SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Sabres next year

Équipe: 2022-23 Sabres de Buffalo
Date de création initiale: 30 avr. 2022
Publié: 30 avr. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
C- okposo
A- tuch
A- Johnson
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2765 000 $
2765 000 $
2800 000 $
44 500 000 $
2900 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1750 000 $
11 250 000 $
Transactions
1.
BUF
  1. Johnson, Erik
Détails additionnels:
Buffalo sells Johnson on the future and his role playing with Power and gives him a 2 year 4.25 million extension immediately
COL
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (BUF)
2.
NYI
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (BUF)
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2023 (BUF)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de BUF
Logo de FLA
Logo de VGK
Logo de BUF
Logo de NJD
Logo de BUF
Logo de CGY
Logo de BUF
2023
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de PHI
Logo de VGK
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
2024
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $62 100 000 $0 $3 120 000 $20 400 000 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
855 833 $855 833 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance412 500 $$412K)
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
825 000 $825 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Islanders de New York
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
800 000 $800 000 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
900 000 $900 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
765 000 $765 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
30 avr. 2022 à 8 h 0
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 1,737
Mentions "j'aime": 460
As far as EJ goes, I bet they have to give the extension to get him to waive.

That being said, I’d rather target Gudas
30 avr. 2022 à 8 h 5
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,723
Mentions "j'aime": 14,490
Quoting: NeedTheCleanser
As far as EJ goes, I bet they have to give the extension to get him to waive.

That being said, I’d rather target Gudas


Correct about the extension and even if it's a bit high, doesn't hurt the cap
30 avr. 2022 à 8 h 34
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 5,715
Mentions "j'aime": 4,783
Not bad, think they could get the same for cheaper in FA, but for a 4th.
30 avr. 2022 à 10 h 16
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 143
Mentions "j'aime": 15
I really dont think Lou will move Varly but if he does, Id imagine its for nothing less then a pair of 2nds, or a 2nd and 3rd. Kuemper was traded for prospect, a 1st and a 3rd. While I believe thats an overpay for sure, Varly is still a staring goalie and an immediate upgrade for the Sabres
KingMurray a aimé ceci.
30 avr. 2022 à 10 h 59
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 420
Mentions "j'aime": 268
Quoting: scmurray_512
I really dont think Lou will move Varly but if he does, Id imagine its for nothing less then a pair of 2nds, or a 2nd and 3rd. Kuemper was traded for prospect, a 1st and a 3rd. While I believe thats an overpay for sure, Varly is still a staring goalie and an immediate upgrade for the Sabres


Was going to come in and say that Lou would notice all those second rounders in 2023 and ask that you up your offer.
30 avr. 2022 à 12 h 0
#6
RETIRED
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 4,846
Mentions "j'aime": 2,481
COL accepts.
EJ is better than Gudas as an option
30 avr. 2022 à 12 h 15
#7
we miss leo k
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 5,973
Mentions "j'aime": 5,107
I just don't think the value's there for Varlamov. He finished the year with a .911 SV% and 4.6 GSAA in 31 games, so solid 1B numbers in my book. If we're looking at a summer trade for a goalie, I think we have to look back to the Darcy Kuemper trade for context instead of looking at the deadline deals (especially considering MAF had considerable control over his destiny.)

Kuemper was traded from Arizona to Colorado, with Arizona retaining $1M, for a 1st, a conditional 3rd, and Connor Timmins, a recent 2nd round pick who'd already debuted in the NHL at 21, after putting up a .907 with -0.6 GSAA in 27 games with the Coyotes. The retention brought his cap hit down to $3.5M, so that's worth noting, but it's hard not to notice that Varlamov is an incredibly similar profile - last year of his deal, better numbers actually, and a $5M hit before retention vs. a $4.5M hit for Kuemper. Varlamov also has more playoff experience than Kuemper at this point, which is something I think GMs are going to find important.

With all that, I don't feel like it's outlandish to expect a 1st and a B-level prospect back for Varlamov. Isles would most likely have room to retain some money on that deal this season if need be, so his cap hit is something that can be made more manageable.
30 avr. 2022 à 12 h 56
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,723
Mentions "j'aime": 14,490
Quoting: KingMurray
Was going to come in and say that Lou would notice all those second rounders in 2023 and ask that you up your offer.


I'm offering the 41st overall pick for an old goalie who has no term, makes 5 million and is a clear back up.

This site is so broken sometimes
30 avr. 2022 à 12 h 58
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,723
Mentions "j'aime": 14,490
Quoting: dannibalcorpse
I just don't think the value's there for Varlamov. He finished the year with a .911 SV% and 4.6 GSAA in 31 games, so solid 1B numbers in my book. If we're looking at a summer trade for a goalie, I think we have to look back to the Darcy Kuemper trade for context instead of looking at the deadline deals (especially considering MAF had considerable control over his destiny.)

Kuemper was traded from Arizona to Colorado, with Arizona retaining $1M, for a 1st, a conditional 3rd, and Connor Timmins, a recent 2nd round pick who'd already debuted in the NHL at 21, after putting up a .907 with -0.6 GSAA in 27 games with the Coyotes. The retention brought his cap hit down to $3.5M, so that's worth noting, but it's hard not to notice that Varlamov is an incredibly similar profile - last year of his deal, better numbers actually, and a $5M hit before retention vs. a $4.5M hit for Kuemper. Varlamov also has more playoff experience than Kuemper at this point, which is something I think GMs are going to find important.

With all that, I don't feel like it's outlandish to expect a 1st and a B-level prospect back for Varlamov. Isles would most likely have room to retain some money on that deal this season if need be, so his cap hit is something that can be made more manageable.


How old was kuemper? You mentioned salary. How different is the sabres 2nd and Colorados 1st? Save percentage in Arizona quite different than playing in trotz system etc etc etc

Also look at kuempers 2 seasons before then.

Come on
1 mai 2022 à 17 h 3
#10
we miss leo k
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 5,973
Mentions "j'aime": 5,107
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
How old was kuemper? You mentioned salary. How different is the sabres 2nd and Colorados 1st? Save percentage in Arizona quite different than playing in trotz system etc etc etc

Also look at kuempers 2 seasons before then.

Come on


Kuemper was 31 when he was traded; Varlamov just turned 34. I don't think that's an insane age difference worth pointing out - they're both over 30 in this comparison.

Again, salary isn't really a huge issue because the Isles wouldn't have a problem retaining money to make Varlamov's hit more sustainable for a team acquiring him.

Buffalo's 2nd round is 41; that's going to be 10-15 picks behind Colorado's pick. For argument's sake, let's give the Avs pick 28.

Here are some guys picked #28 from 2010-2019: Charlie Coyle, Zack Phillips, Brady Skjei, Morgan Klimchuk, Josh Ho-Sang, Anthony Beauvillier, Lucas Johansen, Shane Bowers, Ryan Suzuki, & Nils Lundkvist. 3 bonafide NHL players, 4 guys that didn't make it, and 3 guys who are firmly in "too soon to tell" but seem to have high upside - both Lundvkist and Suzuki peaked as the 2nd ranked prospects in their respective systems.

Here are some guys picked #41 from 2010-2019: Patrik Nemeth, Dmitirij Jaskin, Mitchell Heard, Robert Hagg, Joshua Jacobs, Ryan Gropp, Nathan Bastian, Jarret Anderson-Dolan, Bode Wilde, Kaedan Korczak. 4 guys who bounced around the fringes of the NHL, 3 guys that never made it, and 3 prospects that are ranked towards the back of their respective team's top 10s.

So, to answer your question, I'd say it's a pretty sizable difference between the 2.

By saying "look at Kuemper's 2 seasons before then" you're completely contradicting your "save percentage in arizona is quite different than playing in trotz's system" point - Rick Tocchet was Arizona's coach for all 3 seasons, so presumably Kuemper put up that .907 in the same system he put up those back to back .925/.928 seasons, no? And if you want to play that game, Varlamov's two seasons prior to this were .929 & .914, plus a .922/2.31 in 34 playoff games (Kuemper put up a .913/3.47 in 9.)

Just because -you- don't think Varlamov is worth a similar package to Kuemper doesn't make it true. And again, at this point the Isles seem content to mostly run it back without any major changes to their lineup for next season, so it's going to have to be something much better than a 2nd & a 5th to get Varlamov.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage