RONDE 1 | ÉQUIPE | ORIGINAL | JOUEUR | DéTAILS |
---|
1 | - | Slow start to the season, but now his offense is back. Safe pick, probable 1C. | ||
2 | - | He's been created for NA ice surface, not European. Olympics changed him into different, better player. Rare combination of size, physicality and skill. | ||
3 | - | 6ft3 top pairing RD who can play all situations. They are rare and more valuable than 1st line wingers. Slight health concerns. | ||
4 | - | Another top pairing RD. If you need to choose between simmilar Fs and D-men, select D-man. | ||
5 | - | My 1st player from NTDP would be Cooley. However, he is not the best in a team by a mile, so I am not as high on him as majority of fans. | ||
6 | - | 1st half of season best player of draft class. Streaky scorer, but I can't deny his PPG is amongst the best on his Liiga team. | ||
7 | Big winger who is 1st in NTDP in goal-scoring. Also played at C which I think he could be suited for. Commited to Boston College. | |||
8 | - | The best player on Saginaw team, 2nd scorer. His „Russian factor“ is not as strong (NA club). He could played 2020/21 in Russia, but didn't. | ||
9 | - | Small offensive player who might get his 5-9 NHL and additional 30 AHL games in 2022/23. | ||
10 | - | He might be slow, but big Cs are almost must-have. Teams would like to build around big C. Think of Kirby Dach. | ||
11 | - | Younger prospect from the same MHL franchise as Chinakhov and Gritsyuk. Playoff performer, he can deliver a goal or two for a team coming from behind. | ||
12 | - | The highest offensive potential of Djurgardens' U-20 powerhouse. Dominating in U-20, struggling in SHL. | ||
13 | - | I don't expect Nazar to be available that low. I would only take him if he falls. Skilled wingers are relativelly common. | ||
14 | - | Safe pick from above-average Thunderbirds' program. At the very least 2nd pairing D-man. | ||
15 | - | Slightly different type of player as Nazar and maybe even better one. But I am not willing to spend more than that on smaller LW. | ||
16 | His playing style is attractive, but he is not the biggest player on the back end. That's why from WHL I give an edge to Korchinski. | |||
17 | - | He has a size and work ethic, but is not great skater. Also is versatile and can probably play a role on all 4 lines. Reminds me of McTavish. | ||
18 | - | The risk is high with Lambert. Now he is on his 2nd team in Liiga and is still on a decline. He might bounce back as Raty, but also might not. | ||
19 | - | Light-framed C/RW has attractive style, good shot, but will he be able to handle NHL? Some risk there. | ||
20 | - | Roby Jarventie II, maybe slightly bigger, club is the same. The best scorer on his Mestis team, Jarventie wasn't. For me enough for late 1st round pick. | ||
21 | - | Big and mobile D-man with not much visiable offensive upside as of yet. Also weak shot. But he has a frame and speed to follow Seider's and Edvinsson's steps. | ||
22 | - | Struggles in KHL, dominates MHL (on a good team). His rushes are predictable, as left-shot RW prefers to go to the middle (forehand). Should play VHL, not KHL. | ||
23 | - | |||
24 | ||||
25 | ||||
26 | - | |||
27 | - | |||
28 | - | |||
29 | - | |||
30 | ||||
31 | ||||
32 |
RONDE 2 | ÉQUIPE | ORIGINAL | JOUEUR | DéTAILS |
---|
33 | - | NHL bloodline. His father stayed on the same NCAA team for 3 years. I don't know about the son, it mildly turns me off. | ||
34 | - | Christian Kyrou | Offensive D-man. His defense is average, but he is 2nd scorer on a team, 1st in OHL amongst 1st time eligable D-men. I also really like Erie's hockey products. | |
35 | - | Younger, 6ft5, mobile RD. They are scarce, he will go high. I am willing to spend 2nd round pick on him and give him time for development. | ||
36 | - | In U-20 dominating on both ends of the ice, but he mainly plays SHL. Comparing to players from previous drafts for me still only 2nd rounder. | ||
37 | Offensively disappointing season, but the most complete D-man from weaker 2021/22 NTDP defensive squad. Safe pick. | |||
38 | - | Taller C whose numbers are also product of a good team and isn't the fastest. But bigger Cs are always in demand. | ||
39 | - | Big right-shot C will always find a spot in NHL club. I am just not confident about his upside. | ||
40 | - | Attractive pick, but I have tiny doubts in Broncos' defensive program. Compareable former Bronco: Heatherington. | ||
41 | - | Behind Wright maybe 2nd best forward from weak OHL class. Suitable for 2nd round pick, not more. | ||
42 | - | He is coming from the same AJHL team as Dylan Holloway, but is a step behind in his development (at the same age). | ||
43 | C who likes to skate with a puck on his stick and shoot. He is productive against men, but also mildly selfish. | |||
44 | More was expected from him this season. He failed to make it to the top 2 lines on NCAA team, but the potential is there. | |||
45 | - | He plays C but might be better on a W. He is good in the crease and on redirections. Also not the best off the puck. Rogle is not ideal club for F-prospects. | ||
46 | I like leaders. He is the best player and scorer of young and below-average team. Heating up in 2nd part of season. | |||
47 | Shorter D-man with NHL weight. That combination gives me a concern about his upside. How much can he grow? What you see might be what you get. | |||
48 | - | He left NTDP for NCAA and it was for his benefits. Comparing to Jack Hughes, Devine suited 3rd line role better. | ||
49 | - | By far the best scorer on his team and the best USHL scorer of first time eligable players. He is going to NCAA. For how long? | ||
50 | Maxim Mayorov | Young goalie with very high upside. I see future NHL starter in him. Worth 2nd round pick (despite „Russian factor“), might end as undrafted. | ||
51 | - | |||
52 | ||||
53 | ||||
54 | ||||
55 | ||||
56 | - | |||
57 | - | |||
58 | ||||
59 | ||||
60 | ||||
61 | ||||
62 | - | |||
63 | ||||
64 |
RONDE 3 | ÉQUIPE | ORIGINAL | JOUEUR | DéTAILS |
---|
65 | - | NHL-sized goalie. He is in a phase of transformation from U-20 to adults and has his share of problems with that. | ||
66 | - | Barely overager. By far the best D-man on a (bad) team. Also involved off the ice, he raised his voice in Movember campaign. | ||
67 | - | My 1st forward from Slovakian league would be Nemec's teammate. He has simmilar output than Mesar, but is 8 months younger. | ||
68 | - | Overager who is very good in top adult Slovakian league. His contract expires after the season and he is AHL ready. | ||
69 | - | Great D-man from weak league and committed to „not great“ university for prospects. Some risk with that pick. | ||
70 | - | The best scorer on Halifax team. Mooseheads might have the best program in QMJHL. | ||
71 | He hasn't progressed much from the last season. That gives me some second thoughts. | |||
72 | - | Big player, but small sample size. 2020/21 only 24GP of 34 GP possible. In 2019/20 nothing special. I wouldn't risk 2nd round pick on him. | ||
73 | - | Overager with solid VHL season for 2nd time in a row. Decent also away from the puck. Team player, not flashy, just effective. | ||
74 | Big and relatively mobile D-man. His offensive upside is limited. Also nothing special in several Allsvenskan games. | |||
75 | - | The best player on his MHL team. Goal-scorer by profile, his short stint in VHL wasn't great. Light frame. | ||
76 | - | Major health concerns. Decent on a weak VHL team. Coming from the same system as Trikozov, but his devotion is questionable. | ||
77 | Bigger step ahead was expected from him. In a team with good D-squad he is not clear-cut the best of them. Fill-in for a team in need of RD. | |||
78 | - | He took a slight step back comparing to the last season. So far nothing special in SHL. Still one of the youngest prospects. | ||
79 | Shorter and light-framed D-man. But I am conservative about that. You win championship with mostly big and physical defense. | |||
80 | Best D-man on one of the worst WHL teams. NHL frame and decently mobile. His +/- is catastrophous, partly due to weak goaltending. Take him, teach him. | |||
81 | - | Role player. Power forward with NHL size who can score here and there. Perfect fit for bottom lines. | ||
82 | Good player in a bad league. Commited to NCAA in 2023/24 (Minny, which is great for D-men). 2023/24 is... late. | |||
83 | I respect Storm's program. 6ft-ish LDs are common and it's the Guelph's system that gives Buchinger advantage in front of simmilar players. | |||
84 | - | Adam Engstrom | I give slight edge to Engstrom in comparison to teammate Odelius. He is taller, it could be as simple as that. Also better +/-. | |
85 | - | Big D-man in his 1st season in OHL. Overager who previously played only in Danish leagues. They are not well covered by scouts, OHL is. | ||
86 | - | 1st-2nd D-man on Djurgardens powerhouse, 7 months younger than Engstrom. Simmilar Djurgardens D-alumni: Gustafsson, Bjornfot. | ||
87 | - | Skating is the name of the game. He can't produce against men, but Frolunda is very good franchise. | ||
88 | Mooseheads have the best F-program in QMJHL, but their D-products are also improving (Weegar, Fitzgerald, McIsaac, Barron). Comparable prospect: Whynot. | |||
89 | He will go much earlier. I am just not sold on his defense. Offensive-wise he is good, but not (his teammate) Pastujov-level. Talent is there, but he is project. | |||
90 | James Stefan | Younger overager. Last season decent on bad Lincoln team (USHL). Now good on Portland, one of the better WHL franchises. | ||
91 | 200ft C without major deficiencies. Nothing really special in U-20, but decent enough in Liiga. Now on his 2nd team there. | |||
92 | Offensive potential is undesputable. But it is Firkus' light frame that gives me second thoughts. Project, not a prospect. | |||
93 | ||||
94 | ||||
95 | - | |||
96 | - |
RONDE 4 | ÉQUIPE | ORIGINAL | JOUEUR | DéTAILS |
---|
97 | Danil Aimurzin | |||
98 | - | |||
99 | - | |||
100 | ||||
101 | - | Zakhar Vinogradov | ||
102 | - | |||
103 | ||||
104 | - | |||
105 | - | |||
106 | - | |||
107 | - | Samuel Mayer | ||
108 | ||||
109 | - | |||
110 | - | |||
111 | ||||
112 | ||||
113 | - | Stanislav Berezhnoy | ||
114 | ||||
115 | - | |||
116 | - | |||
117 | - | |||
118 | ||||
119 | - | Emeric Gaudet | ||
120 | - | |||
121 | ||||
122 | ||||
123 | - | |||
124 | ||||
125 | ||||
126 | - | |||
127 | - | |||
128 |
RONDE 5 | ÉQUIPE | ORIGINAL | JOUEUR | DéTAILS |
---|
129 | - | |||
130 | - | |||
131 | - | |||
132 | - | |||
133 | - | |||
134 | German Tochilkin | |||
135 | Ben King | |||
136 | ||||
137 | - | Logan Morrison | ||
138 | - | |||
139 | - | |||
140 | - | |||
141 | ||||
142 | - | |||
143 | ||||
144 | - | |||
145 | - | |||
146 | - | |||
147 | - | |||
148 | - | |||
149 | - | |||
150 | - | Tyson Dyck | ||
151 | - | |||
152 | ||||
153 | - | |||
154 | ||||
155 | - | |||
156 | - | |||
157 | - | |||
158 | - | |||
159 | - | |||
160 | - |
RONDE 6 | ÉQUIPE | ORIGINAL | JOUEUR | DéTAILS |
---|
161 | - | |||
162 | - | |||
163 | - | |||
164 | - | |||
165 | - | |||
166 | - | |||
167 | - | |||
168 | - | |||
169 | ||||
170 | ||||
171 | - | |||
172 | - | |||
173 | Ian Blomquist | |||
174 | - | |||
175 | - | |||
176 | - | |||
177 | - | |||
178 | - | Davis Burnside | ||
179 | - | Matteus Soderbom | ||
180 | - | |||
181 | Gavin White | |||
182 | - | |||
183 | - | |||
184 | - | |||
185 | ||||
186 | Nikita Yevseyev | |||
187 | - | |||
188 | - | |||
189 | - | |||
190 | - | |||
191 | - | |||
192 | - |
RONDE 7 | ÉQUIPE | ORIGINAL | JOUEUR | DéTAILS |
---|
193 | ||||
194 | - | Dylan Ernst | ||
195 | - | |||
196 | ||||
197 | - | |||
198 | - | |||
199 | - | Chas Sharpe | ||
200 | - | Jakub Kopecky | ||
201 | - | Marcel Mahkovec | ||
202 | ||||
203 | - | |||
204 | Yaroslav Yapparov | |||
205 | ||||
206 | - | John Babcock | ||
207 | - | |||
208 | - | |||
209 | - | |||
210 | - | |||
211 | Daniel Kral | |||
212 | ||||
213 | - | |||
214 | - | |||
215 | ||||
216 | - | Maxim Arefyev | ||
217 | - | |||
218 | - | |||
219 | - | |||
220 | - | |||
221 | ||||
222 | - | |||
223 | - | |||
224 | - |