SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

No Knies

Créé par: JackSC87
Équipe: 2022-23 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 15 avr. 2022
Publié: 15 avr. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
This is very difficult, some tough decisions to be made. Muzzin is probably the biggest question mark here. He's getting hurt very frequently and his play is noticeably regressing, but moving him would be very difficult. And of course there's still the chance that he comes back next season and is great.
*** Note that those D pairings aren't set in stone. I assume they will roster 7 Dmen again next year and just rotate them with injuries similar to this year.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 800 000 $
21 250 000 $
21 500 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
33 000 000 $
32 900 000 $
21 800 000 $
1750 000 $
11 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (DAL)
2.
TOR
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2023 (CHI)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de WPG
Logo de DAL
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2282 500 000 $82 678 117 $212 500 $0 $-178 117 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
950 000 $950 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
796 667 $796 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
837 500 $837 500 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
834 167 $834 167 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
G
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
766 667 $766 667 $
G
RFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
15 avr. 2022 à 16 h 18
#1
Owly
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 4,559
Mentions "j'aime": 932
Muzzin has looked pretty good with Brodie so far.
15 avr. 2022 à 16 h 20
#2
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 7,792
Mentions "j'aime": 4,483
No one is taking on Mrazek without sweeteners being added.
15 avr. 2022 à 16 h 55
#3
Roster Architect
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 2,643
Mentions "j'aime": 909
I think Toronto would be smart and are looking at locking up Sandin long term, which in turn comes at a higher cap hit. Might be tougher to swallow now but will be well worth it in the future.

Not so sure Mikheyev comes back. He had he trade request before and as much as that was about ice time and a higher role, he’s gotten that but he’s also proved he’s an option on a second line. Not saying that a deal at $2.9m is outta the question, but at that price point Toronto might have to let him walk or move Kerfoot - they can’t keep both when they both play the same role.

Absolutely cannot go into next season with a tandem of Campbell and a rookie goalie - Campbell has proved to be too inconsistent and injury prone. I think moving Mrazek is likely and while it may not cost them a lot, they’ll need to sweeten a bit but likely bring a goalie back too.

That 4th line is honestly atrocious. Douglas isn’t an NHL option at this point. He’s a call up option maybe, but not an opening day roster - Clifford will be on that line instead.

I like the idea of bringing Gio back but I don’t think it’s likely. I don’t think he fits in the lineup - he’s great for Liljegren’a development on the bottom pair, but that’s likely Muzzin’s spot next year. Nylander is likely moved for a right handed top 4 guy this summer, leaving no spot for Gio in the lineup.
15 avr. 2022 à 16 h 59
#4
In Pridham we trust
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 3,589
Mentions "j'aime": 1,969
Leafs will carry 7 or 8 dmen next year, but it wouldn't be those 7.

All 7 of those guys will be NHL regulars next year, if healthy.

Dermott was traded this year based on deserving NHL minutes. And he would be 8th on that depth chart.
15 avr. 2022 à 17 h 5
#5
In Pridham we trust
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 3,589
Mentions "j'aime": 1,969
Quoting: TrueCanuck
I think Toronto would be smart and are looking at locking up Sandin long term, which in turn comes at a higher cap hit. Might be tougher to swallow now but will be well worth it in the future.

Not so sure Mikheyev comes back. He had he trade request before and as much as that was about ice time and a higher role, he’s gotten that but he’s also proved he’s an option on a second line. Not saying that a deal at $2.9m is outta the question, but at that price point Toronto might have to let him walk or move Kerfoot - they can’t keep both when they both play the same role.

Absolutely cannot go into next season with a tandem of Campbell and a rookie goalie - Campbell has proved to be too inconsistent and injury prone. I think moving Mrazek is likely and while it may not cost them a lot, they’ll need to sweeten a bit but likely bring a goalie back too.

That 4th line is honestly atrocious. Douglas isn’t an NHL option at this point. He’s a call up option maybe, but not an opening day roster - Clifford will be on that line instead.

I like the idea of bringing Gio back but I don’t think it’s likely. I don’t think he fits in the lineup - he’s great for Liljegren’a development on the bottom pair, but that’s likely Muzzin’s spot next year. Nylander is likely moved for a right handed top 4 guy this summer, leaving no spot for Gio in the lineup.


Obviously it would be smart to lock up Sandin or Liljegren or both long term, but unless Mrazek or Muzzin or both are dealt this summer it won't be possible.

Why is Nylander traded for a top 4 dman?
15 avr. 2022 à 17 h 12
#6
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,603
Mentions "j'aime": 9,697
Not a chance the Hawks take Mrazeks cap dump unless some serious assets are coming with. Go look at the Brett Connolly trade and it'll be something similar.
15 avr. 2022 à 17 h 15
#7
Roster Architect
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 2,643
Mentions "j'aime": 909
Quoting: Barilko14
Obviously it would be smart to lock up Sandin or Liljegren or both long term, but unless Mrazek or Muzzin or both are dealt this summer it won't be possible.

Why is Nylander traded for a top 4 dman?


I wouldn’t lock up Liljegren long term - he hasn’t had much time in the NHL and he’s been up and down a lot. Sandip has looked incredible and has the underlying numbers that show he produces offence so it’s smart to lock him up. I’m of the belief that Kerfoot is likely moved this summer which opens up the cap space for that. Sandin for 5-6 years shouldn’t cost more than $4-$5m so he’d fit.

Chris Johnston reported that he believes one of the Leafs core 4 are moved this summer regardless to address other areas of needs - Nylander is really the only likely guy to be moved. Matthews is going anywhere. Tavares has a NMC and is more valuable to the team than Nylander is, and Marner is a long shot to be moved. I doubt Lyubushkin is coming back to Toronto so there’s gonna be a spot open and Nylander is the piece that can bring back the type of defenceman that they need (thinking like a Pesce, Marino, etc. type if they’re available). Nylander’s defensive game and efforts have been well criticized in Toronto and to the point that Keefe moved him the the 3rd line because of it and Nylander’s just not most effective on a 3rd line. Tavares has shown that he can play with lower tier wingers and elevate their game so it may be time to move on from Nylander and establish a d-core that can defend a bit better consistently. It just seems inevitable at this point.
15 avr. 2022 à 17 h 16
#8
Roster Architect
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 2,643
Mentions "j'aime": 909
Quoting: exo2769
Not a chance the Hawks take Mrazeks cap dump unless some serious assets are coming with. Go look at the Brett Connolly trade and it'll be something similar.


Go look at the Nick Ritchie trade and it says otherwise. Both Mrazek and Ritchie have contract structures that are designed for easy buyouts, making it moveable and not much to be added on.
15 avr. 2022 à 17 h 18
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 10,720
Mentions "j'aime": 10,410
What is the deal with Knies anyway? Didn't capfriendly post that TOR signed Knies like a week or two ago? Cuz there is no contract to be found for him... Was that just a capfriendly mess up?
15 avr. 2022 à 17 h 27
#10
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,603
Mentions "j'aime": 9,697
Quoting: TrueCanuck
Go look at the Nick Ritchie trade and it says otherwise. Both Mrazek and Ritchie have contract structures that are designed for easy buyouts, making it moveable and not much to be added on.


Agreed on the buyout. I think that's what TOR should do

Ritchie however isn't a good comp. The Connolly trade last year is really dang close to what Mrazek is right now. Connolly had 2.5 years...Mrazek has 2.5 years. Connolly had a $3.5M hit, Mrazek is higher at $3.8M. Mrazaek will be sent to Rockford just like Connolley and if he plays well...then brought up and if he stinks again in the NHL...waived and sent down. Ritchie is 1 year less, $1.3M less, and a forward which can be moved around in the lineup with other forwards to help maximize potential or minimize detriment, heck even limit ice time. When you're dead cap in net it's different, you can't get hidden you're just exposed.
15 avr. 2022 à 17 h 28
#11
In Pridham we trust
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 3,589
Mentions "j'aime": 1,969
Modifié 15 avr. 2022 à 17 h 35
Quoting: TrueCanuck
I wouldn’t lock up Liljegren long term - he hasn’t had much time in the NHL and he’s been up and down a lot. Sandip has looked incredible and has the underlying numbers that show he produces offence so it’s smart to lock him up. I’m of the belief that Kerfoot is likely moved this summer which opens up the cap space for that. Sandin for 5-6 years shouldn’t cost more than $4-$5m so he’d fit.

Chris Johnston reported that he believes one of the Leafs core 4 are moved this summer regardless to address other areas of needs - Nylander is really the only likely guy to be moved. Matthews is going anywhere. Tavares has a NMC and is more valuable to the team than Nylander is, and Marner is a long shot to be moved. I doubt Lyubushkin is coming back to Toronto so there’s gonna be a spot open and Nylander is the piece that can bring back the type of defenceman that they need (thinking like a Pesce, Marino, etc. type if they’re available). Nylander’s defensive game and efforts have been well criticized in Toronto and to the point that Keefe moved him the the 3rd line because of it and Nylander’s just not most effective on a 3rd line. Tavares has shown that he can play with lower tier wingers and elevate their game so it may be time to move on from Nylander and establish a d-core that can defend a bit better consistently. It just seems inevitable at this point.


Reach much?

Johnston was on the Leafs report and said he wished he didn't "report" that.

Do the Leafs value solid transition play more than most teams? Who's among the best on the team at transition?

Nylander and Tavares needed a shake-up at 5v5. The ****storm that would happen if Tavares got "demoted" would still be front page news. Last 7 games Nylnder TOI 18:23, Tavares 17:40, btw.

Kerfoot moving on would free up the $$ needed to re-sign Campbell (or another No.1). Wouldn't necessarily lead to a Sandin long term deal.

Also Sandin has played 20 more games in his career than Liljegren, so saying Liljegren doesn't have enough experience to earn a longer term deal is a bit foolish.

Why wouldn't Lyubushkin be back next year?

You've got a lot of theories going on here, based on very little.
15 avr. 2022 à 17 h 29
#12
In Pridham we trust
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 3,589
Mentions "j'aime": 1,969
Quoting: Garak
What is the deal with Knies anyway? Didn't capfriendly post that TOR signed Knies like a week or two ago? Cuz there is no contract to be found for him... Was that just a capfriendly mess up?


He was never signed.
15 avr. 2022 à 17 h 33
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 10,720
Mentions "j'aime": 10,410
Quoting: Barilko14
He was never signed.


Well I see that now. What I'm saying is, I could have sworn capfriendly showed that TOR had signed him within the last few weeks but now it doesn't say he has a contract. So I was wondering if I just imagined it or if it was just a capfriendly blip or maybe I mixed him up with someone else... but I could have sworn that happened.
15 avr. 2022 à 17 h 34
#14
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,603
Mentions "j'aime": 9,697
Quoting: Garak
Well I see that now. What I'm saying is, I could have sworn capfriendly showed that TOR had signed him within the last few weeks but now it doesn't say he has a contract. So I was wondering if I just imagined it or if it was just a capfriendly blip or maybe I mixed him up with someone else... but I could have sworn that happened.


It's possible. They usually have the black exclamation mark on the right hand side of a signing noting that a signing hasn't been verified. They remove it once it's been verified.
Garak a aimé ceci.
15 avr. 2022 à 17 h 37
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 10,720
Mentions "j'aime": 10,410
Quoting: exo2769
It's possible. They usually have the black exclamation mark on the right hand side of a signing noting that a signing hasn't been verified. They remove it once it's been verified.


Yeah maybe it was something like that. Or maybe I mixed him up in my head somehow with Abruzzese. I do remember reading something about Abruzzese possibly going to free agency and not signing with TOR and then like a day later he signed. Idk. Haven't been on here as much since the TDL.
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
15 avr. 2022 à 17 h 56
#16
Roster Architect
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 2,643
Mentions "j'aime": 909
Quoting: Barilko14
Reach much?

Johnston was on the Leafs report and said he wished he didn't "report" that.

Do the Leafs value solid transition play more than most teams? Who's among the best on the team at transition?

Nylander and Tavares needed a shake-up at 5v5. The ****storm that would happen if Tavares got "demoted" would still be front page news. Last 7 games Nylnder TOI 18:23, Tavares 17:40, btw.

Kerfoot moving on would free up the $$ needed to re-sign Campbell (or another No.1). Wouldn't necessarily lead to a Sandin long term deal.

Also Sandin has played 20 more games in his career than Liljegren, so saying Liljegren doesn't have enough experience to earn a longer term deal is a bit foolish.

Why wouldn't Lyubushkin be back next year?

You've got a lot of theories going on here, based on very little.


I’ll bet good money on Nylander being moved this season. A lot of signs point to it.
15 avr. 2022 à 17 h 59
#17
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,438
Mentions "j'aime": 22,639
I don't know why you even wrote "Muzzin is difficult to trade". It's impossible, with his NTC He's not going to a poor team with cap, and certainly a true contender can't afford/don't want him.
Mrzarek looks more like a buyout candidate as any trade would be a big sweetener. Douglas in the NHL?
15 avr. 2022 à 17 h 59
#18
In Pridham we trust
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 3,589
Mentions "j'aime": 1,969
Quoting: TrueCanuck
I’ll bet good money on Nylander being moved this season. A lot of signs point to it.


Doubt it.
15 avr. 2022 à 18 h 4
#19
Roster Architect
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 2,643
Mentions "j'aime": 909
Quoting: exo2769
Agreed on the buyout. I think that's what TOR should do

Ritchie however isn't a good comp. The Connolly trade last year is really dang close to what Mrazek is right now. Connolly had 2.5 years...Mrazek has 2.5 years. Connolly had a $3.5M hit, Mrazek is higher at $3.8M. Mrazaek will be sent to Rockford just like Connolley and if he plays well...then brought up and if he stinks again in the NHL...waived and sent down. Ritchie is 1 year less, $1.3M less, and a forward which can be moved around in the lineup with other forwards to help maximize potential or minimize detriment, heck even limit ice time. When you're dead cap in net it's different, you can't get hidden you're just exposed.


So you’d rather a career AHLer, a bottom pair defenceman and a 7th round pick with Mrazek for a AHLer and a bottom pair defenceman? .. seems like a better deal for Chicago to take a 2nd or 3rd for Mrazek and send back nothing
15 avr. 2022 à 20 h 20
#20
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,603
Mentions "j'aime": 9,697
Quoting: TrueCanuck
So you’d rather a career AHLer, a bottom pair defenceman and a 7th round pick with Mrazek for a AHLer and a bottom pair defenceman? .. seems like a better deal for Chicago to take a 2nd or 3rd for Mrazek and send back nothing


I guess "serious assets" is relative. I like Stillman and if you go through my history that's saying something because I didn't like that trade at all. Stillman is better than Lucas Carlson by A LOT. Lucas Carlson didn't even make the Blackhawks defensive core!!! The only reason he's playing now is because Ekblad and Nutivaara are hurt. I get Borgy is a former 1st round pick looking for a chance. He's also running out of time to put it all together in CHI too, but he's got talent. I guess in summary...YES, for sure I'd rather have NHLers than a 2nd round pick from TOR.
16 avr. 2022 à 11 h 27
#21
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 839
Mentions "j'aime": 134
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
Muzzin has looked pretty good with Brodie so far.


Yeah not bad, he just can't stay healthy
16 avr. 2022 à 11 h 32
#22
Owly
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 4,559
Mentions "j'aime": 932
Quoting: JackSC87
Yeah not bad, he just can't stay healthy


He's had some issues this year but that could very well just be an outlier string of bad luck.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage