SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Ranger Fans

Créé par: SlevinKalevra
Équipe: 2022-23 Stars de Dallas
Date de création initiale: 17 mars 2022
Publié: 30 avr. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Nils is behind Fox, Trouba, and Schneider. Common opinion is Trouba won’t waive and Schneider is considered untouchable for good reason
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
36 500 000 $
33 000 000 $
33 000 000 $
2950 000 $
2825 000 $
1975 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
21 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
NYR
    Asking price??
    2.
    TOR
    1. Glendening, Luke
    2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (DAL)
    Enfoui
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2022
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de DAL
    2023
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de DAL
    2024
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de DAL
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2381 500 000 $79 195 000 $675 000 $1 857 500 $2 305 000 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 4
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    5 500 000 $5 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
    AD
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    AG, C, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    894 167 $894 167 $
    C
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    9 850 000 $9 850 000 $
    C, AD
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
    AG, C
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    836 667 $836 667 $
    C, AD
    RFA - 4
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
    AG, C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
    C, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    825 000 $825 000 $
    C
    RFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    3 650 000 $3 650 000 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    8 450 000 $8 450 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    G
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    5 800 000 $5 800 000 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
    DG
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 2
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    4 916 667 $4 916 667 $
    G
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    950 000 $950 000 $
    AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    975 000 $975 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    30 avr. 2022 à 10 h 5
    #1
    Lambchopz17
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2020
    Messages: 1,406
    Mentions "j'aime": 479
    The gap between Kerfoot and Glendening is going to be higher than a 3rd
    30 avr. 2022 à 10 h 10
    #2
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 5,282
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,731
    Quoting: Lambchopz
    The gap between Kerfoot and Glendening is going to be higher than a 3rd


    Wasn’t sure. I’ve seen him moved for a second round pick several times on this site. I figured an affordable veteran depth player might drop it to a third. Changed it to a second
    30 avr. 2022 à 10 h 13
    #3
    Lambchopz17
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2020
    Messages: 1,406
    Mentions "j'aime": 479
    Quoting: SlevinKalevra
    Wasn’t sure. I’ve seen him moved for a second round pick several times on this site. I figured an affordable veteran depth player might drop it to a third. Changed it to a second


    Yeah that’s probably more realistic. A mid 2nd + depth piece is fair value for him, and I could see Toronto potentially taking that (if it’s the highest offer of course). I’m not sure if they really need Glendening for next year but never hurts to take him
    SlevinKalevra a aimé ceci.
    30 avr. 2022 à 10 h 20
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 19,545
    Mentions "j'aime": 7,343
    Glendening has negative value, he's awful and even if he wasnt he's not a need or even a nice to have for the leafs, taking him would be a cap dump.
    So a cap dump to a team that cant really take cap dumps and getting kerfoot is gonna cost dallas a lot
    30 avr. 2022 à 10 h 35
    #5
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 5,282
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,731
    Quoting: Lambchopz
    Yeah that’s probably more realistic. A mid 2nd + depth piece is fair value for him, and I could see Toronto potentially taking that (if it’s the highest offer of course). I’m not sure if they really need Glendening for next year but never hurts to take him


    I like Glendening. He does what he does well. But we already have Faksa. I’d lean towards keeping the cheaper player in Glendening but if we can find an affordable Klinger replacement I’d be looking to see if we could swap Glendening out for a scoring forward
    Lambchopz a aimé ceci.
    30 avr. 2022 à 10 h 37
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2017
    Messages: 6,728
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
    Bourque for Lundkvist makes sense positionally for both teams.
    SlevinKalevra a aimé ceci.
    30 avr. 2022 à 10 h 37
    #7
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 5,282
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,731
    Quoting: JaredOfLondon
    Glendening has negative value, he's awful and even if he wasnt he's not a need or even a nice to have for the leafs, taking him would be a cap dump.
    So a cap dump to a team that cant really take cap dumps and getting kerfoot is gonna cost dallas a lot


    He only makes 1.5 million. Lol. If it’s an issue we can just give the second round pick and ship him elsewhere
    Saskleaf a aimé ceci.
    30 avr. 2022 à 10 h 41
    #8
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 5,282
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,731
    Quoting: Sagecoll
    Bourque for Lundkvist makes sense positionally for both teams.


    I wouldn’t be thrilled about giving up Bourque but like you said it makes sense for both teams. Kinda what I had in mind when I posted this
    Fox_Czar_Cup a aimé ceci.
    30 avr. 2022 à 10 h 45
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 19,545
    Mentions "j'aime": 7,343
    Quoting: SlevinKalevra
    He only makes 1.5 million. Lol. If it’s an issue we can just give the second round pick and ship him elsewhere


    1.5 mill to a team close to the cap is still a cap dump if the player is of no use to them and doesnt make them better even if he isnt as bad as Glendening is.
    A 2nd is probably a little light for a guy like kerfoot for what good middle 6 guys who can play c and w go for but it's not horrible
    SlevinKalevra a aimé ceci.
    30 avr. 2022 à 10 h 48
    #10
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2017
    Messages: 6,728
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
    Quoting: SlevinKalevra
    I wouldn’t be thrilled about giving up Bourque but like you said it makes sense for both teams. Kinda what I had in mind when I posted this


    I'm not stoked to giving up Lundkvist trust me lol. But you guys are loaded at C and we have a ton of RHD. It makes a lot of sense. Both undersized high IQ guys, both former late 1st rounders, etc.
    SlevinKalevra a aimé ceci.
    30 avr. 2022 à 11 h 3
    #11
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2019
    Messages: 1,831
    Mentions "j'aime": 691
    Lundkvist is great but there's no room for him with Fox Trouba and Schneider on the right side. I'd happily trade him for Pavelski next deadline.
    30 avr. 2022 à 11 h 32
    #12
    bang bang
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2017
    Messages: 1,195
    Mentions "j'aime": 351
    Quoting: Kap97
    Lundkvist is great but there's no room for him with Fox Trouba and Schneider on the right side. I'd happily trade him for Pavelski next deadline.


    lol what
    30 avr. 2022 à 14 h 1
    #13
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 588
    Mentions "j'aime": 177
    Lunkdvist would be moved for a young center prospect. Likely the rangers would need to add for certain quality centers, but thats the rangers need. Wyatt Johnston would probably be the best trade. He had a fantastic d+1 season, so the rangers would have to add, maybe a 2nd or something of that nature to balance it out.
    30 avr. 2022 à 14 h 5
    #14
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 5,282
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,731
    Quoting: slater417
    Lunkdvist would be moved for a young center prospect. Likely the rangers would need to add for certain quality centers, but thats the rangers need. Wyatt Johnston would probably be the best trade. He had a fantastic d+1 season, so the rangers would have to add, maybe a 2nd or something of that nature to balance it out.


    Johnston is a no go
    EsoYeezus69, Fox_Czar_Cup, Goofie and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage