SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Realistic next year

Créé par: Wadejos123
Équipe: 2022-23 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 20 avr. 2022
Publié: 20 avr. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Let the tank commence
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
2925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 500 000 $
44 500 000 $
31 250 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
21 000 000 $
11 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (NYI)
Détails additionnels:
Hawks need to clear spots on the blue line for the kids. Mitchell, Regula, Galvas, Beaudan, Philips all deserve their shot at proving if they are ready for the NHL full time. 2 of Mccabe, C. Jones, and Stillman need to be moved. Mccabe is a Bowman signing that I could see Davidson moving on from early
2.
CHI
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
Détails additionnels:
Same reasoning as Mccabe trade
EDM
  1. Jones, Caleb [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2022 (CBJ)
Détails additionnels:
Kieth retires, Jones returns to fill his place. At worst a cheap depth piece for the Oilers they have familiarity with
3.
CHI
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (CBJ)
Détails additionnels:
Hawks are kinda in a bind here. I doubt they want to pay the QO and have him clog up a spot for the youth in hopes he recoups his value. KD probably leaves it to some other team to take that chance. I don't see Kubalik worth more than a 3rd anymore based on how he's played.
WPG
  1. Kubalik, Dominik [Droits de RFA]
4.
CHI
  1. Hill, Adin
Détails additionnels:
Cheap plug in net while Soderblom continues to develop. Soderblom probably gets 10-15 games in the NHL to see if he's ready, and Comesso is still a few years away. Hawks need to plug up the net in the meantime
SJS
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (CHI)
5.
CHI
    Anywhere- clear the roster spots
    Frais appliqués
    Enfoui
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2022
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de MIN
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de VGK
    Logo de CBJ
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    2023
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de NYI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    2024
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2382 500 000 $69 340 128 $237 500 $1 732 500 $13 159 872 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
    AD
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
    AG, C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    758 333 $758 333 $
    AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    925 000 $925 000 $
    AG
    RFA
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    C, AD
    RFA - 4
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    AG, C, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    AD, C, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    800 000 $800 000 $
    AG, C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    758 333 $758 333 $
    AG
    RFA - 2
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    867 500 $867 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
    DD
    NMC
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
    DG
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    866 667 $866 667 $
    DD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 175 000 $2 175 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    AD, C, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    800 000 $800 000 $
    AD, C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
    DG
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    20 avr. 2022 à 14 h 49
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2020
    Messages: 15,607
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,912
    What is Kubalik's QO? 4 mil? If he was willing to sign for less than his QO, I think the Jets would be interested.
    csick, capsfan2121, BatVader and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
    20 avr. 2022 à 14 h 50
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 10,970
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,542
    I think Hill is still worth a late 3rd. but chicago is a good choice for him.
    Wadejos123 et DowngoesDemko a aimé ceci.
    20 avr. 2022 à 14 h 57
    #3
    Tintin over 1122
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2021
    Messages: 15,925
    Mentions "j'aime": 10,165
    I wouldn’t scratch Johnson. Maybe just trade him with some retention to the highest bidder
    20 avr. 2022 à 14 h 59
    #4
    IamAlwaysRight
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2021
    Messages: 2,681
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,321
    I am certain we can get one of your 2022 3rd's for Hill. There will be better offers.
    DowngoesDemko a aimé ceci.
    20 avr. 2022 à 15 h 6
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 10,437
    Mentions "j'aime": 10,014
    I completely agree with the need to move defensemen. After the season CHI's had, I would honestly be fine with it if our entire D were rookies next season. Not going to happen, but I wouldn't be opposed. haha.

    But that is also coming from someone that is totally open to moving anyone, at this point... even Cat. I am even in favor of selling low on Jones just to get him out of CHI. If we were a contending team with a proper D partner for him, that would be another story. But a rebuilding team has zero need for Seth Jones services.
    Wadejos123 a aimé ceci.
    20 avr. 2022 à 15 h 11
    #6
    Silentfox1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2018
    Messages: 660
    Mentions "j'aime": 214
    kind of seems like a waste of 5mil to just scratch him, no?
    20 avr. 2022 à 15 h 16
    #7
    TheRealKyleDavidson
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2022
    Messages: 467
    Mentions "j'aime": 162
    I like the idea of playing the young guys, but to this extent could be a problem for their development. An example is the 3rd line which is full of young players that are trying to prove themselves after down or slow years. The best thing to do is to find a veteran winger or experienced player for dach and Kurashev on that 3rd line, which I believe is the best for their development. If we want Dach and Kurashev to take the next step.
    MisstheWhalers a aimé ceci.
    20 avr. 2022 à 15 h 16
    #8
    TheRealKyleDavidson
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2022
    Messages: 467
    Mentions "j'aime": 162
    Quoting: silentfox1
    kind of seems like a waste of 5mil to just scratch him, no?


    Hawks should buy him out
    silentfox1 a aimé ceci.
    20 avr. 2022 à 15 h 27
    #9
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2017
    Messages: 8,186
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,797
    Quoting: Windjammer
    What is Kubalik's QO? 4 mil? If he was willing to sign for less than his QO, I think the Jets would be interested.


    4 mil, yes. I think if he's willing to sign for less the hawks take the chance and sign him themselves. Could be any team in the trade not just jets
    Windjammer a aimé ceci.
    20 avr. 2022 à 15 h 29
    #10
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2017
    Messages: 8,186
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,797
    Quoting: Garak
    I completely agree with the need to move defensemen. After the season CHI's had, I would honestly be fine with it if our entire D were rookies next season. Not going to happen, but I wouldn't be opposed. haha.

    But that is also coming from someone that is totally open to moving anyone, at this point... even Cat. I am even in favor of selling low on Jones just to get him out of CHI. If we were a contending team with a proper D partner for him, that would be another story. But a rebuilding team has zero need for Seth Jones services.


    Not in favor of moving debrincat or selling low on Jones. The only untouchables in the entire system I see as Debrincat, Jones, Dach, Reichel. I would listen on anything else basically.
    Garak a aimé ceci.
    20 avr. 2022 à 15 h 29
    #11
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2017
    Messages: 8,186
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,797
    Quoting: Rhehdbdbd
    Hawks should buy him out


    No point, not like we need the cap for anything else
    Garak et MisstheWhalers a aimé ceci.
    20 avr. 2022 à 15 h 30
    #12
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2017
    Messages: 8,186
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,797
    Quoting: Rhehdbdbd
    I like the idea of playing the young guys, but to this extent could be a problem for their development. An example is the 3rd line which is full of young players that are trying to prove themselves after down or slow years. The best thing to do is to find a veteran winger or experienced player for dach and Kurashev on that 3rd line, which I believe is the best for their development. If we want Dach and Kurashev to take the next step.


    Kayumov is a wild card but he's also no rookie. He's 24 and has been playing against men in the KHL for a while
    Garak a aimé ceci.
    20 avr. 2022 à 15 h 41
    #13
    TheRealKyleDavidson
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2022
    Messages: 467
    Mentions "j'aime": 162
    Quoting: Wadejos123
    No point, not like we need the cap for anything else


    in a rebuild, cap space is the most important thing. we would be able to pick up bad contracts and etc to speed it up.
    20 avr. 2022 à 15 h 42
    #14
    TheRealKyleDavidson
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2022
    Messages: 467
    Mentions "j'aime": 162
    Quoting: Wadejos123
    Kayumov is a wild card but he's also no rookie. He's 24 and has been playing against men in the KHL for a while


    you're right, but I would prefer a more established player. Josh Baily for example could be a cap dump that we pick up and get assets for and play him with dach.
    20 avr. 2022 à 15 h 51
    #15
    we miss leo k
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2018
    Messages: 5,961
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,094
    Just a minor quibble, but Jake McCabe's possession numbers are in Zdeno Chara territory this year (42-43% CF, about 5-6% worse than their teammates.) When you add that he's still got 3x$4M left on that deal, it's hard to be stoked about giving up a pick that'll be around 45 for that profile. I'd just as soon throw that term & AAV at Ian Cole and see if he bites to play LD2 for the Isles next year.
    20 avr. 2022 à 15 h 59
    #16
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 10,437
    Mentions "j'aime": 10,014
    Quoting: Wadejos123
    Not in favor of moving debrincat or selling low on Jones. The only untouchables in the entire system I see as Debrincat, Jones, Dach, Reichel. I would listen on anything else basically.


    That is completely an understandable stance to take. I just question whether or not Cat's point totals are sustainable, especially if you remove Kane from the equation. Which, he still does a lot of other things on the ice that are great. But $9mil + great? I don't think so. Sell high on Cat, now.

    As for Jones, he needs proper D partner and to be playing for a contender. He is gonna waste his prime on a rebuilding team and become an anchor later on. At which time, everyone will be calling for his head. We need to forget what Bowman gave up for him, and just get what we can for him now... but within reason. If low means we aren't even getting a 1st in the package, then just keep him. But then we need to consider moving Murphy. I don't really like Murphy on the left side and we probably shouldn't have both of them clogging up the right side.
    20 avr. 2022 à 16 h 21
    #17
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2017
    Messages: 8,186
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,797
    Quoting: Garak
    That is completely an understandable stance to take. I just question whether or not Cat's point totals are sustainable, especially if you remove Kane from the equation. Which, he still does a lot of other things on the ice that are great. But $9mil + great? I don't think so. Sell high on Cat, now.

    As for Jones, he needs proper D partner and to be playing for a contender. He is gonna waste his prime on a rebuilding team and become an anchor later on. At which time, everyone will be calling for his head. We need to forget what Bowman gave up for him, and just get what we can for him now... but within reason. If low means we aren't even getting a 1st in the package, then just keep him. But then we need to consider moving Murphy. I don't really like Murphy on the left side and we probably shouldn't have both of them clogging up the right side.


    Cat is the future captain, I just don't see it happening unless some team blows us away. And Jones is only 27. He will still be playing very good hockey and in his prime in say 3-4 years when we're breaking out of this rebuild
    Garak a aimé ceci.
    20 avr. 2022 à 16 h 22
    #18
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2017
    Messages: 8,186
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,797
    Quoting: Rhehdbdbd
    in a rebuild, cap space is the most important thing. we would be able to pick up bad contracts and etc to speed it up.


    Johnson already was a bad contract we picked up
    20 avr. 2022 à 17 h 42
    #19
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 10,437
    Mentions "j'aime": 10,014
    Quoting: Wadejos123
    Cat is the future captain, I just don't see it happening unless some team blows us away. And Jones is only 27. He will still be playing very good hockey and in his prime in say 3-4 years when we're breaking out of this rebuild


    Again, your stance is understandable. It is all certainly possible and I wouldn't complain if Davidson made those bets. But I also wouldn't complain if he ripped it all apart and started from scratch, as long as the returns were fair.
    Wadejos123 a aimé ceci.
    20 avr. 2022 à 23 h 50
    #20
    TheRealKyleDavidson
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2022
    Messages: 467
    Mentions "j'aime": 162
    Quoting: Wadejos123
    Johnson already was a bad contract we picked up


    yes, we should pick up more contracts like that so that we can get assets in return for the bad cap hit and hope that we can bring the players value back up, which hasn't happened with Johnson
    21 avr. 2022 à 8 h 35
    #21
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2017
    Messages: 8,186
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,797
    Quoting: Rhehdbdbd
    yes, we should pick up more contracts like that so that we can get assets in return for the bad cap hit and hope that we can bring the players value back up, which hasn't happened with Johnson


    You don't take on bad contracts just to buy them all out and take more lol. Thats not how it works
    dannibalcorpse a aimé ceci.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage