SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Yes Ive lost my mind

Créé par: Butlrr
Équipe: 2022-23 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 7 avr. 2022
Publié: 10 avr. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Yes, I want to stop worrying about right side D. This is my team- figure it out, professional hockey players.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
32 500 000 $
36 000 000 $
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
3800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
34 600 000 $
2762 500 $
21 250 000 $
45 000 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
Transactions
1.
VAN
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (DAL)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (DAL)
2.
VAN
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (ARI)
ARI
  1. Poolman, Tucker
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (DAL)
3.
VAN
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (NYR)
NYR
  1. Pearson, Tanner
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (DAL)
4.
VAN
  1. Sanheim, Travis
  2. van Riemsdyk, James
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (PHI)
PHI
  1. Ekman-Larsson, Oliver
  2. Miller, J.T. (2 625 000 $ retained)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (VAN)
5.
VAN
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (WPG)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de VAN
Logo de NYR
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de PHI
Logo de WPG
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de NYR
Logo de ARI
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $73 954 167 $1 250 000 $1 150 000 $8 545 833 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 1
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 8
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AG
UFA
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
800 000 $800 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
800 000 $800 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
800 000 $800 000 $
C
UFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
4 675 000 $4 675 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 4
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
10 avr. 2022 à 18 h 24
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 2,042
Mentions "j'aime": 1,017
I don’t say this often, but…

Jets Accept
Butlrr a aimé ceci.
10 avr. 2022 à 18 h 37
#2
Jet69
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 2,595
Mentions "j'aime": 1,142
Quoting: BatVader
I don’t say this often, but…

Jets Accept


Not that Garland isn’t worth it but I’d be holding onto that 1st with every fibre of my being. It may very well be a lotto pick as knowing the Jets org, not much may change this off-season and next year might be just as much a tire fire as this year was.
I am not against moving picks/prospects, but if we are moving those assets, we better get our coveted RHD first.
Windjammer et Butlrr a aimé ceci.
10 avr. 2022 à 18 h 49
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 15,607
Mentions "j'aime": 6,912
Garland would be nice, but definitely isn't worth giving up the Jets 1st for.
10 avr. 2022 à 19 h 5
#4
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
“Have you lost your mind, cause I’ll help you find it”
-Stanley Hudson, the office
Butlrr et DowngoesDemko a aimé ceci.
10 avr. 2022 à 19 h 26
#5
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,708
Mentions "j'aime": 31,448
Stars decline thanks. Not a fan of Myers and his contract. Would need you to pay us for taking that deal.
Butlrr et CEO a aimé ceci.
10 avr. 2022 à 20 h 0
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 93
Mentions "j'aime": 12
Quoting: justaBoss
Stars decline thanks. Not a fan of Myers and his contract. Would need you to pay us for taking that deal.


Yeah to be fair, so would I. I get the feeling Dallas is the sort of team that would make this trade in real life, where Myers bizarrely holds some actual value.
CEO a aimé ceci.
10 avr. 2022 à 20 h 7
#7
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,708
Mentions "j'aime": 31,448
Quoting: Butlrr
Yeah to be fair, so would I. I get the feeling Dallas is the sort of team that would make this trade in real life, where Myers bizarrely holds some actual value.


I have to disagree. DAL usually doesn't make stupid trades.

They like veterans yes to a troubling extent, but they don't often overpay for crap they don't need.

If anything they'd sign him as UFA for too much money.
Butlrr a aimé ceci.
10 avr. 2022 à 20 h 15
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 93
Mentions "j'aime": 12
Quoting: jgimp69
Not that Garland isn’t worth it but I’d be holding onto that 1st with every fibre of my being. It may very well be a lotto pick as knowing the Jets org, not much may change this off-season and next year might be just as much a tire fire as this year was.
I am not against moving picks/prospects, but if we are moving those assets, we better get our coveted RHD first.


The risk of it being top five is a big scary red flag (also what makes it enticing for the Canucks). This might be the year Jets can cash out on Wheeler’s productive season and maybe take a run at Klingberg in FA?

Who am I kidding, the Jets never make big free agency signings. Your plan is better.
jgimp69 a aimé ceci.
10 avr. 2022 à 20 h 16
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 93
Mentions "j'aime": 12
Quoting: justaBoss
I have to disagree. DAL usually doesn't make stupid trades.

They like veterans yes to a troubling extent, but they don't often overpay for crap they don't need.

If anything they'd sign him as UFA for too much money.


What’s the plan post-Klingberg? Any ideas?
10 avr. 2022 à 20 h 21
#10
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,708
Mentions "j'aime": 31,448
Quoting: Butlrr
What’s the plan post-Klingberg? Any ideas?


That's the million dollar question (actually MORE than that lol), but if anything this year has proven that our defense is not a huge problem, secondary scoring is. I think getting a player like Burakovsky or any kind of scoring 2nd line winger is an absolute necessity. Getting a 2nd pair RHD is a secondary concern.

Ideally I'd want Shattenkirk. He'd be a good 2nd pair D for us at reasonable cost, able to help our PP with Klingberg gone.

Given LA's RHD depth maybe we could make an offer for Walker or Roy. Spence is an option too - I'd like a swap between Spence and Dellandrea, as it can help both teams with DAL getting a young puckmoving RHD and LA gets a right shot two-way forward they're lacking.

Obviously the most ideal scenario is the one where Klingberg re-signs with us with smaller money because he's still really good, but that seems very unlikely.
Butlrr a aimé ceci.
10 avr. 2022 à 20 h 53
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 93
Mentions "j'aime": 12
Really seems like Klingberg wants the home run contract and Nill seems unlikely to give it to him. Shattenkirk is sneaky good but just at that age where D start falling out of the top 4.

Honestly, I just looked at Dallas and thought “they might want a RHD like Myers”. It sounded like there are suddenly suitors for Myers but I have no idea who that might be.
10 avr. 2022 à 22 h 59
#12
Benzino204
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,642
Mentions "j'aime": 695
Garland would be a pretty nice addition. I'm not fond of losing the 1st unless a Scheifele trade or something happens where we have another first
Butlrr a aimé ceci.
11 avr. 2022 à 8 h 28
#13
B
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 7,862
Mentions "j'aime": 1,423
Well you've lost your cap dumps easily enough lol
Butlrr a aimé ceci.
11 avr. 2022 à 10 h 46
#14
Tspky
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 3,883
Mentions "j'aime": 980
Why would rangers ever do that?
11 avr. 2022 à 10 h 46
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,282
Mentions "j'aime": 2,731
Quoting: Butlrr
Really seems like Klingberg wants the home run contract and Nill seems unlikely to give it to him. Shattenkirk is sneaky good but just at that age where D start falling out of the top 4.

Honestly, I just looked at Dallas and thought “they might want a RHD like Myers”. It sounded like there are suddenly suitors for Myers but I have no idea who that might be.


Only way I’d take Myers is if Faksa is headed the other way and Vancouver retains some money on Myers. Just because Myers has been decent this year, that doesn’t mean he’s worth that bloated contract he got
EsoYeezus69 et Butlrr a aimé ceci.
11 avr. 2022 à 12 h 54
#16
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 93
Mentions "j'aime": 12
Quoting: Spanky227
Why would rangers ever do that?


Maybe they wouldn’t? I don’t know.

Would they want Pearson? I’m not sure, but with Strome, Copp, Vatrano and Motte set for FA, they might need a middle six forward. If you look at those guys Drury seems to be adding, Pearson seems in that mold.

As for value, mid to late first for early-ish second is not a big acquisition cost. Rangers are a playoff team.
11 avr. 2022 à 21 h 33
#17
Tspky
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 3,883
Mentions "j'aime": 980
Quoting: Butlrr
Maybe they wouldn’t? I don’t know.

Would they want Pearson? I’m not sure, but with Strome, Copp, Vatrano and Motte set for FA, they might need a middle six forward. If you look at those guys Drury seems to be adding, Pearson seems in that mold.

As for value, mid to late first for early-ish second is not a big acquisition cost. Rangers are a playoff team.


Yeah they can just sign someone in the off-season to bring what Pearson would for cheaper. They already have Chytil and goodrow for the third line, and it’s tbd what happens with kravtsov. I’d rather resign Vatrano than trade away our first for a scrub player, even with getting a 2nd in return. Pearson doesn’t make up the roughly 20 spot drop for NYR
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage