SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Fauteuil - DG

Rookie All-stars

Créé par: Karim_D
Équipe: 2021-22 Équipe personnalisée
Date de création initiale: 11 mai 2022
Publié: 11 mai 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
*I hate the NHL rule regarding the rookies, so I do not take any 24+ players
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
3681 500 000 $31 604 998 $0 $21 493 750 $49 895 002 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
880 833 $880 833 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
AD, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
880 833 $880 833 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance412 500 $$412K)
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
AD, C
RFA - 3
Logo de Predators de Nashville
863 333 $863 333 $
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
863 333 $863 333 $
AG, C
RFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
AG, C
RFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance62 500 $$62K)
AD, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Predators de Nashville
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
C
RFA - 3
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
908 333 $908 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AG, C
RFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
897 500 $897 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
RFA - 3
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance318 750 $$319K)
C
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 850 000 $$2M)
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance125 000 $$125K)
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
809 166 $809 166 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
791 667 $791 667 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
820 000 $820 000 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
880 833 $880 833 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance25 000 $$25K)
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Stars de Dallas
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
RFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
11 mai 2022 à 16 h 49
#1
Wright-Zuki-Caufield
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 219
Mentions "j'aime": 84
Might as well put pitlick over pezzetta
11 mai 2022 à 19 h 38
#2
Lambchopz17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2020
Messages: 1,406
Mentions "j'aime": 479
Liljegren 2nd best rookie d man this year low key
12 mai 2022 à 9 h 26
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 153
Mentions "j'aime": 19
Quoting: HabsLoveZuki
Might as well put pitlick over pezzetta


He is 25 years old, otherwise I would have picked him for sure, as well as Bunting. I just don't like the NHL rule for the rookies
12 mai 2022 à 9 h 28
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 153
Mentions "j'aime": 19
Quoting: Lambchopz
Liljegren 2nd best rookie d man this year low key


IMO, Drysdale and Durzi were better than him but you're right, I should've put him before Schneider and Spence !
12 mai 2022 à 9 h 56
#5
Lambchopz17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2020
Messages: 1,406
Mentions "j'aime": 479
Quoting: Karim_D
IMO, Drysdale and Durzi were better than him but you're right, I should've put him before Schneider and Spence !


Drysdale and Durzi both played top PP throughout the season, or at least for points of it, whereas Lily didn’t. If you look solely at 5v5, Liljegren has a noticeable edge over them based on lots of analytics and even just counted stats. With that said, I personally don’t value PP production very highly, so if other people do value PP more heavily, then I completely understand choosing those other 2 over Liljegren
12 mai 2022 à 10 h 6
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 153
Mentions "j'aime": 19
Quoting: Lambchopz
Drysdale and Durzi both played top PP throughout the season, or at least for points of it, whereas Lily didn’t. If you look solely at 5v5, Liljegren has a noticeable edge over them based on lots of analytics and even just counted stats. With that said, I personally don’t value PP production very highly, so if other people do value PP more heavily, then I completely understand choosing those other 2 over Liljegren


You know what ? I totally agree with you. Honestly I would probably take Liljegren before Durzi, but I would stand with Drysdale, I think that he's a fast D-men with an excellent offensive IQ. Defensivly, not too sure yet, but I'm pretty sure that he will be able to work on it an become an excellent 2-way. Not saying that Liljegren isn't good tho, he is something, thats for sure !
Lambchopz a aimé ceci.
12 mai 2022 à 11 h 41
#7
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: Lambchopz
Drysdale and Durzi both played top PP throughout the season, or at least for points of it, whereas Lily didn’t. If you look solely at 5v5, Liljegren has a noticeable edge over them based on lots of analytics and even just counted stats. With that said, I personally don’t value PP production very highly, so if other people do value PP more heavily, then I completely understand choosing those other 2 over Liljegren


Ducks fan here...long term I think Dry>Lilly, but he definitely got rushed to the show. When it comes to PP production? Meh, there's lot of value there, but I'll also note that Hampus Lindholm (for some reason) spent the majority of time QB-ing PP1 before he was traded. Certified "worst coach in the NHL" Dallas Eakins also tried his best to put his rookies in perfectly idiotic situations all year, which also didn't help (ie. Zegras playing with AHLers like Grant/Mayhew on the majority of nights, or Drysdale being thrown to the wolves).

If it was my list, and again, I'm a Ducks fan, I'd go:
-Mo
-Durzi
-Lilly
-Dry
-Schneider
-Spence
Karim_D et Lambchopz a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage