SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Another Devils post

Créé par: Wadejos123
Équipe: 2022-23 Devils du New Jersey
Date de création initiale: 8 mai 2022
Publié: 8 mai 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Walsh/Smith/Rutta rotate in and out on D. Rutta is one year plug until Luke Hughes gets here, could be any vet d man
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
88 000 000 $
88 000 000 $
21 200 000 $
12 750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
12 500 000 $
44 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
NJD
  1. Fiala, Kevin [Droits de RFA]
MIN
  1. Bahl, Kevin
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (NJD)
2.
NJD
    traded for picks
    Rachats de contrats
    Frais appliqués
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2022
    Logo de NJD
    Logo de NJD
    Logo de NJD
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de NYI
    Logo de CBJ
    Logo de NJD
    Logo de NJD
    2023
    Logo de NJD
    Logo de NJD
    Logo de NJD
    Logo de NJD
    Logo de NJD
    Logo de NJD
    Logo de NJD
    2024
    Logo de NJD
    Logo de NJD
    Logo de NJD
    Logo de NJD
    Logo de NJD
    Logo de NJD
    Logo de NJD
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2282 500 000 $76 348 333 $0 $1 650 000 $6 151 667 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Devils du New Jersey
    894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    AD, AG
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Devils du New Jersey
    8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
    C
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Devils du New Jersey
    8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Devils du New Jersey
    7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
    C
    UFA - 5
    8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Devils du New Jersey
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    C, AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Devils du New Jersey
    894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
    AD, C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Devils du New Jersey
    3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
    AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Devils du New Jersey
    2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Devils du New Jersey
    975 000 $975 000 $
    C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Devils du New Jersey
    1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
    AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Devils du New Jersey
    825 000 $825 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Devils du New Jersey
    1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Devils du New Jersey
    9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
    DD
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    G
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Devils du New Jersey
    3 166 667 $3 166 667 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Devils du New Jersey
    4 166 666 $4 166 666 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Devils du New Jersey
    2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Devils du New Jersey
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
    DG/DD
    RFA - 1
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 3
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Devils du New Jersey
    863 333 $863 333 $
    AG
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Devils du New Jersey
    4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Devils du New Jersey
    925 000 $925 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    8 mai 2022 à 14 h 51
    #1
    KFTW
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2018
    Messages: 42,654
    Mentions "j'aime": 23,808
    I’m sorry but 5th overall for Fiala is a dumb trade
    HeadHighSauce et NJDevils1317 a aimé ceci.
    8 mai 2022 à 15 h 9
    #2
    Speak of the Devil
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2017
    Messages: 23,935
    Mentions "j'aime": 26,436
    For the lines, it would likely be
    Sharagovich-Hughes-Mercer
    Fiala-Hischier-Bratt
    8 mai 2022 à 15 h 16
    #3
    Dougie HIMilton
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2020
    Messages: 3,071
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,628
    I’m still not even sure I want to trade a top 5 pick for Fiala and we’re adding prospects too? Ugh.
    csick et Tbrew a aimé ceci.
    8 mai 2022 à 15 h 24
    #4
    KFTW
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2018
    Messages: 42,654
    Mentions "j'aime": 23,808
    Quoting: HeadHighSauce
    I’m still not even sure I want to trade a top 5 pick for Fiala and we’re adding prospects too? Ugh.


    The only way I’d move that pick is if it’s out of the top 7.

    Wright, Cooley, Nemec, Slafkovsky, Jiricek, Savoie and Kemell.

    You don’t trade one of those guys
    NJDevils1317 a aimé ceci.
    8 mai 2022 à 15 h 25
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2021
    Messages: 4,303
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,202
    How many teams can afford a Fiala contract AND have a 1st they would trade for him? How many of those 1sts are valuable enough to not need a load of assets added in that are still quality and not a quantity of spare parts?
    8 mai 2022 à 15 h 29
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2021
    Messages: 4,303
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,202
    Quoting: csick
    The only way I’d move that pick is if it’s out of the top 7.

    Wright, Cooley, Nemec, Slafkovsky, Jiricek, Savoie and Kemell.

    You don’t trade one of those guys


    I would say I'm close to this, I go with Wright, Slaf, Jiricek and Nemec for sure. If all of them are gone, I'd be more open to hear out why we should trade it. There is no goalie we could/would get for it, but an elite scorer I would listen about.
    csick a aimé ceci.
    8 mai 2022 à 15 h 30
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 39,974
    Mentions "j'aime": 18,306
    We’d love Fiala.
    But hard to imagine #5 pick is on the table.
    8 mai 2022 à 15 h 35
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 39,974
    Mentions "j'aime": 18,306
    Quoting: csick
    The only way I’d move that pick is if it’s out of the top 7.

    Wright, Cooley, Nemec, Slafkovsky, Jiricek, Savoie and Kemell.

    You don’t trade one of those guys


    I think the only realistic scenario where we trade #5-7 pick is if we get a 2022 1st back (so trade down, not trading out). (But it that case, we’d be getting lesser player back)

    I am assuming Cooley, Nemec and Wright go in top-3. Slafkovsky probably #4. So if Jirieck, Savoie or Kemell remain…I would have no problem dropping down 5-10 spots and grabbing Lambert, Chesley, Lekkerimaki, etc.
    csick a aimé ceci.
    8 mai 2022 à 15 h 35
    #9
    Patient gm
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 1,864
    Mentions "j'aime": 992
    If an offer sheet is being considered then I would guess it is
    8 mai 2022 à 15 h 36
    #10
    KFTW
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2018
    Messages: 42,654
    Mentions "j'aime": 23,808
    Quoting: NHLfan10506
    I think the only realistic scenario where we trade #5-7 pick is if we get a 2022 1st back (so trade down, not trading out). (But it that case, we’d be getting lesser player back)

    I am assuming Cooley, Nemec and Wright go in top-3. Slafkovsky probably #4. So if Jirieck, Savoie or Kemell remain…I would have no problem dropping down 5-10 spots and grabbing Lambert, Chesley, Lekkerimaki, etc.


    Boeser + 15 for Zacha + 5 is something I like
    8 mai 2022 à 15 h 45
    #11
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2020
    Messages: 4,414
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,130
    Quoting: csick
    The only way I’d move that pick is if it’s out of the top 7.

    Wright, Cooley, Nemec, Slafkovsky, Jiricek, Savoie and Kemell.

    You don’t trade one of those guys


    Quoting: NHLfan10506
    We’d love Fiala.
    But hard to imagine #5 pick is on the table.


    5th overall is the absolute best case scenario for Fiala. But I think it's dependent on what the demand for him is going to be and if there's any sort of bidding war.

    It's well known that Ottawa wants him badly and have been in contact with Guerin since early March. And now there are rumors that NJ wants him, which there were rumors about them wanting him earlier in the year too. If Dorian and Fitz square off, Guerin is in the driver seat. Unsigned RFA or not. Demand increases value, and therefore the cost it would take to get him.

    Also consider it will fully depend on where each team will wind up after the lottery on Tuesday. NJ could drop out of the top 5 and Ottawa move up into it. You never know what can or will happen. If the team wants the player badly enough, who knows what they might be willing to give up to acquire him.

    Just saying... 🤷‍♂️
    csick a aimé ceci.
    8 mai 2022 à 15 h 49
    #12
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 39,974
    Mentions "j'aime": 18,306
    Modifié 8 mai 2022 à 15 h 57
    Quoting: csick
    Boeser + 15 for Zacha + 5 is something I like


    Seems reasonable. It will depend on what they’d want in draft.

    Same goes for Minnesota. I doubt they are thinking they’d trade him for a specific pick. But maybe for a specific prospect.

    Say, it’s draft day. #5 pick is on the board following

    1. Wright
    2. Cooley
    3. Nemec
    4. Savoie

    Minnesota has three offers in their pocket

    1. ANA: #10 pick and a player for Fiala.
    2. OTT: #7 pick for Faila
    3. NJD: #5 pick for FIala and #25 pick.

    If they going into draft saying they want Slafkovsky (and would move Fiala for him). And if they believe Columbus takes him #6…they shouldn’t hesitate to make the deal for #5 be be done with it.
    Archiv3 a aimé ceci.
    8 mai 2022 à 15 h 55
    #13
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 39,974
    Mentions "j'aime": 18,306
    Quoting: RazWild
    5th overall is the absolute best case scenario for Fiala. But I think it's dependent on what the demand for him is going to be and if there's any sort of bidding war.

    It's well known that Ottawa wants him badly and have been in contact with Guerin since early March. And now there are rumors that NJ wants him, which there were rumors about them wanting him earlier in the year too. If Dorian and Fitz square off, Guerin is in the driver seat. Unsigned RFA or not. Demand increases value, and therefore the cost it would take to get him.

    Also consider it will fully depend on where each team will wind up after the lottery on Tuesday. NJ could drop out of the top 5 and Ottawa move up into it. You never know what can or will happen. If the team wants the player badly enough, who knows what they might be willing to give up to acquire him.

    Just saying... 🤷‍♂️


    I don’t think the Devils pick is all that likely to be dealt. And even if it were an option for us, it’s probably used to acquire more of a power forward or as Fitzy said the other day, “a heavier skilled forward”.

    Also, I think Guerin motivation to move FIala for a pick will be dictated by their draft board as much as anything else. If they like XYZ player and have chance to get him, make a deal. Otherwise, hold off.
    8 mai 2022 à 15 h 57
    #14
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2020
    Messages: 4,414
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,130
    Quoting: NHLfan10506
    Seems reasonable. It will depend on what they’d want in draft.

    Same goes for Minnesota. I doubt they are thinking they’d trade him for a specific pick. But maybe for a specific prospect.

    Say, it’s draft day. #5 pick is on the board following

    1. Wright
    2. Cooley
    3. Nemec
    4. Savoie

    Minnesota has three offers in their pocket

    1. ANA: #10 pick and a player for Fiala.
    2. OTT: #7 pick for Faila
    3. NJD: #5 pick for FIala and #25 pick.

    If they going into draft saying they want Slafkovsky (and would move Fiala for him). If they believe Columbus takes him #6…they shouldn’t hesitate to make the deal for #5 be be done with it.


    Small correction, we're currently slotted with the #27 pick not #25. And we'll have to have been knocked out of the playoffs before the WCF in order to keep it.
    8 mai 2022 à 15 h 58
    #15
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2022
    Messages: 714
    Mentions "j'aime": 211
    Quoting: csick
    I’m sorry but 5th overall for Fiala is a dumb trade


    Based off multiple reports - its not even close to out of the question. It is more likely than not that the NJD will set the price to start with at that to set the market....
    csick a aimé ceci.
    8 mai 2022 à 15 h 59
    #16
    KFTW
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2018
    Messages: 42,654
    Mentions "j'aime": 23,808
    Quoting: User123409871234
    Based off multiple reports - its not even close to out of the question. It is more likely than not that the NJD will set the price to start with at that to set the market....


    I don’t understand why you don’t just draft Jiricek or Slafkovsky or Savoie and wait 1 year for them
    NJDevils1317 et HeadHighSauce a aimé ceci.
    8 mai 2022 à 16 h 4
    #17
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2022
    Messages: 714
    Mentions "j'aime": 211
    Quoting: csick
    The only way I’d move that pick is if it’s out of the top 7.

    Wright, Cooley, Nemec, Slafkovsky, Jiricek, Savoie and Kemell.

    You don’t trade one of those guys



    You also hope for a legit 1st line player with a top 5 pick - maybe superstar, however, not too long ago the Rangers selected first overall a player that was supposed to be the next McDavid. To say that the value of a 40+ goal scorer who is 26 is not worth a top 5 pick is uneducated. That is what the team is hoping to get out of the pick but they get a guarantee with this move, no further comment.
    csick a aimé ceci.
    8 mai 2022 à 16 h 6
    #18
    KFTW
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2018
    Messages: 42,654
    Mentions "j'aime": 23,808
    Quoting: User123409871234
    You also hope for a legit 1st line player with a top 5 pick - maybe superstar, however, not too long ago the Rangers selected first overall a player that was supposed to be the next McDavid. To say that the value of a 40+ goal scorer who is 26 is not worth a top 5 pick is uneducated. That is what the team is hoping to get out of the pick but they get a guarantee with this move, no further comment.


    Just take Jiricek. Hard to find a 6’3 RD who’s good everywhere on the ice .
    HeadHighSauce a aimé ceci.
    8 mai 2022 à 16 h 8
    #19
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2020
    Messages: 4,414
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,130
    Quoting: NHLfan10506
    I don’t think the Devils pick is all that likely to be dealt. And even if it were an option for us, it’s probably used to acquire more of a power forward or as Fitzy said the other day, “a heavier skilled forward”.

    Also, I think Guerin motivation to move FIala for a pick will be dictated by their draft board as much as anything else. If they like XYZ player and have chance to get him, make a deal. Otherwise, hold off.


    I mean, Fiala isn't that light of a player. He weights 204 lbs. He was targeted for hits at several points this year and the player attempting to hit him got the worst of it when Fiala just shrugged them off.

    He also had 52 hits on the year, which is low, but ended the year with a .63 H/PG pace. Which is respectable.

    He's started to become a more physical player as he's worked on becoming a better defensive player. Those stats have increased every year as he's improved.
    8 mai 2022 à 16 h 9
    #20
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2022
    Messages: 714
    Mentions "j'aime": 211
    Quoting: csick
    Just take Jiricek. Hard to find a 6’3 RD who’s good everywhere on the ice .


    I mean thats fair - you still have to see how the game translates, but RHD's are so overvalued *cough* Dumba *cough*, even if he turns out to be a middle pairing guy they can still get a later first for him - sadly.
    csick a aimé ceci.
    8 mai 2022 à 16 h 10
    #21
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2020
    Messages: 4,414
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,130
    Quoting: csick
    I don’t understand why you don’t just draft Jiricek or Slafkovsky or Savoie and wait 1 year for them


    Because they don't want to wait a year plus for a player when their goal is to make the playoffs next year. Same for Ottawa.
    8 mai 2022 à 16 h 11
    #22
    KFTW
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2018
    Messages: 42,654
    Mentions "j'aime": 23,808
    Quoting: User123409871234
    I mean thats fair - you still have to see how the game translates, but RHD's are so overvalued *cough* Dumba *cough*, even if he turns out to be a middle pairing guy they can still get a later first for him - sadly.


    Agreed
    8 mai 2022 à 16 h 21
    #23
    Dougie HIMilton
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2020
    Messages: 3,071
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,628
    Quoting: User123409871234
    You also hope for a legit 1st line player with a top 5 pick - maybe superstar, however, not too long ago the Rangers selected first overall a player that was supposed to be the next McDavid. To say that the value of a 40+ goal scorer who is 26 is not worth a top 5 pick is uneducated. That is what the team is hoping to get out of the pick but they get a guarantee with this move, no further comment.


    Nobody thought Laf was the next McDavid
    8 mai 2022 à 16 h 31
    #24
    Dougie HIMilton
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2020
    Messages: 3,071
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,628
    Quoting: RazWild
    Because they don't want to wait a year plus for a player when their goal is to make the playoffs next year. Same for Ottawa.

    Maybe they do, but good lord is that so incredibly short sighted. The devils could be set up for a legitimate Makar/Byram situation - as in, having good dmen stepping in with the team after making serious strides, not necessarily the talent levels - with Hughes/Jiricek because they were much, much better than their record but had bad goalies.
    8 mai 2022 à 16 h 42
    #25
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2020
    Messages: 4,414
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,130
    Modifié 8 mai 2022 à 16 h 48
    Quoting: HeadHighSauce
    Maybe they do, but good lord is that so incredibly short sighted. The devils could be set up for a legitimate Makar/Byram situation - as in, having good dmen stepping in with the team after making serious strides, not necessarily the talent levels - with Hughes/Jiricek because they were much, much better than their record but had bad goalies.


    Name me a team that wasn't short-sighted after declaring their rebuild was done. Lol
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage