Quoting: BeterChiarelli
Is the expectation that nobody play for Nashville next season then? I don't think your feedback is at all realistic: it's a cap-equivalent move and Nashville gets the best piece in that deal. All it would mean is Nick Cousins not getting re-upped on a new deal.
Some actual feedback would be great.
I'm not sure what's unrealistic. The only UFA forwards NSH has entering the summer are Forsberg and Cousins. They're trying to re-sign Forsberg, and there isn't a potential replacement for him in this proposal, so Forsberg isn't relevant to this trade. Cousins could possibly come back for another year, but NSH may just move on from him if they feel anyone from Milwaukee (ie Glass, Novak, Olivier, etc) earns a spot in the lineup. A re-signed Cousins would presumably be cheaper than Foegele's contract too.
It's not a cap equivalent move, because NSH is giving up two players that make $3.3M combined. So they'd be spending more than they were on Myers and McCarron, with Foegele's $2.75M plus whatever goes to the other player they replace Myers with (even someone making league minimum still puts that number at $3.5M at the minimum).
Foegele is an adequate depth player, and yeah probably a bit of a better overall player than McCarron, but Big Sexy knows his role, fits in with the team well, and seems to be a locker room favourite. If he gets pushed out of the lineup because a prospect outplays him, that's great. Swapping him out for a different warm body, and hoping to find the same chemistry is a gamble, even if Foegele might have a touch more skill. I'd much rather have him at $750K than Foegele at $2.75M, and really don't think I'd do a one for one swap there, even if they had the same contract.
If NSH can't find anyone willing to trade for Myers this summer, buying out his remaining year is dirt cheap. The Preds would actually gain a bit of cap space somehow in 22-23, and get a paltry $634K penalty for 23-24, according to the CF buyout calculator. His contract isn't much of burden to NSH.