              frosty cold
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: juin 2021
              Messages: 88
              Mentions "j'aime": 22
              First of all I must say this makes for interestimg conversation.
              The only trade I would be somewhat interested in is number 2 assuming Slavkofsky is still on the board.
              BTW - I think you are greatly undervaluing Sanderson.
              csick et sensonfire a aimé ceci.
              13 mai 2022 à 20 h 46
              #12
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: janv. 2018
              Messages: 16,884
              Mentions "j'aime": 11,896
              These are all insane what are you talking about lmao?

              There's decades of data to suggest that trading up in the draft is a losing proposition to begin with, and you're talking about moving our best prospects and potential shot at a wildly better player in Connor Bedard. This is just horrific for Ottawa
              csick, athrin et Cowling a aimé ceci.
              13 mai 2022 à 21 h 1
              #13
              KFTW
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: juill. 2018
              Messages: 42,157
              Mentions "j'aime": 23,514
              I’d pay the Tampa 2nd to move up from 7 to 5 and take Jiricek
              sensonfire et athrin a aimé ceci.
              13 mai 2022 à 21 h 2
              #14
              KFTW
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: juill. 2018
              Messages: 42,157
              Mentions "j'aime": 23,514
              Quoting: Claesson4Norris
              These are all insane what are you talking about lmao?

              There's decades of data to suggest that trading up in the draft is a losing proposition to begin with, and you're talking about moving our best prospects and potential shot at a wildly better player in Connor Bedard. This is just horrific for Ottawa


              2 2nds to move up 1 spot Lmao, when the prospects are neck and neck.
              athrin a aimé ceci.
              13 mai 2022 à 21 h 13
              #15
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: janv. 2018
              Messages: 16,884
              Mentions "j'aime": 11,896
              Quoting: csick
              2 2nds to move up 1 spot Lmao, when the prospects are neck and neck.


              The Columbus deal is essentially just p*ssing two 2nds into the wind and it's still the best value proposition for Ottawa. 2nd overall being essentially Greig, Sanderson and say Lekkerimaki for a Slafkovsky which is just comical. I'm stunned that this is made by a Sens fan, and I'm pretty sure this isn't a troll post either lol.

              You offer 7th overall pick, Sanderson and an unprotected 1st next year you can get basically any forward in the league, barring a handful of true untouchables. Or you could have Shane Wright lmao.
              csick, wardbell92 et Cowling a aimé ceci.
              13 mai 2022 à 21 h 17
              #16
              KFTW
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: juill. 2018
              Messages: 42,157
              Mentions "j'aime": 23,514
              Quoting: Claesson4Norris
              The Columbus deal is essentially just p*ssing two 2nds into the wind and it's still the best value proposition for Ottawa. 2nd overall being essentially Greig, Sanderson and say Lekkerimaki for a Slafkovsky which is just comical. I'm stunned that this is made by a Sens fan, and I'm pretty sure this isn't a troll post either lol.

              You offer 7th overall pick, Sanderson and an unprotected 1st next year you can get basically any forward in the league, barring a handful of true untouchables. Or you could have Shane Wright lmao.


              Yeah i wouldn’t offer Jake for Shane cuz both are prospects and it doesn’t make sense to do a risky trade like that. It’s also not like there’s a clear star at 2nd overall. Cooley , Slaf could both go at 4 if someone likes Nemec more
              Cowling a aimé ceci.
              13 mai 2022 à 21 h 31
              #17
              Démarrer sujet
              sensonfire
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: févr. 2021
              Messages: 11,614
              Mentions "j'aime": 4,383
              Quoting: csick
              2 2nds to move up 1 spot Lmao, when the prospects are neck and neck.


              Quoting: Claesson4Norris
              The Columbus deal is essentially just p*ssing two 2nds into the wind and it's still the best value proposition for Ottawa. 2nd overall being essentially Greig, Sanderson and say Lekkerimaki for a Slafkovsky which is just comical. I'm stunned that this is made by a Sens fan, and I'm pretty sure this isn't a troll post either lol.

              You offer 7th overall pick, Sanderson and an unprotected 1st next year you can get basically any forward in the league, barring a handful of true untouchables. Or you could have Shane Wright lmao.


              I never really understood what the value of a Top 10 pick is.

              Let alone one in the Top 5.

              Especially since the value varies from one draft to the next.



              Maybe someone who would know more than me could explain in a way that is somewhat helpful.

              Like yourself.

              And I wouldn't make a post like this one or the last one ever again.



              What do you say?
              Claesson4Norris a aimé ceci.
              13 mai 2022 à 22 h 25
              #18
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: janv. 2018
              Messages: 16,884
              Mentions "j'aime": 11,896
              Quoting: sensonfire
              I never really understood what the value of a Top 10 pick is.

              Let alone one in the Top 5.

              Especially since the value varies from one draft to the next.



              Maybe someone who would know more than me could explain in a way that is somewhat helpful.

              Like yourself.

              And I wouldn't make a post like this one or the last one ever again.



              What do you say?


              Trading up in the draft is just an inherently losing proposition. From a value perspective, it's basically always better to be the team moving back vs moving up because the real world cost is always more than the projected increase in pick value. There have been a lot of interesting articles written by sports blogs on the subject going back as far as like 2011. Think the Leafs nation blog have a couple.

              As far as the specific pieces in question, I think you're really undestimating the value of a Top drafted and semi developed prospect vs the mystery box. For example Jake Sanderson, who was arguably the best player not in the NHL this year is probably as valuable or more valuable than a 1st overall pick. He's a true top prospect who is about to jump into a significant role in the NHL next year. A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.

              To put it in terms of players, the gap between a Cooley and say Lekkerimaki is nowhere near the difference of having Greig and Sanderson.

              Also you should make whatever posts you want haha. I disagree with the values on these deals, but I wasn't intending to discourage you from posting or anything lol
              sensonfire a aimé ceci.
              14 mai 2022 à 5 h 1
              #19
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: avr. 2022
              Messages: 1,144
              Mentions "j'aime": 387
              cbj accepts if both Jiricek and Nemec are gone at 6
              sensonfire a aimé ceci.
              14 mai 2022 à 12 h 57
              #20
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: avr. 2018
              Messages: 2,242
              Mentions "j'aime": 983
              Quoting: sensonfire
              What is a Top 5 pick worth exactly in your opinion?


              You’re right that a top 5 pick is valuable, I just think you undervalued Ottawa’s pick a bit. Moving up 2 spots to 5th shouldn’t cost the farm in a draft class where there is no distinct drop off in the quality of prospects there. If you were looking to acquire a pick that high without giving something like 7th up then it’s extremely expensive, yes.

              Each class will have different groupings of players. Ottawa only paid a 3rd to move up from 12th to 11th in 2016. But in a year like 2021 where there was a distinct top 9, moving up from 10 to 9 would have been very expensive for Dorion. When you look at 2020, the top grouping ended at 10 so moving up from 10 to 9 that year wouldn’t have been nearly as costly. It’s all very fluid year to year.

              So keep in mind that this draft class isn’t the strongest, even someone like Greig (taken low in a strong 2020 class) who’s now two years down the road in development may end up being a better player than someone like Geekie who looks like a top 10 pick. He was ranked as the 18th best propect outside the NHL by Button recently. Does Geekie come close to that ranking? Unlikely. Does he come close to that ranking in his D+2 season? Maybe but we’d have to wait to find out and as of right now Greig is better and much closer to helping at the NHL level. I wouldn’t want to swap Greig for a Geekie 1 for 1. Sanderson was ranked as the best propect in the world outside of the NHL. I wouldn’t swap him 1 for 1 for any pick in this draft.

              Sorry for the long winded answer. TLDR Moving up from 7th is still very valuable in this draft and is much closer in value to 6th, 5th abd 4th than 4th is to 3rd, 2nd and 1st. Sanderson should be untouchable and trading Greig to move up would be counterproductive.
              sensonfire a aimé ceci.
               
              Répondre
              To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
              Question:
              Options:
              Chargement de l'animation
              Soumettre les modifications du sondage