SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Just for kicks Out of the box idea

Créé par: exo2769
Équipe: 2022-23 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 19 avr. 2022
Publié: 22 avr. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
The Hawks are rebuilding. I don't like the idea of losing Murphy, but the Hawks are not contenders and they need to develop their draft picks. I like the way Vlasic and Regula have been playing lately. I'd like to give Ian Mitchell more NHL ice time and allow Beaudin a larger role in Rockford. The way to rebuild is to trade good assets away and retain 50%. That's how we can best weaponize our cap space...to help out other teams that would like to spend assets toward beating the cap. TOR is the perfect example. They have more money than any other team in the NHL and have been able to sign UFAs like Steeves and Ellis from Notre Dame without using an draft capital at all. And even prying away Curtis Douglas from Dallas. They've even been able to find quality players in the 2nd/3rd rounds like Knies, Robertson, Topi, etc... They can't however, make the cap go any higher for them vs other teams. Spend the assets to make it happen.

As a side...If MIN can $13M in dead cap next year...we can have $2.2M in dead cap...
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
32 000 000 $
13 600 000 $
14 000 000 $
21 000 000 $
21 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
13 000 000 $
Transactions
CHI
  1. Knies, Matthew [Liste de réserve]
  2. Mrázek, Petr
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
Détails additionnels:
Imagine paying Mrazek $6M per year...because that's what this is.
TOR
  1. Borgström, Henrik
  2. Murphy, Connor (2 200 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
Its 4 years of a #1 RHD for $2.2M
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Frais appliqués
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de MIN
Logo de EDM
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
Logo de CHI
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CHI
2023
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2024
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CGY
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2082 500 000 $70 950 962 $237 500 $1 700 000 $11 549 038 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 600 000 $3 600 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
758 333 $758 333 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
758 333 $758 333 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 8
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
G
UFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
866 667 $866 667 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
975 000 $975 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
22 avr. 2022 à 11 h 36
#1
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,709
Mentions "j'aime": 31,449
If I'm Leafs I'd just buy Mrazek out and get Demelo from Jets.

Bound to get so much cheaper than this.
Ritzy, MatthewsFan et exo2769 a aimé ceci.
22 avr. 2022 à 11 h 37
#2
Ovchinnikov 137
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 10,412
Mentions "j'aime": 11,982
<a href=buyout.png">


Or better yet, we buy him out and keep Knies and the picks
exo2769 et Lambchopz a aimé ceci.
22 avr. 2022 à 11 h 39
#3
Leafs Sufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 4,073
Mentions "j'aime": 3,511
Since when do #1 RHD sign for 4 years at 4.4M?
22 avr. 2022 à 11 h 39
#4
Démarrer sujet
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,595
Mentions "j'aime": 9,676
Quoting: MatthewsFan
<a href=buyout.png">


Or better yet, we buy him out and keep Knies and the picks


You can absolutely do that. There's a combination of factors here. Murphy being a veteran and provided exactly what TOR needs to a big help. It's much larger part of this trade than Mrazek's buyout.
Garak a aimé ceci.
22 avr. 2022 à 11 h 40
#5
Démarrer sujet
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,595
Mentions "j'aime": 9,676
Quoting: Ritzy
Since when do #1 RHD sign for 4 years at 4.4M?


Murph was our #1 RHD all of last year. He signed that exact contract. and I have him on the 2nd pair for TOR.
22 avr. 2022 à 11 h 42
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,638
Mentions "j'aime": 14,424
This seems insane for toronto to do
Lambchopz et Logan_Ollivier a aimé ceci.
22 avr. 2022 à 11 h 42
#7
Lambchopz17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2020
Messages: 1,406
Mentions "j'aime": 479
“#1 RHD” if Murphy is considered a #1 RD, than the Leafs already have 1 #1 RD in Brodie (actually kind true tho), a young #1 RHD guy for either 1 or 2 years from now, and Justin Holl who, relative to Connor Murphy, isn’t even majorly behind.

Leafs don’t really need a guy like Murphy, he’s basically Lyubushkin but more accustomed to top 4 minutes. Brodie and Liljegren are their top 4 RD for the next 2-3 years most likely, and Murphy would eventually be our 3RD. A very good 3RD, yes, but far from worth paying up a stud prospect and 2 1sts, even if we are getting the Mrazek contract dumped
Logan_Ollivier et villenash a aimé ceci.
22 avr. 2022 à 11 h 42
#8
Leafs Sufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 4,073
Mentions "j'aime": 3,511
Quoting: exo2769
Murph was our #1 RHD all of last year. He signed that exact contract. and I have him on the 2nd pair for TOR.


Oh okay, he was your #1 RHD, not an actual #1 RHD.

No thanks, rather keep Knies and the firsts.
Logan_Ollivier et villenash a aimé ceci.
22 avr. 2022 à 11 h 42
#9
Ovchinnikov 137
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 10,412
Mentions "j'aime": 11,982
Quoting: exo2769
You can absolutely do that. There's a combination of factors here. Murphy being a veteran and provided exactly what TOR needs to a big help. It's much larger part of this trade than Mrazek's buyout.


Not hating on Murphy, I like the player. But the easiest way out of this is a buyout for Mrazek. It's not ideal but one that I would support
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
22 avr. 2022 à 11 h 44
#10
Démarrer sujet
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,595
Mentions "j'aime": 9,676
Quoting: Ritzy
Oh okay, he was your #1 RHD, not an actual #1 RHD.

No thanks, rather keep Knies and the firsts.


Well our #1 RHD means that he's is in FACT a #1 RHD. Probably and admittedly would be behind Brodie because MR and TJ are playing really well together.
22 avr. 2022 à 11 h 46
#11
Démarrer sujet
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,595
Mentions "j'aime": 9,676
Quoting: MatthewsFan
Not hating on Murphy, I like the player. But the easiest way out of this is a buyout for Mrazek. It's not ideal but one that I would support


I still think the biggest benefit out of all of this is $2.2M in cap retention for 4 years. That's MASSIVE for a team always at the cap ceiling. Let's pretend you buyout Mrazek....that's $1M on average rounding...so what would you give for $3.2M in cap space for 4 years...and a VERY capable 2nd pair shutdown dman?
22 avr. 2022 à 11 h 48
#12
Ovchinnikov 137
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 10,412
Mentions "j'aime": 11,982
Quoting: exo2769
I still think the biggest benefit out of all of this is $2.2M in cap retention for 4 years. That's MASSIVE for a team always at the cap ceiling. Let's pretend you buyout Mrazek....that's $1M on average rounding...so what would you give for $3.2M in cap space for 4 years...and a VERY capable 2nd pair shutdown dman?


We’ve had Kessel’s dead cap hit for multiple seasons and just posted the best regular season in Leafs history. They can make it work.
22 avr. 2022 à 11 h 50
#13
Leafs Sufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 4,073
Mentions "j'aime": 3,511
Quoting: exo2769
Well our #1 RHD means that he's is in FACT a #1 RHD. Probably and admittedly would be behind Brodie because MR and TJ are playing really well together.


I guess by that logic, Lybushkin is a #1 RHD? He plays on the top pairing with Reilly. Think most people would agree with that fact? Of course not, because he isn't one. He's slotted there because he plays well with Reilly.
Laquille a aimé ceci.
22 avr. 2022 à 11 h 57
#14
Démarrer sujet
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,595
Mentions "j'aime": 9,676
Quoting: Ritzy
I guess by that logic, Lybushkin is a #1 RHD? He plays on the top pairing with Reilly. Think most people would agree with that fact? Of course not, because he isn't one. He's slotted there because he plays well with Reilly.


I mean what you're saying is not even true. MR plays with Brodie. That's your top pair. Murphy was the #1 RD for an entire season, not just a couple games. AND again, I have Murphy on your 2nd pair. I'm surprised in need to mention that a 3rd time.

https://www.naturalstattrick.com/linestats.php?fromseason=20212022&thruseason=20212022&stype=2&sit=5v5&score=all&rate=n&team=TOR&vteam=ALL&view=wowy&loc=B&gpfilt=none&fd=2021-10-12&td=2022-05-01&tgp=2000&strict=incl&p1=8476853&p2=8474673&p3=0&p4=0&p5=0


22 avr. 2022 à 12 h 6
#15
Démarrer sujet
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,595
Mentions "j'aime": 9,676
Quoting: justaBoss
If I'm Leafs I'd just buy Mrazek out and get Demelo from Jets.

Bound to get so much cheaper than this.


I can see the buyout for sure, but now you're essentially paying Demelo $4M a year and giving up assets for him. They're certainly not giving him up for free by an stretch.

I'm not only removing that $1M, but also taking another $2.2M for 4 years. So what would be getting $3.2M for 4 years and have a better defensive dman than Demelo.
22 avr. 2022 à 12 h 8
#16
Leafs Sufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 4,073
Mentions "j'aime": 3,511
Quoting: exo2769
I mean what you're saying is not even true. MR plays with Brodie. That's your top pair. Murphy was the #1 RD for an entire season, not just a couple games. AND again, I have Murphy on your 2nd pair. I'm surprised in need to mention that a 3rd time.

https://www.naturalstattrick.com/linestats.php?fromseason=20212022&thruseason=20212022&stype=2&sit=5v5&score=all&rate=n&team=TOR&vteam=ALL&view=wowy&loc=B&gpfilt=none&fd=2021-10-12&td=2022-05-01&tgp=2000&strict=incl&p1=8476853&p2=8474673&p3=0&p4=0&p5=0




Really not sure what I'm supposed to be looking at.

You're still asking a kings ransom for a "#1 RHD" just because he plays in that spot for you. AND again, TOR will decline.

As many people have said to you between this thread, and the duplicate you posted, TOR will buyout Mrazek long before they consider something like this.
22 avr. 2022 à 12 h 22
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,269
Mentions "j'aime": 4,915
I think it favors us too much. TOR wouldn't do this. Assume we were a good team, would we pay Reichel, 2 1st's, and dump Connely for a guy like Murphy? Absolutly not
Ritzy a aimé ceci.
22 avr. 2022 à 12 h 32
#18
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,709
Mentions "j'aime": 31,449
Quoting: exo2769
I can see the buyout for sure, but now you're essentially paying Demelo $4M a year and giving up assets for him. They're certainly not giving him up for free by an stretch.

I'm not only removing that $1M, but also taking another $2.2M for 4 years. So what would be getting $3.2M for 4 years and have a better defensive dman than Demelo.


Both are pretty average. Demelo can be had for 2nd+3rd imo. Much better than spending Knies and two firsts to solve two not-that-pressing issues.
22 avr. 2022 à 12 h 34
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 2,273
Mentions "j'aime": 699
Quoting: exo2769
I mean what you're saying is not even true. MR plays with Brodie. That's your top pair. Murphy was the #1 RD for an entire season, not just a couple games. AND again, I have Murphy on your 2nd pair. I'm surprised in need to mention that a 3rd time.

https://www.naturalstattrick.com/linestats.php?fromseason=20212022&thruseason=20212022&stype=2&sit=5v5&score=all&rate=n&team=TOR&vteam=ALL&view=wowy&loc=B&gpfilt=none&fd=2021-10-12&td=2022-05-01&tgp=2000&strict=incl&p1=8476853&p2=8474673&p3=0&p4=0&p5=0




Just a heads up, Rielly and Lyubushkin has been the leafs top pair for a few weeks now, Brodie has been paired with Holl.
Ritzy a aimé ceci.
22 avr. 2022 à 13 h 35
#20
Démarrer sujet
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,595
Mentions "j'aime": 9,676
Quoting: SNipeSHowInc
Just a heads up, Rielly and Lyubushkin has been the leafs top pair for a few weeks now, Brodie has been paired with Holl.


Exactly! This, A few weeks is just a joke. I could say Vlasic is the Hawks top pair because he played on the top pair yesterday. A few weeks is nothing. A full season is something, that's what I'm talking about.
22 avr. 2022 à 13 h 38
#21
Démarrer sujet
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,595
Mentions "j'aime": 9,676
Quoting: Wadejos123
I think it favors us too much. TOR wouldn't do this. Assume we were a good team, would we pay Reichel, 2 1st's, and dump Connely for a guy like Murphy? Absolutly not


Apples and Oranges. We're rebuilding. I have ZERO issue with Bowman's trade of Danault and Romanov for Fleishman/Weise. Does hindsight mean the Hawks lost the trade badly...of course, but they at least tried. AND we're in a cap constrained environment. Getting $3.2M in exact cap space a year for 4 years is huge.

https://www.capfriendly.com/forums/thread/12878
22 avr. 2022 à 14 h 14
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 550
Mentions "j'aime": 395
Quoting: Wadejos123
I think it favors us too much. TOR wouldn't do this. Assume we were a good team, would we pay Reichel, 2 1st's, and dump Connely for a guy like Murphy? Absolutly not


I don't think Toronto would do this, but I don't think it's a bad deal. When the Hawks were contending, they paid a 1st for half a season of guys like Ladd and Vermette. Sometimes those moves work out, sometimes they don't. But if the Hawks could have traded 2 1sts for a top 4 Dman making 2 million and dumping Bickell, I don't think I would have said no. For a contender, a guy like Murphy at a number like that for 4 years is pretty damn valuable. Same principle as the Hagel trade. I will say I don't think Murphy out performs his contract as much as Hagel, so maybe drop Knies for a lesser prospect, but the idea is there. Again, I'm not sure I would do it in TOR's situation in particular, but I think the concept is there.
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
22 avr. 2022 à 14 h 20
#23
Démarrer sujet
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,595
Mentions "j'aime": 9,676
Modifié 22 avr. 2022 à 14 h 35
Quoting: thesaadfather
I don't think Toronto would do this, but I don't think it's a bad deal. When the Hawks were contending, they paid a 1st for half a season of guys like Ladd and Vermette. Sometimes those moves work out, sometimes they don't. But if the Hawks could have traded 2 1sts for a top 4 Dman making 2 million and dumping Bickell, I don't think I would have said no. For a contender, a guy like Murphy at a number like that for 4 years is pretty damn valuable. Same principle as the Hagel trade. I will say I don't think Murphy out performs his contract as much as Hagel, so maybe drop Knies for a lesser prospect, but the idea is there. Again, I'm not sure I would do it in TOR's situation in particular, but I think the concept is there.


YES! Let's take this real life example and expand on it. We send Bickell, and TWO 1sts (Jokiharju/Boqvist), and a really good prospect for (4) years of a Top 6 winger or top 4 Dman at $2.2M...for 4 years?!?!?!?!?! We get a nice player in return....AND We're also keeping Panarin if this trade happens because we'll have the cap space.

***EDIT*** I guess technically it would have been Jake Oettinger

Imagine us going into the Nashville series being able to NOT be forced to put Tanner Kero as our #2C, but actually having someone that can play the #2C...I'm not even looking for the best #2C, but just someone that could play the position decent.
22 avr. 2022 à 14 h 33
#24
Benny
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2016
Messages: 405
Mentions "j'aime": 162
Quoting: exo2769
Well our #1 RHD means that he's is in FACT a #1 RHD. Probably and admittedly would be behind Brodie because MR and TJ are playing really well together.


bruh Andrew Peeke is the #1 RHD of the Columbus blue jackets. I think this speaks by itself that where you play in ONE given organization doesn't make you a true #1 RHD.

Connor Murphy is a second pair D-men, that happens to play more minutes because of the lack of better player on the team he plays for.
22 avr. 2022 à 14 h 59
#25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 2,273
Mentions "j'aime": 699
Quoting: exo2769
Exactly! This, A few weeks is just a joke. I could say Vlasic is the Hawks top pair because he played on the top pair yesterday. A few weeks is nothing. A full season is something, that's what I'm talking about.


No but like, youre still wrong. Rielly Brodie isnt the top pair. and Connor Murphy isnt a number 1 dman. Its like saying Michael Bunting is a top 3 forward in the NHL. Yes he plays on the top line, but hes not a top 3 forward
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage