SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Pay us for your bad contracts

Créé par: Ross_Johnston
Équipe: 2022-23 Sabres de Buffalo
Date de création initiale: 11 avr. 2022
Publié: 11 avr. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Get laid and then paid to take back bad contracts for the next 2-3 years until the Sabres are ready to contend.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2900 000 $
2900 000 $
2900 000 $
2900 000 $
54 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 500 000 $
1850 000 $
Transactions
1.
BUF
  1. Monahan, Sean
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (CGY)
CGY
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2022 (CGY)
2.
BUF
  1. Mrázek, Petr
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
TOR
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (BUF)
3.
BUF
  1. Zaitsev, Nikita
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (OTT)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (OTT)
4.
BUF
  1. Nemeth, Patrik
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (NYR)
NYR
5.
BUF
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (DAL)
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de BUF
Logo de FLA
Logo de VGK
Logo de TOR
Logo de BUF
Logo de CGY
Logo de DAL
Logo de BUF
Logo de NJD
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
2023
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de PHI
Logo de VGK
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
2024
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de NYR
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $64 040 834 $0 $2 187 500 $18 459 166 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance412 500 $$412K)
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
825 000 $825 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
900 000 $900 000 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
850 000 $850 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
900 000 $900 000 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
900 000 $900 000 $
C, AG
RFA
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
11 avr. 2022 à 13 h 58
#1
bang bang
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 1,195
Mentions "j'aime": 351
Besides zaitsev I dont think these are that bad of contracts
11 avr. 2022 à 14 h 1
#2
Terry_AkiSauce
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 3,421
Mentions "j'aime": 1,045
Leafs would much rather buy-out Mrazek, pretty cheap
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
11 avr. 2022 à 14 h 8
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 373
Mentions "j'aime": 78
Quoting: Terry_AkiSauce
Leafs would much rather buy-out Mrazek, pretty cheap


yeah, people who think Toronto will give up a top tier asset to avoid a 1M cap hit next season, and 800K the following year are nuts. Cap expected to jump a lot for the 24-25 season, so the 1.4M that year and the one after won't be an issue.
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
11 avr. 2022 à 14 h 10
#4
Leafs Sufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 4,073
Mentions "j'aime": 3,511
How many more times are we going to do this?
11 avr. 2022 à 14 h 16
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,988
Mentions "j'aime": 877
Rangers accept
11 avr. 2022 à 14 h 18
#6
Démarrer sujet
No longer a Virgin
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 6,009
Mentions "j'aime": 2,602
Quoting: AdamFox
Besides zaitsev I dont think these are that bad of contracts


Not so much "bad" as they are hampering these teams salary caps. Monahan isn't awful, but his crap hurts the Flames situation big time, for example.
11 avr. 2022 à 14 h 20
#7
Démarrer sujet
No longer a Virgin
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 6,009
Mentions "j'aime": 2,602
Quoting: Cor
yeah, people who think Toronto will give up a top tier asset to avoid a 1M cap hit next season, and 800K the following year are nuts. Cap expected to jump a lot for the 24-25 season, so the 1.4M that year and the one after won't be an issue.


Quoting: Terry_AkiSauce
Leafs would much rather buy-out Mrazek, pretty cheap


The Leafs are rolling and are in "win now" mode, IMO. If they can clear the cap without paying buyout fees, I think they're happy to do so. Mrazek clears up 3.8 plus Kessel's contract being up (1.2) million, and the cap going up by a million. That's 6 million in cap space right there - you could add a substantial player at that price. I'd rather that than buyout Mrazek. Just my opinion though!
11 avr. 2022 à 14 h 22
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,133
Mentions "j'aime": 14,147
Imagine playing any of those 4th liners over girgensons
11 avr. 2022 à 14 h 42
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 4,032
Mentions "j'aime": 1,923
Quoting: Ritzy
How many more times are we going to do this?


Less times than the leaf fans "getting a 3rd for mrazek" lol
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
11 avr. 2022 à 14 h 43
#10
Leafs Sufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 4,073
Mentions "j'aime": 3,511
Quoting: OrganizedConfusion55
Less times than the leaf fans "getting a 3rd for mrazek" lol


So the response to dumb posts is to post a dumb post?
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
11 avr. 2022 à 14 h 44
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 4,032
Mentions "j'aime": 1,923
Quoting: Ritzy
So the response to dumb posts is to post a dumb post?


Nope. Just using leaf logic
Ross_Johnston a aimé ceci.
11 avr. 2022 à 14 h 51
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,545
Mentions "j'aime": 7,343
The leafs will give you a signed spezza jersey for mrazek or just buy him out
11 avr. 2022 à 14 h 58
#13
Démarrer sujet
No longer a Virgin
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 6,009
Mentions "j'aime": 2,602
Quoting: Ritzy
So the response to dumb posts is to post a dumb post?


rude frown
11 avr. 2022 à 15 h 1
#14
Nah.
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,361
Mentions "j'aime": 4,177
I wish more teams did this.

Alas, only AZ/HOU ever seems willing to "weaponize the cap."
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
11 avr. 2022 à 15 h 51
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 8,125
Mentions "j'aime": 6,134
The rangers one is particularly bad. We would have no use whatsoever for him, and he's got 2 years left. And we get a 3rd. Awful.
11 avr. 2022 à 15 h 52
#16
Démarrer sujet
No longer a Virgin
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 6,009
Mentions "j'aime": 2,602
Quoting: sabres89
The rangers one is particularly bad. We would have no use whatsoever for him, and he's got 2 years left. And we get a 3rd. Awful.


Bury him. A 3rd is a 3rd. Good deal IMO, helps reach the cap floor and gives a veteran presence on a super young team
11 avr. 2022 à 15 h 53
#17
Sabres are elite
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 7,979
Mentions "j'aime": 3,299
None of these make sense for both of the teams involved, except maybe the Calgary one.
sabres89 a aimé ceci.
11 avr. 2022 à 18 h 12
#18
Terry_AkiSauce
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 3,421
Mentions "j'aime": 1,045
Quoting: stephane_robidas
The Leafs are rolling and are in "win now" mode, IMO. If they can clear the cap without paying buyout fees, I think they're happy to do so. Mrazek clears up 3.8 plus Kessel's contract being up (1.2) million, and the cap going up by a million. That's 6 million in cap space right there - you could add a substantial player at that price. I'd rather that than buyout Mrazek. Just my opinion though!


1.2 + 3.8 = 6? Also, they can buy out Mrazek for 1M but who would they replace him with? There's no good UFA goalies next year and also could potentially LTIR mrazek
11 avr. 2022 à 19 h 19
#19
Démarrer sujet
No longer a Virgin
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 6,009
Mentions "j'aime": 2,602
Quoting: Terry_AkiSauce
1.2 + 3.8 = 6? Also, they can buy out Mrazek for 1M but who would they replace him with? There's no good UFA goalies next year and also could potentially LTIR mrazek


You missed the last part, haha. the cap goes up by a million. 3.8+1.2+1=6
11 avr. 2022 à 20 h 32
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,282
Mentions "j'aime": 2,731
A second is a little steep for Stadt considering his lack of production. And considering Dallas isn’t exactly an offensive Mecca
EsoYeezus69 et Ross_Johnston a aimé ceci.
14 avr. 2022 à 10 h 9
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 373
Mentions "j'aime": 78
Quoting: stephane_robidas
The Leafs are rolling and are in "win now" mode, IMO. If they can clear the cap without paying buyout fees, I think they're happy to do so. Mrazek clears up 3.8 plus Kessel's contract being up (1.2) million, and the cap going up by a million. That's 6 million in cap space right there - you could add a substantial player at that price. I'd rather that than buyout Mrazek. Just my opinion though!


The difference between freeing up 2.6M of Mrazek's contract and 3.6M of Mrazek's contract is not worth a first round pick to move.

That is simply ridiculous.

He has a buyout friendly contract. Was likely structured that way purposely.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage